|
|
||||||||
| ABSTRACT |
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|
|
|---|
In 2001, land rights disputes caused more than 1,000 Montagnards to flee the central highlands of Vietnam. After a period of time in which they likely did not have access to clean water and adequate sanitation in the forests of Vietnam, they were sheltered for almost a year in temporary camps administered by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees in two northeastern Cambodian provinces. Refugees lived in family housing units and had pit latrines, water from streams or wells with charcoal for boiling it, and access to medical services. In April 2002, they were relocated from the camps to an abandoned factory in Phnom Penh, Cambodia, where they had access to running water and a latrine in a public area. There, they were screened in preparation for urgent resettlement in North Carolina.
As part of the resettlement process, CDC, the International Organization for Migration (IOM), and the North Carolina Division of Public Health tailored an enhanced refugee health program to meet this populations needs. Malaria-related screening and treatment have been previously described.10 Pre-departure interventions for intestinal parasitosis included administering a five-day course of albendazole for presumptive treatment of intestinal parasitosis. A five-day course was chosen instead of one dose because a recent analysis demonstrated the cost-effectiveness of the longer regimen for treating immigrants from countries endemic for strongyloidiasis and other common intestinal helminthic infections.11 We considered treatment for infection with Strongyloides stercoralis especially important because of its ability to infect its host for decades and the threat of hyperinfection and disseminated infection in persons who become immunocompromised.
To assess the impact of the five-day pre-departure treatment regimen, we conducted medical assessments and examined stool samples for parasites shortly after the refugees arrived in the United States.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|
|
|---|
From June 2002 through April 2003, clinical and laboratory assessments were conducted at five North Carolina county health departments on all refugees within 90 days of their arrival in the United States. Gastrointestinal symptoms, including abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, bloody stools, and weight loss, were ascertained. Instructions for stool collection were also provided on video, orally in tribal languages, and in written Vietnamese. All refugees were asked to collect one stool specimen every other day for three days in 10% formalin-filled vials. Those persons with gastrointestinal symptoms were also asked to submit three additional specimens in containers filled with low-viscosity poly-vinylacrylate (LV-PVA).12 At a second visit, persons with parasitic infections received appropriate treatment.13
Laboratory evaluation. The North Carolina State Laboratory for Public Health (NCSLPH) examined all specimens. To increase sensitivity for detecting Giardia intestinalis and other parasites, up to three specimens per refugee were pooled.14 An aliquot of the pooled formalin-fixed specimens from each person was concentrated by the formalin ethylacetate concentration method, and wet mounts were examined microscopically (22 x 22 mm2 cover slip area) at 10x, 20x, and/or 40x magnification. Pooled specimens collected in LV-PVA were stained with Wheatleys trichrome and examined under oil immersion (100x).15 Parasites were identified by species and classified as pathogenic protozoa (G. intestinalis), nonpathogenic protozoa, or helminths (all pathogenic). Entamoeba histolytica and E. dispar were not differentiated and were classified as potentially pathogenic, and Blastocystis hominis was considered nonpathogenic.
The Division of Parasitic Diseases, CDC (Atlanta, GA) performed quality assurance on specimens collected from June 1, 2002, through August 31, 2002. Aliquots of all concentrated samples with positive findings and 10% of those with negative findings were collected in Sarstedt (Nümbrecht, Germany) tubes. They were processed and examined by the same methods used by the NCSLPH.
Data analysis. Results of the microscopic stool examinations were analyzed to compare differences between treated and untreated groups of refugees and to examine other potential risk factors for parasitic infection, such as age and sex. A logistic regression model, controlling for age and sex, was used to assess the impact of albendazole treatment on infection with intestinal parasites. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant for the purpose of inference to a larger population of similar refugees.
Information on post-resettlement symptoms was recorded for the 491 refugees who were seen in North Carolina clinics during June–September 2002. The sensitivity and specificity of clinical symptoms for infection with intestinal parasites were calculated by using the NCSLPH stool examination as the reference for presence of infection.
For the laboratory quality assurance analysis, results from the NCSLPH and CDC laboratory evaluation of pooled specimen sets were compared. The CDC findings were used as reference to calculate sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). The results of laboratory examination of stool specimens fixed in LV-PVA were also compared for concordance with corresponding specimens fixed in formalin. Data were analyzed by using version 8.0 of the SAS system for Windows (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).
| RESULTS |
|
|
|---|
The age and sex distribution of the 815 refugees is shown in Figure 1
. Seventy-six percent of the cohort was male. The age of most refugees (65%) ranged from 19 to 44 years, with only six (< 1%)
65 years of age. There were 15 pregnant women (1.8%) and 23 (2.8%) children less than two years of age. The demographics of the evaluated refugees were similar to the remainder of refugees who did not submit stool specimens or were resettled to other areas of the United States.
|
|
|
|
18 years of age, but the prevalence of infection with nonpathogenic protozoa and helminths was similar (Tables 3
|
Among 491 treated refugees who responded to the questionnaire and submitted stool specimens, 192 (39%) reported at least one gastrointestinal symptom. The most common symptom was abdominal pain (25%), followed by weight loss (11%), nausea/vomiting (10%), diarrhea (5%), and bloody stools (4%). Among the 491 refugees evaluated for symptoms, 455 (92.7%) had no parasites or only nonpathogenic protozoa found on microscopic examination; 36 (7.3%) had a pathogenic or potentially pathogenic parasite identified. Twenty-six of the 36 symptomatic refugees with parasites in their stool had G. intestinalis, and of these, 6 (23%) persons had abdominal pain, 3 had weight loss (11%), 1 had nausea/vomiting, and 1 had diarrhea (4%). None had bloody stools. Rates of symptoms were not statistically significantly different in refugees with and without G. intestinalis infection. For identifying pathogenic intestinal parasite infection, the reporting of any gastrointestinal symptom had a sensitivity of 36%, a specificity of 55%, a PPV of 7%, and an NPV of 92%. There were no significant associations between any one of the symptoms reported and the presence of any pathogenic intestinal parasite.
Laboratory quality assurance. From the specimens evaluated by the NCSLPH in the evaluation period, CDC examined all 195 positive specimens and 49 randomly selected negative specimens. Among negative specimens, results for 46 (94%) of 49 were concordant. Of the three discordant specimens, one was not analyzed because there was no identification number for the CDC laboratory, one had 1+ B. hominis, and one specimen had rare hookworm. Among positive specimens, results from CDC and NCSLPH were concordant in 129 (66%) specimen sets and discordant in 66 (34%) specimen sets. More than half (36 or 54%) of discordant results involved identification of nonpathogenic protozoa. Using CDCs results as the reference, the specificity and NPV of NCSLPH examinations were high (> 96%). Sensitivity was 100% for most pathogens, greater than 90% for the most prevalent pathogen, G. intestinalis, and 100% for all the helminths except Ascaris lumbricoides (identified by both CDC and NCSLPH in one sample and by only one laboratory in each of two other samples). Strongyloides stercoralis was identified by NCSLPH in three samples but in none by CDC. Because results were similar between the two laboratories and CDC did not examine the specimens collected after August 31, 2002, the NCSLPH findings were used for the analysis.
| DISCUSSION |
|
|
|---|
90% against these organisms.16 The prevalence of infection with S. stercoralis among treated persons in our population was also low (0.4%), but we cannot comment on the effectiveness of treatment because none of the small group of untreated persons had this infection for comparison. No significant differences were seen between the treated and untreated groups with respect to infection with Hymenolepis nana and Taenia species, other pathogens for which longer courses of albendazole may have some effectiveness. Despite the small number of untreated persons in our study, the prevalence of infections with A. lumbricoides and hookworm were similar to that of untreated refugees from Southeast Asia who were resettled in Illinois and Minnesota around the same time as our study.4,9 Strongyloides infection was also infrequent in these other refugee groups: 3.4% and less than 1% of refugees resettled in Illinois and Minnesota, respectively, had this parasite detected in their stool.4,9
Although a five-day course of albendazole has been effective for treating G. intestinalis infections in a number of studies,17–19 rates of infection were similar for treated adults (5.4%) and untreated pregnant women (6.7%). The higher prevalence of G. intestinalis infection among children (15.9%) may reflect a higher pretreatment prevalence or reinfection after treatment. Hand-to-mouth behavior places children at greater risk for giardiasis, and adults may have partial immunity from repeated exposures. Similar rates of infection with E. histolytica/dispar and nonpathogenic protozoa in our treated and untreated groups is not surprising because albendazole is not active against these organisms.
We found that reported symptoms were not correlated with findings of intestinal parasites in stool examination. Other studies have shown similar results, even in refugee and immigrant populations that had not received presumptive treatment and had higher rates of infection.5,20
In general, the concordance in results of stool examinations from the CDC laboratories and NCSLPH was excellent. Low intensity of infection and the known insensitivity of stool examination with S. stercoralis most likely contributed to the different results from the two laboratories.
We were unable to collect and test pre-departure specimens because of the urgency of resettlement, and pre-departure rates of infection may have been low because the refugee camp where our population stayed for a year provided relatively clean water and medical treatment. Another limitation of our study is that the untreated (children < 2 years of age and pregnant women) and untreated groups were not directly comparable. Pregnant women, as well as young children, may be at greater risk of infection for immunologic and behavioral reasons (e.g., pica).21
Future studies should compare the current policy of presumptive treatment of Southeast Asian refugees with a one-day course of albendazole with a five-day course and with the combination of one dose of albendazole with one or two doses of ivermectin, which is active against Strongyloides. Better information about likely infection rates with various pathogens would indicate whether short or longer courses of albendazole with or without adjunctive therapies would provide benefit. Adding a dimension of prevention effectiveness to the analysis will also be important to guide policy. We elected to treat with albendazole for five days on the basis of an analysis of hypothetical situations that showed greater cost-effectiveness for presumptive treatment than for universal screening and targeted treatment or watchful waiting when the prevalence of Strongyloides was greater than 16% or a combined prevalence of A. lumbricoides, hookworm and Trichuris trichiura was greater than 65%.9 Previous work suggests that the direct dollar costs of stateside screening are higher than the costs of disease prevented in asymptomatic Southeast Asian adult refugees,22 but models using social utility23 and other factors, and information on disease prevalence as well as treatment prior to departure would change the analysis.
Further data are also needed to guide recommendations for pregnant women and children less than two years of age. The World Health Organization recommends single-dose albendazole for infected pregnant women24 and children as young as one year of age25 because of its positive impact on nutrition, growth, infant mortality, birth weight, and hemoglobin level. Children less than two years of age are often excluded from mass treatment programs; however, once they become mobile, they are likely to be at risk for parasitic infection. Increasing experience throughout the world has demonstrated the safety of albendazole in these two groups, especially in pregnant women. Although albendazole is teratogenic in rats and rabbits, cross-sectional and prospective controlled trials show minimal risk of albendazole and mebendazole to pregnant women, even in the first trimester.26–32 In one study of pregnant women refugees in camps with access to adequate nutrition, monitoring, and medical care, deferring treatment during pregnancy did not result in adverse health effects,33 and the risk of adverse effects can be expected to decrease after migration from a parasite-endemic area.
In conclusion, this evaluation was a unique opportunity to design and implement an enhanced refugee health assessment in a partnership composed of CDC, IOM, the North Carolina Division of Public Health, including the Communicable Disease Program, Refugee Health Program, and Laboratory for Public Health, and five local health departments in North Carolina. The results of our evaluation of the impact of pre-departure treatment among Vietnamese Montagnard refugees in the context of an urgent refugee resettlement suggest that a five-day course of pre-departure albendazole treatment was effective in reducing helminthic infection.
Received August 15, 2007. Accepted for publication February 11, 2008.
Acknowledgments: We thank Suzanne Wahlquist, John MacArthur, David Addiss, and Henry Bishop (Division of Parasitic Diseases, CDC, Atlanta, GA) for their work in the laboratory and support of clinical management of infected refugees in North Carolina; George Robertson for laboratory support and Rehan Mohammad for information technology assistance at NCSLPH; the Los Angeles Quarantine Station staff and Annelise Casano for data management assistance in the Division of Global Migration and Quarantine, CDC (Atlanta, GA); Jean-Marie Maillard for support in the Communicable Disease Control Branch, North Carolina Division of Public Health; Phyllis Stevens, Debbie Turner, Lou Cook, Bernie Ihland, and the staffs of Guilford, Mecklenberg, Wake, Forsyth, and Craven counties for their implementation of the enhanced refugee health program in North Carolina; Maria Cano, Ulana Bodnar, David Kim, and Kevin Yeskey for their clinical support; Heather Wachtel, Anthony Albert, Rey Fernandez, and Joyce Elmore for assisting with medical record abstraction in North Carolina; and Linda Ekwenugo, Steve Goard, Shirley Gibson, and Recordo Gibson for data entry at CDC in Atlanta.
Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the funding agency.
Disclosure: J. Jina Shah is currently working for Novartis Vaccines. Work for this paper was done prior to employment with Novartis, and there is no conflict of interest.
* Address correspondence to J. Jina Shah, Novartis Vaccines, 4560 Horton Street, MS X-600A, Emeryville, CA 94608. E-mail: jina.shah{at}gmail.com ![]()
Authors addresses: J. Jina Shah, Novartis Vaccines, 4560 Horton Street, MS X-600A, Emeryville, CA 94608, Tel: 510-923-5509, Fax: 510-923-3450, E-mail: jina.shah{at}gmail.com. Susan A. Maloney, International Emerging Infections Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Mailstop D59, Atlanta, GA 30329-4018, Tel: 404-639-4448, Fax: 404-639-4441. Yecai Liu and Martin S. Cetron, Division of Global Migration and Quarantine, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30329-4018, Tel: 404-498-1600, Fax: 404-639-4441. Elaine W. Flagg, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Mailstop E46 Atlanta, GA 30329-4018. Stephanie P. Johnston and Patricia P. Wilkins, Division of Parasitic Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, Mailstop F36, Atlanta, GA 30341-3717, Tel: 770-488-7044, Fax: 770-488-3115. Suzanna A. Young, Refugee Health Program, North Carolina Division of Public Health, Department of Health and Human Services, 5505 Six Forks Road, 1915 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1915, Tel: 919-707-5204, Fax: 919-870-4800. Robert Weston, Omak Clinic, 916 Koala Drive, Omak, WA 98841, Tel: 509-826-1800, Fax: 509-826-7916. Samuel Merritt, North Carolina State Laboratory of Public Health, 306 North Wilmington Street, PO Box 28047, Mail Service Center 1918, Raleigh, NC 27611-8047. Vincent Keane, 84 Napier Street, Cottesloe, Western Australia, 6011, Australia, Tel: 61-8-9385-2450. Jaime Calderon, International Organization for Migration, Surya Building Floor 12A, JI. M. H. Thamrin Kav. 9, Jakarta 10350, Indonesia, Tel: 62-21-3983-8528, Fax: 62-21-3983-8528. Donald J. Sharp, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Mailstop G24, 1600 Clifton Road, NE, Atlanta, GA 30333. Louise Causer, National Centre in HIV Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Sydney, New South Wales 2052 Australia, Tel: 61-2-9385-0900, Fax: 61-2-9385-1874. James H. Maguire, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 660 West Redwood Street, Howard Hall, Suite 100, Room 102B, Baltimore, MD 21201, Tel: 410-706-0206, Fax: 410-706-8013.
| REFERENCES |
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |