| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
 |
ABSTRACT |
 TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
|
INTRODUCTION |
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
The introduction of VL transmission in the region motivated an intensive control program using the traditional measures of infection detection in dogs, with culling of seropositive animals and insecticide spraying of households during the rainy season. In parallel, epidemiologic and control studies were undertaken to understand the epidemiology of VL in the region.
Because almost all data substantiating the existing control measures derive from areas of high-level transmission, there is a need to generate epidemiologic data on VL in this region, which is apparently an area of medium-level transmission.
Existing data in Brazil suggest that from 12% to 20% of infected humans may develop clinically overt disease, but this is linked to the prevalence of childhood malnutrition and possibly to other factors. Recent literature has correlated asymptomatic infection to clinical cases, thus suggesting occurrence in clusters and, in at least one study, implying that asymptomatic humans could constitute a reservoir.4,5
This study was conducted to obtain preliminary data on asymptomatic human VL infection in the urban area of Araçatuba and to identify possible contributory factors, such as sex, age, presence of dogs in the household, or human cases in the area.
This study also had the secondary objective of testing the usefulness of the K39 dipstick test for routine use in control programs. Although it is accepted that this test is not the most sensitive one for detecting asymptomatic cases, it is a fairly simple and practical test for field use and can be used in quick prevalence studies to support control programs. One advantage that it has over the standard skin test is that, unlike the latter, it is able to differentiate between mucocutaneous leishmaniasis (MCL) and VL, which is an important issue in this region, because MCL is common.6,7 This should be an important issue when planning control measures.
|
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
Study area. Araçatuba has 170,000 inhabitants, and 97.64% of this population lives in the urban area of the municipality. It is at an altitude 398 m above sea level and is located 140 km from the Paraná River and the state of Mato Grosso do Sul, where canine and human VLs are endemic. It is a regional economic center, with adequate sanitation (100% of households have piped water and sewerage systems) and an active economy based on sugar cane.8
The city is divided into eight areas for vector-borne disease control (i.e., five urban and three rural or semi-rural areas), and each area is divided into five sectors. According to Brazilian law, rural and urban areas within a municipality are defined by the municipality itself, but urban areas usually encompass populations living in areas that have urban infrastructure and urban economic activity. Two sectors, from different urban areas, were selected, named, and justified as follows: A1, this area had the highest number of confirmed human cases up to 2003 and has low socioeconomic status (Table 1
); A2, this was where the first human VL case was detected, in 1999, and is an area with good socioeconomic status and a lower number of reported cases (Table 1).
|
Study population. Each block and house was numbered, and a census was conducted. Residents were asked to answer a questionnaire on how long they had lived in the area, what backyard vegetation they had, and how many dogs they had. Houses were selected through a random number table.
A nurse visited the houses selected, and the people living there were asked to participate in the study. After giving their informed consent, blood samples were taken from all residents who were > 2 years old. Data were collected regarding demographics, how long the participants had lived in the area and in Araçatuba, any previous residence in VL-endemic areas, and their existing and previous illnesses. Individuals were screened for reported symptoms, co-morbidities, and ongoing treatment. During the interview, the participants of study had answered on the presence of dogs in the house, in the present or in the preceding 2 years, presence of sick animals (dogs), and death of dogs in the residence. Governmental organizations (Superintendência de Controle de Endemias and Centro de Zoonoses) were informed of canine infection rates.
Tests. The Kalazar Detect dipstick test was used. This is an immunochromatographic test (Inbios International, Seattle, WA) that was designed for qualitative detection of antibodies against Leishmania chagasi rK39 antigen in serum during infection.9,10 Asymptomatic cases with recent and still active infection can be identified by this test.6,7
The blood samples (2–3 mL) were collected from individuals, without anticoagulant, and transported at 4–8°C, and the samples were centrifuged for 10 minutes to separate the sera. In a Nunc 96-well plate, two or three drops of chase buffer per well were mixed with 20 µL of serum and finally placed on a cellulose strip. Following the manufacturer’s instructions, test results were taken to be positive when two bands (a control band and a positive test band) appeared within 10 minutes. Test results were taken to be negative if only the control band appeared. The test is qualitative, and the manufacturer indicates that a faint band should be considered to be a positive result.
Statistical analysis.
The sample size (N) was estimated based on the following data: Araçatuba had a mean number of confirmed cases of 25.6 reported for the period 1999–2004, an incidence rate of 15.3 cases per 100,000 inhabitants. If this represents 10% of the infected persons, we would have ~153 cases. Our study was a pilot study, because there are still many unanswered questions on VL asymptomatic infection prevalence rate and on the K39 dipstick test. Differences in proportions for categorical variables were analyzed using 
2, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
|
RESULTS |
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
).
|
and 4. Patients with active clinically VL were not identified during the period of study.
|
|
In A2, only two homes with positive results had dogs. One home had dogs over the preceding 2 years that had not died of VL, and the remaining homes had never had any dogs previously. In six homes, there were dogs with VL, but there was no evidence of human infection.
In A1, as in A2, no association was found with dogs. There were 17 positive results in homes that had no dogs, and of these, four had never had dogs and another four had had dogs with VL. In other homes that had dogs with VL over the preceding 2 years, there were no positive results. Another two cases were in individuals who had or had had dogs, but without any evidence of VL. There were two individuals with positive tests in a home with dogs that died over the preceding 2 years. In 10 homes where there had been infected dogs over the preceding 2 years, there were no humans with positive results.
|
DISCUSSION |
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
The data presented are the preliminary results from a study on the use of prevalence and distribution of asymptomatic human cases as an indicator for disease transmission in Araçatuba.
Normally in Brazil and other countries, VL occurs in children 
5 years of age. In Araçatuba, the epidemiologic context seemed different, because clinical cases were occurring at all ages (children, teenagers, and adults) and solely in urban areas. There was no correlation between age and positive serology, as also found in an outbreak described in Salvador (northeastern Brazil), possibly because both areas were places with recent L. chagasi transmission.11 The same was found with asymptomatic cases: positive results were found in all ages.
The role of asymptomatic humans in VL transmission has recently been a subject for discussion,12 but that was not the intention of this study. Clinical cases of VL are concentrated in certain areas of Araçatuba, mostly on the poorer outskirts of the urban area. Our data suggest a socioeconomic gradient in the distribution of asymptomatic cases. This socioeconomic gradient has been found in other vector-borne diseases, such as dengue and Indian VL.13,14 The presence of dogs in the home does not seem to be a significant determinant of human infection, notwithstanding evidence to the contrary from other areas.15,16 Possibly the presence and number of dogs in the home is easily confounded with socioeconomic factors, such as household human density or a favorable environment for L. longipalpis breeding.
The data from this study suggest that human infection is more common than can be inferred from the occurrence of clinical cases. Further studies are needed before seroprevalence studies in humans can become a tool for VL control programs, although this seems promising.
Received July 5, 2006. Accepted for publication July 19, 2007.
Acknowledgments: The authors acknowledge the contributions made by its field agents in Araçatuba.
Financial support: This work was supported by the Endemic Disease Control Authority (Superintendência de Controle de Endemias, SUCEN).
Disclosure: Luis J. Silva is currently employed by Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics. This statement is made in the interest of full disclosure and not because the authors consider this a conflict of interest.
* Address correspondence to Luiz J. da Silva, Nanuque 115 apto. A4 112, São Paulo 05302-030, Brazil. E-mail: ljsilva{at}unicamp.br 
Authors’ addresses: Sandra C. Barão, Mariângela R. Resende, and Luiz J. da Silva, Núcleo de Vigilância Epidemiológica, Hospital de Clínicas da Unicamp, Rua Vital Brasil, 251, Cidade Universitária Zeferino Vaz 13083-888 Campinas, SP, Brazil; E-mails: scbarao{at}hotmail.com, mresende{at}hc.unicamp.br, and ljsilva{at}unicamp.br. Vera L. de Fonseca Camargo-Neves, Grupo de Estudo em Leishmaniose, Superintendência de Controle de Endemias, Secretaria de Estado de Saúde Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 351, 1° andar, 01246-000 São Paulo, SP, Brazil, E-mail: veracamargo{at}saude.sp.gov.br.
|
REFERENCES |
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
