Volume 89, Issue 5
  • ISSN: 0002-9637
  • E-ISSN: 1476-1645



An accurate measure of infectious dengue virus in human and mosquito tissues is critical to fully understand virus–host relationships, disease severity, viral fitness, and pathogenesis. In recent years, RNA copy number measured by quantitative real time-polymerase chain reaction has been used to measure dengue virus concentration and . In this study, we detail important differences in the measurement of viral growth kinetics in Vero and C6/36 tissue cultures, in mosquitoes, and in viremic human sera using RNA genomic equivalents and mosquito infectious dose 50 (MID). Although there was reasonably good correlation between the two methods, RNA copy number was 2 to 5 logs greater than infectious virus titers. These differences varied significantly depending on virus strain, viral platform, infectious virus assay, and viral growth phase. The results have important implications for the correct interpretation of biological and epidemiological data from experimental and clinical studies, and show that genomic equivalents should be interpreted with caution when used as a proxy for infectious virus in such studies.


Article metrics loading...

The graphs shown below represent data from March 2017
Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. Gubler DJ, , 2011. Dengue, urbanization and globalization: the unholy trinity of the 21st century. Trop Med Health 39: 19.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kimura R, Hotta S, , 1944. Studies on dengue fever (VI). On the inoculation of dengue virus into mice (In Japanese). Nippon Igaku 3379: 629633. [Google Scholar]
  3. Sabin AB, , 1952. Research on dengue during World War II. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1: 3050. [Google Scholar]
  4. Halstead SB, Sukhavachana P, Nisalak A, , 1964. In vitro recovery of dengue viruses from naturally infected human beings and arthropods. Nature 202: 931932.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  5. Rosen L, Gubler DJ, , 1974. The use of mosquitoes to detect and propagate dengue viruses. Am J Trop Med Hyg 23: 11531160. [Google Scholar]
  6. Igarashi A, , 1978. Isolation of a Singh's Aedes albopictus cell clone sensitive to Dengue and Chikungunya viruses. J Gen Virol 40: 531544.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  7. Tesh RB, , 1979. A method for the isolation and identification of dengue viruses, using mosquito cell cultures. Am J Trop Med Hyg 28: 10531059. [Google Scholar]
  8. Yuill TM, Sukhavachana P, Nisalak A, Russell PK, , 1968. Dengue-virus recovery by direct and delayed plaques in LLC-MK2 cells. Am J Trop Med Hyg 17: 441448. [Google Scholar]
  9. Vorndam AV, Kuno G, Gubler DJ, Kuno G, , 1997. Laboratory diagnosis of dengue virus infections. , editors. Dengue and Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever. New York: CAB International, 313334. [Google Scholar]
  10. Gubler DJ, Kuno G, Sather GE, Velez M, Oliver A, , 1984. Mosquito cell cultures and specific monoclonal antibodies in surveillance for dengue viruses. Am J Trop Med Hyg 33: 158165. [Google Scholar]
  11. Blacksell SD, Jarman RG, Bailey MS, Tanganuchitcharnchai A, Jenjaroen K, Gibbons RV, , 2011. Evaluation of six commercial point-of-care tests for diagnosis of acute dengue infections: the need for combining NS1 antigen and IgM/IgG antibody detection to achieve acceptable levels of accuracy. Clin Vaccine Immunol 18: 20952101.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lanciotti RS, Calisher CH, Gubler DJ, Chang GJ, Vorndam AV, , 1992. Rapid detection and typing of dengue viruses from clinical-samples by using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain-reaction. J Clin Microbiol 30: 545551. [Google Scholar]
  13. Johnson BW, Russell BJ, Lanciotti RS, , 2005. Serotype-specific detection of dengue viruses in a fourplex real-time reverse transcriptase PCR assay. J Clin Microbiol 43: 49774983.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  14. Guzman MG, Kouri G, , 2004. Dengue diagnosis, advances and challenges. Int J Infect Dis 8: 6980.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  15. Vaughn DW, Green S, Kalayanarooj S, Innis BL, Nimmannitya S, Suntayakorn S, , 2000. Dengue viremia titer, antibody response pattern, and virus serotype correlate with disease severity. J Infect Dis 181: 29.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  16. Richardson J, Molina-Cruz A, Salazar MI, Black WT, , 2006. Quantitative analysis of dengue-2 virus RNA during the extrinsic incubation period in individual Aedes aegypti . Am J Trop Med Hyg 74: 132141. [Google Scholar]
  17. Bae HG, Nitsche A, Teichmann A, Biel SS, Niedrig M, , 2003. Detection of yellow fever virus: a comparison of quantitative real-time PCR and plaque assay. J Virol Methods 110: 185191.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  18. van der Schaar HM, Rust MJ, Waarts BL, van der Ende-Metselaar H, Kuhn RJ, Wilschut J, Zhuang X, Smit JM, , 2007. Characterization of the early events in dengue virus cell entry by biochemical assays and single-virus tracking. J Virol 81: 1201912028.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wang WK, Sung TL, Tsai YC, Kao CL, Chang SM, King CC, , 2002. Detection of dengue virus replication in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from dengue virus type 2-infected patients by a reverse transcription-real-time PCR assay. J Clin Microbiol 40: 44724478.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  20. Colton L, Biggerstaff BJ, Johnson A, Nasci RS, , 2005. Quantification of West Nile virus in vector mosquito saliva. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 21: 4953.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  21. Khan MA, Ellis EM, Tissera HA, Alvi MY, Rahman FF, Masud F, Chow A, Howe S, Dhanasekaran V, Ellis BR, Gubler DJ, , 2013. Emergence and diversification of dengue 2 cosmopolitan genotype in Pakistan. PLoS ONE 8: e56391.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  22. Low JG, Ooi EE, Tolfvenstam T, Leo YS, Hibberd ML, Ng LC, , 2006. Early Dengue infection and outcome study (EDEN)—study design and preliminary findings. Ann Acad Med Singapore 35: 783789. [Google Scholar]
  23. Gubler DJ, Suharyono W, Lubis I, Eram S, Sulianti Saroso J, , 1979. Epidemic dengue hemorrhagic fever in rural Indonesia. I. Virological and epidemiological studies. Am J Trop Med Hyg 28: 701710. [Google Scholar]
  24. Kuberski TT, Rosen L, , 1977. A simple technique for the detection of dengue antigen in mosquitoes by immunofluorescence. Am J Trop Med Hyg 26: 533537. [Google Scholar]
  25. Reed LJ, Muench HA, , 1938. A simple method of estimating fifty percent endpoints. Am J Hyg 27: 493497. [Google Scholar]
  26. Wang S, He R, Anderson R, , 1999. PrM- and cell-binding domains of the dengue virus E protein. J Virol 73: 25472551. [Google Scholar]
  27. Murray JM, Aaskov JG, Wright PJ, , 1993. Processing of the dengue virus type 2 proteins prM and C-prM. J Gen Virol 74: 175182.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Received : 22 Feb 2013
  • Accepted : 13 Aug 2013
  • Published online : 06 Nov 2013

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error