|
|
||||||||
| ABSTRACT |
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|
|
|---|
The morbidity caused by this ectoparasite is frequently underestimated. In addition to the discomfort caused by the intensely pruritic lesions, infestation causes significant morbidity because of secondary bacterial infections, especially group A Streptococci. Repeated infestation and resultant recurrent pyoderma have now been identified as important precipitants of poststreptococcal renal and rheumatic heart disease, and thus control programs for scabies represent a major focus of public health intervention in endemic communities such as indigenous communities in northern Australia.2–5
The standard treatment of human scabies in the developed world is topical application of the pyrethroid drug permethrin in a concentration of 5%. In scabies-endemic communities, public health prevention strategies are increasingly based on mass community treatment. In studies evaluating such community control programs, significant short-term success has been shown, with a major reduction in the prevalence of symptomatic scabies and pyoderma.6,7 However, mass community treatment in endemic communities creates an environment for emerging tolerance or resistance, and new approaches to control are needed.
The contribution of drug resistance to treatment failure in individual patients has been largely unexplored. To date, treatment failures have been attributed to incorrect application of the acaricide, failure to treat all contacts leading to re-infestation, or the so-called core transmitter crusted scabies patients.7 However, there are increasing reports of treatment failure to acaricidal drugs including 1% gammabenzene hexachloride (Lindane [Drexel Chemical Company, Memphis, TN], Quellada [Stafford-Miller, NSW, Australia]),8 crotamiton 10% (Eurax [Novartis Pharmaceuticals, NSW, Australia]),9–10 and more recently ivermectin.11
Permethrin was first approved for human use in 1986 in the United States for treatment of head lice caused by Pediculus capitis. Permethrin resistance in head lice is now widespread, with clinical failures reported in Australia, Israel, England, France, and the Czech Republic.12,13 Permethrin in the form of a 5% cream was introduced in northern Australia in 1994 for treatment of scabies. At the time of its introduction, an in vitro study showed a 100% mortality after 1-hour exposure to 5% permethrin.14 Since then, it has been extensively used across central and northern Australia, and such widescale use may have led to the selection of resistance. Indeed, a recently published in vitro acaricide efficacy study suggested that S. scabiei mites are becoming increasingly tolerant to permethrin.15 In this study, 35% of mites exposed to 5% permethrin were still alive after 3 hours, and 4% were still alive after 18–22 hours of exposure. These results therefore raise concerns about the development of acaricide resistance in scabies mites.
Pyrethroids act on the nervous system of arthropods by altering the function of voltage-sensitive sodium channel (Vssc) in nerve membranes, otherwise known as the para-homologous sodium channel. They slow the kinetics of sodium channel activation and inactivation, resulting in the prolonged opening of the channels that lead to paralysis and death. Arthropod Vsscs are members of a family of large, complex transmembrane proteins that generate the action potentials in the neuronal membranes of higher eukaryotes that are responsible for neurotransmission.16 The
subunit of this sodium channel is composed of four homologous repeating domains (I–IV) each with six transmembrane segments (S1–S6) that contribute to the functional gating properties of the channel. The best recognized mechanism of reduced sensitivity of the nervous system of arthropods to pyrethroid insecticides is known as knockdown resistance (kdr). This is mediated by specific mutations in this Vssc. The most important mutations associated with the kdr phenotype have been identified in domain II. Such mutations were initially identified in pyrethroid-resistant houseflies (Musca domestica) and subsequently in several other species,17–19 including Anopheles gambiae,20 the mosquito vector for malaria, and Culex pipiens,21 an important mosquito vector for flavivirus infection. The functional significance of these mutations has been verified by electrophysiological study of mutant alleles in Xenopus laevis oocytes.22
Of significance, these kdr mutations located in domain II have not been detected in pyrethroid-resistant arthropods more closely related to the scabies mites, such as the cattle tick (Boophilus microplus) and honeybee mite (Varroa destructor). Instead, a point mutation was identified in domain III in pyrethroid-resistant cattle ticks23 and in the linker connecting domains III and IV and in domain IV itself in pyrethroid-resistant honeybee mites.24 These results suggest that distinct sodium channel gene mutations may be selected in different arthropod species in response to pyrethroid drug pressure.
The aim of this study was to clone and sequence the Vssc gene in the human scabies mite, S. scabiei var hominis, and develop a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assay to enable survey for mutations in the para-homologous gene that may be associated with permethrin resistance.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|
|
|---|
S. scabiei var hominis genomic DNA. Genomic sequence was obtained by PCR from human scabies mites collected from shed skin of a crusted scabies patient. Genomic DNA was extracted as previously described.27 In brief, 50 mites were placed in Prepman Ultra Reagent (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA), homogenized with a motorized homogenizer, and boiled for 10 minutes. After cooling in ice for 2 minutes, the tube was spun, and 1 µL of the supernatant was used as template for PCR.
S. scabiei var suis cDNA. Total RNA was extracted using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbard, CA) from scabies mites collected from a pigs ear. Pig mite cDNA was derived by reverse transcription using Gene Racer 5' primer (Invitrogen) and a gene-specific primer.
PCR strategies.
Primers for PCR were designed from Vssc orthologs in GenBank and are listed in Table 1
. Degenerate primer pairs were used to amplify domains III–IV of the SsVssc from the S. scabiei var hominis cDNA library. The region spanning domain II was initially isolated from genomic DNA extracted from human scabies mites using a degenerate forward primer and a scabies gene-specific reverse primer. The corresponding cDNA sequence was amplified from pig scabies mites, S. scabiei var suis, using a gene-specific primer pair. The 3' end of the scabies sodium channel was initially amplified from the S. scabiei var vulpes cDNA library using a gene-specific primer and a bacteriophage lambda vector primer (T7). The corresponding 3' region was subsequently amplified from the S. scabiei var hominis cDNA library.
|
Cloning and DNA sequencing. Purified products were ligated into pGEM T Easy vector and recombinant plasmids transformed into JM109 competent cells (Promega, Madison, WI). Plasmid DNA was purified with the Roche Plasmid Purification Kit. Insert-positive clones were verified by restriction enzyme digestion and subjected to DNA cycle sequencing. Cycle sequenced products were precipitated by 70% iso-propanol and analyzed using the ABI Prism 3100 Genetic Analyzer sequencing apparatus. Sequences were analyzed using MacVector 7.2 (Accelrys, San Diego, CA) and compared with orthologs in GenBank using Blast X.
Ethics approval. Ethics approval for collection of skin samples containing mites was obtained from the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Menzies School of Health Research and the Royal Darwin Hospital, and ethics approval for collection of mites from pigs ear was obtained from Animal Ethics Committee of the Queensland Institute of Medical Research.
| RESULTS |
|
|
|---|
Cloning S. scabiei genomic DNA.
Fragments corresponding to the cDNA of the SsVssc sequence were amplified from S. scabiei var hominis genomic DNA using primers designed from the cDNA sequence (Table 1
). Genomic fragment (GF1) of 2 kb in length spanning domain IIS1–S6 was amplified by a degenerate forward primer, 1045F, and a gene-specific reverse primer, 3205R; genomic fragment 2 (GF2) of 1.1 kb spanning domain IIS6 to domain IIIS2 was amplified by gene-specific primers 86F and 189R; genomic fragment 3–4 (GF3–4) of 1.4 kb was amplified by gene-specific primers 189F and 1595R; and genomic fragment 5 (GF5) of 1.1 kb was amplified by gene-specific primers 1595F and 2538R. The S. scabiei var suis genomic sequence was cloned in a similar manner.
Scabies mite sodium channel gene. The partial SsVssc cDNA encompasses 3,711 nucleotides with an open reading frame (ORF) encoding 1,237 amino acids (GenBank accession no. DQ077149: S. scabiei var hominis; no. DQ077150: S scabiei var suis). The putative stop codon (TAA) is at nucleotide 3238. At the 3' end of the cDNA sequence, a poly (A) tail sequence, was found after 297 bp of 3' untranslated region.
Alignment of the deduced amino acid sequence of SsVssc with the cattle tick, B. microplus sodium channel gene23 showed strongest similarity at domains III and IV, with 74% identity at the amino acid level (Figure 1
). The SsVssc also showed high similarity to the honeybee mite, V. destructor,29 Vssc protein at domain II, with 81% identity at the amino acid level. As expected, the SsVssc sequence of the short intracellular linker between domains III and IV was highly conserved compared with the B. microplus sequence (98% identity) and the V. destructor (96% identity).
|
The corresponding genomic DNA sequence of S. scabiei var hominis (Genbank accession no. DQ077148) was analyzed to determine genomic organization of the scabies mite sodium channel gene. A 55-bp intron in the transmembrane linker connecting domains II and III and a 72-bp intron in the transmembrane linker connecting domains III and IV were found. A 67-bp intron was found in the middle of domain II S4, and a 508-bp intron was found within domain III S2. Other introns were detected in intracellular linkers connecting segments S1 and S2 of domain II (61 bp); segments S5 and S6 of domain II (75 bp); segments S1 and S2 of domain III (61bp); segments S4 and S5 of domain III (382 bp); and segments S5 and S6 of domain III (96 bp) (data not shown).
Comparison of S. scabiei var humanis and var suis Vssc genes. A comparison of the S. scabiei var hominis and S. scabiei var suis Vsscs (GenBank accession no. DQ 145115) genomic sequences showed identical intron/exon structures with 99% identity at the amino acid level (data not shown).
Development of a genotyping strategy.
Based on the derived genomic sequence, genotyping primers were designed to cover the coding regions of the genomic sequence that includes sites associated with permethrin resistance in a range of arthropods, and a PCR amplification strategy that results in five PCR products, each of approximately 1 kb in length was developed (Figure 2
; Table 1
).
|
The next pair of primers amplified the linker region between domains II and III and used primers LA and LB resulting in a 761-bp product. The optimal cycling conditions were as follows: 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 seconds, 51°C for 30 seconds, and 68°C for 35 seconds.
Two PCR primer pairs were designed to span domain III because it contains four introns of 61–508 bp. The first pair (D3A and D3B) amplified a 899-bp product and covered the region of domain III S1–S3. Optimal cycling conditions were as follows: 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 seconds, 51°C for 30 seconds, and 68°C for 35 seconds. The second pair of primers (D3C and D3D) covered domain III S4–S6 and resulted in a 1,095-bp product with optimal cycling conditions of 94°C for 30 seconds, 49°C for 30 seconds, and 68°C for 1 minute for 35 cycles.
The domain IV genotyping protocol resulted in the amplification of a PCR product of 1,370 bp using primer pairs D4A and D4B with optimal cycling conditions of 94°C for 30 seconds, 49°C for 30 seconds, and 68°C for 1 minutes and 25 seconds for 35 cycles.
Genotyping of single mites.
Individual human scabies mites were obtained from the bedding of crusted scabies patients, whereas individual scabies mites were obtained from the ears of infested pigs using a dissecting microscope. Single mites were suspended in Prepman Ultra reagent, and standardized PCR protocols covering the five genotyping regions were performed for each mite. PCR products were purified, and direct cycle sequencing was performed. This protocol enabled successful genotyping of individual mites (Figure 3
). From a total of 27 mites that were genotyped, complete sequences were obtained in 19 mites in all domains, a success rate of 70%. To date, no nucleotide polymorphism resulting in a codon change at positions associated with knockdown resistance in other arthropods has been identified in this preliminary survey.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|
|
|---|
The first mechanism for pyrethroid resistance (target alteration) has been rigorously studied in the housefly (M. domestica), where specific gene mutations causing the kdr phenotype were first identified. These include a substitution of leucine by phenylalanine at domain II S6 (L1014F) and a replacement of methionine by threonine (M918T) in the nearby linker of S4 and S5 in the same domain. If both mutations are present, the highly resistant trait, the so-called super kdr, is observed. The same mutations have been found in a range of agricultural pests with pyrethroid resistance.35,36 The association of mutations in the sodium channel gene with knockdown resistance has led to the search for other novel resistance conferring mutations in other species. In a pyrethroid-resistant strain of an arachnid arthropod, the southern cattle tick, B. microplus, a point mutation associated with pyrethroid resistance was identified at domain III S6 (F1538I). This mutation is located at a site distant from where mutations in the Vssc gene have been found in pyrethroid-resistant insects.23 The same is true for the pyrethroid-resistant honeybee mite, V. destructor, where multiple mutations, in domain III S6 (F758L), in domain IV S5 (I982V), in domain IVS6 (M1055I), and in the linker region connecting domains III and IV (L826P), have been identified.24 Amino acid residues linking domains III and IV constitute part of the intracellular mouth of the sodium channel pore and form the inactivation gating particle, and mutations in this region have been associated with resistance to pyrethroid insecticides.30
In all cases, these mutations affect the sensitivity of the channels by accelerating the decay of the tail currents that enhances pyrethroid dissociation from sodium channels. The majority of the resistance-associated mutations have been identified in the S6 transmembrane segment of domains I, II, and III, which suggests that they occur at residues forming the pyrethroid-binding sites. Structural alterations arising from these mutations may alter the interaction of pyrethroids with sodium channels, therefore reducing the sensitivity to pyrethroid insecticides.23
An alternate mechanism for pyrethroid resistance among arthropod pests is an increase in pesticide degrading enzyme activity. This can be caused by either an increase in substrate specificity caused by steric effects on enzyme–substrate interactions or hyperproduction of the enzyme. This hyperproduction may result in increased detoxification of insecticide esters initially by sequestration followed by hydrolysis during reactivation of inhibited esterase.37 Increased hydrolysis of insecticides by esterases has been implicated in insecticide resistance in some species such as the blowfly, Lucilia cuprina,38,39 and cattle tick, B. microplus.40 It has also been shown that increased detoxification of insecticides was also related to amplification of esterase genes in the mosquito, Culex quin-quefaciatus,41 and the aphid Myzus persicae.42
While three classes of degrading enzyme have been implicated in insecticide detoxification (cytochrome P-450 mixed function oxidases, glutathione S-transferases, and esterases), available evidence supports the role of B1 carboxylesterase as the degrading enzyme responsible for permethrin resistance. It has been shown recently that a strain of permethrin-resistant cattle ticks, B. microplus, without kdr mutations, had hyperproduction of B1 carboxylesterase instead.37,43 Such hyperproduction is a well-recognized mechanism of pyrethroid resistance in the mosquito, Cx. quinquefasciatus, and the peach potato aphid, M. persicae. In both species, gene duplication has been identified as the mechanism of resistance.44 A point mutation (Asp to Asn) in this resistance-conferring esterase gene has also been identified in the drug-resistant strain of cattle tick.32
In this study, a major mechanism for pyrethroid resistance, kdr, which has been well established in a range of arthropods, was studied in S. scabiei. It is of significance because there were no previous studies conducted on sodium channel gene associated with knockdown resistance in scabies mites.
Comparison of DNA sequences from human mite genomic DNA and cDNA was undertaken to study possible sites of alternative splicing. Alternative splicing is a major mechanism by which ion channels of the nervous system of animals increase structural and functional diversity. Extensive alternative splicing of the para sodium channel gene has been reported in previous studies,45–46 and its functional significance has been shown in the German cockroach to produce pharmacologically distinct channels.47 A possible alternative splice site has been identified in the S. scabiei Vssc at a location similar to that in the V. destructor Vssc (data not shown). Further analysis of gene transcripts for investigation of alternative splice events is planned.
Genotyping primers were designed based on the derived genomic sequence covering domains II–IV, where the majority of the known resistance-associated mutations was located. Using the genotyping protocol developed, we are now able to genotype individual scabies mites from different sources with varying susceptibilities to permethrin. The ability to genotype individual mites will enable us to identify polymorphisms that maybe associated with knockdown resistance in scabies mites. Once polymorphisms have been identified, it will be possible to verify their functional significance by electrophysiological studies using Xenopus laevis oocytes.22 It will then be possible to design mutation-specific PCR protocols, targeting the highly associated kdr mutations, thus enabling survey of populations of mites.
Received June 6, 2005. Accepted for publication December 8, 2005.
Acknowledgments: The authors thank Professor David Kemp for sharing the S. scabiei var hominis cDNA library and for support of K. Fischer under his Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) program Grant 290208, Dr. J. G. Mattsson of the National Veterinary Institute, Uppsala, Sweden, for sharing the S. scabiei var vulpes cDNA library, and Professor Bart Currie from the Menzies School of Health Research.
Financial support: This work was supported by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (Grant 288301) and Australian Centre for Tropical Health and Nutrition (ACITHN), University of Queensland, Australia.
* Address correspondence to Cielo Pasay, Clinical Tropical Medicine Laboratory, Infectious Diseases and Immunology Division, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Herston, Queensland 4029, Australia. E-mail: cielop{at}qimr.edu.au ![]()
Authors addresses: Cielo Pasay, Katja Fischer, and James Mc Carthy, Queensland Institute of Medical Research and Australian Centre for International and Tropical Health and Nutrition, University of Queensland, 300 Herston Road, Herston, Queensland 4029, Australia. Shelley Walton and Deborah Holt, Menzies School of Health Research, PO Box 41096, Casuarina, Darwin NT 0811, Australia and Institute of Advanced Studies, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Reprint requests: Cielo Pasay, Clinical Tropical Medicine Laboratory, Infectious Diseases and Immunology Division, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Herston, Queensland 4029, Australia. E-mail: cieloP{at}qimr.edu.au.
| REFERENCES |
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |