|
|
||||||||
| ABSTRACT |
|
|
|---|
3 children under the age of 12 years, low parental educational level, drinking bottled water, and living in close contact with dogs. Washing hands before meals had a protective effect. From these significant risk factors, multiple modes of transmission of G. duodenalis were suggested in this population. | INTRODUCTION |
|
|
|---|
G. duodenalis isolated from humans and other mammals is morphologically identical. Molecular studies revealed a substantial level of genetic diversity between G. duodenalis isolates. G. duodenalis recovered from humans fall into the two major genetic assemblages, i.e., A and B. Other distinct groups, assemblages C, D, E, F, and G, are animal-specific.3 However, assemblage A and B have also both been isolated from animals, indicating that these 2 assemblages have zoonotic potential. The existence of subgenotypes within each assemblage was also identified. Assemblage A comprises two distinct clusters, AI and AII, while assemblage B consists of BIII and BIV. To date, only one study showed strong evidence supporting zoonotic transmission of giaridiasis.4
Most studies in Thailand examined the prevalence of giardiasis especially in schoolchildren and in day-care centers.5–7 However, at the present time, no information on risk factors of giardiasis in Thailand is available. In the present study, we conducted a cross-sectional study of giardiasis in rural primary schoolchildren to determine the prevalence and the associated risk factors. In addition, genotypic characterization of G. duodenalis isolates from these children was also performed. The epidemiology of the infection with different Giardia genotypes would significantly contribute to the understanding of its sources and modes of transmission.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|
|
|---|
Stool collection and examination. Stool specimens were examined for intestinal parasites immediately after the collection by wet-smear preparation in normal saline and Lugols iodine solution. All specimens were then processed with the formalin/ethyl acetate sedimentation concentration and the sodium nitrate flotation techniques to detect G. duodenalis and other intestinal parasites. Blastocystis hominis was identified after a short-term in vitro cultivation using Jones medium supplemented with 10% horse serum because this method is more sensitive than wet-smear preparation and concentration techniques.8,9 The cultures were incubated at 37°C for 48–72 hours and then examined at 10x and 40x magnification under a light microscope. Every stool specimen was examined for Cryptosporidium spp. and microsporidia using modified acid-fast and Gram-chromotrope staining, respectively.
Genotypic characterization. The purified Giardia cysts were washed thrice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). DNA extraction was performed using FTA filter paper as previously described.10 Genotypic characterization of G. duodenalis was determined by polymorphic sites using semi-nested PCR of a 432-bp region of the glutamate dehydrogenase (gdh) gene and PCR-RFLP method described by Read et al. (2004).11 Briefly, amplification of the gdh gene was performed using primer pairs of GDHeF/GDHiR and GDHiF/GDHiR. A total mixture of 50 µL contained DNA template using a piece of FTA filter paper, 1x PCR buffer, 1.0 U of Taq polymerase, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM dNTP, and 25 pmol of each primer. The PCR condition was as follows: 1 cycle of 94°C for 2 min, 56°C for 1 min and 72°C for 2 min, followed by 55 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 56°C for 20 s and 72°C for 45 s and a final extension of 72°C for 7 min. RFLP analysis was performed by digesting 10 µL of the PCR product with 5 U of NlaIV in 1x enzyme buffer (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA) in a final volume of 20 µL for 3 h at 37°C. PCR products and restriction fragments were separated by electrophoresis in 2% agarose gel. Gels were stained with ethidium bromide and visualized under UV light and documented on high-density printing paper by using a UVIsave gel-documentation system (UVItech, Cambridge, England). DNA sequencing of PCR products was also performed to compare results with the sequences of the following GenBank entries: L40509 (G. duodenalis assemblage AI), L40510 (G. duodenalis assemblage AII), AF069059 (G. duodenalis assemblage BIII), and L40508 (G. duodenalis assemblage BIV). Multiple alignment and restriction map analysis were performed using BioEdit (version 7) software.
Questionnaires. To determine the risk factors and outcomes of giardiasis, standardized questionnaires for collection of demographic data, sanitary behaviors including cooking and eating habits, source and treatment method of drinking water, pets or animal contact, and also history of present gastrointestinal symptoms were used in this study. Diarrhea was defined as a change in their normal pattern of bowel movements and at least 3 loose stools during a 24-h period, and dysentery was defined as at least one passage of mucous bloody stool in 1 day. The weight and the height of each student were recorded at school to determine their nutritional status using Thailands standard growth curve, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand, 1999. Parents of the enrolled students were asked to complete the questionnaires.
Statistical analysis.
The association between potential risk factors and G. duodenalis carriage was assessed by the
2 test with a 95% confidence interval. Univariate analysis was performed using EpiInfo, version 6.04b. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals and P values were calculated to compare outcomes among study groups. Logistic regression using SPSS for Windows, version 9.6, was performed for multivariate analysis to assess the independent association of risk factors and G. duodenalis.
| RESULTS |
|
|
|---|
|
Characteristics of the enrolled students.
Table 2
shows the characteristics of the enrolled students. These schoolchildren ranged in age from 5 to 14 years old. Giardiasis was more prevalent in younger students. Prevalence in the students of age 5–9 years was 9.0%, which was significantly higher than those over 9 years old (2.9%) (P = 0.004,
2 test). The prevalences of giardiasis were not significantly different between groups consisting of differences in sex, nutritional status, and clinical symptoms (Table 2
).
|
3 children under age 12 years, a low parental educational level (less than primary school), and people living in proximity to dogs for more than once a week. These groups had a greater risk of acquiring giardiasis. Multivariate analysis also confirmed that these risk factors were independently associated with giardiasis in this population (Table 4
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|
|
|---|
Most cases in this population were asymptomatic, so we made the choice of conducting a cross-sectional rather than a case-control study. Because giardiasis is a chronic disease, some of the cases might not be recent infections. This would mean that persons who answered questions related to specific risks might have suffered from recall bias. However, most of the questions used in our study appeared to be general rather than specific in nature. Hence, the results should not be affected by this possibility. In several studies, outbreak of giardiasis especially in developed countries usually indicated waterborne transmission. Significant risks identified in these studies included drinking untreated water, swallowing water while swimming, and even drinking tap water.15–20 In the present study, multivariate analysis showed that drinking bottled water presented a 2.5 times greater risk of acquiring giardiasis. However, most of the bottled water consumed by this population was distributed by regional water companies, and the quality of the bottled water has not been investigated in this study. The safety of the drinking water is ensured by filtration processes because cysts are relatively resistant to chlorine and ozone.21
In this study, we used PCR-RFLP of the ghd gene to characterize G. duodenalis. Although amplification of the gdh gene was less sensitive than other gene loci, such as SSU-rRNA gene, subgenotypes of Giardia could be differentiated using a single gene locus.10,11 Only 42.2% of positive specimens (12 of 33) were successfully characterized for their genotype. From our findings, it might be postulated that, in this population, only assemblage A, subgenotype II of G. duodenalis was transmitted via water. However, there was no statistical measurement to support this finding because the sample size was too small. In addition, examination of water for G. duodenalis with genotypic characterization should be done.
Both assemblage A, subgenotype II and assemblage B, sub-genotype IV of G. duodenalis can be identified both in humans and animals; hence, it is possible that these genotypes are zoonoses. However, epidemiological evidence supporting zoonotic transmission is rather limited. Until recently, molecular epidemiological evidence strongly supported giardiasis as a zoonosis. The study by Traub et al. (2004) showed that humans owning dogs infected with Giardia had a greater risk of getting parasitized than those who had not. In addition, some humans and dogs living in the same household harbored the same genotypes of G. duodenalis.4 A recent study in Thailand showed that some dogs living in temple communities might serve as a source of G. duodenalis for human infection because infected human cases in this community contained assemblage A, which is similar to that found in dogs.22 In the present study, we found that schoolchildren who had close contact with dogs had an approximately 2 times greater risk of acquiring giardiasis. In addition, assemblage A, subgenotype II and assemblage B, subgenotype IV were identified in these schoolchildren. Thus, both epidemiological data and G. duodenalis assemblages identified in these children might support the zoonotic transmission from dogs to human.
A study of clinical presentations of giardiasis in Dutch patients showed that assemblage A isolates were detected in patients with intermittent diarrhea, while assemblage B isolates were present in patients with persistent diarrhea.24 Another case-control study showed the significant association between assemblage A, subgenotype AII infections and diarrhea.25 In contrast, Cedillo-Rivera and colleagues (2003) reported that assemblages A and B exhibit no apparent differences in virulence, suggesting that host factors play a dominant role in determining the clinical course of the infection.26 In this study, no specific symptoms were significantly observed in those infected children. In addition, all 12 children whose Giardia was characterized had no GI symptoms. Thus, further studies need to be carried out to confirm the correlation of the assemblages and their clinical symptoms.
Person-to-person transmission is well recognized in crowded populations with exposure to infected persons. In developed countries, several reports put the emphasis on this mode of transmission in day-care centers.27 In developing countries, person-to-person transmission could occur in the community, especially in households with numerous children.28 The prevalence of giardiasis in this population was significantly greater in younger children. Thus, it is not surprising that having
3 children under age 12 years and sharing the same house presented a 2.5 times greater risk of getting the infection. This indicates that person-to-person transmission is also an important transmission pathway of giardiasis in this community.
Personal hygiene is a critical factor for children with giardiasis worldwide. In this study, children who washed their hands before meals were at a lower risk for Giardia infection. Educational achievement, especially for those affected children, can only occur effectively through the support of a school health program.22 To ensure that children are being adequately cared for at home, provision of health education to parents or caretakers needs to be addressed, particularly for parents who have had no formal education, as children under their care have a higher risk of getting infected with Giardia.
Most epidemiological studies of giardiasis indicated waterborne, foodborne, or person-to-person transmission, depending on the study population.23 Multiple modes of transmission of giardiasis were previously reported in only a few studies, most of which were conducted in developed countries.18,19,29,30 Two case-control studies were conducted in Auckland, New Zealand, in which infected cases included those of different regions, so it should not be surprising to identify multiple modes of transmission of giardiasis.18,19 White et al. (1989) and Katz et al. (2006) also reported multiple modes of transmission of giardiasis in rather specific populations, i.e., residents, employees and children of nursing home and country-club residents, respectively.29,30 Our study was conducted in a different setting, i.e., a rural community in Thailand, where the evidence of multiple modes of transmission of giardiasis, including person-to-person, zoonotic, and waterborne transmission, could be observed. This indicates that the nature of transmission of giardiasis varied depending on each population. Hence, control strategies of giardiasis in each population should be based on the epidemiological information for each population.
Received May 14, 2007. Accepted for publication December 7, 2007.
Acknowledgments: We acknowledge all participants and staff of this primary school. The authors thank Francois Le Berre for his assistance in the preparation of the manuscript.
Financial support: This study was financially supported by the Thailand Research Fund (BRG 4880003).
* Address correspondence to Saovanee Leelayoova, Department of Parasitology, Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, 315 Ratchawithi Road, Ratchathewi, Bangkok 10400, Thailand. E-mail: s_leelayoova{at}scientist.com ![]()
Authors addresses: Supawat Ratanapo, Suthipong Soontrapa, Chakri Faithed, and Ram Rangsin, Department of Military and Community Medicine, Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok 10400, Thailand. Mathirut Mungthin, Tawee Naaglor, Phunlerd Piyaraj, Paanjit Taamasri, and Saovanee Leelayoova, Department of Parasitology, Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, 315 Ratchawithi Rd., Ratchathewi, Bangkok 10400, Thailand, Telephone/ Fax: +662 354 7761, E-mail: s_leelayoova{at}scientist.com.
| REFERENCES |
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Leelayoova, S. Siripattanapipong, U. Thathaisong, T. Naaglor, P. Taamasri, P. Piyaraj, and M. Mungthin Drinking Water: A Possible Source of Blastocystis spp. Subtype 1 Infection in Schoolchildren of a Rural Community in Central Thailand Am J Trop Med Hyg, September 1, 2008; 79(3): 401 - 406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |