| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Leishmaniasis is a protozoan disease caused by the genus Leishmania transmitted by female phlebotomine sand flies of the genus Phlebotomus in the Old World and Lutzomyia in the New World.1,2 It is well known that the prevalent sand fly species and infection rate of sand flies with Leishmania species are important risk factors in each endemic area, because only part of sand fly species transmit each particular species of Leishmania.1,2 The Andean highlands of Ecuador and Peru are unique endemic areas for leishmaniasis even though their ecologic features are quite different from those of tropical and subtropical areas where most endemic areas are located. In Ecuador, Andean-type cutaneous leishmaniasis, which occurs usually as a single small papular lesion, is caused by Leishmania (Leishmania) mexicana and very occasionally L. (L.) major-like.3–6 Lutzomyia (Lu.) ayacuchensis is the only proven vector for L. (L.) mexicana, although other sand fly species existed as minor populations in these areas.3–6 On the other hand, the main etiologic agent of Andean cutaneous leishmaniasis in Peru, commonly known as Uta, is L. (Viannia) peruviana.7 In these areas, Lu. peruensis,8–10 Lu. verru-carum,9 and Lu. ayacuchensis11,12 are proven to transmit L. (V.) peruviana. Although information on the distributing sand fly species, endemic protozoan species, and vectors is accumulating for each endemic area, further details on the seasonality of prevalent sand fly species and their rates of infection with Leishmania species as a risk factor are required using larger populations. In the present study, using our recently established mass screening method, sand flies from areas where Andean-type cutaneous leishmaniasis is endemic in Ecuador and Peru were examined for Leishmania infections, and the infected parasite species and prevalent sand fly species were identified.
Sand flies were collected in February and March 2007 in the Andean areas of Ecuador and Peru, where Andean-type cutaneous leishmaniasis is endemic. The sites were as follows: in Ecuador, Huigra (2°20'S, 78°58'W, Department of Chimborazo), at an altitude of 1,200–1,500 m: collections were made using protected human bait on a fruit farm for two nights. In Peru, Huayllacayán Valley, Yumpe and the surrounding 5 areas (10°15'S, 77°29'W, Department of Ancash), at an altitude of 2,000–2,400 m: collections were made using CDC light traps and Shannon traps at four points mainly on fruit farms for three nights. The sand flies were fixed in 70% ethanol and stored at room temperature. Parts of the specimens from Peru were morphologically identified prior to fixation. The sand fly species was identified by a polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP)-based method as described previously.13,14 To this end, 18S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequences of the three species, Lu. verrucarum, Lu. peruensis, and Lu. noguchii, which are prevalent in research areas, were determined, and their restriction enzyme sites were analyzed. On the basis of the analytical results, morphologically identified sand flies (79 Lu. verrucarum, 88 Lu. peruensis, and 28 Lu. noguchii) were subjected to PCR-RFLP analyses with the AfaI enzyme, and consequently the three species were clearly classified (data not shown). No genetic diversity affecting the RFLP pattern obtained with AfaI was observed (data not shown). Unidentified specimens captured in Ecuador and Peru were subjected to a PCR-RFLP analysis of the 18S rRNA gene for molecular typing of the species. As the result, the sand flies were identified as Lu. ayacuchensis and Lu. nevesi in the Ecuadorian Andes, and Lu. verrucarum, Lu. peruensis, and Lu. noguchii in the Peruvian Andes (Table 1
). Infection of Leishmania within individual sand flies was examined by our recently established mass screening method.13 The Leishmania minicircle DNA-positive samples in a single PCR assay were regarded as positive for the infection because the reproducibility of the method has been confirmed.13 As the result, 3 and 1 positive flies were detected in the Ecuadorian and Peruvian Andes, respectively (Table 1). The positive ones were identified as Lu. ayacuchensis in Ecuador and Lu. peruensis in Peru (Table 1). The infection rate appears to be lower in Peru (0.2%) than Ecuador (1.6%), corresponding to the previous findings.3–5,8–10,12,15 The factors causing such a difference remain to be elucidated. However, it is conceivable that the distribution of reservoir animals is greater, and the cycle of transmission between reservoirs and vectors is better maintained in the Ecuadorian Andes, because climate, ecology, flora, and fauna differ considerably between the two countries. To identify the parasite species within the minicircle DNA-positive sand flies, parasite Cyt b gene sequences were determined from the specimens.13,15,16 The Cyt b gene sequences of all three positive samples from Ecuador (Huigra 1–7G, 1–11B, and 2–5F) had the highest degree of homology with the sequence of L. (L.) mexicana (98.4–98.5%) when compared with other species (88.7–96.9%), whereas the positive one from Peru (Peru 3–5F) had greater homology (99.9%) with L. (V.) braziliensis and L. (V.) peruviana than any of the others (88–98.8%). A phylogenetic tree showed that all 3 positive samples from Ecuador divided into the same clade as L. (L.) mexicana, whereas the Peruvian specimen had a closer relationship with L. (V.) braziliensis and L. (V.) peruviana (Figure 1). These results indicated that the 3 positive sand flies from the Ecuadorian Andes were all infected with L. (L.) mexicana, and the one positive specimen from the Peruvian Andes was infected with L. (V.) braziliensis or L. (V.) peruviana. In a previous study, comparative enzymatic analyses of L. (V.) peruviana and L. (V.) braziliensis revealed that mannose phosphate isomerase (MPI) is the only reliable marker for distinguishing between the two species on the basis of isoenzyme profiles.17 Furthermore, a recent study showed that the difference results from a single nucleotide change involving an amino acid substitution in the MPI genes.18 We analyzed restriction enzyme sites of the MPI genes from the two species and found that the gene of L. (V.) peruviana, but not L. (V.) braziliensis, has an AvaII site at a different nucleotide position. Therefore, PCR-RFLP analysis of MPI gene was performed on the positive sample. As shown in Figure 2, AvaII cut the MPI fragments amplified from the Peru 3–5F sample and L. (V.) peruviana, but not from L. (V.) braziliensis, indicating that the positive Lu. peruensis was infected with L. (V.) peruviana. Thus, an additional simple PCR-RFLP analysis of the MPI gene allowed for differentiation between L. (V.) peruviana and L. (V.) braziliensis.
|
|
|
Received February 5, 2008. Accepted for publication July 12, 2008.
Acknowledgments: We are indebted to Roberto Sud A. (Ministerio de Salud Publica y Asistencia Social, Guayaquil, Ecuador) for his technical assistance throughout the study; to the director Dr. Luiggi Martini R. and the coordinator Dr. Ernesto Gutierrez V. (Instituto Nacional de Higiene y Medicina Tropical, Guayaquil, Ecuador) for their arrangement of our field activities; and to Dr. Teresa Flor, Dr. Jenny Muzzio Rodriguez, and Dr. Yim-Yan Wong Chum (Instituto Nacional de Higiene y Medicina Tropical, Guayaquil, Ecuador) for their support at the laboratory and field phases of the study. We would like to acknowledge the technical expertise of The DNA Core facility of the Center for Gene Research, Yamaguchi University, supported by a grant-in-aid from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan.
Financial support: This study was supported by the Ministry of Education, Culture and Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan (Grant Nos. 14256004, 18256004, and 18780230).
* Address correspondence to Hirotomo Kato, Department of Veterinary Hygiene, Faculty of Agriculture, Yamaguchi University, 1677-1 Yoshida, Yamaguchi 753-8515, Japan. E-mail: katoh{at}yamaguchi-u.ac.jp 
Authors’ addresses: Hirotomo Kato and Hiroyuki Iwata, Department of Veterinary Hygiene, Faculty of Agriculture, Yamaguchi University, 1677-1 Yoshida, Yamaguchi 753-8515, Japan. Abraham G. Cáceres, Sección de Entomología, Instituto de Medicina Tropical "Daniel A. Carrion," Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Perú and Laboratorio de Entomología, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Lima, Perú. Eduardo A. Gomez, Departamento de Oncocercosis, Servicio Nacional de Erradicacion de la Malaria, Ministerio de Salud Publica, Ecuador. Tatsuyuki Mimori, Department of Microbiology, School of Health Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto 862-0976, Japan. Hiroshi Uezato, Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, Nishihara, Okinawa 903-0215, Japan. Jorge D. Marco, Paola A. Barroso, and Yoshihisa Hashiguchi, Department of Parasitology, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Nankoku, Kochi 783-8505, Japan.
Reprint requests: Hirotomo Kato, Department of Veterinary Hygiene, Faculty of Agriculture, Yamaguchi University, 1677-1 Yoshida, Yamaguchi 753-8515, Japan, Tel/Fax: +81-83-933-5900, E-mail: katoh{at}yamaguchi-u.ac.jp.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
