| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
ABSTRACT |
 TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
|
INTRODUCTION |
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
Only an integrated approach based on in vivo and in vitro drug susceptibility tests can provide clinical treatment response parameters as well as intrinsic drug sensitivity data to elucidate the background of clinical treatment failures. As a public health tool in vivo tests can be used to monitor drug resistance and to compare drug susceptibility status at different points in time or in different endemic areas. Polymerase chain reaction allows for the distinction of reinfection and recrudescence in outpatient trials. In vitro tests on the other hand are an excellent tool to demonstrate biologic resistance to antimalarials independent of host immune reaction and patient compliance.
The aim of this study was therefore to determine the therapeutic efficacy of quinine plus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for the management of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Southeastern Bangladesh and to elucidate the background of treatment failures by correlating clinical findings with in vitro drug sensitivity data.
|
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
In total, 72 subjects were screened and 63 were enrolled into the study. The minimum sample size was calculated to be 61 following WHO guidelines for the assessment and monitoring of antimalarial drug efficacy assuming an anticipated population proportion of clinical failures of 20%, a confidence level of 95%, and a precision of 10%.4 No patients were withdrawn. One patient was lost to follow-up during the 42-day follow-up. Thirty-one (49.2%) patients were female; 32 (50.8%) were male. The median age was 20 years (range 18–63).
All patients received treatment with quinine 3 times a day (10 mg/kg per dose) for 3 days, followed by a single dose of sulfadoxine (25 mg/kg) co-formulated with 1.25 mg/kg of pyrimethamine on the fourth day. All treatment was directly observed. The first dose on day 0 was administered by the study team; the subsequent doses were supervised by local health care workers and village volunteers.
The in vivo study design roughly followed the WHO guidelines for the assessment and monitoring of antimalarial drug efficacy with an extension of follow-up until day 42.4 Patients were asked to return on days 3, 7, and then weekly until day 42. If the patients did not return for the scheduled visits or missed an appointment they were visited at their homes by the study staff. Blood smears were performed and the temperature was recorded at each visit. Thick smears were used to quantify parasite densities per 200 white blood cells. Slides were declared negative based on reading 200 high-power fields. Patients were advised to return to the center in case of any symptoms consistent with malaria.
Primary outcome measure was cure. Absence of parasitemia until day 42 irrespective of axillary temperature was categorized as adequate clinical and parasitological response. Patients who showed a presence of parasitemia and axillary temperature 
37.5°C on any day from day 4 to day 42 were classified as late clinical treatment failure; presence of parasitemia on any day from day 7 to day 42 and axillary temperature < 37.5°C were classified as late parasitological failure. Patients who were parasitemic on day 3 with an axillary temperature 37.5°C or 25% of the parasite count on day 0 were categorized as early treatment failure.4
Venous blood was drawn for the assessment of antimalarial drug susceptibility on enrollment and whenever a patient developed parasitemia during follow-up. All samples were tested in the HRP2 in vitro drug susceptibility assay. The culture was performed as previously described.5 In brief, the fresh P. falciparum parasite isolates were cultured in the presence of serial dilutions of the antimalarial drugs dihydroarte-misinin (DHA), mefloquine (MEF), quinine (QNN), chloroquine (CHL), pyrimethamine (PYR), and sulfadoxine (SDX) at 1.5% hematocrit in complete RPMI 1640 with 0.5% Albumax (Albumax® I, Gibco, Bangkok, Thailand) and 25 mg/L of gentamycin without freezing, washing, dilution, addition of serum, or preculturing. For sulfadoxine and pyrimethamine a specially prepared RPMI1640 medium was used with low content of folate and PABA (1/100 as compared with standard RPMI1640). After 72 hours of culture the plates were frozen and stored at –20°C. The plates were then thawed and parasite growth inhibition was quantified using an HRP2 ELISA based on 2 commercially available monoclonal antibodies (Immunology Consultants Laboratory Inc., Newberg, OR) directed against P. falciparum-specific HRP2: MPFM-55A, an IgM antibody used as the capture antibody and MPFG-55P, a horseradish peroxidase conjugated IgG antibody, which was used as the indicator antibody. The ELISA was performed as previously described.6 Optical density was measured at 450 nm using a field-deployable ELISA plate reader.
Gene loci of pre-treatment and post-treatment sample pairs (MSP2) were compared in polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to determine whether the genotype before and after reappearance of parasites in the peripheral blood was identical, indicating a recrudescence.
Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to calculate the proportion of aparasitemic patients for each point in time (later referred to as cure rates). Patients who were lost to follow-up, who had reinfections diagnosed by PCR, or who developed P. vivax parasitemia during the follow-up were censored. Inhibitory concentrations were calculated using nonlinear regression analysis based on a polynomial regression model.7
|
RESULTS |
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
).
|
).
|
25% of that on day 0) but who did not show any clinical signs and symptoms and who cleared parasites without requiring additional therapy were classified as cured with delayed parasite clearance. Parasite densities were not significantly higher (P > 0.05) in failures than in patients who were cured. By day 3 all patients had cleared fever and the majority of all patients showed a heavily reduced parasite load. All patients who presented with treatment failures were treated following the national treatment guidelines (third-line regimen: 7 days quinine TID). The in vitro data suggest high levels of chloroquine resistance among the samples tested in the course of this study. The geometric mean IC50 and IC90 were 93.06 nM (95% CI: 80.38–107.76) and 214.76 nM (95% CI: 175.64–262.62), respectively. In contrast the isolates were relatively sensitive to quinine and mefloquine. The geometric mean IC50 for quinine was 73.24 nM (95% CI: 65.26–82.21) and the IC90 157.75nM (95% CI: 134.16–185.5). The IC50 for mefloquine was 11.26 nM (95% CI: 9.75–13.0) and the IC90 19.55 nM (95%CI: 15.73–24.29). The dihydroartemisinin ICs were equally low suggesting high sensitivity of the parasites to that drug (IC50: 1.33 nM; 95% CI: 1.08–1.63, IC90: 2.65 nM; 95% CI: 2.13–3.29). For pyrimethamine and sulfadoxine the geometric mean IC50s were 1.7 µ M (95% CI: 1.25–2.3) and 40.46 µM (95% CI: 31.15–51.97), respectively; the IC90s were 4.83 µM (95% CI: 3.17–7.37) and 173.48 µM (95% CI: 120.78–249.17).
Significant correlations suggesting cross sensitivity were found between DHA and mefloquine at IC50 and IC90 level (R = 0.65; P < 0.001; N = 49 and R = 0.57; P < 0.001; N = 49) as well as between pyrimethamine and sulfadoxine at IC90 level (R = 0.88; P = 0.009; N = 7).
Close relations were also found between in vitro drug sensitivity and clinical treatment response parameters, suggesting a significant impact of intrinsic drug sensitivity on the treatment outcome. In Mann-Whitney U tests isolates taken on admission from patients who later developed treatment failures showed significantly higher IC50 levels for PYR (P = 0.008) than those patients who were cured (Geometric means: 1199.25 nM 95% CI: 731.66–1965.66 and 365.08 nM 95% CI: 253.29–536.22, respectively). As the definite parasite clearance is not related to quinine sensitivity, the quinine IC50s were not higher in patients who later developed treatment failures (P > 0.05).
|
DISCUSSION |
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
Our data suggest that the combination of 3 days of quinine with a single dose of S/P, formerly the official second-line therapy in Bangladesh, is an interesting and affordable alternative as long as or whenever ACT is not available. A relatively faster acting antimalarial with a short half-life combined with a slower acting, long half-life drug has proven to be a good strategy for eliminating falciparum parasites from the bloodstream. The role of quinine in this combination is to reduce the initial parasite biomass, whereas the role of S/P is to eliminate the remaining parasites and keep up drug levels above the minimum inhibitory concentration long enough to prevent recrudescence.
S/P shares mechanisms of action with Cotrimoxazole and they are therefore likely to develop cross-sensitivity patterns. One study reports that treatment with S/P resulted in increased colonization with cotrimoxazole-nonsusceptible S. pneumoniae. However, the clinical impact of cotrimoxazole resistance in these pathogens is not fully understood.10 Moreover in recent studies Cotrimoxazole did not appear to select for SP-resistant parasites.11
The majority of failures in this study were categorized as late treatment failures. The significantly higher pyrimethamine IC50s found in parasite samples from patients who later developed recrudescences clearly show that these were largely caused by reduced sensitivity to S/P. In spite of emerging resistance to S/P in this area, in combination with quinine the activity of S/P is still sufficient to clear more than 87% of the infections. However, for the future it will be important to strictly limit the use of S/P to combination therapies. Its use as monotherapy could quickly lead to high levels of resistance. Efficacy of S/P in combination with chloroquine was found to be only 63.4% and is therefore probably not a viable option.12
Only 1 patient was characterized as early treatment failure. Due to its short half-life the activity of quinine has relatively little impact on the overall cure rate. In this combination quinine resistance would be expected to lead to early treatment failures. Although another 2 patients had similarly slow parasite clearance, they were classified as cured with delayed parasite clearance as they cleared parasites quickly after day 3 and did not require salvage therapy. These findings are consistent with the generally low quinine IC50s found in this study.
The high chloroquine IC50s found in this study are similar to earlier reports of in vitro and clinical chloroquine resistance in this area.8,9,13 Chloroquine resistance in Bangladesh has been known since the 1970s and is likely to have increased since then.14 Our in vitro data once again confirm the fact that chloroquine should not be used for the management of P. falciparum malaria in this region. They are directly comparable to chloroquine drug sensitivity data from Thailand from the same year (unpublished data), a country with some of the highest levels of antimalarial drug resistance in the world.
The relatively low ICs for DHA and mefloquine suggest that both drugs still show a high activity against P. falciparum parasites from that area. So far artemisinin derivatives have never been used on a large scale in Bangladesh. Our data suggest that they will be an interesting option for combination regimens (e.g., with lumefantrine) in the future. Although previous data indicate that mefloquine sensitivity may be compromised due to the import of mefloquine-resistant parasites across the near border with Myanmar these new data show that mefloquine sensitivity in the area is still comparatively high.13 However, due to its extremely long half-life me-floquine may not be a good choice for an area with relatively high malaria endemicity like the Chittagong Hill Tracts.
The recrudescence rate in the 42-day follow-up is similar to failure rates found in a previous study with a 28-day follow-up from a nearby area.15
Although failures from S/P may occur also 4–6 weeks after the course of treatment we found no recrudescence after day 30.16 In our study the median time until recrudescence was 27 days and most of the failures actually happened on or around day 28. These data suggest that the minimum follow-up for S/P efficacy studies should therefore be 35 days, thereby confirming previous observations with the same drug combination.16 With longer follow-ups in outpatient studies, however, the role of PCR for the distinction of recrudescence/ reinfection becomes even more important.
The overall compliance was very good; only 1 patient was lost to follow-up. No severe adverse events (SAE) were observed. Probably due to the short administration of quinine relatively few patients complained about cinchonism (e.g., tinnitus) during their course of treatment.
There are only limited data about the use and the resistance patterns of Q3F in Africa, but due to the known safety in the management of children and pregnant women it might also be an affordable option for sub-Saharan Africa.
In conclusion, our data suggest that Q3F is an interesting alternative as long as or whenever ACT is not available. Both drugs used in this combination are available from local producers and are relatively inexpensive. However, it is important to reiterate that S/P sensitivity is compromised and that S/P should only be used in combination with faster-acting antimalarials that have a different mechanism of action to prevent a rapid progression of drug resistance. Continuous surveillance of antimalarial drug resistance in Bangladesh, both in vivo and in vitro, will therefore be essential.
Received March 9, 2006. Accepted for publication May 13, 2006.
Acknowledgments: The study was conducted at the ICDDR,B: Centre for Health and Population Research with the support of grants from the U.S. Department of Defense Global Emerging Infections System (GEIS) program, and the Austrian Science Fund Project No. 15754-B02. ICDDR,B acknowledges with gratitude the commitment of U.S. Department of Defense Global Emerging Infections System (GEIS) program, and the Austrian Science Fund to the Centre’s research effort. We also express our gratitude to the team of BRAC for their excellent support in the fieldwork. We also thank the laboratory and clinic staff of the Chakaria field station for their help, and last but not least the local community for their cooperation.
Disclaimer: The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the author, and are not to be construed as official, or as reflecting true views of the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense.
* Address correspondence to Harald Noedl, Department of Specific Prophylaxis and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Vienna Kinderspitalgasse 15 A-1090 Vienna, Austria. E-mail: harald.noedl{at}meduniwien.ac.at 
Authors’ addresses: Kamala Thriemer, Bernhard Attlmayr, and Harald Noedl, Department of Specific Prophylaxis and Tropical Medicine, Medical University Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15, A-1090, Vienna, Austria. Rashidul Haque, Yukiko Wagatsuma, and Selim Akhter, Centre for Health and Population Research, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Mohakhali, Dhaka-1212, Bangladesh. Mohammed Abdus Salam, BRAC Bangladesh, 75 Mohakhali, Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh. Mark Fukuda, Kurt Schaecher, and R. Scott Miller, Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, 316/6 Rajvithi Road, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Reprint requests: Harald Noedl, Department of Specific Prophylaxis and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspital-gasse 15, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. Telephone: 43-1-4277-64882, Fax: 43-1-4277-64889, E-mail: harald.noedl{at}meduniwien.ac.at.
|
REFERENCES |
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  H. Noedl, D. Socheat, and W. Satimai Artemisinin-Resistant Malaria in Asia N. Engl. J. Med., July 30, 2009; 361(5): 540 - 541. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. HAQUE, K. THRIEMER, Z. WANG, K. SATO, Y. WAGATSUMA, M. A. SALAM, S. AKTHER, J. AKTER, M. FUKUDA, R. S. MILLER, et al. THERAPEUTIC EFFICACY OF ARTEMETHER-LUMEFANTRINE FOR THE TREATMENT OF UNCOMPLICATED PLASMODIUM FALCIPARUM MALARIA IN BANGLADESH Am J Trop Med Hyg, January 1, 2007; 76(1): 39 - 41. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
