1921
Volume 94, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 0002-9637
  • E-ISSN: 1476-1645

Abstract

Abstract

is the primary vector of the dengue and chikungunya viruses. After mating, male seminal fluid molecules cause females to become unreceptive to a subsequent mating. This response is often assumed to be immediate and complete, but a growing body of evidence suggests that some females do mate more than once. It is unknown how quickly a female becomes unreceptive to a second mating. Furthermore, the degree to which she remains monandrous after laying several batches of eggs has not been rigorously tested. Therefore, we assessed the rates of polyandry in two sets of experiments using wild-type males and those with fluorescent sperm. The first experiment tested the likelihood of polyandry after postmating intervals of various durations. Most females became refractory to a second mating within 2 hours after mating, and rates of polyandry ranged from 24% immediately after mating to 3% at 20 hours after mating. The second experiment tested whether females were polyandrous after cycles of blood meals and oviposition. No re-insemination was found after one, three, or five such cycles. This study is the first to demonstrate that polyandrous behavior depends on the postmating interval. Our results will inform future applications that depend on an accurate knowledge of mating behavior, including models of gene flow, investigations of molecules that drive female mating behavior, and control strategies that deploy genetically modified mosquitoes into the field.

[open-access] This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.15-0893
2016-04-06
2017-11-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/14761645/94/4/780.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.15-0893&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bhatt S, Gething PW, Brady OJ, Messina JP, Farlow AW, Moyes CL, Drake JM, Brownstein JS, Hoen AG, Sankoh O, Myers MF, George DB, Jaenisch T, Wint GRW, Simmons CP, Scott TW, Farrar JJ, Hay SI, , 2013. The global distribution and burden of dengue. Nature 496: 504507.[Crossref]
  2. WHO, 2015. Impact of Dengue. Available at: http://www.who.int/csr/disease/dengue/impact/en/. Accessed September 26, 2015.
  3. Burt FJ, Rolph MS, Rulli NE, Mahalingam S, Heise MT, , 2012. Chikungunya: a re-emerging virus. Lancet 379: 662671.[Crossref]
  4. Villar L, Dayan GH, Arredondo-Garcia JL, Rivera DM, Cunha R, Deseda C, Reynales H, Costa MS, Morales-Ramirez JO, Carrasquilla G, Rey LC, Dietze R, Luz K, Rivas E, Miranda Montoya MC, Cortes Supelano M, Zambrano B, Langevin E, Boaz M, Tornieporth N, Saville M, Noriega F, CYD Study Group, , 2015. Efficacy of a tetravalent dengue vaccine in children in Latin America. N Engl J Med 372: 113123.[Crossref]
  5. Walker T, Johnson PH, Moreira LA, Iturbe-Ormaetxe I, Frentiu FD, McMeniman CJ, Leong YS, Dong Y, Axford J, Kriesner P, Lloyd AL, Ritchie SA, O'Neill SL, Hoffmann AA, , 2011. The wMel Wolbachia strain blocks dengue and invades caged Aedes aegypti populations. Nature 476: 450453.[Crossref]
  6. Hoffmann AA, Montgomery BL, Popovici J, Iturbe-Ormaetxe I, Johnson PH, Muzzi F, Greenfield M, Durkan M, Leong YS, Dong Y, Cook H, Axford J, Callahan AG, Kenny N, Omodei C, McGraw EA, Ryan PA, Ritchie SA, Turelli M, O'Neill SL, , 2011. Successful establishment of Wolbachia in Aedes populations to suppress dengue transmission. Nature 476: 454457.[Crossref]
  7. Harris AF, Nimmo D, McKemey AR, Kelly N, Scaife S, Donnelly CA, Beech C, Petrie WD, Alphey L, , 2011. Field performance of engineered male mosquitoes. Nat Biotechnol 29: 10341037.[Crossref]
  8. Spielman A, Leahy MG, Skaff V, , 1967. Seminal loss in repeatedly mated female Aedes aegypti . Biol Bull 132: 404412.[Crossref]
  9. Gwadz RW, Craig GB, Jr Hickey WA, , 1971. Female sexual behavior as the mechanism rendering Aedes aegypti refractory to insemination. Biol Bull 140: 201214.[Crossref]
  10. Craig GB, Jr, 1967. Mosquitoes: female monogamy induced by male accessory gland substance. Science 156: 14991501.[Crossref]
  11. Helinski MEH, Deewatthanawong P, Sirot LK, Wolfner MF, Harrington LC, , 2012. Duration and dose-dependency of female sexual receptivity responses to seminal fluid proteins in Aedes albopictus and Ae. aegypti mosquitoes. J Insect Physiol 58: 13071313.[Crossref]
  12. Oliva CF, Damiens D, Vreysen MJB, Lemperiere G, Gilles J, , 2013. Reproductive strategies of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) and implications for the sterile insect technique. PLoS One 8: e78884.[Crossref]
  13. Gabrieli P, Kakani EG, Mitchell SN, Mameli E, Want EJ, Mariezcurrena Anton A, Serrao A, Baldini F, Catteruccia F, , 2014. Sexual transfer of the steroid hormone 20E induces the postmating switch in Anopheles gambiae . Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111: 1635316358.[Crossref]
  14. Chen PS, Stumm-Zollinger E, Aigaki T, Balmer J, Bienz M, Bohlen P, , 1988. A male accessory gland peptide that regulates reproductive behavior of female D. melanogaster . Cell 54: 291298.[Crossref]
  15. Chapman T, Bangham J, Vinti G, Seifried B, Lung O, Wolfner MF, Smith HK, Partridge L, , 2003. The sex peptide of Drosophila melanogaster: female post-mating responses analyzed by using RNA interference. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 99239928.[Crossref]
  16. Tram U, Wolfner MF, , 1998. Seminal fluid regulation of female sexual attractiveness in Drosophila melanogaster . Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 40514054.[Crossref]
  17. Bretman A, Lawniczak MKN, Boone J, Chapman T, , 2010. A mating plug protein reduces early female remating in Drosophila melanogaster . J Insect Physiol 56: 107113.[Crossref]
  18. Scott D, , 1986. Sexual mimicry regulates the attractiveness of mated Drosophila melanogaster females. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83: 84298433.[Crossref]
  19. Gwadz RW, Craig GB, , 1970. Female polygamy due to inadequate semen transfer in Aedes aegypti . Mosq News 30: 355360.
  20. Williams RW, Berger A, , 1980. The relation of female polygamy to gonotrophic activity in the ROCK strain of Aedes aegypti . Mosq News 40: 597604.
  21. Young ADM, Downe AER, , 1982. Renewal of sexual receptivity in mated female mosquitos, Aedes aegypti . Physiol Entomol 7: 467471.[Crossref]
  22. Helinski MEH, Valerio L, Facchinelli L, Scott TW, Ramsey J, Harrington LC, , 2012. Evidence of polyandry for Aedes aegypti in semifield enclosures. Am J Trop Med Hyg 86: 635641.[Crossref]
  23. Richardson JB, Jameson SB, Gloria-Soria A, Wesson DM, Powell J, , 2015. Evidence of limited polyandry in a natural population of Aedes aegypti . Am J Trop Med Hyg 93: 189193.[Crossref]
  24. Perez-Staples D, Shelly TE, Yuval B, , 2013. Female mating failure and the failure of ‘mating’ in sterile insect programs. Entomol Exp Appl 146: 6678.[Crossref]
  25. Alphey N, Alphey L, Bonsall MB, , 2011. A model framework to estimate impact and cost of genetics-based sterile insect methods for dengue vector control. PLoS One 6: e25384.[Crossref]
  26. Atkinson MP, Su Z, Alphey N, Alphey LS, Coleman PG, Wein LM, , 2007. Analyzing the control of mosquito-borne diseases by a dominant lethal genetic system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 95409545.[Crossref]
  27. Magori K, Legros M, Puente ME, Focks DA, Scott TW, Lloyd AL, Gould F, , 2009. Skeeter Buster: a stochastic, spatially explicit modeling tool for studying Aedes aegypti population replacement and population suppression strategies. PLoS Neglect Trop Dis 3: e508.[Crossref]
  28. Smith RC, Walter MF, Hice RH, O'Brochta DA, Atkinson PW, , 2007. Testis-specific expression of the beta2 tubulin promoter of Aedes aegypti and its application as a genetic sex-separation marker. Insect Mol Biol 16: 6171.[Crossref]
  29. Spielman A, Sr Leahy MG, Skaff V, , 1969. Failure of effective insemination of young female Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. J Insect Physiol 15: 14711479.[Crossref]
  30. Spielman A, , 1964. The mechanics of copulation in Aedes aegypti . Biol Bull 127: 324344.[Crossref]
  31. Maciel-de-Freitas R, Codeco CT, Lourenco-de-Oliveira R, , 2007. Daily survival rates and dispersal of Aedes aegypti females in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Am J Trop Med Hyg 76: 659665.
  32. Simmons LW, , 2005. The evolution of polyandry: sperm competition, sperm selection, and offspring viability. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36: 125146.[Crossref]
  33. Mavale M, Parashar D, Sudeep A, Gokhale M, Ghodke Y, Geevarghese G, Arankalle V, Mishra AC, , 2010. Venereal transmission of chikungunya virus by Aedes aegypti mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). Am J Trop Med Hyg 83: 12421244.[Crossref]
  34. Chapman T, Liddle LF, Kalb JM, Wolfner MF, Partridge L, , 1995. Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature 373: 241244.[Crossref]
  35. Markow TA, Coppola A, Watts TD, , 2001. How Drosophila males make eggs: it is elemental. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 268: 15271532.[Crossref]
  36. Fritzsche K, Arnqvist G, , 2015. The effects of male phenotypic condition on reproductive output in a sex role-reversed beetle. Anim Behav 102: 209215.[Crossref]
  37. Alcock J, Buchmann SL, , 1985. The significance of post-insemination display by male Centris pallida (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae). Z Tierpsychol 68: 231243.[Crossref]
  38. Huck UW, Lisk RD, , 1986. Mating-induced inhibition of receptivity in the female golden hamster. I. Short-term and long-term effects. Behav Neural Biol 45: 107119.[Crossref]
  39. Eberhard WG, , 1996. Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  40. Yasui Y, , 1997. A “good-sperm” model can explain the evolution of costly multiple mating by females. Am Nat 149: 573584.[Crossref]
  41. Fuchs MS, Craig GB, Jr Hiss EA, , 1968. The biochemical basis of female monogamy in mosquitoes. I. Extraction of the active principle from Aedes aegypti . Life Sci 7: 835839.[Crossref]
  42. Fuchs MS, Hiss EA, , 1970. The partial purification and separation of the protein components of matrone from Aedes aegypti . J Insect Physiol 16: 931939.[Crossref]
  43. Hartberg WK, , 1971. Observations on the mating behaviour of Aedes aegypti in nature. Bull World Health Organ 45: 847850.
  44. Klowden MJ, , 2006. Switchover to the mated state by spermathecal activation in female Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes. J Insect Physiol 52: 679684.[Crossref]
  45. Rogers DW, Whitten MMA, Thailayil J, Soichot J, Levashina EA, Catteruccia F, , 2008. Molecular and cellular components of the mating machinery in Anopheles gambiae females. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 1939019395.[Crossref]
  46. Ponlawat A, Harrington LC, , 2009. Factors associated with male mating success of the dengue vector mosquito, Aedes aegypti . Am J Trop Med Hyg 80: 395400.
  47. Kuno G, , 2010. Early history of laboratory breeding of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) focusing on the origins and use of selected strains. J Med Entomol 47: 957971.[Crossref]
  48. Burton-Chellew MN, Beukeboom LW, West SA, Shuker DM, , 2007. Laboratory evolution of polyandry in the parasitoid wasp Nasonia vitripennis . Anim Behav 74: 11471154.[Crossref]
  49. Helinski MEH, Harrington LC, Takken W, Koenraadt CJM, , 2013. Considerations for male fitness in successful genetic vector control programs. , eds. Ecology of Parasite-Vector Interactions. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers, 221244.[Crossref]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.15-0893
Loading
/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.15-0893
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplementary Data

Supplementary PDF

  • Received : 11 Dec 2015
  • Accepted : 04 Jan 2016

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error