1921
Volume 88, Issue 5
  • ISSN: 0002-9637
  • E-ISSN: 1476-1645

Abstract

Abstract.

Inter- and intra-observer variation was examined among six microscopists who read 50 scrub typhus (ST) and murine typhus (MT) indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) immunoglobulin M (IgM) slides. Inter-observer agreement was moderate (κ = 0.45) for MT and fair (κ = 0.32) for ST, and was significantly correlated with experience ( = 0.03 and = 0.004, respectively); κ-scores for intra-observer agreement between morning and afternoon readings (range = 0.35–0.86) were not correlated between years of experience for ST and MT IFAs (Spearman's ρ = 0.31, = 0.54 and = 0.14, respectively; = 0.78). Storage at 4°C for 2 days showed a change from positive to negative in 20–32% of slides. Although the titers did not dramatically change after 14 days of storage, the final interpretation (positive to negative) did change in 36–50% of samples, and it, therefore, recommended that slides should be read as soon as possible after processing.

[open-access] This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene's Re-use License which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.12-0325
2013-05-01
2017-11-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/14761645/88/5/932.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.12-0325&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Koh GC, Maude RJ, Paris DH, Newton PN, Blacksell SD, , 2010. Diagnosis of scrub typhus. Am J Trop Med Hyg 82: 368370.[Crossref]
  2. La Scola B, Raoult D, , 1997. Laboratory diagnosis of rickettsioses: current approaches to diagnosis of old and new rickettsial diseases. J Clin Microbiol 35: 27152727.
  3. Isaac R, Varghese GM, Mathai E, Manjula J, Joseph I, , 2004. Scrub typhus: prevalence and diagnostic issues in rural Southern India. Clin Infect Dis 39: 13951396.[Crossref]
  4. Blacksell SD, Bryant NJ, Paris DH, Doust JA, Sakoda Y, Day NP, , 2007. Scrub typhus serologic testing with the indirect immunofluorescence method as a diagnostic gold standard: a lack of consensus leads to a lot of confusion. Clin Infect Dis 44: 391401.[Crossref]
  5. Bozeman FM, Elisberg BL, , 1963. Serological diagnosis of scrub typhus by indirect immunofluorescence. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 112: 568573.[Crossref]
  6. Chhieng DC, Talley LI, Roberson J, Gatscha RM, Jhala NC, Elgert PA, , 2002. Interobserver variability: comparison between liquid-based and conventional preparations in gynecologic cytology. Cancer 96: 6773.[Crossref]
  7. Phetsouvanh R, Blacksell SD, Jenjaroen K, Day NP, Newton PN, , 2009. Comparison of indirect immunofluorescence assays for diagnosis of scrub typhus and murine typhus using venous blood and finger prick filter paper blood spots. Am J Trop Med Hyg 80: 837840.
  8. Coleman RE, Sangkasuwan V, Suwanabun N, Eamsila C, Mungviriya S, Devine P, Richards AL, Rowland D, Ching WM, Sattabongkot J, Lerdthusnee K, , 2002. Comparative evaluation of selected diagnostic assays for the detection of IgG and IgM antibody to Orientia tsutsugamushi in Thailand. Am J Trop Med Hyg 67: 497503.
  9. Landis JR, Koch GG, , 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33: 159174.[Crossref]
  10. Reisner BS, DiBlasi J, Goel N, , 1999. Comparison of an enzyme immunoassay to an indirect fluorescent immunoassay for the detection of antinuclear antibodies. Am J Clin Pathol 111: 503506.[Crossref]
  11. Parkash V, Bifulco C, Feinn R, Concato J, Jain D, , 2010. To count and how to count, that is the question: interobserver and intraobserver variability among pathologists in lymph node counting. Am J Clin Pathol 134: 4249.[Crossref]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.12-0325
Loading
/content/journals/10.4269/ajtmh.12-0325
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Received : 20 May 2012
  • Accepted : 11 Sep 2012

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error