1921
Volume 98, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 0002-9637
  • E-ISSN: 1476-1645

Abstract

Abstract.

Low adoption and compliance levels for household water treatment and safe storage (HWTS) technologies have made it challenging for these systems to achieve measurable health benefits in the developing world. User compliance remains an inconsistently defined and poorly understood feature of HWTS programs. In this article, we develop a comprehensive approach to understanding HWTS compliance. First, our Safe Drinking Water Compliance Framework disaggregates and measures the components of compliance from initial adoption of the HWTS to exclusive consumption of treated water. We apply this framework to an ultraviolet (UV)–based safe water system in a cluster-randomized controlled trial in rural Mexico. Second, we evaluate a no-frills (or “Basic”) variant of the program as well as an improved (or “Enhanced”) variant, to test if subtle changes in the user interface of HWTS programs could improve compliance. Finally, we perform a full-cost analysis of both variants to assess their cost effectiveness (CE) in achieving compliance. We define “compliance” strictly as the habit of consuming safe water. We find that compliance was significantly higher in the groups where the UV program variants were rolled out than in the control groups. The Enhanced variant performed better immediately postintervention than the Basic, but compliance (and thus CE) degraded with time such that no effective difference remained between the two versions of the program.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

The graphs shown below represent data from March 2017
/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.17-0440
2018-01-22
2019-11-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/14761645/98/3/tpmd170440.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.17-0440&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bain R, Cronk R, Wright J, Yang H, Slaymaker T, Bartram J, , 2014. Fecal contamination of drinking-water in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med 11: e1001644. [Google Scholar]
  2. Shaheed A, Orgill J, Montgomery MA, Jeuland MA, Brown J, , 2014. Why “improved” water sources are not always safe. Bull World Health Organ 92: 283289. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ercumen A, Gruber JS, Colford JM, , 2014. Water distribution system deficiencies and gastrointestinal illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Health Perspect 122: 651660. [Google Scholar]
  4. Hunter PR, MacDonald AM, Carter RC, , 2010. Water supply and health. PLoS Med 7: e1000361. [Google Scholar]
  5. Albert J, Luoto J, Levine D, , 2010. End-user preferences for and performance of competing POU water treatment technologies among the rural poor of Kenya. Environ Sci Technol 44: 44264432. [Google Scholar]
  6. Clasen T, Roberts I, Rabie T, Schmidt W, Cairncross S, , 2015. Interventions to improve water quality for preventing diarrhoea (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10: CD004794. [Google Scholar]
  7. Lantagne DS, Quick R, Mintz ED, , 2006. Household Water Treatment and Safe Storage Options in Developing Countries: A Review of Current Implementation Practices. Washington DC: US Center for Disease Control.
  8. Sobsey MD, , 2002. Managing Water in the Home: Accelerated Health Gains from Improved Water Supply. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
  9. Wolf J, ., 2014. Assessing the impact of drinking water and sanitation on diarrhoeal disease in low- and middle-income settings: systematic review and meta-regression. Trop Med Int Health 19: 928942. [Google Scholar]
  10. Arnold BF, Colford JM, Jr, 2007. Treating water with chlorine at point-of-use to improve water quality and reduce child diarrhea in developing countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Trop Med Hyg 76: 354364. [Google Scholar]
  11. Arnold B, Arana B, Mäusezahl D, Hubbard A, Colford JM, , 2009. Evaluation of a pre-existing, 3-year household water treatment and handwashing intervention in rural Guatemala. Int J Epidemiol 38: 16511661. [Google Scholar]
  12. Mäusezahl D, ., 2009. Solar drinking water disinfection (SODIS) to reduce childhood diarrhoea in rural Bolivia: a cluster-randomized, controlled trial. PLoS Med 6: e1000125. [Google Scholar]
  13. Parker Fiebelkorn A, Person B, Quick RE, Vindigni SM, Jhung M, Bowen A, Riley PL, , 2012. Systematic review of behavior change research on point-of-use water treatment interventions in countries categorized as low- to medium-development on the human development index. Soc Sci Med 75: 622633. [Google Scholar]
  14. Stauber CE, Printy ER, McCarty FA, Liang KR, Sobsey MD, , 2012. Cluster randomized controlled trial of the plastic BioSand Water filter in Cambodia. Environ Sci Technol 46: 722728. [Google Scholar]
  15. Brown J, Clasen T, , 2012. High adherence is necessary to realize health gains from water quality interventions. PLoS One 7: e36735. [Google Scholar]
  16. Enger KS, Nelson KL, Rose JB, Eisenberg JNS, , 2013. The joint effects of efficacy and compliance: a study of household water treatment effectiveness against childhood diarrhea. Water Res 47: 11811190. [Google Scholar]
  17. Hunter PR, Zmirou-Navier D, Hartemann P, , 2009. Estimating the impact on health of poor reliability of drinking water interventions in developing countries. Sci Total Environ 407: 26212624. [Google Scholar]
  18. Burt Z, Njee RM, Mbatia Y, Msimbe V, Brown J, Clasen TF, Malebo HM, Ray I, , 2017. User preferences and willingness to pay for safe drinking water: experimental evidence from rural Tanzania. Soc Sci Med 173: 6371. [Google Scholar]
  19. Amrose S, Burt Z, Ray I, , 2015. Safe drinking water for low-income regions. Annu Rev Environ Resour 40: 203231. [Google Scholar]
  20. Figueroa ME, Kincaid DL, , 2010. Social, Cultural and Behavioral Correlates of Household Water Treatment and Storage. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
  21. Luoto J, Mahmud M, Albert J, Luby S, Najnin N, Unicomb L, Levine DI, , 2012. Learning to dislike safe water products: results from a randomized controlled trial of the effects of direct and peer experience on willingness to pay. Environ Sci Technol 46: 62446251. [Google Scholar]
  22. Mosler H-J, , 2012. A systematic approach to behavior change interventions for the water and sanitation sector in developing countries: a conceptual model, a review, and a guideline. Int J Environ Health Res 22: 431449. [Google Scholar]
  23. Bertrand M, Mullainathan S, Shafir E, , 2004. A behavioral-economics view of poverty. Am Econ Rev 94: 419423. [Google Scholar]
  24. Gruber JS, Reygadas F, Arnold BF, Ray I, Nelson K, Colford JM, , 2013. A stepped wedge, cluster-randomized trial of a household UV-disinfection and safe storage drinking water intervention in rural Baja California Sur, Mexico. Am J Trop Med Hyg 89: 238245. [Google Scholar]
  25. Reygadas F, Gruber JS, Ray I, Nelson KL, , 2015. Field efficacy evaluation and post-treatment contamination risk assessment of an ultraviolet disinfection and safe storage system. Water Res 85: 7484. [Google Scholar]
  26. NSF, 2002. NSF International Standard/American National Standard for Drinking Water Treatment Units—Ultraviolet Microbiological Water Treatment Systems. Available at: http://edge.rit.edu/edge/P11413/public/NSF%20Standard%2055. Accessed May 20, 2017.
  27. WHO, 2011. Evaluating Household Water Treatment Options: Health-Based Targets and Microbiological Performance Specifications. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. Available at: http://apps.who.int//iris/handle/10665/44693. Accessed November 15, 2014.
  28. Feise RJ, , 2002. Do multiple outcome measures require p-value adjustment? BMC Med Res Methodol 2: 8. [Google Scholar]
  29. Yelland LN, Salter AB, Ryan P, , 2011. Performance of the modified Poisson regression approach for estimating relative risks from clustered prospective data. Am J Epidemiol 174: 984992. [Google Scholar]
  30. Hussey MA, Hughes JP, , 2007. Design and analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials. Contemp Clin Trials 28: 182191. [Google Scholar]
  31. Gertler PJ, Martinez S, Premand P, Rawlings LB, Vermeersch CMJ, , 2011. Impact Evaluation in Practice. Washington, DC: World Bank. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10986/2550.
  32. Rao V, Woolcock M, , 2003. Integrating qualitative and quantitative approaches in program evaluation. Bourguignon F, Pereira da Silva LA, eds. The Impact of Economic Policies on Poverty and Income Distribution: Evaluation Techniques and Tools. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
  33. Rosa G, Clasen T, , 2017. Consistency of use and effectiveness of household water treatment among Indian households claiming to treat their water. Am J Trop Med Hyg 97: 259270. [Google Scholar]
  34. Ray I, , 2007. Women, water, and development. Annu Rev Environ Resour 32: 421449. [Google Scholar]
  35. Colindres RE, Jain S, Bowen A, Mintz E, Domond P, , 2007. After the flood: an evaluation of in-home drinking water treatment with combined flocculent-disinfectant following Tropical Storm Jeanne—Gonaives, Haiti, 2004. J Water Health 5: 367374. [Google Scholar]
  36. Freeman MC, Quick RE, Abbott DP, Ogutu P, Rheingans R, , 2009. Increasing equity of access to point-of-use water treatment products through social marketing and entrepreneurship: a case study in western Kenya. J Water Health 7: 527534. [Google Scholar]
  37. Luby SP, Mendoza C, Keswick BH, Chiller TM, Hoekstra RM, , 2008. Difficulties in bringing point-of-use water treatment to scale in rural Guatemala. Am J Trop Med Hyg 78: 382387. [Google Scholar]
  38. McLennan JD, , 2000. To boil or not: drinking water for children in a periurban barrio. Soc Sci Med 51: 12111220. [Google Scholar]
  39. Wood S, Foster J, Kols A, , 2012. Understanding why women adopt and sustain home water treatment: insights from the Malawi antenatal care program. Soc Sci Med 75: 634642. [Google Scholar]
  40. Juran L, MacDonald MC, , 2014. An assessment of boiling as a method of household water treatment in South India. J Water Health 12: 791802. [Google Scholar]
  41. Brown J, Hamoudi A, Jeuland M, Turrini G, , 2016. Seeing, believing, and behaving: heterogeneous effects of an information intervention on household water treatment. J Environ Econ Manage 86: 141159. [Google Scholar]
  42. Davis J, Pickering AJ, Rogers K, Mamuya S, Boehm AB, , 2011. The effects of informational interventions on household water management, hygiene behaviors, stored drinking water quality, and hand contamination in peri-urban Tanzania. Am J Trop Med Hyg 84: 184191. [Google Scholar]
  43. Jalan J, Somanathan E, , 2008. The importance of being informed: experimental evidence on demand for environmental quality. J Dev Econ 87: 1428. [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.17-0440
Loading
/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.17-0440
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplemental Table

  • Received : 06 Jun 2017
  • Accepted : 27 Nov 2017
  • Published online : 22 Jan 2018

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error