1921
Volume 96, Issue 5
  • ISSN: 0002-9637
  • E-ISSN: 1476-1645

Abstract

Abstract

Anti-leishmaniasis drug resistance is a common problem worldwide. The aim of this study was to inventory the general in vitro level of sensitivity of isolates circulating in French Guiana and to highlight potential in vitro pentamidine-resistant isolates. This sensitivity study was conducted on 36 patient-promastigote isolates for seven drugs (amphotericin B, azithromycin, fluconazole, meglumine antimoniate, miltefosine, paromomycin, and pentamidine) using the Cell Counting Kit-8 viability test. The IC values obtained were heterogeneous. One isolate exhibited high IC values for almost all drugs tested. Pentamidine, which is the first-line treatment in French Guiana, showed efficacy at very low doses (mean of 0.0038 μg/mL). The concordance of the in vitro pentamidine results with the patients' clinical outcomes was 94% ( = 0.82).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

The graphs shown below represent data from March 2017
/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.16-0373
2017-02-06
2019-11-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/14761645/96/5/1143.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.16-0373&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. WHO, 2015. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. Available at: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs375/en/. Accessed February 1, 2015.
  2. Sundar S, More DK, Singh MK, Singh VP, Sharma S, Makharia A, Kumar PCK, Murray HW, , 2000. Failure of pentavalent antimony in visceral leishmaniasis in India: report from the center of the Indian epidemic. Clin Infect Dis 31: 11041107.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bermudez H, Rojas E, Garcia L, Desjeux P, Dujardin JC, Boelaert M, Chappuis F, , 2006. Generic sodium stibogluconate is as safe and effective as branded meglumine antimoniate, for the treatment of tegumentary leishmaniasis in Isiboro secure park, Bolivia. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 100: 591600.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  4. Oliveira-Neto MP, Schubach A, Mattos M, Goncalves-Costa SC, Pirmez C, , 1997. A low-dose antimony treatment in 159 patients with American cutaneous leishmaniasis: extensive follow-up studies (up to 10 years). Am J Trop Med Hyg 57: 651655. [Google Scholar]
  5. Llanos-Cuentas A, Tulliano G, Araujo-Castillo R, Miranda-Verastegui C, Santamaria-Castrellon G, Ramirez L, Lazo M, De Doncker S, Boelaert M, Robays J, Dujardin J, Arevalo J, Chappuis F, , 2008. Clinical and parasite species risk factors for pentavalent antimonial treatment failure in cutaneous leishmaniasis in Peru. Clin Infect Dis 46: 223231.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  6. Andersen EM, Cruz-Saldarriaga M, Llanos-Cuentas A, Luz-Cjuno M, Echevarria J, Miranda-Verastegui C, Colina O, Berman JD, , 2005. Comparison of meglumine antimoniate and pentamidine for Peruvian cutaneous leishmaniasis. Am J Trop Med Hyg 72: 133137. [Google Scholar]
  7. Palacios R, Osorio LE, Grajalew LF, Ochoa MT, , 2001. Treatment failure in children in a randomized clinical trial with 10 and 20 days of meglumine antimonate for cutaneous leishmaniasis due to Leishmania Viannia species. Am J Trop Med Hyg 64: 187193. [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown M, Noursadeghi M, Boyle J, Davidson RN, , 2005. Successful liposomal amphotericin B treatment of Leishmania braziliensis cutaneous leishmaniasis. Br J Dermatol 153: 203205.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  9. Yardley V, Croft SL, , 1997. Activity of liposomal amphotericin B against experimental cutaneous leishmaniasis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 41: 752756. [Google Scholar]
  10. Wortmann G, Zapor M, Ressner R, Fraser S, Hartzell J, Pierson J, Weintrob A, Magill A, , 2010. Lipsosomal amphotericin B for treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis. Am J Trop Med Hyg 83: 10281033.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  11. Neves LO, Talhari AC, Gadelha EP, Junior S, Guerra JA, Ferreira LC, Talhari S, , 2011. A randomized clinical trial comparing meglumine antimoniate, pentamidine and amphotericin B for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis by Leishmania guyanensis . An Bras Dermatol 86: 10921101.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  12. Prata A, Silva-Vergara ML, Costa L, Rocha A, Krolewiecki A, Silva JC, de Paula EV, Pimenta Junior FG, Giraldo LE, , 2003. Efficacy of azithromycin in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 36: 6569.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  13. Krolewiecki AJ, Romero HD, Cajal SP, Abraham D, Mimori T, Matsumoto T, Juarez M, Taranto NJ, , 2007. A randomized clinical trial comparing oral azithromycin and meglumine antimoniate for the treatment of American cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis . Am J Trop Med Hyg 77: 640646. [Google Scholar]
  14. Alrajhi AA, Ibrahim EA, De Vol EB, Khairat M, Faris RM, Maguire JH, , 2002. Fluconazole for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania major . N Engl J Med 346: 891895.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  15. Emad M, Hayati F, Fallahzadeh MK, Namazi MR, , 2011. Superior efficacy of oral fluconazole 400 mg daily versus oral fluconazole 200 mg daily in the treatment of cutaneous Leishmania major infection: a randomized clinical trial. J Am Acad Dermatol 64: 606608.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sousa AQ, Frutuoso MS, Moraes EA, Pearson RD, Pompeu MM, , 2011. High-dose oral fluconazole therapy effective for cutaneous leishmaniasis due to Leishmania (Vianna) braziliensis . Clin Infect Dis 53: 693695.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  17. Soto J, Arana BA, Toledo J, Rizzo N, Vega JC, Diaz A, Luz M, Gutierrez P, Arboleda M, Berman JD, Junge K, Engel J, Sindermann H, , 2004. Miltefosine for new world cutaneous leishmaniasis. Clin Infect Dis 38: 12661272.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  18. Soto J, Toledo J, Gutierrez P, Nicholls RS, Padilla J, Engel J, Fischer C, Voss A, Berman J, , 2001. Treatment of american cutaneous leishmaniasis with miltefosine, an oral agent. Clin Infect Dis 33: E57E61.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hepburn NC, Tidman MJ, Hunter JA, , 1994. Aminosidine (paromomycin) versus sodium stibogluconate for the treatment of American cutaneous leishmaniasis. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 88: 700703.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  20. Soto J, Grogl M, Berman J, Olliaro P, , 1994. Limited efficacy of injectable aminosidine as single-agent therapy for Colombian cutaneous leishmaniasis. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 88: 695698.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ben Salah A, Ben Messaoud N, Guedri E, Zaatour A, Ben Alaya N, Bettaieb J, Gharbi A, Belhadj Hamida N, Boukthir A, Chlif S, Abdelhamid K, El Ahmadi Z, Louzir H, Mokni M, Morizot G, Buffet P, Smith PL, Kopydlowski KM, Kreishman-Deitrick M, Smith KS, Nielsen CJ, Ullman DR, Norwood JA, Thorne GD, McCarthy WF, Adams RC, Rice RM, Tang D, Berman J, Ransom J, Magill AJ, Grogl M, , 2013. Topical paromomycin with or without gentamicin for cutaneous leishmaniasis. N Engl J Med 368: 524532.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ben Salah A, Buffet PA, Morizot G, Ben Massoud N, Zaatour A, Ben Alaya N, Haj Hamida NB, El Ahmadi Z, Downs MT, Smith PL, Dellagi K, Grogl M, , 2009. WR279,396, a third generation aminoglycoside ointment for the treatment of Leishmania major cutaneous leishmaniasis: a phase 2, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 3: e432.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  23. El-On J, Jacobs GP, Witztum E, Greenblatt CL, , 1984. Development of topical treatment for cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania major in experimental animals. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 26: 745751.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  24. Grogl M, Schuster BG, Ellis WY, Berman JD, , 1999. Successful topical treatment of murine cutaneous leishmaniasis with a combination of paromomycin (aminosidine) and gentamicin. J Parasitol 85: 354359.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  25. Armijos RX, Weigel MM, Calvopina M, Mancheno M, Rodriguez R, , 2004. Comparison of the effectiveness of two topical paromomycin treatments versus meglumine antimoniate for new world cutaneous leishmaniasis. Acta Trop 91: 153160.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  26. Soto J, Fuya P, Herrera R, Berman J, , 1998. Topical paromomycin/methylbenzethonium chloride plus parenteral meglumine antimonate as treatment for American cutaneous leishmaniasis: controlled study. Clin Infect Dis 26: 5658.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  27. Dedet JP, Pradinaud R, Gay F, , 1989. Epidemiological aspects of human cutaneous leishmaniasis in French Guiana. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 83: 616620.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  28. Gangneux JP, Sauzet S, Donnard S, Meyer N, Cornillet A, Pratlong F, Guiguen C, , 2007. Recurrent American cutaneous leishmaniasis. Emerg Infect Dis 13: 14361438.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  29. Nacher M, Carme B, Sainte Marie D, Couppie P, Clyti E, Guibert P, Pradinaud R, , 2001. Influence of clinical presentation on the efficacy of a short course of pentamidine in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis in French Guiana. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 95: 331336.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  30. Simon S, Veron V, Carme B, , 2010. Leishmania spp. identification by polymerase chain reaction–restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis and its applications in French Guiana. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 66: 175180.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ginouves M, Carme B, Couppie P, Prevot G, , 2014. Comparison of tetrazolium salt assays for evaluation of drug activity against Leishmania spp. J Clin Microbiol 52: 21312138.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  32. Trager W, , 1969. Pteridine requirement of the hemoflagellate Leishmania tarentolae . J Protozool 16: 372375.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  33. Jain M, Dole VS, Myler PJ, Stuart KD, Madhubala R, , 2007. Role of biopterin transporter (BT1) gene on growth and infectivity of Leishmania . AJBB 3: 199206. [Google Scholar]
  34. Pal JK, Joshi-Purandare M, , 2001. Dose-dependent differential effect of hemin on protein synthesis and cell proliferation in Leishmania donovani promastigotes cultured in vitro. J Biosci 26: 225231.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  35. Moreira ES, Soares RM, Petrillo-Peixoto M de L, , 1995. Glucantime susceptibility of Leishmania promastigotes under variable growth conditions. Parasitol Res 81: 291295.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  36. Nacher M, Carme B, Sainte Marie D, Couppie P, Clyti E, Guibert P, Pradinaud R, , 2001. Seasonal fluctuations of incubation, healing delays, and clinical presentation of cutaneous leishmaniasis in French Guiana. J Parasitol 87: 14951498.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  37. Vermeersch M, da Luz RI, Tote K, Timmermans JP, Cos P, Maes L, , 2009. In vitro susceptibilities of Leishmania donovani promastigote and amastigote stages to antileishmanial reference drugs: practical relevance of stage-specific differences. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53: 38553859.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  38. Croft SL, Sundar S, Fairlamb AH, , 2006. Drug resistance in leishmaniasis. Clin Microbiol Rev 19: 111126.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  39. Neal RA, Killick-Kendrick R, Peters N, , 1989. Experimental chemotherapy. , eds. The Leishmaniases. London, UK: Academic Press, 793845. [Google Scholar]
  40. Berman JD, Wyler DJ, , 1980. An in vitro model for investigation of chemotherapeutic agents in leishmaniasis. J Infect Dis 142: 8386.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  41. Sereno D, Lemesre JL, , 1997. Axenically cultured amastigote forms as an in vitro model for investigation of antileishmanial agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 41: 972976. [Google Scholar]
  42. Kumar D, Kulshrestha A, Singh R, Salotra P, , 2009. In vitro susceptibility of field isolates of Leishmania donovani to miltefosine and amphotericin B: correlation with sodium antimony gluconate susceptibility and implications for treatment in areas of endemicity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53: 835838.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  43. Lira R, Sundar S, Makharia A, Kenney R, Gam A, Saraiva E, Sacks D, , 1999. Evidence that the high incidence of treatment failures in Indian kala-azar is due to the emergence of antimony-resistant strains of Leishmania donovani . J Infect Dis 180: 564567.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  44. Ibrahim ME, Hag-Ali M, el-Hassan AM, Theander TG, Kharazmi A, , 1994. Leishmania resistant to sodium stibogluconate: drug-associated macrophage-dependent killing. Parasitol Res 80: 569574.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  45. Grogl M, Thomason TN, Franke ED, , 1992. Drug resistance in leishmaniasis: its implication in systemic chemotherapy of cutaneous and mucocutaneous disease. Am J Trop Med Hyg 47: 117126. [Google Scholar]
  46. Azeredo-Coutinho RB, Mendonca SC, Callahan H, Portal AC, Max G, , 2007. Sensitivity of Leishmania braziliensis promastigotes to meglumine antimoniate (glucantime) is higher than that of other Leishmania species and correlates with response to therapy in American tegumentary leishmaniasis. J Parasitol 93: 688693.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  47. Berman JD, Edwards N, King M, Grogl M, , 1989. Biochemistry of pentostam resistant Leishmania . Am J Trop Med Hyg 40: 159164. [Google Scholar]
  48. Gupta N, Goyal N, Rastogi AK, , 2001. In vitro cultivation and characterization of axenic amastigotes of Leishmania . Trends Parasitol 17: 150153.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  49. Seifert K, Escobar P, Croft SL, , 2010. In vitro activity of anti-leishmanial drugs against Leishmania donovani is host cell dependent. J Antimicrob Chemother 65: 508511.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  50. Zauli-Nascimento RC, Miguel DC, Yokoyama-Yasunaka JK, Pereira LI, Pelli de Oliveira MA, Ribeiro-Dias F, Dorta ML, Uliana SR, , 2010. In vitro sensitivity of Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis and Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis Brazilian isolates to meglumine antimoniate and amphotericin B. Trop Med Int Health 15: 6876. [Google Scholar]
  51. Grogl M, Oduola AM, Cordero LD, Kyle DE, , 1989. Leishmania spp.: development of pentostam-resistant clones in vitro by discontinuous drug exposure. Exp Parasitol 69: 7890.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  52. Croft SL, , 2001. Monitoring drug resistance in leishmaniasis. Trop Med Int Health 6: 899905.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  53. Yardley V, Ortuno N, Llanos-Cuentas A, Chappuis F, Doncker SD, Ramirez L, Croft S, Arevalo J, Adaui V, Bermudez H, Decuypere S, Dujardin JC, , 2006. American tegumentary leishmaniasis: is antimonial treatment outcome related to parasite drug susceptibility? J Infect Dis 194: 11681175.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.16-0373
Loading
/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.16-0373
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Received : 10 May 2016
  • Accepted : 19 Nov 2016
  • Published online : 06 Feb 2017

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error