Volume 89, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0002-9637
  • E-ISSN: 1476-1645



Snake bite is a major public problem in the rural tropics. In southern Nepal, most deaths caused by neurotoxic envenomation occur in the village or during transport to health centers. The effectiveness of victims' transport by motorcycle volunteers to a specialized treatment center, combined with community health education, was assessed in a non-randomized, single-arm, before-after study conducted in four villages (population = 62,127). The case-fatality rate of snake bite decreased from 10.5% in the pre-intervention period to 0.5% during the intervention (relative risk reduction = 0.949, 95% confidence interval = 0.695–0.999). The snake bite incidence decreased from 502 bites/100,000 population to 315 bites/100,000 population in the four villages (relative risk reduction = 0.373, 95% confidence interval = 0.245–0.48), but it remained constant in other villages. Simple educational messages and promotion of immediate and rapid transport of victims to a treatment center decreased the mortality rate and incidence of snake bite in southeastern Nepal. The impact of similar interventions should be assessed elsewhere.


Article metrics loading...

The graphs shown below represent data from March 2017
Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. World Health Organization, 1987. Baseline epidemiological study on snake-bite treatment and management. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 42: 319320. [Google Scholar]
  2. Chippaux JP, , 1998. Snake-bites: appraisal of the global situation. Bull World Health Organ 76: 515524. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kasturiratne A, Wickremasinghe AR, de Silva N, Gunawardena NK, Pathmeswaran A, Premaratna R, Savioli L, Lalloo DG, de Silva HJ, , 2008. The global burden of snakebite: a literature analysis and modelling based on regional estimates of envenoming and deaths. PLoS Med 5: e218.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  4. Alirol E, Sharma SK, Bawaskar HS, Kuch U, Chappuis F, , 2010. Snake bite in south Asia: a review. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 4: e603.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  5. Mohapatra B, Warrell DA, Suraweera W, Bhatia P, Dhingra N, Jotkar RM, Rodriguez PS, Mishra K, Whitaker R, Jha P, , 2011. Snakebite mortality in India: a nationally representative mortality survey. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 5: e1018.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  6. Sharma SK, Khanal B, Pokhrel P, Khan A, Koirala S, , 2003. Snakebite: reappraisal of the situation in eastern Nepal. Toxicon 41: 285289.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pandey DP, , 2007. Epidemiology of snakebites based on field survey in Chitwan and Nawalparasi districts, Nepal. J Med Toxicol 3: 164168.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sharma SK, Chappuis F, Jha N, Bovier PA, Loutan L, Koirala S, , 2004. Impact of snake bites and determinants of fatal outcomes in southeastern Nepal. Am J Trop Med Hyg 71: 234238. [Google Scholar]
  9. Hansdak SG, Lallar KS, Pokharel P, Shyangwa P, Karki P, Koirala S, , 1998. A clinico-epidemiological study of snake bite in Nepal. Trop Doct 28: 223226.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  10. Heap BJ, Cowan GO, , 1991. The epidemiology of snake bite presenting to British Military Hospital Dharan during 1989. J R Army Med Corps 137: 123125.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  11. Warrell DA, White MA, , 1995. Clinical toxicology of snake bites in Asia. , ed. Handbook of Clinical Toxicology of Animal Venoms and Poisons. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 493588. [Google Scholar]
  12. Warrell DA, Cook GC, Zumla AI, , 2009. Venomous and poisonous animals. , eds. Manson's Tropical Diseases, 22nd edition. London: Academic Press, 557581. [Google Scholar]
  13. Wall F, Cottle HR, , 1921. Ophidia taprobanica or the snakes of Ceylon. , ed. Colombo, Sri Lanka: Governmental Press Ceylon, 529546.
  14. Anonymous, 2002. District Demographic Profile of Nepal. Kathmandu, Nepal: Informal Sector Research and Study Center. [Google Scholar]
