|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ABSTRACT |
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|
|
|---|
In areas of high malaria transmission, the risk of developing placental malaria and its severe complications is higher in primigravid women and decreases with parity,1,3,6,7 because women develop effective antibody-mediated immune responses against variant surface antigens from parasites causing placental malaria in a parity-dependent manner.811 These antibodies are associated with improved pregnancy outcomes.12,13 Variant surface antigens from parasites that produce placental malaria around the globe exhibit a remarkable degree of antigenic similarity,8,9,1417 but are distinct from variant surface antigens from non-placental isolates.18 The molecular basis for this observation is that parasites that sequester in the placenta predominantly express relatively conserved forms of the cytoadherence ligand PfEMP1 that principally bind to the glycosaminoglycan chondroitin sulfate A (CSA), which is abundantly expressed at the surface of syncytiotrophoblasts in the placenta where infected erythrocytes accumulate, but not to the endothelial receptor CD36.14,16,1922 In contrast, parasites infecting children and non-pregnant adults principally express highly polymorphic forms of PfEMP1 with opposite binding specificity.18,22
Here we studied the development of placental malaria in women with the genetic trait South-East Asian ovalocytosis (SAO). This mutation, largely asymptomatic in heterozygotes but incompatible with life in homozygotes,23,24 is determined by a 27 base pairs deletion in the gene encoding band 3, the major erythrocyte transmembrane protein.25 The SAO trait, which results in erythrocytes with decreased anion transport activity26 and dramatically altered mechanical properties,27 reaches a high prevalence of more than 20% in some areas of the Western Pacific, and its geographical distribution parallels that of malaria endemicity in Papua New Guinea (PNG).24 Previous studies have demonstrated that the SAO trait confers protection against cerebral malaria. Remarkably, no single SAO individual was found to suffer from cerebral malaria in 2 independent studies.28,29 In contrast, SAO individuals are fully susceptible to malaria infection and disease, and also to some complications of the disease like severe malaria anemia.29 However, none of the previous studies assessed whether this trait confers protection against placental malaria, which like cerebral malaria, is closely associated with sequestration of infected erythrocytes. In this study, we used a case-control approach to compare the level of placental infections between SAO and control women.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|
|
|---|
Sample collection. This study was approved by the PNG Medical Research Advisory Committee. After obtaining informed consent, all women enrolled were asked to answer a questionnaire for demographic, medical, and obstetric information.
Four hundred and four women at delivery and 281 pregnant women attending the antenatal clinic were enrolled for this study. Blood smears were missing for 2 of the women enrolled at delivery, so only 402 were included in the parasitological analysis. Blood was also collected in cross-sectional village surveys from 196 non-pregnant women matched by age and geography with the women enrolled at delivery and from 49 non-pregnant women individually age-matched and geography-matched with 49 of the women attending the antenatal clinic.
Pregnant women were recruited for this study at Alexishafen and Mugil health centers. All women participating in this study were prescribed weekly chloroquine prophylaxis in accordance with PNG Standard Treatment Guidelines, but compliance was not monitored. Previous studies in the area found that the level of compliance was high, but the efficacy of this prophylaxis was low31 and did not reduce the risk of infection at delivery.33 From women attending the antenatal clinic, finger prick blood was taken for malaria diagnosis, genetic analysis, and hemoglobin (Hb) measurement (using a portable Hemocue Hb meter, HemoCue AB, Ängelholm, Sweden). From women attending for delivery, a sample of peripheral venous blood in EDTA; a sample of serum; thick and thin smear films from both venous and placental blood; and a section of the placenta were collected within 12 hours after delivery. Hb concentration, temperature, and birth weight were recorded. A biopsy specimen of placental tissue was obtained from the maternal surface near the center of the placenta,35 placed in 10% neutral buffered formalin and stored at room temperature for up to 3 months until it was transported to Adelaide for histologic examination. Smears were prepared from a droplet of the blood welling into an incision in the paracentral area of the placenta.
The number of infected erythrocytes per 200 leukocytes was determined from Giemsa-stained smears. Parasite densities were determined by assuming a leukocyte count of 8,000 parasites/µL.
Genetic analysis. The SAO status of all patients was determined by PCR as previously described, using the primers P198 and P199.25 DNA was prepared using the rapid boiling method.36 In a small number of cases the PCR did not yield any band and nested PCR was used to determine the SAO status, using the primers Band 3-5 ' ext. (5 '-GGCGCTATCAGTCCAGCCC-3') and Band3-3'ext. (5'-AGTGGAGATCAGCAGCTCCG-3') for the primary reaction and the previously described primers25 for the nested.
Placental examination. The placental biopsies were processed and embedded in paraffin wax by standard techniques. Four micron sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and with Giemsas stain. Slides were examined blind to flow cytometry results and to maternal SAO, malarial, or parity status. H&E slides were examined with standard microscopy and also with polarization microscopy, which increases the sensitivity of detection of placental malaria.37 To rule out the formation of formalin pigment that could be mistaken by malaria pigment, we tested a subset of slides by immersing in picric acid and we did not observe any reduction in the pigment, indicating that it was not formalin artifact that is removed by the picric acid. This is in good agreement with previous studies that found that the use of neutral buffered formalin instead of acid formalin prevents the formation of formalin pigment.7,35,37,38 All cases were classified by one observer (TYK) as no infection (no evidence of pigment or parasites); active infection (parasites or pigment in maternal erythrocytes and monocytes in the intervillous space); past-chronic infection (parasites not present but pigment confined to fibrin or cells within fibrin); or active-chronic infection (both active and chronic infection), as previously described in detail.35 These categories correspond to no infection, acute infection, past infection, and chronic infection according to the criteria of Ismail and colleagues.7 The amount of malaria pigment deposits seen in chronic infections was also semi-quantitatively assessed as: mild (focally present), moderate (small dots diffusely distributed with focal coarse deposits), and severe (large amounts of malarial pigment).7 Active infections were also semi-quantitatively assessed as mild, moderate, or severe according to the proportion of infected erythrocytes. A sample of 46 randomly selected slides was examined independently by another observer (SJR). Concordance was reached in all but one case, which was then deliberated and agreed upon.
Flow cytometry. A randomly selected subset of serum samples were evaluated for antibodies to variant surface antigens expressed on erythrocytes infected with trophozoite stages of 2 laboratory lines, CS2 and E8B, as previously described.39 Assays were performed blind to SAO and malarial status. Samples were analyzed on a Becton Dickinson FAC-Scalibur flow cytometer and mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of infected erythrocytes was measured. Sera from 5 malaria-naïve donors were used to define a cut-off for positivity (MFI >mean + 2 SD of negative controls) and a pool of reactive sera from malaria-exposed pregnant women provided a positive control. Amounts of antibody in test samples were expressed relative to the positive control according to the formula: MFIrelative = [(MFIsample MFInegative control)/(MFIpositive control MFInegative control)] x 100.
Data analysis. For some of the analysis, samples collected at delivery were individually matched for gravidity and geography. For each sample determined to carry the SAO trait, 3 controls were selected among the collected samples from non-SAO women of the same gravidity and living in the same sub-region. When more than 3 women matched these criteria, the 3 specimens collected on the nearest dates were selected. Gravidity and place of residence were considered the main factors affecting the risk of developing placental malaria, whereas seasonality is not presumed to have an effect in an area of year-round transmission. We did not observe differences in the prevalence of malaria infection between women delivering in different seasons (data not shown). Mean age was very similar between the SAO and control groups (mean age 27.5 years, range 1940, and 27.6 years, range 1640, in SAO and matched control women, respectively).
Odds ratios for the prevalence of infection or high-density infection between individually matched SAO and control women were determined using conditional logistic regression. Other statistical tests were used as described in the text. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA software (version 6.0).
| RESULTS |
|
|
|---|
|
Women with a P. falciparum infection (detected by microscopy) tended to have lower Hb values (average 0.25 g/dL lower) and babies with lower BW (average 62 g lower), but these tendencies were not statistically significant. The prevalences of infant LBW and of maternal severe anemia were not significantly different between women with or without an infection.
Prevalence of the South-East Asian ovalocytosis trait. The SAO status was determined by PCR for all women participating in the study. Forty-eight of 404 women (11.9%) from whom blood was collected at delivery carried the SAO trait. The prevalence of the trait among pregnant women attending the antenatal clinic was similar (13.2% in 281 women). In contrast, the prevalence of the SAO trait in a group of 196 non-pregnant women within the same age group and with the same geographic sub-region distribution as in women enrolled at delivery was 17.3%, and the prevalence for 49 non-pregnant women individually matched with 49 of the women attending the antenatal clinic was 22.4%. Overall, the SAO trait was present in 18.4% of 245 non-pregnant women but only in 12.4% of 685 pregnant women. The difference in the prevalence of the SAO trait between the 404 women at delivery and the 196 matched non-pregnant women approached significance (P = 0.076 using two-tailed Fischers test), which together with the observation that this tendency was consistent for other groups of pregnant and non-pregnant women suggests that the SAO trait may be less common among pregnant women.
Placental infection in women with South-East Asian ovalocytosis.
Sequestration of infected red blood cells in the placenta does occur in SAO women (Figure 1
); 10.4% of the SAO women had an active infection (either active only or active-chronic), and 31.2% had a past-chronic infection, whereas active and past-chronic infection occurred in 16.7% and 25.7% of the control women, respectively (Table 2
). These differences were not significant. However, high-density active infections (moderate or severe) were less common in SAO women than in control women (see Table 2
), although this difference was not statistically significant (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.021.55, P = 0.121). The same tendency was observed for past-chronic infections with high-density pigment deposition (moderate or severe) (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.061.51, P = 0.148). Overall, the probability of having an infection scored as moderate or severe (either active or chronic) for SAO women was significantly lower than for control women (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.060.81, P = 0.022).
|
|
Parallel analysis using blood film data instead of histology data showed similar results (Table 3
). SAO women had a lower probability of having a positive smear with a density above 500 parasites/µL, but the difference was not significant (for placental smears, OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.021.61, P = 0.130, for venous smears, OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.042.29, P = 0.237). Again, the difference between SAO and control women was larger among primigravidae (see Table 3
).
|
Antibodies against placental-bindinglike isolates in women with South-East Asian ovalocytosis.
As determined by flow cytometry, sera from SAO women at delivery contained antibodies against the parasite line CS2, which adheres to CSA and expresses variant surface antigens resembling those from placental-binding isolates (Table 4
).39 These antibodies occurred at similar levels between SAO and control women (P = 0.46 using Mann-Whitney test), and this was true for both gravidity groups (P = 0.947 for primigravidae and P = 0.639 for multigravidae) (see Table 4
). The level of antibodies against CS2 surface antigens provides an indication of exposure to placental-binding parasites. As expected, antibodies against CS2 were more abundant in multigravidae than in primigravidae (P = 0.002 using Mann-Whitney test), both among SAO (P = 0.028) and among control (P = 0.027) women (see Table 4
).
|
Pregnancy-related clinical malaria in women with SouthEast Asian ovalocytosis. Blood was collected from 197 pregnant women attending the antenatal clinic and experiencing either fever, history of fever in the past week, or headache. Fifty-one of them had a P. falciparum positive slide, of whom 28 had a parasite density higher than 1000 parasites/µL. We consider that, in these women, fever was most likely attributable to placental malaria, because this level of parasitemia is rarely seen among non-pregnant adult women. For instance, only 1 of 196 women of similar age living in the same area had a parasitemia above this threshold in a cross-sectional survey conducted on non-pregnant women. Furthermore, others have shown that parasites in peripheral blood from pregnant women living in endemic areas usually originate from an ongoing placental infection.41
Four of the 28 women (14%) presumptively suffering from clinical malaria in pregnancy carried the SAO trait, suggesting that this trait does not provide protection, or provides incomplete protection, against clinical malaria in pregnancy.
| DISCUSSION |
|
|
|---|
The main finding of this study was that SAO women do suffer from placental malaria, and SAO-infected erythrocytes can sequestrate in the placenta. Using a case-control approach, we found that the prevalence of placental infection was not significantly different between control and SAO women when all gravidity groups were analyzed together. However, the prevalence of moderate or severe placental infections (either active or chronic) was lower in SAO than in control women. High-density active infections clearly indicate accumulation of large numbers of parasites in the placenta, but the density of pigment deposition in past-chronic infections can be indicative of either the time elapsed from a past infection or its severity. However, we believe that the density of pigment deposition relates to the severity of the past infection, because in non-SAO women the percentage of moderate and severe past infections decreased with gravidity, as expected for a true marker of severity. When data was stratified by gravidity, it became apparent that differences between SAO and control women in the prevalence and severity of placental infection only occurred in primigravidae. SAO primigravidae had significantly lower prevalence of placental infection than normal (non-SAO) primigravidae, who are at the highest risk of suffering placental malaria and its associated complications.1,3,6,7 On the other hand, the prevalence and severity of placental infections in multigravidae was similar between SAO and controls, presumably because with successive pregnancies normal women develop immune responses that reduce their risk of suffering from placental malaria to the levels observed in SAO women from the first pregnancy. Because histologic determination of the severity of placental infections is only semi-quantitative and the number of SAO primigravidae in our study was low, this intriguing observation must be taken with caution, but it clearly opens the way for larger studies specifically designed to address this issue.
The observation that reduced risk of placental infection in SAO women occurred at first pregnancy suggests that either immunologic mechanisms are not involved in the protection observed or SAO women mount more effective immune responses against placental parasites during the first pregnancy. However, our flow cytometry experiments did not reveal any major difference between SAO and control women in the acquisition of antibodies against variant surface antigens from placental-bindinglike parasites. Although we only determined these antibody titers in a small subset of sera and we can not draw conclusions about their prevalence in this population, these results clearly indicate that SAO women are exposed to placental binding parasites and that they do not develop drastically higher titers of antibodies against their surface antigens. Thus, although we can not completely rule out the possibility that antibodies to placental-binding parasites in SAO women have different specificity that confers them a higher protective effect, it is likely that the protection against high-density placental infection observed in SAO primigravidae operates via non-immune mechanisms.
The observation in children that the SAO trait confers protection against cerebral malaria but not against malaria parasitemia or severe malaria anemia29 suggests that protection acts via post-invasion mechanisms. This has led several authors to hypothesize that the SAO trait might prevent sequestration of infected erythrocytes.24,28,29 Our in vitro studies support the view that differences in the invasion of SAO erythrocytes alone are not likely to explain the protection conferred,44 but we found that SAO infected erythrocytes cytoadhere in vitro to the principal receptors for sequestration, including CSA, suggesting that sequestration of SAO infected erythrocytes does occur.45 Here we show by histologic observation of placental sections that infected erythrocytes from SAO women accumulate in the placenta. This result confirms the predictions from our in vitro experiments, and provides the first in vivo evidence that SAO erythrocytes do sequester, using the only model amenable for the observation of sequestered infected erythrocytes in vivo in a large number of samples.
Our in vitro studies also showed that SAO-infected erythrocytes exhibit an altered adhesive behavior,45 but the alteration was in the opposite direction to that previously predicted. Under conditions of flow, SAO erythrocytes infected with the CD36-binding line 3D7 bind more efficiently than normal infected erythrocytes to the principal endothelial receptor for sequestration, CD36.45 Thus, the SAO trait may affect the tissue distribution of sequestered infected erythrocytes for parasites with dual binding to CD36 and other receptors.45 Parasites that sequester in the placenta do not bind to CD36 because since binding to CD36 and CSA are mutually exclusive.22 Therefore, the increase in binding to CD36 associated with SAO would not affect the distribution of placental binding parasites. Thus, the observation that SAO-infected erythrocytes do sequester in the placenta is not at odds with our previous findings.
An intriguing observation of this study was the lower prevalence of the SAO trait among pregnant women. It is unlikely that low fertility is associated with this trait, because some SAO women had many descendants (up to 8 for the SAO women enrolled in this study), and the average number of descendants was similar between SAO and control pregnant women. It is also unlikely that the difference is explained by miscarriages of SAO homozygous fetus, because those could only account for 25% of the conceptions when the father is also SAO and 0% when the father is not SAO. One possible explanation would be that the combination of SAO with some other trait produces sterility, whereas women who do not carry this hypothetical other trait would have normal fertility. The reduced prevalence of the SAO trait among pregnant women will have to be taken into consideration when designing any further study that assesses the effect of the SAO trait on placental malaria. The power of our study to detect a protective effect of this trait was reduced because our calculations were based on previous estimates of a 35% prevalence of the SAO trait in this area,24 whereas the actual prevalence that we found in pregnant women was only 12.4%. Furthermore, we believe that 18% might provide an accurate estimation of the prevalence of the SAO trait in non-pregnant individuals from the Madang North Coast area. We collected samples from many different villages along the full area and avoided collecting samples from multiple individuals of the same family, and did not observe as high a prevalence of the SAO trait as previously reported.24 Another recent study conducted in Liksul, at the northern end of our study area, found a prevalence of the SAO trait of less than 15%.46
The enormous burden of malaria has shaped the human genome in numerous ways to increase the chances of survival from this disease.47 Here we describe that the SAO trait, well known to confer specific protection against cerebral malaria, was associated in our study with some level of protection against placental malaria in primigravidae. Although this observation will have to await confirmation from larger studies, a common fundamental step for both pathologies is the sequestration of infected erythrocytes, which makes it likely that the altered adherent behavior caused by the deletion in band 3 lies behind the mechanism of protection against both pathologies. A selective advantage against placental malaria would implicate that the mutation is selected and perpetuated not only by conferring a selective advantage against malaria to its carriers but also to the descendants of female carriers, but this could not be completely confirmed because we did not observe an improved birth weight outcome in newborns from SAO women. Because of the intrinsic variability in BW and the relatively low prevalence of LBW, this would require a study with an enormous sample size.
Received December 14, 2005. Accepted for publication May 10, 2006.
Acknowledgments: We are extremely grateful to all the pregnant women in the Madang North coast who participated in the study. We are also grateful to Martin Imbans for assistance with the field work, to Aphrodite Caragounis and Edson Dembo for assistance with the flow cytometry, to Blaise Genton for useful discussions about the study, and to the staff at the Alexishafen and Mugil health centers for their constant support to this study, especially sister Balsi and Marian Baniwap.
Financial support: This investigation received financial assistance from UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR). SJR is supported by a Wellcome Trust Senior Fellowship.
* Address correspondence to Alfred Cortés, National Institute for Medical Research, The Ridgeway, Mill Hill, London NW7 1AA, UK. E-mail: acortes{at}nimr.mrc.ac.uk ![]()
The American Committee on Clinical Tropical Medicine and Travelers Health (ACCTMTH) assisted with publication costs.
Authors addresses: Ariadna Benet, C./Sant Antoni Maria Claret, 264, 6th floor, door 4, Barcelona 08041 Spain, E-mail: ariadnabm{at}yahoo.com. T. Yee Khong, Department of Histopathology, Womens and Childrens Hospital, 72 King William Road, North Adelaide, South Australia 5006, Australia, Telephone: 61-8-81616793, Fax: 61-8-81617022, E-mail: yee.khong{at}adelaide.edu.au. Alice Ura, Rebecca Samen, Kerry Lorry, Mata Mellombo, Livingstone Tavul, and Key Baea, Papua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research, Madang, P.O.Box 378, MP511, Papua New Guinea, Telephone: 675-8522909, Fax: 675-8523289, E-mail: yagaum{at}pngimr.org.pg. Stephen J. Rogerson, Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria 3050, Australia, Telephone: 61-3-83443259, Fax: 61-3-93471863, E-mail: sroger{at}unimelb.edu.au. Alfred Cortés, National Institute for Medical Research, The Ridgeway, Mill Hill, London NW7 1AA, UK, Telephone: 44-20-88162402, Fax: 44-20-88162730. Current address: Institut de Recerca Biomédica (IRB), Parc Científic de Barcelona (PCB), C./Josep Samitier 15 08028 Barcelona, Telephone: 34-93-403-4867, Fas: 34-93-403-4870, E-mail: acortes{at}nimr.mrc.ac.uk.
| REFERENCES |
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. O'DONNELL, A. RAIKO, J. B. CLEGG, D. J. WEATHERALL, and S. J. ALLEN SOUTHEAST ASIAN OVALOCYTOSIS AND PREGNANCY IN A MALARIA-ENDEMIC REGION OF PAPUA NEW GUINEA Am J Trop Med Hyg, April 1, 2007; 76(4): 631 - 633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |