|
|
||||||||
| ABSTRACT |
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|
|
|---|
These small plastic bags, which contain 4–5 tablets or capsules, are called "yaa chud" in Thai, or literally "combination medicine," and are sold to patients or their families without prescription or medical assessment (Supplementary Figure 1, available online at www.ajtmh.org).7–9 Similar small combination packs of medicines are sold by shops and pharmacies in many areas of Southeast Asia for the treatment of fevers and, more specifically, for malaria.10 In western Thailand, these combinations are prepared by putting the tablets and capsules, obtained from pharmaceutical wholesalers, in small plastic bags that are sold individually. They are often the first line of care for patients with malaria and fever. Some shops and mobile injection doctors also dispense and administer injections of drugs and saline infusions.11 Foster estimated that approximately half of total worldwide antimalarial distribution was through informal outlets and private sellers.12 However, there are no firm data on how often patients with malaria take yaa chud in Southeast Asia.
There are many potential problems with the unregulated distribution of drugs in this way because their use will reduce the effectiveness of antimalarial therapy.13–15 The medicines are unlabelled, in varied combinations, and without expiration dates or instructions on how to take the drugs. They are prepared by staff untrained in pharmacy who are almost certainly unaware of drug interactions and contraindications. There is evidence that many yaa chud medicines are composed of inappropriate and/or unnecessary drugs.7–9 Anecdotally, shop owners in Thailand state that the bags of yaa chud are composed of drugs to reduce fever, such as paracetamol, antibiotics, such as ampicillin, and antimalarial drugs such as quinine and chloroquine. Shopkeepers may sell a sick customer only one plastic bag, which will be insufficient to cure any of the diseases that the patient is likely to have, with the possible exception of scrub typhus.16
Yaa chud may contain drugs contraindicated in pregnancy or childhood and may give rise to unexpected adverse effects. The tablets and capsules within the bags may be genuine, counterfeit, substandard, or degraded but without evidence of their chemical identity or packaging, this is extremely difficult to determine. They may also have important wider implications for public health because sub-therapeutic doses of anti-infective drugs may select for the emergence and spread of organisms resistant to the drugs administered.4,17,18 This finding is especially important for malaria because sub-therapeutic doses will select for the survival of P. falciparum parasites resistant to the antimalarial drug.4,5 The use of yaa chud may have contributed to the high prevalence of chloroquine and pyrimethamine-sulfadoxine–resistant malaria in the region, and if currently used drugs such as artesunate, tetracyclines, and mefloquine are included in yaa chud, this may facilitate the spread of resistance to these vital drugs.1,19
Three major reasons for patients having subtherapeutic plasma drug concentrations are reduced adherence to optimum regimens,20 regimens of inadequate dose and/or duration,21 and poor quality drugs containing either low concentrations of the active ingredient(s) or low bioavailability.22 There is very limited field evidence comparing the relative importance of these three factors on treatment failure and the spread of antimalarial resistance because it is very difficult to tease apart the affects of the misuse of anti-infective drugs by health workers, patient adherence, and poor quality drugs. The identification of the pharmaceuticals in these unlabelled drugs is thus of great importance. Color dye tests8 and thin-layer chromatography10 (TLC) have been used to identify the drugs in yaa chud. To identify the active ingredients in tablets and capsules in yaa chud from the Thailand–Myanmar border and therefore to what malaria patients may be exposed, a local researcher bought samples that were provisionally identified by their appearance and a subset were assayed using mass and atomic spectrometry.23,24 The collector also asked the seller for details of dose, possible side effects, and what the buyer should do if the fever persisted. The provisional identities, experimentally determined active ingredients, and collection details were correlated and we present data on the composition of yaa chud and discuss their public health importance.
| METHODS |
|
|
|---|
Sample analysis. Chemical analysis was performed using multiple complementary techniques including liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS),26,27 direct analysis in real time mass spectrometry (DART-MS),28 and atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS), a method capable of detecting inorganic components in samples. All samples were kept refrigerated (4°C) until analysis.
Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Drug standards (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and yaa chud samples were first crushed with a mortar and pestle and approximately 30 mg of sample was suspended in 1 mL of methanol (Sigma-Aldrich) and extracted on a rotary shaker for approximately 2 hours. After extraction, suspensions were filtered through 0.45-µm polytetrafluoroethylene membrane filters (Pall Corporation, Ann Arbor, MI). The extracts were kept refrigerated until analysis with a liquid chromatographic system equipped with a Zorbax Extend-C18 column (1100 LC System; Agilent, Santa Clara, CA) interfaced to a time-of-flight mass spectrometer (JMS-100TLC, AccuTOFTM MS; JEOL, Peabody, MA) by an electrospray ionization source operated in positive ion mode.29 The LC and MS settings were optimized to provide high sensitivity for a wide range of drugs as previously described.24 Sample extracts were diluted with methanol (Sigma-Aldrich) or 50:50 acetonitrile:water (v/v) as needed.
Direct analysis in real time mass spectrometry. This technique does not require sample preparation and thus samples were analyzed as provided. A commercial DART ion source (IonSense, Saugus, MA) was coupled to the AccuTOF mass spectrometer. Uncoated tablets were held with a pair of metal tweezers in front of the DART ion source for an average time of 20 seconds. Coated tablets were first broken in half and the interior of the sample was analyzed by DART. Capsules were opened and those with granular contents were analyzed by holding the granule(s) in front of the DART source. The contents of capsules containing powders were packed into the open end of a melting point capillary for DART analysis. Experimental settings for this technique have been described elsewhere.23
Because of the packaging of the yaa chud loose in bags, cross-contamination between tablets was common and problematic for DART-MS analysis because contaminant particles embedded on the sample surface produced signals corresponding to active ingredients from other tablets in the package. The active ingredients were thus assigned on the basis of the common peaks observed for the external tablet surface and the internal surface of the broken tablet.
Data analysis. Mass spectral data analysis was performed with the built-in mass spectrometer software (MassCenter version 1.3.4m; JEOL). Identification of sample ingredients was performed by importing the spectral peak list into Excel® (Microsoft, Auburn, WA) and using a system of macros to search for matches against an in-house library of protonated molecules derived from the Model List of Essential Drugs published by the World Health Organization.30 A positive match was indicated when the difference between the experimental and theoretical m/z values was less than 5 mmu. If discrepancies in the active ingredients identified using LC-MS and DART-MS were observed, the analyses were repeated by continuous infusion electrospray ionization-MS to provide final confirmation of the identity. Data on drug collection and identity were analyzed by using Stata 10 software (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX).
Atomic absorption spectroscopy. Samples that were provisionally identified as containing either mineral supplements or antacids (3/132 or 2%) were analyzed using AAS. Atomic spectrometry enables the determination of total metal contents in different kind of samples (organic, inorganic, and biological). For solids, it usually requires a previous step of dissolution. In this case, the samples (approximately 100 mg) were digested in closed polyfluorotetraethylene (PFTE®) vessels with 5 mL of 70% (w/w) nitric acid using a microwave digestion system (MDS 2000; CEM Co., Matthews, NC). The digestion conditions were automatically controlled by the microwave unit through a standard five-step heating program. Once the cycle was completed, the PFTE vessels were cooled down to room temperature and the final clear solution was adjusted to a volume of 10 mL with distilled water. Once dissolved, metals concentrations were determined by atomic absorption spectrometry using an air/acetylene flame as atomic source. A 6700 atomic absorption spectrometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with Hamamatzu (Kyoyo, Japan) single hollow cathode lamps of copper, iron, manganese, zinc, calcium, and magnesium was used for the measurements. The standard programs (Shimadzu) provided were used throughout the experiments. The metals concentrations in the samples were obtained by the working curve method. Suitable dilutions of the dissolved samples were performed to fit the working linear ranges of the different metals being studied.
| RESULTS |
|
|
|---|
|
Of 43 shopkeepers for whom it was recorded, 21 (49%) did not spontaneously offer health advice for the 49 packets collected at these locations. Shopkeepers usually recommended taking the packets singly (96%). Of the two remaining packets that came with offered or requested verbal dosage information, one was recommended to be taken two packets at a time and the other was recommended to be taken three packets at a time. Of 43 packets with verbal dosage interval information, the interval between packets was recommended to be 24 hours in 15 (35%), 8 hours in 14 (33%), 12 hours in 13 (30%), and 4 hours in 1 (2%). None of the shopkeepers said that one yaa chud packet was insufficient or gave any advice as to how long the packets should be taken.
Shopkeepers said that 45 (90%) of yaa chud samples would work for malaria, 4 (8%) said that they would not work, and 1 (2%) did not know. Of 48 packets with available information, shopkeepers said that for 23 (48%) packets it would not matter if the buyers wife was pregnant, that it would matter for 19 (40%) packets, and did not know for 6 (12%) packets. Of 43 packets with available information, shopkeepers said that 32 (74%) yaa chud would not harm her, that 7 (16%) would cause harm, and that 4 (9%) may or may not cause harm.
Identification of yaa chud contents. An attempt was made to identify the tablets and capsules from knowledge as to what was locally available, but this proved difficult and chemical identification was necessary.
A subset of 100 physically distinct tablets/capsules (39%), representing all taxa of medicine with different shape, printed codes, and color present in the collection were analyzed using DART-MS, LC-MS and/or AAS. An active ingredient was identified in 89% of the subset of physically distinct preparations (Table 1
). The data from these 100 chemically identified medicines were extrapolated to identical tablets/capsules (by shape, codes, and color) in the rest of the collection, which were not analyzed chemically. The most frequent active ingredients identified were paracetamol (acetaminophen) (22%), chlorpheniramine (13.4%), chloroquine (12.6%), tetracycline/doxycycline (11.4%), and quinine (5.1%) (Figure 1
). Tetracycline could not be distinguished from doxycycline because of their identical elemental compositions. A few samples (10) contained two or more active ingredients each: chlorpheniramine in combination with paracetamol (2 samples), vitamin B3 and vitamin C (2), vitamin B3, vitamin B6, and vitamin B7 (1), chloroquine plus paracetamol (1), sulfamethoxazole and paracetamol (1), and two different types of antacids (3).
|
|
|
The four packets that the shopkeepers said would not work for malaria did not contain chloroquine or quinine. Only 7 bags (14%) contained medicine that could have potentially cured P. falciparum malaria if taken by a 50-kg adult (assuming that the tablets were quinine, 300 mg/bag, and tetracycline, 250 mg/bag) at a dose of two bags every 8 hours for 7 days, although the tetracycline dose would be higher than the recommended 4 mg/kg of body weight every 6 hours.31 No shopkeeper offered such a regimen. The remainder of yaa chud bought had no potential curative effect for malaria. All but one of the yaa chud contained medicines (paracetamol, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs]), which may have alleviated some symptoms (fever, headache) but would have caused harm by delaying access to curative antimalarial drugs, which are available for free through local Thai hospitals or NGOs. Using the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) pregnancy categories32 and the British National Formulary33 guidelines, 7 (26%) of 27 of the drugs in the yaa chud were contraindicated or had an FDA Category of C or D (tetracycline, primaquine, NSAIDs, alprenolol, tolperisone), which indicated that an adverse effect to the drug was observed in pregnant animal or human studies. These were contained in 41 (82%) of 50 of the yaa chud. Comparing the sellers statement as to whether the yaa chud was safe in pregnancy and what pharmaceuticals were found in their product, of 22 (48%) of 46 yaa chud that were said to be safe in pregnancy, 17 (77%) contained contraindicated drugs.
| DISCUSSION |
|
|
|---|
The sample subset with no active ingredients present might be composed of degraded or counterfeit drugs. Interestingly, of a total of 11 samples without any detectable active ingredient, 7 (64%) could also not be given a provisional identity by the group of experts that examined the yaa chud samples, which suggested that these tablet/capsules might be counterfeit. Conversely, 36 (82%) of 44 samples that could not be visually identified, but did undergo chemical analysis, contained a detectable active ingredient. Visual inspection of tablets and capsules is not sufficient to decide the identity of an active ingredient with certainty.
Limitations of the study included that we could not be sure that all kong cham shops were sampled; we sampled all that we could find. We assummed that visually identical samples had the same active ingredient composition and dissolution properties were not investigated. We did not measure the quantity of active ingredient in each tablet/capsule, and we do not know whether these inappropriate medicines contain counterfeit, substandard, or degraded drugs.22,34 Although the sample size was relatively small, inspection of a graph of the cumulative number of distinct chemical identities found with increasing yaa chud sample size suggests that few more additional active ingredients would be found if the sample size had been larger (Figure 4
). An additional limitation is that the yaa chud were collected in 2000 and 2001 and malaria treatment has changed locally since then and considerable effort has been expended in Tak province to improve the use of ACT therapy.3 Further work to determine whether artemisinin derivatives and mefloquine are now used in yaa chud and how often yaa chud is taken by malaria patients is needed.
|
Plasai and Spielman examined whether the frequent sub-curative self-administration of yaa chud by gem miners on the Thailand–Cambodia border explained the spread of mefloquine resistance.10 The samples that they collected included 23 packets of tablets containing chloroquine, primaquine, sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, tetracycline, prochlorperazine, chlorpheniramine, dimenhydrinate, paracetamol, aspirin, dipyrone, sulfadiazine, dexamethasone, and vitamin B, and 8 ampules sold for malaria as supplements contained quinine, chloroquine, calcium gluconate, metamizole and vitamin B. No mefloquine or oral quinine were found in the yaa chud in 1993, which suggested that yaa chud was not important in the spread of mefloquine-resistant P. falciparum malaria, but could have facilitated the spread of chloroquine and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance.
Mainland Southeast Asia has had great importance in the spread of drug-resistant malaria and preliminary reports of clinically important artemisinin resistance occurs on the Thailand–Cambodia border are of considerable concern.35,36 If the consumption of yaa chud containing inadequate antimalarial therapy or with inadequate dosing leads to treatment failure, gametocytemia is likely to be higher and prolonged, risking the enhanced spread of resistance parasites to others in the community and beyond.37,38 Malaria is perceived as the major cause of treatable fever in these areas. However, with the possible exception of scrub typhus,16 the yaa chud in the dose provided would not have cured the patient of any infectious disease.
Much, if not most, of anti-infective drug use in Asia is unregulated39,40 and yaa chud-like packets of medicines are sold to impoverished villagers in Laos (Mayxay M, unpublished data), Cambodia,41 Myanmar, and Thailand but such practices have not yet been documented in Africa (Amin A, Barnes K, Goodman C, unpublished data). However, some sellers offer bowls of exposed tablets and capsules among which customers pick and choose15,41 and sell tablets, but apparently of only one type, in plastic bags (Figure 1
in the report by Patterson and others42). It will be important to ensure that new antimalarial drugs, especially the artemisinin derivatives, are not sold in these ways.15 It seems extremely unlikely that the packets sold between 2000 and 2001 had any beneficial effect for the patients and probably caused harm both to patients and to public health. Drug regulatory action and patient education are required to reduce the trade in yaa chud and similar inappropriate pharmacy practices. However, only 20% of World Health Organization member states are estimated to have well-developed drug regulation and 30% have either no drug regulation or a capacity that hardly functions.43 The lack of financial and human resources available to many drug regulatory authorities often makes action against inappropriate and poor quality medicines impossible.
Received April 29, 2008. Accepted for publication July 5, 2008.
Acknowledgments: We thank Yongyuth Losuppakarn (Mae Sot Hospital) and Kamolrat Silamut for assistance; the students of the Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University (Bangkok) for help in provisionally identifying the yaa chud ingredients; Catherine Goodman, Elizabeth Ashley, Rose McGready, Shunmay Yeung, and Francois Nosten for helpful comments on the manuscript; and Amin Abdinasir, Karen Barnes, and Mayfong Mayxay for advice
Financial support: The collection of samples and part of the chemical analysis were supported by the Wellcome Trust of Great Britain as part of the Wellcome Trust–Mahidol University–Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Programme. Facundo M. Fernández was supported by a National Science Foundation CAREER grant for DART-MS analysis. Christina Y. Hampton was supported by a Molecular Biophysics Training Program from the Georgia Institute of Technology.
* Address correspondence to Paul N. Newton, Wellcome Trust–Mahosot Hospital–Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Collaboration, Microbiology Laboratory, Mahosot Hospital, Vientiane, Lao Peoples Democratic Republic, E-mail: paul{at}tropmedres.ac or Facundo M. Fernández, School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, E-mail: facundo.fernandez{at}chemistry.gatech.edu ![]()
Note: Supplementary Figure 1 (Picture of yaa chud samples collected) and Supplementary Figure 2 (Poster of the Royal Government of Thailand warning of the dangers of yaa chud) appear online at www.ajtmh.org.
Authors addresses: Paul N. Newton, Wellcome Trust–Mahosot Hospital–Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Collaboration, Mahosot Hospital, Vientiane, Lao Peoples Democratic Republic, Tel/Fax: 856-21-242-168 and Centre for Clinical Vaccinology and Tropical Medicine, University of Oxford, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, OX3 7LJ, United Kingdom, E-mail paul{at}tropmedres.ac. Christina Y. Hampton, Krystyn Alter-Hall, and Facundo M. Fernández, School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, Tel: 404-385-4432, Fax: 404-385-6447, E-mails: christina.hampton{at}gatech.edu and facundo.fernandez{at}chemistry.gatech.edu. Thanongsak Teerwarakulpana, Mae Sot, Tak Province, Thailand. Sompol Prakongpan, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand, E-mail: pyspk{at}mahidol.ac.th. Ronnatrai Ruangveerayuth, Mae Sot Hospital, Mae Sot, Tak Province, Thailand, E-mail ronnatrai{at}yahoo.com. Nicholas J. White and Nicholas P. J. Day, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, 420/6 Rajvithi Road, Bangkok 10400, Thailand, Tel: 66-2-203-633, Fax: 66-2-203-6334 and Centre for Clinical Vaccinology and Tropical Medicine, University of Oxford, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, OX3 7LJ, United Kingdom. Mabel B. Tudino and Natalia Mancuso, Departa-mento de Química Inorgánica, Analítica y Química Física/Instituto de Quimica de los Materiales, Medio Ambiente y Energia, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Universitaria, 1428, Buenos Aires, Argentina, Tel: 54-11-4576-3360, Fax: 54-11-4576-3341, E-mail: tudino{at}q1.fcen.uba.ar.
| REFERENCES |
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Maxmen On The Trail of Disease in Southeast Asia J. Exp. Med., January 16, 2009; 206(1): 7 - 10. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |