|
|
||||||||
| ABSTRACT |
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|
|
|---|
Similarly, in California, B. burgdorferi has been isolated from several host species including western gray squirrels (Sciurus griseus), dusky-footed wood rats (Neotoma fuscipes), and California kangaroo rats (Dipodomys californicus).6,7 However, prevalence of B. burgdorferi infection in wood rats and kangaroo rats typically has been low.6–9 Conversely, a study of western gray squirrels in oak woodlands in Mendocino County, northwestern California, showed that squirrels are commonly infected with B. burgdorferi (80% by polymerase chain reaction [PCR]), and that larval Ixodes pacificus ticks readily acquire infections (47% of attached larvae were infected).6
We broaden the geographic survey of Lyme disease in Californian sciurids to sites throughout northern California and perform xenodiagnosis and transmission experiments using I. pacificus to determine whether western gray squirrels are competent reservoirs.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|
|
|---|
Upon capture, squirrels were restrained using a canvas handling bag.10 At first capture during each trapping session, animals were briefly anaesthetized with isoflurane (Isothesia; Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, IL), and tissue samples were taken using a 2-mm ear punch to obtain ear punch biopsy (EPB) specimens of the pinna after the ears had been surface-sterilized sequentially with 10% povidoneiodine (Betadine solution; The Purdue Frederick Company, Norwalk, CT) and 70% ethanol. We marked squirrels with ear tags in 2006 and used passive integrated transponder tags (Biomark, Boise, ID) inserted subcutaneously in 2007 because ear tags were frequently removed by squirrels. Sex and body mass were recorded, and all ticks found were removed and stored in 95% ethanol. Squirrels were released at their sites of capture. Squirrels recaptured during the same trapping session were identified and released.
Study sites. We trapped in woodland sites that were composed of oaks (black oak, Quercus kelloggii, or interior live oak Quercus wislizenii), Pacific madrone (Arbutus menziesii), and occasionally pines (Pinus spp.). The climate in northern California is predominantly Mediterranean with hot, dry summers and cool, moist winters.
We trapped at numerous sites but only captured multiple squirrels at China Camp State Park in Marin County (38.01°N, 122.46°W), Annadel State Park in Sonoma County (38.43°N, 122.62°W), and the Hopland Research and Extension Center (herein Hopland) in Mendocino County (39.00°, 124.15°W). We trapped at China Camp in April 2007, at Annadel State Park in June 2006 and March 2007, and repeatedly at Hopland from March 2006 until February 2008 as part of a long-term study. We report the results of PCR tests for only the first sampling of any individual squirrel.
Although we observed squirrels at additional sites, these animals were difficult to capture (0 squirrels captured in more than 400 trap nights), in part because wood rats and/or ground squirrels (Spermophilus beecheyi) removed bait from traps. Our success rate in capturing live squirrels appeared to be associated with longer pre-baits (two weeks), the presence of black oaks, and a lower density of competing rodents.
Additional EPB samples were collected from dead squirrels found on roads and from animals obtained by shooting. The EPB samples were obtained in the same way as described above. Ear samples, collected by Californian county vector-control agencies, were also provided by the California Department of Public Health as part of an investigation into West Nile virus.11
DNA extraction and pathogen detection in skin biopsy specimens and ticks. The EPB samples and tick specimens collected from infested animals were tested individually for B. burgdorferi. DNA was extracted from ticks and EPB samples using published methods.6,12 DNA was extracted from each individual EPB sample using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) spin-column protocol for animal tissue with a few modifications. Squirrel EPB samples that had been stored in 95% ethanol were placed in a 1.5-mL tube and allowed to air-dry before adding ATL buffer. Borrelia burgdorferi infection was assessed with a nested PCR format that specifically targets the rrf (5S)–rrl (23S) ribosomal RNA intergenic spacer region. Cultured B. burgdorferi s.s. strain CA4 and UV-treated nuclease-free sterile water (Growcells, Irvine, CA) were used as positive and negative controls, respectively, during each PCR run. Using cultured, serially diluted strain CA4, we determined that the sensitivity of the nested PCR protocol was approximately 5 spirochetes/mL. To control for possible PCR inhibition, dilutions from a subset of samples that gave a negative result and their dilutions (10–1 to 10–10) were tested by nested PCR. We found no evidence of PCR inhibition. Furthermore, each sample was tested twice to monitor the consistency of results.
Amplicons were purified using the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) and sequenced with internal PCR primers by the University of California DNA Sequencing Facility using a 96-capillary 3730xl DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Forward and reverse sequences were assembled and manually edited using Sequencher version 4.6 (Gene Codes Corp., Ann Arbor, MI). All sequenced samples were aligned with representative rrf-rrl sequences available in GenBank for B. burgdorferi sensu stricto, B. californiensis, Borrelia genomospecies 1 and 2, B. bissettii, and unclassified borrelial strains found in North America using Clustal X multiple sequence alignment program (version 1.83.1).13 The final alignment including representative genospecies sequences, along with tick- and squirrel-derived DNA sequences, was edited manually using Mesquite version 1.1214 and used to generate a distance matrix and neighbor-joining phylogenetics tree using PAUP* 4.0 based on uncorrected p distance.15
Xenodiagnostic and transmission experiments. Wild-caught squirrels were brought into the laboratory for B. burgdorferi transmission experiments using immature I. pacificus. All squirrels were captured at Hopland and were transferred to the University of California, Berkeley, Office of Laboratory Animal Care. Squirrels were housed in galvanized steel cages, fitted with nest-boxes with aspen-chip bedding, and maintained on a 12:12 light cycle at 70–74°F. They were provided ad libitum with fresh tap water and food, consisting primarily of laboratory rodent chow and seed-based hamster diet supplemented with apple, Timothy hay-cubes, and nuts.
Questing adult I. pacificus ticks were collected from Marin County, California. Females were allowed to feed and mate on laboratory rabbits and the resultant F1 larvae were used in xenodiagnostic and transmission tests. Fifty larvae from each female tick were pooled and tested by PCR to ensure all broods were uninfected by B. burgdorferi.
For tick infestation, squirrels were briefly anaesthetized with isoflurane followed by an intraperitoneal inoculation of a mixture of 0.15 mg/kg ketamine HCl (Ketaset; Fort Dodge Animal Health, Fort Dodge, IA) and 0.75 mg/kg medetomidine HCl (Domitor; Pfizer, Exton, PA). Supportive treatment, including 10 mL of normal saline solution and 0.5 mL of 50% dextrose solution (delivered subcutaneously) and an external heat source were also provided. Approximately 200 I. pacificus larvae were brushed onto each animal. After 1 hour, 3.75 mg/kg of atipamezole HCl (Antisedan; Pfizer) was administered to antagonize the medetomidine, and squirrels were returned to cages for recovery. Cages were suspended above water trays that were checked daily for replete ticks for up to 11 days. To determine the duration of infection, larvae were placed on squirrels at approximately two-month intervals. Molted nymphs were tested by PCR to determine the prevalence of B. burgdorferi infection in immature ticks.
We tested whether infected ticks were able to successfully infect a naive squirrel. Because of a combination of low numbers of uninfected animals in the wild and the difficulties associated with capturing and housing squirrels, we were able to conduct transmission experiments on only one squirrel. All EPB samples collected on three consecutive occasions over a six-month period from this squirrel were negative for B. burgdorferi and it also failed to infect any larvae during two xenodiagnoses (n = 82 larvae tested). To determine whether ticks are capable of infecting squirrels with B. burgdorferi, we placed on the uninfected individual nymphs that had been exposed to an infected squirrel in the laboratory as larvae. We used five nymphs from a cohort that had demonstrated an infection prevalence of 50% during xenodiagnoses, and after feeding confirmed by PCR that at least one nymph that fed on the uninfected squirrel contained B. burgdorferi. We collected EPB samples and exposed the squirrel to naive tick larvae one, two, and four months after exposure to the potentially infected nymphs.
Animal care and use. Animal handling and capture procedures were reviewed and approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of California at Berkeley, and complied with guidelines from the California Department of Fish and Game, and the National Institutes of Health.
Human Lyme disease incidence. We examined the relationship between B. burgdorferi infection prevalence in western gray squirrels and the Lyme disease incidence in humans using linear regression. Lyme disease incidence (reported cases per 100,000 person-years per county) was calculated for the 10-year period 1997–2006.16 Western gray squirrel infection prevalence data were calculated for all California counties from which we tested a minimum of three squirrel samples.
| RESULTS |
|
|
|---|
2 = 0.02, degrees of freedom = 1, P = 0.88).
|
|
Although we tested EPB samples from other Sciurus species in California, few animals were positive for B. burgdorferi. One eastern gray squirrel (S. carolinensis) was infected in Santa Cruz County (n = 14), as was one fox squirrel (Sciurus niger) (n = 64) from Alameda County. We also found evidence of B. burgdorferi infection in 1 of 6 possums (Didelphis virginiana), but not in striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis) (n = 5).
There was a strong relationship between county-based western gray squirrel infection prevalence and the log-transformed incidence rates of humans cases (per 100,000 person years) (F1,13 = 16.65, R2 = 0.56, P = 0.0012) (Figure 2
).
|
|
The one naive squirrel had been exposed experimentally to one B. burgdorferi PCR-positive nymph. The EPB samples collected one, two, and four months after exposure were PCR positive, PCR negative, and PCR positive, respectively. Sequencing of the B. burgdorferi amplicon from the first months positive EPB sample showed that it was identical to the sequence of the amplicon harvested from the positive nymph that had fed on the squirrel. Xenodiagnoses showed that this squirrel infected 0% (0 of 2), 86% (25 of 29), and 47% (14 of 30) nymphs one, two, and four months post-exposure, respectively.
| DISCUSSION |
|
|
|---|
The average prevalence of B. burgdorferi infection in squirrels was 30%, but ranged from 0% to nearly 50% in different counties, and was most common in the northwestern counties of Humboldt and Mendocino.18,19 In northern California, western gray squirrels are infected solely with B. burgdorferi sensu stricto, the only genospecies known to cause Lyme disease in the United States.
We also observed an apparent statewide association between squirrel infection prevalence and Lyme disease incidence, which suggests that squirrels are an important reservoir host responsible for maintaining this zoonotic disease regionally. Such a conclusion must be tempered by many potentially confounding factors. Human incidence was calculated from multiple years of data (1997–2006), whereas our squirrel research comprises two years of data. Furthermore, 59% of the samples tested were from road-killed animals for which data on habitat type, distance from urban centers, and tick abundance were unavailable. Both squirrel and human infection prevalence may be a function of the risk of exposure to ticks, and previous research has demonstrated that the likelihood of human cases is related to habitat type and tick abundance.20
The abundance and infection prevalence of both tick vectors and reservoir hosts are co-dependent, and therefore our observed relationship between human and squirrel infection prevalence is intriguing. In that regard, because some PCR-negative squirrels were capable of infecting ticks with B. burgdorferi, our reported prevalences of infection in squirrels must be considered conservative underestimates at best. We conclude that spirochete infection may be quite localized within an animal, and therefore it would be prudent to take multiple EPB samples from squirrels when conducting surveillance for Borrelia spp. It is unlikely that differences in PCR results are caused by our detection methods because we found no evidence of PCR inhibition. Previous work on deer mice also demonstrated that ear tissues are not the most reliable biopsy samples for diagnosing the presence of B. burgdorferi.21 Similarly, B. burgdorferi-positive larvae have been observed feeding on PCR-negative squirrels.6
Numerous investigations have demonstrated that other squirrel species in Europe and the United States can harbor high tick loads and are competent reservoir hosts that have the ability to infect both tick larvae and nymphs. Eurasian red squirrels (Sciurus vulgaris) in Switzerland infect 15–19% of immature ticks, and are the source of a large proportion of infected questing ticks.22,23 In the United Kingdom, up to 26% of non-native eastern gray squirrels are infected with B. burgdorferi s.l. and infect up to 75% of feeding ticks.24 Eastern gray squirrels in the northeastern United States show a prevalence of infection as high as 100%, infect 15–32% of their feeding larvae, and have mean larval loads that range from 5 to 142 per squirrel.2,3,5 Compared with white-footed mice, shrews, and chipmunks, eastern gray squirrels infect lower proportions of larvae with B. burgdorferi. Consequently, eastern gray squirrels have recently been considered to act as dilution hosts, that is, they reduce overall disease risk to humans because despite harboring high tick loads they are less competent reservoir hosts.2,5,25 However, because they harbor such high numbers of larvae, eastern gray squirrels nonetheless contribute to the local abundance of infected ticks in an area and are therefore probably more important in the ecology and epidemiology of Lyme disease in the northeastern United States than previously appreciated.
In New England, a suite of reservoir hosts are involved in maintaining B. burgdorferi.2,5 In northern California, it appears that western gray squirrels are a primary reservoir in dense oak woodlands. Other small mammals, such as dusky-footed wood rats and Peromyscus mice, have lower tick loads and low to moderate prevalence of B. burgdorferi s.l. infection.8,9 Further research into the relative importance of different host species in B. burgdorferi dynamics will determine whether additional mammals or birds are important reservoirs, as well as the importance of habitat in determining regional disease prevalence. Nonetheless, western gray squirrels may act as good sentinel species to determine whether B. burgdorferi is present in certain areas, although they can be difficult to capture alive. With regard to habitat, western gray squirrels are normally associated with oak-woodlands.26 In contrast, non-native eastern gray and fox squirrels mainly occupy suburban areas, where they are infrequently infected with B. burgdorferi because of a lack of exposure to tick vectors. Therefore, human risk of exposure to B. burgdorferi is restricted largely to activities that take place in oak woodlands,27 and as such, personal-protective measures or squirrel-targeted tick-control initiatives are most apt to reduce Lyme disease risk in California.6
Received June 9, 2008. Accepted for publication July 5, 2008.
Acknowledgments: We thank Walter Brown, Natalia Fedorova, Joyce Kleinjan, Bob Murray, Joan Wallace, and especially Esther Omi (University of California, Berkeley, CA) for assistance; Rick Brown, Bernadette Clueit, Desiree Early, Janet Foley, Alan Franklin, Bob Jones, Lisa Jones, Nate Nieto, and numerous Californian vector control or mosquito abatement districts for additional squirrel ear samples; and the California Animal Health and Food Safety Laboratory for collecting tissue samples. We also thank the staff at the Annadel, China Camp, and Clear Lake State Parks (especially Bob Birkland); the staff at the Audubon Canyon Ranch – Bolinas Lagoon Preserve (especially Gwen Heistand); the staff at Bidwell Park; the staff at the Donald and Sylvia McLaughlin Natural Reserve (especially Cathy Koehler); the staff at the Hopland Research and Extension Center (especially Bob Timm); Les Dodge (Dodge Pheasant Farms); and the staff at the Quail Ridge Reserve for their assistance. We do not blame any of the aforementioned for our calamitous lack of success in catching squirrels at most of these locations.
Financial support: This study was supported by grant RO1AI022501 from the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
Disclaimer: The content of the report is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases or the National Institutes of Health.
* Address correspondence to Daniel J. Salkeld, Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720. E-mail: dsalkeld{at}nature.berkeley.edu ![]()
Authors addresses: Daniel J. Salkeld, Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, Tel: 650-796-8229, Fax: 510-643-5438, E-mail: dsalkeld{at}nature.berkeley.edu and International Union for Conservation of Nature, World Conservation Union, Washington, DC 20009. Sarah Leonhard, Yvette A. Girard, Jeomhee Mun, and Robert S. Lane, Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, Tel: 650-796-8229, Fax: 510-643-5438. Nina Hahn, Office of Laboratory Animal Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720. Kerry A. Padgett, Vector-Borne Disease Section, Division of Communicable Disease Control, California Department of Public Health, Richmond, CA 94804.
| REFERENCES |
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Keesing, J. Brunner, S. Duerr, M. Killilea, K. LoGiudice, K. Schmidt, H. Vuong, and R. S. Ostfeld Hosts as ecological traps for the vector of Lyme disease Proc R Soc B, November 22, 2009; 276(1675): 3911 - 3919. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. A. Girard, B. Travinsky, A. Schotthoefer, N. Fedorova, R. J. Eisen, L. Eisen, A. G. Barbour, and R. S. Lane Population Structure of the Lyme Borreliosis Spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi in the Western Black-Legged Tick (Ixodes pacificus) in Northern California Appl. Envir. Microbiol., November 15, 2009; 75(22): 7243 - 7252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |