1921
Volume 92, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0002-9637
  • E-ISSN: 1476-1645

Abstract

Abstract.

We conducted a prospective longitudinal study of fetal size in rural Papua New Guinea (PNG) involving 439 ultrasound-dated singleton pregnancies with no obvious risk factors for growth restriction. Sonographically estimated fetal weights (EFWs; = 788) and birth weights ( = 376) were included in a second-order polynomial regression model (optimal fit) to generate fetal weight centiles. Means for specific fetal biometric measurements were also estimated. Fetal weight centiles from a healthy PNG cohort were consistently lower than those derived from Caucasian and Congolese populations, which overestimated the proportion of fetuses measuring small for gestational age (SGA; < 10th centile). Tanzanian and global reference centiles (Caucasian weight reference adapted to our PNG cohort) were more similar to those observed in our cohort, but the global reference underestimated SGA. Individual biometric measurements did not differ significantly from other cohorts. In rural PNG, a locally derived nomogram may be most appropriate for detection of SGA fetuses.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.14-0423
2015-01-07
2017-11-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/14761645/92/1/178.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.14-0423&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Mikolajczyk RT, Zhang J, Betran AP, Souza JP, Mori R, Gulmezoglu AM, Merialdi M, , 2011. A global reference for fetal-weight and birthweight percentiles. Lancet 377: 18551861.[Crossref]
  2. Leung TN, Pang MW, Daljit SS, Leung TY, Poon CF, Wong SM, Lau TK, , 2008. Fetal biometry in ethnic Chinese: biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference and femur length. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31: 321327.[Crossref]
  3. Brooks AA, Johnson MR, Steer PJ, Pawson ME, Abdalla HI, , 1995. Birth weight: nature or nurture? Early Hum Dev 42: 2935.[Crossref]
  4. Conley D, Bennett NG, , 2000. Race and the inheritance of low birth weight. Soc Biol 47: 7793.
  5. Villar J, Altman DG, Purwar M, Noble JA, Knight HE, Ruyan P, Cheikh Ismail L, Barros FC, Lambert A, Papageorghiou AT, Carvalho M, Jaffer YA, Bertino E, Gravett MG, Bhutta ZA, Kennedy SH, , 2013. The objectives, design and implementation of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. BJOG 120 (Suppl 2): 926.[Crossref]
  6. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Martinez-Poyer J, , 1991. In utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic weight standard. Radiology 181: 129133.[Crossref]
  7. Chitty LS, Altman DG, Henderson A, Campbell S, , 1994. Charts of fetal size: 4. Femur length. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 101: 132135.[Crossref]
  8. Chitty LS, Altman DG, Henderson A, Campbell S, , 1994. Charts of fetal size: 3. Abdominal measurements. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 101: 125131.[Crossref]
  9. Chitty LS, Altman DG, Henderson A, Campbell S, , 1994. Charts of fetal size: 2. Head measurements. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 101: 3543.[Crossref]
  10. Ding G, Tian Y, Zhang Y, Pang Y, Zhang J, , 2013. Application of A global reference for fetal-weight and birthweight percentiles in predicting infant mortality. BJOG 120: 16131621.[Crossref]
  11. Lubchenco LO, Hansman C, Dressler M, Boyd E, , 1963. Intrauterine growth as estimated from liveborn birth-weight data at 24 to 42 weeks of gestation. Pediatrics 32: 793800.
  12. Landis SH, Ananth CV, Lokomba V, Hartmann KE, Thorp JM, Jr Horton A, Atibu J, Ryder RW, Tshefu A, Meshnick SR, , 2009. Ultrasound-derived fetal size nomogram for a sub-Saharan African population: a longitudinal study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 34: 379386.[Crossref]
  13. Schmiegelow C, Scheike T, Oesterholt M, Minja D, Pehrson C, Magistrado P, Lemnge M, Rasch V, Lusingu J, Theander TG, Nielsen BB, , 2012. Development of a fetal weight chart using serial trans-abdominal ultrasound in an East African population: a longitudinal observational study. PLoS ONE 7: e44773.[Crossref]
  14. ClinicalTrials.gov, 2013. Intermittent Preventive Treatment with Azithromycin-Containing Regimens in Pregnant Women in Papua New Guinea (IPTp in PNG). Available at: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01136850. Accessed February 1, 2014.
  15. Loughna P, Chitty L, Evans T, Chudleigh T, , 2009. Fetal size and dating: charts recommended for clinical obstetric practice. Ultrasound 17: 161167.
  16. Sanders R, Winder T, , 2007. Clinical Sonography: A Practial Guide. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
  17. Papageorghiou AT, Sarris I, Ioannou C, Todros T, Carvalho M, Pilu G, Salomon LJ, , 2013. Ultrasound methodology used to construct the fetal growth standards in the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. BJOG 120 (Suppl 2): 2732.[Crossref]
  18. Hadlock FP, Deter RL, Carpenter RJ, Park SK, , 1981. Estimating fetal age: effect of head shape on BPD. AJR Am J Roentgenol 137: 8385.[Crossref]
  19. Salpou D, Kirserud T, Rasmussen S, Johnsen S, , 2008. Fetal age assessment based on 2nd trimester ultrasound in Africa and the effect of ethnicity. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 8: 48.[Crossref]
  20. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Shah YP, King DE, Park SK, Sharman RS, , 1987. Estimating fetal age using multiple parameters: a prospective evaluation in a racially mixed population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 156: 955957.[Crossref]
  21. Mastrobattista JM, Pschirrer ER, Hamrick MA, Glaser AM, Schumacher V, Shirkey BA, Wicklund CA, Hollier LM, , 2004. Humerus length evaluation in different ethnic groups. J Ultrasound Med 23: 227231.[Crossref]
  22. Bottomley C, Daemen A, Mukri F, Papageorghiou AT, Kirk E, Pexsters A, De Moor B, Timmerman D, Bourne T, , 2009. Assessing first trimester growth: the influence of ethnic background and maternal age. Hum Reprod 24: 284290.[Crossref]
  23. Vallely LM, Homiehombo P, Kelly AM, Vallely A, Homer CS, Whittaker A, , 2013. Exploring women's perspectives of access to care during pregnancy and childbirth: a qualitative study from rural Papua New Guinea. Midwifery 29: 12221229.[Crossref]
  24. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, Deter RL, Park SK, , 1985. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements–a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 151: 333337.[Crossref]
  25. de Jong CL, Francis A, van Geijn HP, Gardosi J, , 1999. Fetal growth rate and adverse perinatal events. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 13: 8689.[Crossref]
  26. Mongelli M, Gardosi J, , 1996. Gestation-adjusted projection of estimated fetal weight. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 75: 2831.[Crossref]
  27. Bland JM, Altman DG, , 1999. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 8: 135160.[Crossref]
  28. Amoa AB, Wapi J, Klufio CA, , 1993. Longitudinal fetal biometry of normal pregnant Melanesian Papua New Guineans to construct standards of reference for Papua New Guinea. P N G Med J 36: 219227.
  29. Salomon LJ, Duyme M, Crequat J, Brodaty G, Talmant C, Fries N, Althuser M, , 2006. French fetal biometry: reference equations and comparison with other charts. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 28: 193198.[Crossref]
  30. Royston P, , 1995. Calculation of unconditional and conditional reference intervals for foetal size and growth from longitudinal measurements. Stat Med 14: 14171436.[Crossref]
  31. Merialdi M, Caulfield LE, Zavaleta N, Figueroa A, Costigan KA, Dominici F, Dipietro JA, , 2005. Fetal growth in Peru: comparisons with international fetal size charts and implications for fetal growth assessment. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 26: 123128.[Crossref]
  32. Overpeck MD, Hediger ML, Zhang J, Trumble AC, Klebanoff MA, , 1999. Birth weight for gestational age of Mexican American infants born in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 93: 943947.
  33. Kramer MS, McLean FH, Boyd ME, Usher RH, , 1988. The validity of gestational age estimation by menstrual dating in term, preterm, and postterm gestations. JAMA 260: 33063308.[Crossref]
  34. Savitz DA, Terry JW, Jr Dole N, Thorp JM, Jr Siega-Riz AM, Herring AH, , 2002. Comparison of pregnancy dating by last menstrual period, ultrasound scanning, and their combination. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187: 16601666.[Crossref]
  35. Kramer MS, , 1987. Determinants of low birth weight: methodological assessment and meta-analysis. Bull World Health Organ 65: 663737.
  36. Bernstein IM, Mohs G, Rucquoi M, Badger GJ, , 1996. Case for hybrid “fetal growth curves”: a population-based estimation of normal fetal size across gestational age. J Matern Fetal Med 5: 124127.
  37. Fry AG, Bernstein IM, Badger GJ, , 2002. Comparison of fetal growth estimates based on birth weight and ultrasound references. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 12: 247252.[Crossref]
  38. Zhang J, Sun K, , 2013. Invited commentary: the incremental value of customization in defining abnormal fetal growth status. Am J Epidemiol 178: 13091312.[Crossref]
  39. Carberry AE, Raynes-Greenow CH, Turner RM, Jeffery HE, , 2013. Customized versus population-based birth weight charts for the detection of neonatal growth and perinatal morbidity in a cross-sectional study of term neonates. Am J Epidemiol 178: 13011308.[Crossref]
  40. Rijken MJ, Mulder EJ, Papageorghiou AT, Thiptharakun S, Wah N, Paw TK, Dwell SL, Visser GH, Nosten FH, McGready R, , 2012. Quality of ultrasound biometry obtained by local health workers in a refugee camp on the Thai-Burmese border. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 40: 151157.[Crossref]
  41. Ioannou C, Talbot K, Ohuma E, Sarris I, Villar J, Conde-Agudelo A, Papageorghiou AT, , 2012. Systematic review of methodology used in ultrasound studies aimed at creating charts of fetal size. BJOG 119: 14251439.[Crossref]
  42. Mola GD, Kombuk B, Amoa AB, , 2011. Poor weight gain in late third trimester: a predictor of poor perinatal outcome for term deliveries? P N G Med J 54: 164173.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.14-0423
Loading
/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.14-0423
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplementary Data

Supplementary PDF

  • Received : 08 Jul 2014
  • Accepted : 14 Sep 2014

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error