Volume 100, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0002-9637
  • E-ISSN: 1476-1645



As countries transition toward malaria elimination, malaria programs rely on surveillance–response systems, which are often supported by web- and mobile phone–based reporting tools. Such surveillance–response systems are interventions for elimination, making it important to determine if they are operating optimally. A metric to measure this by is timeliness. This study used a mixed-methods approach to investigate the response time of Zanzibar’s malaria elimination surveillance–response system, Malaria Case Notification (MCN). MCN conducts both passive and reactive case detection, supported by a mobile phone–based reporting tool called Coconut Surveillance. Using data obtained from RTI International and the Zanzibar Malaria Elimination Program (ZAMEP), analysis of summary statistics was conducted to investigate the association of response time with geography, and time series techniques were used to investigate trends in response time and its association with the number of reported cases. Results indicated that response time varied by the district in Zanzibar (0.6–6.05 days) and that it was not associated with calendar time or the number of reported cases. Survey responses and focus groups with a cadre of health workers, district malaria surveillance officers, shed light on operational challenges faced during case investigation, such as incomplete health records and transportation issues, which stem from deficiencies in aspects of ZAMEP’s program management. These findings illustrate that timely response for malaria elimination depends on effective program management, despite the automation of web-based or mobile phone–based tools. For surveillance–response systems to work optimally, malaria programs should ensure that optimal management practices are in place.


Article metrics loading...

The graphs shown below represent data from March 2017
Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. WHO, 2016. World Malaria Report. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. [Google Scholar]
  2. WHO, 2017. A Framework for Malaria Elimination. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. [Google Scholar]
  3. Newby G, Bennett A, Larson E, Cotter C, Shretta R, Phillips AA, Feachem RGA, , 2016. The path to eradication: a progress report on the malaria-eliminating countries. Lancet 387: 17751784. [Google Scholar]
  4. Feachem RGA, 2010. Shrinking the malaria map: progress and prospects. Lancet 376: 15661578. [Google Scholar]
  5. Landier J, Parker DM, Thu AM, Carrara VI, Lwin KM, Bonnington CA, Pukrittayakamee S, Delmas G, Nosten FH, , 2016. The role of early detection and treatment in malaria elimination. Malar J 15: 363. [Google Scholar]
  6. Sturrock HJW, Hsiang MS, Cohen JM, Smith DL, Greenhouse B, Bousema T, Gosling RD, , 2013. Targeting asymptomatic malaria infections: active surveillance in control and elimination. PLoS Med 10: e1001467. [Google Scholar]
  7. Galatas B, Bassat Q, Mayor A, , 2016. Malaria parasites in the asymptomatic: looking for the hay in the haystack. Trends Parasitol 32: 296308. [Google Scholar]
  8. Moonen B, 2010. Operational strategies to achieve and maintain malaria elimination. Lancet 376: 15921603. [Google Scholar]
  9. Smith JL, Auala J, Tambo M, Haindongo E, Katokele S, Uusiku P, Gosling R, Kleinschmidt I, Mumbengegwi D, Sturrock HJW, , 2017. Spatial clustering of patent and sub-patent malaria infections in northern Namibia: implications for surveillance and response strategies for elimination. PLoS One 12: e0180845. [Google Scholar]
  10. Searle KM, 2016. Evaluation of the operational challenges in implementing reactive screen-and-treat and implications of reactive case detection strategies for malaria elimination in a region of low transmission in southern Zambia. Malar J 15: 412. [Google Scholar]
  11. Herdiana H, 2016. Malaria risk factor assessment using active and passive surveillance data from Aceh Besar, Indonesia, a low endemic, malaria elimination setting with Plasmodium knowlesi, Plasmodium vivax, and Plasmodium falciparum. Malar J 15: 468. [Google Scholar]
  12. Sturrock HJ, Novotny JM, Kunene S, Dlamini S, Zulu Z, Cohen JM, Hsiang MS, Greenhouse B, Gosling RD, , 2013. Reactive case detection for malaria elimination: real-life experience from an ongoing program in Swaziland. PLoS One 8: e63830. [Google Scholar]
  13. Gerardin J, Bever CA, Bridenbecker D, Hamainza B, Silumbe K, Miller JM, Eisele TP, Eckhoff PA, Wenger EA, , 2017. Effectiveness of reactive case detection for malaria elimination in three archetypical transmission settings: a modelling study. Malar J 16: 248. [Google Scholar]
  14. Bergquist R, Yang G-J, Knopp S, Utzinger J, Tanner M, , 2015. Surveillance and response: tools and approaches for the elimination stage of neglected tropical diseases. Acta Trop 141: 229234. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ohrt C, Roberts KW, Sturrock HJ, Wegbreit J, Lee BY, Gosling RD, , 2015. Information systems to support surveillance for malaria elimination. Am J Trop Med Hyg 93: 145152. [Google Scholar]
  16. Bjorkman A, Cook J, Sturrock H, Msellem M, Ali A, Xu W, Molteni F, Gosling R, Drakeley C, Martensson A, , 2017. Spatial distribution of falciparum malaria infections in Zanzibar: implications for focal drug administration strategies targeting asymptomatic parasite carriers. Clin Infect Dis 64: 12361243. [Google Scholar]
  17. Global Fund, 2006. Implementation of a New Malaria Treatment Policy in Zanzibar. Available at: http://portfolio.theglobalfund.org/en/Grant/Index/ZAN-102-G01-M-00. Accessed June 8, 2017.
  18. PMI, 2006. 2006 Tanzania Malria Country Action Plan. Washington, DC: United States Presidents Malaria Initiatve. [Google Scholar]
  19. ZMCP, 2009. Malaria Elimination in Zanzibar: A Feasibility Assessment . Zanzibar City, Zanzibar: Ministry of Health and Social Welfare. [Google Scholar]
  20. PMI, 2007. 2007 Tanzania Malaria Operational Plan. Washingotn, DC: United States Presidents Malaria Initative. [Google Scholar]
  21. RTI, 2013. Coconut Surveillance. Available at: http://www.rti.org/impact/coconut-surveillance. Accessed June 10, 2017.
  22. USAID, 2016. Tanzania Vector Scale-up Project (TVSCP): Final Report . Washington, DC: United States Agency for International Development. [Google Scholar]
  23. ZAMEP, 2012. 2013–2018 Strategic Plan. Zanzibar City, Zanzibar: Ministry of Health and Social Welfare. [Google Scholar]
  24. Cotter C, Sudathip P, Herdiana H, Cao Y, Liu Y, Luo A, Ranasinghe N, Bennett A, Cao J, Gosling RD, , 2017. Piloting a programme tool to evaluate malaria case investigation and reactive case detection activities: results from 3 settings in the Asia Pacific. Malar J 16: 347. [Google Scholar]
  25. CDC, 2011. Updated guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems: recommendations from the Guidelines Working Group. MMWR Recomm Rep 50: 135. [Google Scholar]
  26. Lin W, Chen S, Seguy N, Chen Z, Sabin K, Calleja JG, Bulterys M, , 2012. Is the HIV sentinel surveillance system adequate in China? Findings from an evaluation of the national HIV sentinel surveillance system. Western Pac Surveill Response J 3: 7685. [Google Scholar]
  27. Vogt RL, Spittle R, Cronquist A, Patnaik JL, , 2006. Evaluation of the timeliness and completeness of a web-based notifiable disease reporting system by a local health department. J Public Health Manag Pract 12: 540544. [Google Scholar]
  28. Jones G, Le Hello S, Jourdan-da Silva N, Vaillant V, de Valk H, Weill F, Le Strat Y, , 2014. The French human Salmonella surveillance system: evaluation of timeliness of laboratory reporting and dactors associated with delays, 2007 to 2011. Euro Surveill 19: pii: 20664. [Google Scholar]
  29. Rachas A, Nakoune E, Bouscaillou J, Paireau J, Selekon B, Senekian D, Fontanet A, Kazanji M, , 2014. Timeliness of yellow fever surveillance, central African Republic. Emerg Infect Dis 20: 10041008. [Google Scholar]
  30. Akbari H, Majdzadeh R, Foroushani AR, Raeisi A, , 2013. Timeliness of malaria surveillance system in Iran. Iran J Public Health 42: 3947. [Google Scholar]
  31. Quan V, Hulth A, Kok G, Blumberg L, , 2014. Timelier notification and action with mobile phones-towards malaria elimination in South Africa. Malar J 13: 151158. [Google Scholar]
  32. Sun JL, Zhou S, Geng QB, Zhang Q, Zhang ZK, Zheng CJ, Hu WB, Clements ACA, Lai SJ, Li ZJ, , 2016. Comparative evaluation of the diagnosis, reporting and investigation of malaria cases in China, 2005–2014: transition from control to elimination for the national malaria programme. Infect Dis Poverty 5: 65. [Google Scholar]
  33. Chisha Z, 2015. Enhanced surveillance and data feedback loop associated with improved malaria data in Lusaka, Zambia. Malar J 14: 222. [Google Scholar]
  34. PATH, 2014. Zanzibar Trip Report. Project DIAMETER (Diagnostisc for Malaria Elimination Towards Eradication). Seattle, WA: PATH. [Google Scholar]
  35. RTI, 2018. Tanzania Vector Control Scale-Up Project (TVCSP). Available at: https://www.rti.org/impact/tanzania-vector-control-scale-project-tvcsp. Accessed June 8, 2017.
  36. PMI, 2015. Harnessing Innovation and Technology to Scale Up Malaria Case Notification in Zanzibar. Available at: https://www.pmi.gov/news/stories-from-the-field/stories-from-the-field-detail/harnessing-innovation-and-technology-to-scale-up-malaria-case-notification-in-zanzibar. Accessed June 12, 2017.
  37. WHO, 2012. Disease Surveillance for Malaria Elimination. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. [Google Scholar]
  38. Littrell M, Sow GD, Ngom A, Ba M, Mboup BM, Dieye Y, Mutombo B, Earle D, Steketee RW, , 2013. Case investigation and reactive case detection for malaria elimination in northern Senegal. Malar J 12: 331342. [Google Scholar]
  39. Gosling J, Case P, Tulloch J, Chandramohan D, Wegbreit J, Newby G, Gueye CS, Koita K, Gosling R, , 2015. Effective program management: a cornerstone of malaria elimination. Am J Trop Med Hyg 93: 135138. [Google Scholar]
  40. Gueye CS, Newby G, Tulloch J, Slutsker L, Tanner M, Gosling RD, , 2016. The central role of national programme management for the achievement of malaria elimination: a cross case-study analysis of nine malaria programmes. Malar J 15: 488. [Google Scholar]
  41. Le Menach A, Tatem AJ, Cohen JM, Hay SI, Randell H, Patil AP, Smith DL, , 2011. Travel risk, malaria importation and malaria transmission in Zanzibar. Sci Rep 1: 93. [Google Scholar]
  42. Sturrock HJW, Roberts KW, Wegbreit J, Ohrt C, Gosling RD, , 2015. Tackling imported malaria: an elimination endgame. Am J Trop Med Hyg 93: 139144. [Google Scholar]
  43. Abeid KI, , 2015. Assessment of customer satisfaction in public transport services in Zanzibar. Int J Adv Soc Sci Humanit 3: 4151. [Google Scholar]
  44. Kincaide Godbout S, , 2016. Assessing Surveillance Elements of the Zanzibar Malaria Elimination Program to Support Malaria Elimination in Zanzibar. Durham, NC: Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University. [Google Scholar]
  45. Cohen JM, Smith DL, Cotter C, Ward A, Yamey G, Sabot OJ, Moonen B, , 2012. Malaria resurgence: a systematic review and assessment of its causes. Malar J 11: 122. [Google Scholar]
  46. Canavati SE, Lawpoolsri S, Quintero CE, Nguon C, Ly P, Pukrittayakamee S, Sintasath D, Singhasivanon P, Peeters Grietens K, Whittaker MA, , 2016. Village malaria worker performance key to the elimination of artemisinin-resistant malaria: a western Cambodia health system assessment. Malar J 15: 282. [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Received : 10 Jul 2017
  • Accepted : 10 Oct 2018
  • Published online : 10 Dec 2018

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error