  15. Otero R, Gutierrez JM, Rojas G, Nuñez V, Diaz A, Miranda E, Uribe AF, Silva JF, Ospina JG, Medina Y, Toro MF, Garcia ME, Leon G, Garcia M, Lizano S, De la Torre J, Marquez J, Mena Y, Gonzales N, Arenas LC, Puzon A, Blanco N, Sierra A, Espinal ME, Arboleda M, Jimenez JC, Ramirez P, Diaz M, Guzman MC, Barros J, Henao S, Ramirez A, Macea U, Lozano R, , 1999. A randomized blinded clinical trial of two antivenoms, prepared by caprylic acid or ammonium sulphate fractionation of IgG, in Bothrops and Porthidium snake bites in Colombia: correlation between safety and biochemical characteristics of antivenoms. Toxicon 37: 895908.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  16. Otero R, Leon G, Gutierrez JM, Rojas G, Toro MF, Barona J, Rodriguez V, Diaz A, Nuñez V, Quintana JC, Ayala S, Mosquera D, Conrado LL, Fernandez D, Arroyo Y, Paniagua CA, Lopez M, Ospina CE, Alzate C, Fernandez J, Meza JJ, Silva JF, Ramirez P, Fabra PE, Ramirez E, Cordoba E, Arrieta AB, Warrell DA, Theakston DG, , 2006. Efficacy and safety of two whole IgG polyvalent antivenoms, refined by caprylic acid fractionation with or without beta-propiolactone, in the treatment of Bothrops asper bites in Colombia. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 100: 11731182.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  17. Smalligan R, Cole J, Brito N, Laing GD, Mertz BL, Manock S, Maudlin J, Quist B, Holland G, Nelson S, Lalloo DG, Rivadeneira G, Barragan ME, Dolley D, Eddleston M, Warrell DA, Theakston RD, , 2004. Crotaline snake bite in the Ecuadorian Amazon: randomised double blind comparative trial of three South American polyspecific antivenoms. BMJ 329: 1129.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  18. Simpson ID, Norris RL, , 2007. Snakes of medical importance in India: is the concept of the “Big 4” still relevant and useful? Wilderness Environ Med 18: 29.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  19. Warrell DA, , 1999. WHO guidelines for the clinical management of snake bites in the South East Asia region. SE Asian J Trop Med Publ Health 30 (Suppl): 183. [Google Scholar]
  20. Sutherland SK, Coulter AR, Harris RD, , 1979. Rationalisation of first-aid measures for elapid snakebite. Lancet 1: 183185.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  21. Boyd JJ, Agazzi G, Svajda D, Morgan AJ, Ferrandis S, Norris RL, , 2007. Venomous snakebite in mountainous terrain: prevention and management. Wilderness Environ Med 18: 190202.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  22. Pe T, Mya S, Myint AA, Aung NN, Kyu KA, Oo T, , 2000. Field trial of local compression immobilization first-aid technique in Russel's viper (Daboia Russelii siamensis) bite patients. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 31: 346348. [Google Scholar]
  23. Canale E, Isbister GK, Currie BJ, , 2009. Investigating pressure bandaging for snakebite in a simulated setting: bandage type, training and the effect of transport. Emerg Med Australas 21: 184190.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  24. Howarth DM, Southee AE, Whyte IM, , 1994. Lymphatic flow rates and first-aid in simulated peripheral snake or spider envenomation. Med J Aust 161: 695700. [Google Scholar]
  25. Simpson ID, Tanwar PD, Andrade C, Kochar DK, Norris RL, , 2008. The Ebbinghaus retention curve: training does not increase the ability to apply pressure immobilisation in simulated snake bite; implications for snake bite first aid in the developing world. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 102: 451459.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  26. Bawaskar HS, Bawaskar PH, , 2010. Snake bite: simple steps to prevention and reduction of morbidity. Lancet 375: 805.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  27. Chappuis F, Sharma SK, Jha N, Loutan L, Bovier PA, , 2007. Protection against snake bites by sleeping under a bed net in southeastern Nepal. Am J Trop Med Hyg 77: 197199. [Google Scholar]
  28. Bawaskar HS, Bawaskar PH, , 2004. Envenoming by the common krait (Bungarus caeruleus) and Asian cobra (Naja naja): clinical manifestations and their management in a rural setting. Wilderness Environ Med 15: 257266.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ogunfowokan O, Jacob DA, Livinus OL, , 2011. Relationship between bite-to-hospital time and morbidity in victims of carpet viper bite in north-central Nigeria. West Afr J Med 30: 348353. [Google Scholar]
  30. Hofman JJ, Dzimadzi C, Lungu K, Ratsma EY, Hussein J, , 2008. Motorcycle ambulances for referral of obstetric emergencies in rural Malawi: do they reduce delay and what do they cost? Int J Gynaecol Obstet 102: 191197.[Crossref] [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Received : 13 Dec 2012
  • Accepted : 13 Mar 2013
  • Published online : 10 Jul 2013

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error