|
|
||||||||


| ABSTRACT |
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|
|
|---|
In addition to artemisinin-based combinations, a fixed combination of atovaquone-proguanil (Malarone®; GlaxoSmith-Kline, Research Triangle Park, NC), has previously been shown to be effective in the treatment of drug-resistant P. falciparum malaria with cure rates significantly higher than amodiaquine,2 mefloquine,3 chloroquine, and sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine.4 The mechanism of action of atovaquone is by inhibition of parasite mitochondrial electron transport at the level of the cytochrome bc1 complex and collapse of mitochondrial membrane potential.5,6 Proguanil inhibits plasmodial dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) primarily through its metabolite cycloguanil, which results in disruption of parasite DNA synthesis.7 Both in vivo and in vitro studies have demonstrated synergistic anti-malarial action of atovaquone and proguanil, which results in high cure rates in patients with drug-resistant malaria, even when infections are caused by parasites containing mutations in DHFR known to confer resistance to cycloguanil.8,9 The mechanism of synergy of proguanil with atovaquone is postulated to be by its biguanide mode of action rather than through its cycloguanil metabolite.9 Recent studies have reported several cases of atovaquone-proguanil treatment failure in which resistance was linked to a single amino acid mutation at position 268 of cytochrome b (cyt b), resulting in a tyrosine to serine1015 or tyrosine to asparagine substitution.16 In addition to these cases, a small number of treatment failures have been reported with parasites possessing wild-type cyt b. However, to date no alternative molecular mechanisms of resistance have been defined.17,18
Atovaquone-proguanil is currently a first-line agent for the treatment of P. falciparum malaria. However, there is a paucity of recent data examining the efficacy of atovaquone-proguanil in the treatment of multidrug-resistant malaria. This paucity, combined with an increasing number of case reports of atovaquone-proguanil treatment failure, indicate that continued monitoring of the effectiveness of this drug combination will be essential to detect the emergence and spread of atovaquone-proguanil resistance. We conducted an open-label trial on the Thailand-Myanmar border to examine the efficacy of atovaquone-proguanil in an area of multidrug resistance and herein report an overall cure rate of 98%.
| METHODS AND MATERIALS |
|
|
|---|
Study population. Sequential patients with acute, uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria were screened for inclusion in the study. Patients were eligible if they were more than 14 years of age, had a microscopically confirmed P. falciparum infection, had a urine test result negative for chloroquine or sulfonamides, were able to tolerate oral therapy, and were able to give informed consent. Patients were excluded if they fulfilled any one of the World Health Organization criteria for severe or complicated malaria, had an allergy to atovaquone or proguanil, had a history of anti-malarial drug administration within two weeks of presentation, or were pregnant or breast-feeding.
Procedures. One hundred forty patients fulfilled eligibility criteria and after providing informed consent were enrolled in the study. Patients were administered a fixed dose of atovaquone (1,000 mg/day) plus proguanil (400 mg/day) once a day with food for three days. Study drug was provided as directly observed therapy by the site investigators. Participants were hospitalized for the duration of treatment and asked to remain in Bangkok, an area of non-transmission of malaria, for the duration of the 28-day follow-up period.
Giemsa-stained thick and thin blood films were prepared every six hours for quantification of parasitemia until participants were malaria smear negative. Thereafter, thick and thin blood films were taken weekly beginning on day 7 until day 28 and/or with any recurrent fever or symptoms compatible with malaria. Parasitemia was quantified per 1,000 red blood cells on a thin film or per 200 white blood cells on a thick film and expressed as parasites per microliter. A slide was considered negative after examination of 200 oil-immersion fields. Oral temperature was recorded every four hours until patients were afebrile (temperature < 37.5°C) for at least 24 hours. After enrollment, participants were examined daily for clinical signs of malaria. Thereafter, participants were examined weekly on days 7, 14, 21, and 28.
Outcome.
The primary endpoint was the 28-day cure rate. The response to treatment was based on the World Health Organization (WHO) classification system.19 A sensitive response (S) is indicated by parasite clearance within seven days with no recrudescence during the 28-day follow up period. Resistant responses (RIRIII) were categorized according to the WHO criteria for 4-aminoquinolines: RI = parasite clearance within seven days, followed by recrudescence within 28 days; RII = reduction of parasitemia to < 25% of initial parasite count at 48 hours, but without total clearance within a 7-day period; RIII = parasitemia
25% of initial parasite count at 48 hours after initiation of therapy.
Data analysis. Descriptive statistics were calculated for continuous variables. Geometric means were calculated for initial parasitemia. Participants who failed to complete 28 days of follow-up were excluded from the efficacy analysis. Cure rates were calculated from the ratio of S response/total of S + RI + RII + RIII, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Parasite clearance times (PCTs) and fever clearance times (FCTs) were calculated for efficacy analysis. Mean PCTs were calculated from initiation of anti-malarial treatment until the blood films were negative for P. falciparum asexual stages. Similarly, FCTs were calculated from the commencement of therapy until the body temperature decreased to < 37.5°C and the patient remained afebrile for at least 24 hours.
Recrudescent infection. For patients with recurrent parasitemia, genomic DNA was extracted from whole blood samples taken on the day of presentation (pre-treatment) and the day of recurrence using Qiagen (Valencia, CA) columns.20 To distinguish clinical failure from re-infection, a gene encoding merozoite surface protein-1 was amplified by a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and subjected to genotyping using single-strand conformational polymorphism analysis, as described.21 In addition, the cyt b gene was amplified by PCR and sequenced to detect mutations that have been linked to resistance to atovaquone-proguanil in vivo.1016
| RESULTS |
|
|
|---|
|
|
Sequencing of the cyt b gene of isolates from the day of presentation and day of treatment failures from all three patients who failed atovaquone-proguanil therapy showed that all isolates at time of presentation and at time of recrudescence contained wild-type sequence at position 268 and at position 133 of cyt b.
| DISCUSSION |
|
|
|---|
Previous studies reported that the mean PCTs in patients treated with atovaquone-proguanil ranged from 46 to 72 hours.4,2225 Consistent with these observations, we observed a mean PCT of 41.9 hours. Similarly, the mean FCT was 37.1 hours, which is well within the range reported previously.4,2225 Together, these data suggest that atovaquone-proguanil remains an effective drug 10 years after its introduction for the treatment of multidrug-resistant P. falciparum malaria acquired in Southeast Asia.
In this trial, two patients with recrudescent parasitemia were identified as atovaquone-proguanil treatment failures, as well as one case of RIII resistance. Previous studies have linked atovaquone-proguanil treatment failure with mutations at position 268 (Tyr268Asn or Tyr268Ser) of plasmodial cyt b.1016 However, several other reported cases have failed to establish an association between atovaquone-proguanil treatment failure and cyt b mutations.17,18 Consistent with these latter reports, we found no mutations at position 268 of cyt b in parasite isolates from patients with recrudescent parasitemia or RIII resistance in this study. In addition, we did not find mutations at position 133 of cyt b, which has been associated with atovaquone resistance in vitro.27 Collectively, these observations suggest that other mechanisms were involved in these treatment failures.
There are a number of potential explanations accounting for treatment failure in these cases. They include failure to initiate or complete therapy; vomiting, diarrhea, or other gastrointestinal conditions resulting in inadequate absorption of active drug components; or a novel molecular basis of resistance including mutations at other sites in cyt b or in other putative drug targets. Therapy in this trial was directly observed; however, drug levels were not determined and we cannot eliminate the possibility of inadequate absorption. Mutations at alternative sites on the cyt b gene or in an, as yet, unidentified new target remain a possibility. A number of mutations in cyt b, in addition to those at position 268 and 133, have been reported in association with in vitro resistance to atovaquone. However, none of these have been demonstrated in clinical isolates associated with in vivo treatment failure. Collectively, the data suggest that cyt b mutations at position 268 are sufficient, but may not be necessary, for atovaquone-proguanil treatment failure. However, further studies exploring alternative molecular mechanisms of resistance to atovaquone-proguanil are required to confirm or refute this hypothesis.
In summary, 97.8% of patients enrolled in this study were cured by a standard three-day course of atovaquone-proguanil therapy. Our data show that atovaquone-proguanil is still efficacious in the treatment of uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria acquired in a region where multidrug-resistant isolates are prevalent. Continued surveillance for the emergence and spread of atovaquone-proguanilresistant malaria will be essential to prolong the lifespan of this combination agent.
Received October 11, 2006. Accepted for publication January 1, 2007.
Financial support: This study was supported by a Canada Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Team Grant in Malaria (Kevin C. Kain), operating grant MT-13721 (Kevin C. Kain), Genome Canada through the Ontario Genomics Institute (Kevin C. Kain), Physicians Services Incorporated (Kevin C. Kain), and CIHR Canada Research Chair (Kevin C. Kain).
Disclosure: The authors have no conflict of interest with respect to this study.
* Address correspondence to Kevin C. Kain, Tropical Disease Unit, University Health NetworkToronto General Hospital, EN-13-214, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2C4. E-mail: kevin.kain{at}uhn.on.ca ![]()
These authors contributed equally to this report. ![]()
Authors addresses: Srivicha Krudsood, Nopaddon Tangpukdee, Wipa Thanachartwet, Wattana Leowattana, Karnchana Pornpininworakij, and Sornchai Looareesuwan, Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand. Samir N. Patel, Andrea K. Boggild, and Kevin C. Kain, Tropical Disease Unit, University Health NetworkToronto General Hospital, EN-13-214, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2C4, Telephone: 416-340-3535, Fax: 4165955826, E-mail: kevin.kain{at}uhn.on.ca.
| REFERENCES |
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Obaldia III, W. Milhous, and D. Kyle Adaptation of a Thai Multidrug-Resistant C2A Clone of Plasmodium falciparum to Aotus Monkeys and Its Preliminary in vivo Antimalarial Drug Efficacy-Resistance Profile Am J Trop Med Hyg, October 1, 2009; 81(4): 587 - 594. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.K. Roe and G. Pasvol New developments in the management of malaria in adults QJM, October 1, 2009; 102(10): 685 - 693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |