1921
Volume 97, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 0002-9637
  • E-ISSN: 1476-1645

Abstract

Abstract.

Malaria transmission-blocking vaccines (TBV) have been evaluated in field trials in Mali since 2013. However, the assays currently used to measure serum antibody TB activity (TBA) after vaccination are highly variable, in part due to the lack of optimization and standardization for field assays in which mosquitoes feed on gametocytemic blood. Herein, we report a study conducted in Bancoumana village, Mali, where we identify and optimize the parameters that contribute to successful mosquito feeding outcomes in both direct skin feeds (DSFs) and direct membrane feeding assays (DMFA). These parameters include: 1) mosquito age, 2) duration of mosquito starvation prior to feeding, 3) membrane selection for DMFA, 4) anatomical location of DSF feeding (arm, calf, and ankle), and 5) time of day for DSF (dawn or dusk). We found that younger mosquitoes were significantly associated with higher feeding, survival, and infection rates. Longer starvation times were positively, but not significantly, associated with higher infection rates, but were negatively associated with feeding and survival. Membrane type and body location did not affect infection outcome significantly. Although dusk was found to be associated with higher infection rates, this may be confounded by the time from positive blood smear. Based on these findings, we make specific recommendations for optimal feeding parameters in the different assay types to maximize the chance of detecting parasite transmission in a standardized manner.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.16-1000
2017-09-07
2018-11-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/14761645/97/3/tpmd161000.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.16-1000&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. WHO, 2015. World Malaria Report. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
  2. WHO, 2014. World Malaria Report. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
  3. Gallup JL, Sachs JD, , 2001. The economic burden of malaria. Am J Trop Med Hyg 64: 8596.
  4. Duffy PE, Kaslow DC, , 1997. A novel malaria protein, Pfs28, and Pfs25 are genetically linked and synergistic as falciparum malaria transmission-blocking vaccines. Infect Immun 65: 11091113.
  5. Muirhead-Thomson RC, , 1954. Factors determining the true reservoir of infection of Plasmodium falciparum and Wuchereria bancrofti in a West African village. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 48: 208225.
  6. Muirhead-Thomson RC, , 1957. The malarial infectivity of an African village population to mosquitoes (Anopheles gambiae); a random xenodiagnostic survey. Am J Trop Med Hyg 6: 971979.
  7. Githeko AK, Brandling-Bennett AD, Beier M, Atieli F, Owaga M, Collins FH, , 1992. The reservoir of Plasmodium falciparum malaria in a holoendemic area of western Kenya. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 86: 355358.
  8. Toure YT, Doumbo O, Toure A, Bagayoko M, Diallo M, Dolo A, Vernick KD, Keister DB, Muratova O, Kaslow DC, , 1998. Gametocyte infectivity by direct mosquito feeds in an area of seasonal malaria transmission: implications for Bancoumana, Mali as a transmission-blocking vaccine site. Am J Trop Med Hyg 59: 481486.
  9. Gamage-Mendis AC, Rajakaruna J, Carter R, Mendis KN, , 1991. Infectious reservoir of Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum malaria in an endemic region of Sri Lanka. Am J Trop Med Hyg 45: 479487.
  10. Graves PM, Burkot TR, Carter R, Cattani JA, Lagog M, Parker J, Brabin BJ, Gibson FD, Bradley DJ, Alpers MP, , 1988. Measurement of malarial infectivity of human populations to mosquitoes in the Madang area, Papua, New Guinea. Parasitology 96: 251263.
  11. Awono-Ambene HP, Diawara L, Robert V, , 2001. Comparison of direct and membrane feeding methods to infect Anopheles arabiensis with Plasmodium falciparum. Am J Trop Med Hyg 64: 3234.
  12. Bonnet S, Gouagna LC, Paul RE, Safeukui I, Meunier JY, Boudin C, , 2003. Estimation of malaria transmission from humans to mosquitoes in two neighbouring villages in south Cameroon: evaluation and comparison of several indices. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 97: 5359.
  13. Diallo M, , et al., 2008. Evaluation and optimization of membrane feeding compared to direct feeding as an assay for infectivity. Malar J 7: 248.
  14. Team RC, , 2015. A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Available at: https://www.R-project.org/.
  15. Russell V, , 2009. Response-surface methods in R, using RSM. J Stat Softw: 117.
  16. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S, , 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw: 148.
  17. van der Kolk M, de Vlas SJ, Sauerwein RW, , 2006. Reduction and enhancement of Plasmodium falciparum transmission by endemic human sera. Int J Parasitol 36: 10911095.
  18. van der Kolk M, De Vlas SJ, Saul A, van de Vegte-Bolmer M, Eling WM, Sauerwein RW, , 2005. Evaluation of the standard membrane feeding assay (SMFA) for the determination of malaria transmission-reducing activity using empirical data. Parasitology 130: 1322.
  19. Bousema T, Churcher TS, Morlais I, Dinglasan RR, , 2013. Can field-based mosquito feeding assays be used for evaluating transmission-blocking interventions? Trends Parasitol 29: 5359.
  20. Bousema T, , et al., 2012. Mosquito feeding assays to determine the infectiousness of naturally infected Plasmodium falciparum gametocyte carriers. PLoS One 7: e42821.
  21. Ouedraogo A, , et al., 2013. A protocol for membrane feeding assays to determine the infectiousness of P. falciparum naturally infected individuals to Anopheles gambiae. MWJ 4: 16.
  22. Novak MG, Berry WJ, Rowley WA, , 1991. Comparison of four membranes for artificially bloodfeeding mosquitoes. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 7: 327329.
  23. Harada M, Matsuoka H, Suguri S, , 1996. A convenient mosquito membrane feeding method. Medical and Entomological Zoology 103–105.
  24. Mourya DT, Gokhale MD, Barde PV, Padbidri VS, , 2000. A simple artificial membrane-feeding method for mosquitoes. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 94: 460.
  25. Tseng M, , 2003. A simple parafilm M-based method for blood-feeding Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol 40: 588589.
  26. Montes C, Cuadrillero C, Vilella D, , 2002. Maintenance of a laboratory colony of Cimex lectularius (Hemiptera: Cimicidae) using an artificial feeding technique. J Med Entomol 39: 675679.
  27. Hawking F, , 1967. The 24-hour periodicity of microfilariae: Biological mechanisms responsible for its production and control. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 169: 5976.
  28. Khan AM, Dutta P, Das S, Pathak AK, Sarmah P, Hussain ME, Mahanta J, , 2015. Microfilarial periodicity of Wuchereria bancrofti in Assam, northeast India. J Vector Borne Dis 52: 208212.
  29. Braack L, Hunt R, Koekemoer L, Gericke A, Munhenga G, Haddow A, Becker P, Okia M, Kimera I, Coetzee M, , 2015. Biting behavior of African malaria vectors: where do the main vector species bite on the human body? Parasite Vectors 8: 76.
  30. Magesa SM, Mdira YK, Akida JA, Bygbjerg IC, Jakobsen PH, , 2000. Observations on the periodicity of Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes in natural human infections. Acta Trop 76: 239246.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.16-1000
Loading
/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.16-1000
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplementary Data

Supplemental Table

  • Received : 19 Dec 2016
  • Accepted : 17 Apr 2017

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error