|
|
||||||||
| ABSTRACT |
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|
|
|---|
More than 90% of the malaria cases occur in foci of stable transmission disseminated along the Maroni River (Western border with Surinam) and the Oyapock River (Eastern border with Brazil). The coastal area along the Atlantic Ocean has almost no malaria transmission. The malaria parasites responsible for most cases reported each year include mainly Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax. The former is most predominant in the Maroni area and the latter is more frequent in the Oyapock area. Knowledge about the epidemiology of malaria is sketchy in this region, notably about places and circumstances of infection. The principal vector mosquito is Anopheles darlingi, which is the most anthropophilic mosquito in South America, and is known to be endophagic and exophagic, to breed mainly along the rivers, and to have a nocturnal activity.3 However, An. darlingi seems to be able to modify and adapt its behavior according to the characteristics of the region.4
Malaria transmission can vary from village to village but also from household to household in the same village. These patterns probably reflect a composite of heterogeneities in the environment, vector distribution, human vector contact, and household and human host factors. Successful control of malaria depends upon detailed knowledge of its epidemiology, including social and economic factors. This study attempted to identify risk factors of such variations in a forest setting in Camopi village in French Guiana among Amerindian children less than five years of age, a population that is most vulnerable to malaria.
| METHODS |
|
|
|---|
Study design and population. A retrospective study using an open cohort design was carried out with all Wayampi and Emerillon children less than 1 to 5 years of age between January 1 and December 31, 2001. Informed consent was provided by the legal guardian of every child before admission into the study. The study was reviewed and approved by the Ethical Committee of Antilles-Guyane.
Follow-up and all medical data were managed by the Camopi Health Center by two physicians, two nurses, and one Amerindian assistant. The children came to the health center approximately once a month, generally at the time of illness. Data for children for whom follow-up by the Health Center had been interrupted were right censored at the interruption date.
Clinical and parasitologic diagnosis.
Malaria was defined as fever (temperature
38°C at consultation or fever within the past 48 hours) associated with Plasmodium asexual forms on a thin blood smear. All thin blood smears were first analyzed in Camopi by a trained nurse and then checked at the parasitologic laboratory at Cayenne Hospital. The list of all clinical malaria episodes, their date of occurrence, and Plasmodium species identified was based on records of treated malaria patients obtained from the Cayenne Hospital. This list was then used in Camopi with the "carnet de santé" (a personal booklet of medical information kept at the Camopi Health Center) for each child.
Retrospective collection of risk factors. Environmental exposure was evaluated by direct observation of the patients houses. All distances (to the river, the nearest home, the forest, and the health center) were evaluated by s geographic positioning system or direct measurement for distances < 50 meters. A standardized questionnaire about behavioral habits, use of prophylactic measures, knowledge of malaria, and social and economic status was administered individually to every childs mother during the visits.
Statistical analysis. Possible risk or protective factors were adjusted for potential confounders using the Cox proportional-hazards model. Entry date into the study was January 1, 2001 or the birth date for children born after this date. Exit date was December 31, 2001 or the fifth birthday of a child if he or she was born before January 1, 2001. Time under risk was the time from entry in the study until exit. We did not substract any period for any children receiving treatment for a current episode because some children may have had a P. falciparum malaria attack shortly after a P. vivax malaria attack (all malaria attacks were treated when diagnosed).
The influence of each variable on malaria incidence was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox modeling. The proportional hazards assumption was tested graphically and with tests based on Schoenfeld residuals.
Changes in the risk of a first malaria attack were investigated using a single-failure Cox model. This concerned the first episode after inclusion in the study, assuming that some children may have had a malaria attack before inclusion. Factors influencing all the malaria attacks were then investigated using a multiple-failure Cox model (taking into account all the malaria attacks and making no difference between a relapse case and a new malaria case). In both instances, univariate and a multivariate analysis was carried out.
All models were stratified by year of birth, accounting for age (which violated the proportional hazards assumption) and the period of birth (malaria incidence variations according the year). The most parsimonious model was obtained using the log-likelihood ratio test to remove variables from the saturated model. Convergence of this model with both forward and backward automatic stepwise elimination was checked. STATA version 8 software was used for all statistical analyses (STATA Corporation, College Station, TX).
| RESULTS |
|
|
|---|
Description of the population. Forty four percent of the children were Emerillon, 53.5% were Wayampi, and 2.5% were mixed Wayampi-Emerillon. Eighteen percent of the children lived in Camopi village and the others lived on the Oyapock River (59.9%) and the Camopi River (40.1%). The median survival time without a malaria attack was two years, seven months. One percent of the children had their first attack before the age of four months. There were only nine hospitalizations (1.33%) and there were no deaths during follow-up.
Only 25.3% of the mothers could name at least one anti-malarial treatment, and only 39.5% mentioned mosquitoes as malaria vectors. However, malaria was considered a severe and urgent disease by most people (75.3%). In Camopi, 69.8% of the children spent all their nights under bed nets. Many families used insecticides and cutaneous repellent (65.7% and 67.7%, respectively).
Malaria incidence.
Overall annual incidence during the study period was 935 per 1,000 person-years with 246 per 1,000 person-years attributed to P. falciparum and 643 per 1,000 person-years attributed to P. vivax. This varied greatly from year to year (Figure 1
). However, P. vivax remained the most incriminated species (69.8% of all malaria cases). Malaria incidence also varied by age with a peak of clinical malaria episodes in children between 2 and 3 years of age (Figure 2
). We did not observe any significant variation of malaria incidence between the dry season (from July to December) and the rainy season (from January to June) (P = 0.143, by chi-square test).
|
|
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|
|
|---|
Apart from the high risk associated with proximity to the river, the presence of water around the home (swamps, puddles, wells, containers) was associated with malaria only for swamps and only by univariate analysis. This suggests that river banks may be the essential vector breeding sites in Camopi. This is consistent with another study conducted in Belize, in which the malaria vector is the same as in Camopi.10
Children living in isolated villages, as well as those living in isolated homes, had an increased risk of malaria. However, a higher number of people in the same home (more than six occupants) was associated with a higher risk of malaria. Human aggregation is likely to increase the probability for vectors near homes to be infected. Similar observations have also been made in northeastern Venezuela.11
Hematinic treatment was associated with subsequent malaria attacks by univariate single failure analysis, and after adjustments, by multiple-failures analysis. This association has been previously described.12,13 Hematinic treatment could increase the number of reticulocytes and transform a latent infection into a symptomatic attack.14 This suggests that increased surveillance of children receiving hematinic treatment may be useful. The role of treatment for intestinal protozoa is difficult to explain; the presence of parasites was not documented and it was not a time-dependent variable. Therefore, it is unclear if being infected with intestinal worms was a protective factor. Conversely, if treated children were infected, this would imply that intestinal protozoa infections would be associated with a higher risk of malaria.
Family income was associated with the risk of malaria in Camopi, as in other parts of the world. However, construction with poor materials and closure of the house did not play a major role in the occurrence of attacks. These findings differed from those in other studies.15,16
Use of cutaneous repellents and bed nets was associated with a lower risk of malaria by univariate analysis in the multiple failure Cox model. However, this association with bed nets was not observed by multivariate analysis. This could be explained by the fact that nets commonly have holes and are not insecticide-treated. Moreover, several people often share the same bed net, which is often too small. This would result in children being against the edge of the bed net, thus exposing them to anopheline bites. It would be important to evaluate the impact of an insecticide-treated net distribution campaign, which surprisingly has never been conducted in this French administrative region where bed nets are already largely used and well-accepted. House spraying did not play a major role in protection against malaria in Camopi. This could be linked to its irregular use in this remote part of French Guiana. Moreover, the efficiency of this method for Amerindian homes, which are incompletely closed by walls, may not be optimal.17
The strong association of ethnicity with malaria incidence was noteworthy. Wayampi children were protected more from first malaria attack relative to Emerillon children, even after adjusting for behavioral and environmental factors. Some behavioral factors were not examined in this study and should be further explored.18 However, a difference in genetic susceptibility could be involved in Amerindian tribes of different origins. This would explain some of the apparent clustering of the cases in Camopi, where, as shown by Smith and others, few children had most of the attacks.19 Wayanas and Emerillons came to French Guiana in the 18th century from different parts of South America, and could have had a different history of malaria, with different selection pressures on their immunogenetic background. Differences in vector density between Camopi (where Emerillons live) and near the Oyapock River (where Wayampis live) also cannot be ruled out.
Different analyses (single and multiple Cox models) suggest different risk factors for malaria. The multiple failure analysis was more powerful and concerned all malaria attacks, but it did not find any difference between real new attacks and relapses because there was no molecular evidence of a different strain available. The single-failure Cox modeling analysis concerned only the first attack, and therefore could be more valid because it excluded relapses.
This study suggests additional research questions and some testable interventions such as clearing vegetation around homes. Malaria continues to be a major public health problem in Camopi, especially in children. Better comprehension of the epidemiology of malaria in this region could lead to pragmatic, efficient, and locally adapted measures in an integrated control program. These factors may be also relevant in other villages in similar ecotopes.
Received June 22, 2006. Accepted for publication October 31, 2006.
Acknowledgments: We the staff of the Health Center of Camopi, particularly Alain Maniglier, Anne Viaud, and Christelle Monnerville, for their assistance.
* Address correspondence to Sarah Hustache, Laboratoire Hospitalo-Universitaire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Centre Hospitalier de Cayenne, BP 6006, 97300 Cayenne, French Guiana. E-mail: sarah.hustache{at}yahoo.fr ![]()
Authors addresses: Sarah Hustache and Bernard Carme, Laboratoire Hospitalo-Universitaire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Centre Hospitalier de Cayenne, BP 6006, 97300 Cayenne, French Guiana, E-mail: sarah.hustache{at}yahoo.fr. Mathieu Nacher, Centre dInformation et de Soins de lImmunodéficience Humaine, Centre Hospitalier de Cayenne, BP 6006, 97300 Cayenne, French Guiana. Félix Djossou, Départements des Centres de Santé, Centre Hospitalier de Cayenne, BP 6006, 97300 Cayenne, French Guiana.
| REFERENCES |
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |