|
|
||||||||
| ABSTRACT |
|
|
|---|
2 years after treatment. With respect to each exam, positivity was 38.0% for TRALd, 61.9% for ELISA rK39, 47.6% for ELISA rK26, 38.0% for ELISAp, and 40.5% for IIFT. None of the individuals presented recurrence of the disease during the 4 years of follow-up. The tests were repeated in 24 of the 41 individuals, after some time, and the results were the same in 33.3% of the cases. We conclude that serological tests for kala-azar might continue to be positive after treatment of the disease, although this does not indicate a poor prognosis or a poor therapeutic response. | INTRODUCTION |
|
|
|---|
The Montenegro skin test (MST) is negative in kala-azar and becomes positive after treatment.12,13 Some investigators believe that a positive test indicates immunity of the individual against the disease, but others have reported that, if this resistance really exists, it might not be permanent.1418
Within this context, the aim of this study was to analyze the behavior of skin and various immunologic tests used for the detection of kala-azar in individuals with clinical cure of the disease.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|
|
|---|
Some time after treatment, all patients were submitted to clinical examination and serological and skin tests. After the first assessment, all these individuals were followed up clinically for an additional period of 3 years. The skin and serological tests were repeated in 24 of the 41 patients (second assessment).
In both assessments, the patients were examined and submitted for the MST and blood collection. For the evaluation of the clinical recurrence of kala-azar, we considered the classic symptoms and signs that should be confirmed to isolation or visualization of the parasite. Thinking of the possibility that kala-azar can occur in a sub-clinical form, we studied for the presence of signs and symptoms. Based on literature definitions, the patients were classified into the following categories1921:
3: individuals showing three of more of the following signs or symptoms: fever, cough, adynamia, skin pallor, abdominal distension, weight loss, hepatomegaly, and/or splenomegaly;
1: individuals showing only one or none of the signs or symptoms described above. The serum samples were collected between January 1998 and May 1999 and between January and October 2001. The samples were processed in 1999 and 2001, respectively. The TRALd, ELISA rK39, and ELISA using recombinant K26 (ELISA rK26) tests were performed at the Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro (UFTM). Another aliquot preserved at 20°C at UFTM was stored on dry ice and sent to the Laboratory of Leishmaniasis and Vaccines, Institute of Biologic Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais (ICB/UFMG), Belo Horizonte, for ELISA and indirect immunofluorescence testing (IIFT) using promastigote antigen.
The informed consent was obtained from all participants of this study, and the project was approved in Ethical Committee of UFTM.
The program used for statistical analysis was STATISTICA 6.0. The variables were categorical, and we used the Fischer exact test, with 5% significance (P < 0.05).
Immunologic tests.
Montenegro skin test.
Antigen of Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis promastigotes (IFLA/BR/67/PH8), produced at the Laboratory of Leishmaniasis and Vaccines, ICB/UFMG, was used at a standard concentration of 40 µg/mL protein nitrogen diluted 1:10,000 in saline merthiolate.22 Antigen (0.1 mL) was applied intradermally to the anterior side of the left forearm. Readings were obtained 4872 hours after injection, and the size of the papule was delimited with a ball-point pen.23 The reactions were considered to be positive when the mean of the measurements of cross-sectional and longitudinal diameters was
5 mm.
TRAL-d (rK39). For the rapid immunochromatographic test, a kit (InBios International, Seattle, WA) consisting of paper strips coated with recombinant K39 antigen was used according to manufacturer instructions. The strips were stored at ambient temperature (2830°C) or refrigerated (28°C) and protected from humidity. The buffer solution was stored at 28°C.
Readings were obtained 10 minutes later according to manufacturer recommendations, and the results are reported as positive or negative.
ELISA using recombinant antigens. The assay was carried out according to the method of Badaró and others24 using recombinant K39 and K26 antigens of Leishmania (Leishmania) chagasi produced by InBios International. The serum samples were diluted 1:50 and 1:100 and developed with peroxidase-conjugated protein A (Sigma Co., St. Louis, MO).
The cut-off was established as the mean absorbance plus 2 SD of the negative controls.
ELISA using promastigote antigen. The assay was carried out as described by Hommel and others25 and Voller and others,26 using as antigen L. (L.) amazonensis (MHOM/BR/60/BH6) promastigotes in LIT culture medium in the stationary growth phase and lysed by sonication.
Serum samples were tested at an initial dilution of 1:80. Based on these tests, the cut-off for anti-Leishmania IgG reactivity was established using 40 sera obtained from truly negative individuals or controls negative for American tegumentary leishmaniasis and stored at the Laboratory of Leishmaniasis and Vaccines. The cut-off was established based on the mean absorbance of these sera plus 2 SD.
Indirect immunofluorescence test. The assay was performed as described by Camargo L. (L.) amazonensis (MHOM/BR/60/BH6); promastigotes in LIT culture medium in the exponential growth phase were used as antigen.27 Fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled human IgG anti-globulin obtained from rabbit immune serum was used as conjugate (Biomanguinhos, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil).
All samples showing positivity at a dilution
1:40 were considered to be reactive.
| RESULTS |
|
|
|---|
|
Of 38 (92.7%) patients with treatment information, 21 (55.3%) used meglumine antimonate (Glucantime, Rhône-Poulenc Rorer, Mexico), 15 (39.5%) used amphotericin B, and 2 (5.2%) used a combination of meglumine antimonate and amphotericin B. It was not possible for us to access the registers of three patients, because they had been assisted in other health units. The period of treatment ranged from 20 to 30 days (median: 25.3 days) with meglumine antimonate, from 10 to 21 days (median: 14.2 days) with amphotericin B, and 7 days in the two patients treated with the both drugs. We did not observe any relation between the drug used, the period of treatment, and the results of the immunologic tests.
Montenegro skin test. Analysis of the MST in the first assessment showed that 7 of the 8 tests were negative in the first year after treatment, whereas between 1 and 2 years, 3 tests were negative and 13 were positive. Three or more years after treatment, 15 subjects showed positive tests, and only two patients tested negative.
Conversions in the MST were observed. Four patients that were negative in the first assessment converted to positive in the second about 2 years or more after the treatment. From 23 tests done in the second assessment, only 1 was negative. This patient was positive in the first exam and converted to negative.
After the first year after treatment, 84.8% of the skin tests in the first assessment and 95.4% in the second were positive, but this difference didnt have statistical significance.
Serologic tests. Regarding the serologic tests for kala-azar in the first assessment, negativity in all tests was observed for 11 subjects. One of them had < 1 year since treatment, five had between 1 and 2 years, and five had been treated 3 years or more ago. From the 41 studied, 5 individuals showed a positive reaction in one test, 7 in two, 6 in three, 6 in four, and 6 subjects tested positive in all tests. After 1 or more years after treatment, 69.7% of the subjects evaluated showed a positive reaction in at least one test. For each test, positivity was 36.6% for TRALd, 63.4% for ELISA rK39, 46.3% for ELISA rK26, 36.6% for ELISAp, and 39.0% for IIFT. Only one of the seven individuals with a positive TRALd test did not test positive by ELISA rK39. The ELISA rK39 was positive in 11 individuals that were found TRALd negative. No correlation was observed between the presence or absence of symptoms and the results of the immunologic tests.
Repeating the tests, we observed that eight (33.3%) had the same results: six of them were negative for all the tests (Table 2
). Similarly, serologic results of the second assessment tended to be the same as the first assessment, except in five patients where there was an increase in positive tests. It did not have significant statistical difference between the proportion of positives in each test when we compared the first and the second assessment, except to the TRALd (Table 3
).
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|
|
|---|
The meaning of positive serologic tests after treatment of kala-azar in clinically cured patients remains unknown. One explanation might be the fact that individuals with VL do not show complete elimination of the parasite, as shown for 11 (85%) individuals evaluated by a liver biopsy 111 months after treatment.29 This agrees with the opportunistic occurrence of the disease as observed in patients with AIDS.30 On the other hand, because these individuals continued to live in a kala-azar endemic area, we can not determine or dismiss the influence of re-infection in the serological results. Finally, we think that the positive serologic reactions (including with recombinant antigens) in patients treated for kala-azar frequently did not indicate poor therapeutic response or prognosis.
Received November 15, 2005. Accepted for publication June 12, 2006.
Acknowledgments: The authors thank Dr. Antônio Campos-Neto for providing the rK39 and rK26 antigens, Prof. Roberto Badaró for providing the TRALd strips, and Prof. Wilson Mayrink for the MST antigen.
Financial support: The study was supported by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development and the National Health Foundation.
* Address correspondence to Aluízio Prata, Department of Tropical Medicine and Infectology, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Brazil, Caixa Postal: 118, CEP 38001-970, Uberaba, MG, Brazil. E-mail: a_prata{at}mednet.com.br ![]()
Authors addresses: Luciana de Almeida Silva, Héctor Dardo Romero, Aluízio Prata, and Virmondes Rodrigues, Department of Tropical Medicine and Infectology, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Caixa Postal: 118, CEP 38001-970, Uberaba, Brazil, Telephone: 34-3318-5254, Fax: 34-3318-5229. Roberto Teodoro Costa and Evaldo Nascimento, Laboratory of Leishmaniasis and Vaccines, Department of Parasitology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Av. Antônio Carlos 6627, CEP 31270-901 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. Sílvio Fernandes, Guimarães Carvalho Clemente Faria Hospital, States University of Montes Claros, Av. Cula Mangabeira 562, CEP 39401-002 Montes Claros, MG, Brazil.
Reprint requests: Aluízio Prata, Department of Tropical Medicine and Infectology, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Brazil, Caixa Postal: 118, CEP 38001-970, Uberaba, MG, Brazil. E-mail: a_prata{at}mednet.com.br.
| REFERENCES |
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |