Volume 95, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0002-9637
  • E-ISSN: 1476-1645



Leptospirosis is mainly considered an occupational disease, prevalent among agriculture, sewage works, forestry, and animal slaughtering populations. However, putative risk to miners and their inclusion in the high-risk leptospirosis group remain in need of rigorous analysis. Therefore, a study was conducted with the objective to assess the leptospirosis seroprevalence among miners of two districts of Tamil Nadu, India. A total of 244 sera samples from Pudukkottai miners (124) and Karur miners (120) were analyzed by microscopic agglutination test. Antibodies to leptospires were detected in 94 samples giving an overall seroprevalence of 38.5%. The seroprevalence was higher among Pudukkottai miners (65.3%) when compared with Karur miners (10.8%). Seroprevalence among control population (13%) was significantly less than that of the Pudukkottai miners marking a possible high-risk population group distinction. Subject sera most commonly reacted with organisms of the serogroup Autumnalis, and the pattern was similar in carrier animals of the study areas. Two leptospires were isolated from kidney samples of rats. The prevalence of Autumnalis among rodents and humans source tracked human leptospirosis among the miners. The study also determined that Pudukkottai miners are subjected to high-risk challenges such as exposure to water bodies on the way to the mines (odds ratio [OR] = 10.6), wet mine areas (OR = 10.6), rat infestation (OR = 4.6), and cattle rearing (OR = 10.4) and are thus frequently exposed to leptospirosis compared with Karur miners. Hence, control strategies targeting these populations will likely to prove to be effective remediation strategies benefiting Pudukkottai miners and workers in similar environments across occupations.


Article metrics loading...

The graphs shown below represent data from March 2017
Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. Adler B, , 2015. History of leptospirosis. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 387: 19. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bharti AR, Nally JE, Ricaldi JN, Matthias MA, Diaz MM, Lovett MA, Levett PN, Gilman RH, Willig MR, Gotuzzo E, Vinetz JM, , 2003. Leptospirosis: a zoonotic disease of global importance. Lancet Infect Dis 3: 757771.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ratnam S, Sundararaj T, Saubramaian S, , 1983. Serological evidence of leptospirosis in a human population following an outbreak of the disease in cattle. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 77: 9498.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  4. Sehgal SC, Murhekar MV, Sugunan AP, , 1995. Outbreak of leptospirosis with pulmonary involvement in north Andaman. Indian J Med Res 102: 912. [Google Scholar]
  5. Natarajaseenivasan K, Ratnam S, , 1997. Sero-prevalence of leptospiral infection in an agricultural based village in Tamil Nadu. Cheiron 26: 8082. [Google Scholar]
  6. Natarajaseenivasan K, Boopalan M, Selvanayaki K, Suresh SR, Ratnam S, , 2002. Leptospirosis among rice mill workers of Salem, south India. Jpn J Infect Dis 55: 170173. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ambekar AN, Bharadwaj RS, Joshi SA, Kagal AS, Bal AM, , 2004. Sero surveillance of leptospirosis among sewer workers in Pune. Indian J Public Health 48: 2729. [Google Scholar]
  8. Prabhakaran SG, Shanmughapriya S, Dhanapaul S, James A, Natarajaseenivasan K, , 2014. Risk factors associated with rural and urban epidemics of leptospirosis in Tiruchirappalli district of Tamilnadu, India. J Public Health 22: 323333.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  9. World Health Organization and International Leptospirosis Society, 2003. Human Leptospirosis: Guidance for Diagnosis, Surveillance and Control. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 1107. [Google Scholar]
  10. Vijayachari P, Hartskeerl RA, Sharma S, Natarajaseenivsan K, Roy S, Terpstra WJ, Sehgal SC, , 2004. A unique strain of Leptospira isolated from a patient with pulmonary haemorrhages in the Andaman Islands: a proposal of serovar portblairi of serogroup Sehgali. Epidemiol Infect 132: 663673.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  11. Murhekar MV, Sugunan AP, Vijayachari P, Sharma S, Sehgal SC, , 1998. Risk factors in the transmission of leptospiral infection. Indian J Med Res 10: 218223. [Google Scholar]
  12. Sahai H, Khurshid A, , 1996. Statistics in Epidemiology: Methods, Techniques and Applications. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. [Google Scholar]
  13. Dean AG, Dean JA, Coulombier D, Brendel KA, Smith DC, Burton AH, , 1995. Epi Info, Version 6: A Word Processing, Database, and Statistics Program for Epidemiology on Microcomputers. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [Google Scholar]
  14. Sharma S, Vijayachari P, Sugunan AP, Natarajaseenivasan K, Sehgal SC, , 2006. Seroprevalence of leptospirosis among high-risk population of Andaman Islands, India. Am J Trop Med Hyg 74: 278283. [Google Scholar]
  15. Dreyfus A, Wilson P, Collins-Emerson J, Benschop J, Moore S, Heuer C, , 2014. Risk factors for new infection with Leptospira in meat workers in New Zealand. Occup Environ Med 72: 219225.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  16. Natarajaseenivasan K, Vedhagiri K, Sivabalan V, Prabagaran SG, Sukumar S, Artiushin SC, Timoney JF, , 2011. Seroprevalence of Leptospira borgpetersenii serovar javanica infection among dairy cattle, rats and humans in the Cauvery river valley of southern India. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 42: 679686. [Google Scholar]
  17. Zamora J, Riedemann S, Montecions ML, Cabezas X, , 1990. Serological survey of human leptospirosis in high-risk population in Chile. Rev Med Chil 118: 247252. [Google Scholar]
  18. Everard COR, Hayes RJ, Fraser-Champond GM, , 1985. Serological survey for leptospirosis in Trinidad among urban and rural dwellers and persons occupationally at risk. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 79: 96105.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Received : 08 Feb 2016
  • Accepted : 07 Mar 2016
  • Published online : 06 Jul 2016

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error