AJTMH Tropical Medicine and Hygiene News
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 73(5), 2005, pp. 865-870
Copyright © 2005 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HOLMAN, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by GOFF, W. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HOLMAN, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by GOFF, W. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Babesiosis
Right arrow Zoonotic Diseases

COMPARATIVE INFECTIVITY OF BABESIA DIVERGENS AND A ZOONOTIC BABESIA DIVERGENS–LIKE PARASITE IN CATTLE

PATRICIA J. HOLMAN, ANGELA M. SPENCER, SAM R. TELFORD, III, HEIDI K. GOETHERT, ANDREW J. ALLEN, DONALD P. KNOWLES, AND WILL L. GOFF*
Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine, Tufts University, North Grafton, Massachusetts; Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington; Animal Disease Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Pullman, Washington


ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Babesia divergens–like parasites identified in human babesiosis cases in Missouri and Kentucky and in eastern cottontail rabbits (Sylvilagus floridanus) on Nantucket Island, Massachusetts, share identical small subunit ribosomal RNA gene sequences. This sequence is 99.8% identical to that of Babesia divergens, suggesting that the U.S. parasite may be B. divergens, a causative agent of human and bovine babesiosis in Europe. Holstein-Friesian calves were inoculated with cultured Nantucket Island Babesia sp. (NR831) and B. divergens parasites and monitored by clinical signs, Giemsa-stained blood films, PCR, and culture. The NR831 recipients did not exhibit clinical signs of infection and remained negative for all assays. The B. divergens recipients developed clinical infections and became positive by all assays. NR831 recipients were fully susceptible upon challenge inoculation with B. divergens. This study confirms that the Nantucket Island Babesia sp. is not conspecific with B. divergens based on host specificity for cattle.


INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Members of the Babesiidae are protozoan parasites in the order Piroplasmorida and subphylum Apicomplexa. The agents of babesiosis, these tick-transmitted blood parasites are found in mammalian hosts throughout the world. Some species are host-specific, and others are more promiscuous and may even infect hosts across taxonomic classes including humans. Thus, babesiosis, the disease associated with these parasites, is of economic, veterinary, and medical importance.

Human babesiosis is an emerging tick-borne disease.1,2 Most human cases in the United States are caused by Babesia microti,3 primarily a parasite of rodents, whereas cases in Europe are usually caused by Babesia divergens,4 primarily a parasite of cattle but also experimentally in gerbils.5 However, over the past several years, additional human infections in the United States have been reported, and molecular characterization confirms that they are not B. microti.611 Of these, three cases reported in Missouri, Kentucky, and Washington states resulted from infection with agents resembling B. divergens based on the small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) gene and other factors.68 Morphologic similarity was noted in the wide angle between paired piroplasms and the frequent location of parasites at the internal margin of the erythrocyte in the accole position.68

Most cases of human babesiosis caused by B. divergens have occurred in asplenic patients, thus resulting in a high fatality rate.12 The two cases reported in Kentucky and Missouri also occurred in asplenic patients, with the latter resulting in death.6,7 Serum from the Missouri patient reacted with B. divergens antigen in both indirect immunofluorescence and immunoprecipitation.6 In addition, the Missouri agent, designated MO-1, was not infective for gerbils, a standard criterion for identifying B. divergens.6

MO-1 and the causative agent in the Kentucky case are synonymous based on identical SSU rRNA gene sequences (GenBank accession nos. AY048113 and AY887131, respectively). The causative agent in the Kentucky case is reported to be nearly identical in SSU rRNA gene sequence to that of B. divergens (99.8% identity).7 Because homology of this order may be indicative of conspecificity, MO-1 and the Kentucky agent might be considered B. divergens.7 However, neither B. divergens nor its tick vector, Ixodes ricinus, is indigenous to the United States, and, indeed, both are considered exotic species.

Recently, a B. divergens–like parasite that shares identical SSU rRNA gene sequence with the Kentucky parasite was identified in eastern cottontail rabbits (Sylvilagus floridanus) and Ixodes dentatus ticks on Nantucket Island, Massachusetts.13 Although conspecificity of the eastern cottontail rabbit parasite with the Kentucky agent is supported by both morphology and molecular identity in the SSU rRNA gene,13,14 the relationship of this organism to B. divergens is not as clear. The B. divergens SSU rRNA gene sequence similarity to that of the rabbit parasite led to speculation that the rabbit parasite is B. divergens.13 Concern that B. divergens may be endemic in the United States and clarification of the potential of this parasite to infect native cattle led to this study. The study reported herein presents evidence supporting the conclusion that the Nantucket Babesia isolate is a species distinct from B. divergens based on host specificity.


MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Parasites. The Babesia sp. isolated from eastern cottontail rabbits (Nantucket Babesia isolate, NR831) on Nantucket Island, Massachusetts, and the Purnell strain of B. divergens were previously described.1317

The Nantucket Babesia isolate (NR831) was cultivated in vitro in eastern cottontail rabbit erythrocytes in HL-1 medium (BioWhittaker, Walkersville, MD) supplemented with 20% human serum, 2 mM L-glutamine (GibcoBRL, Grand Island, NY), and 200 U/mL penicillin, 200 µg/mL streptomycin, and 50 µg/mL Fungizone (antibiotic-antimycotic; GibcoBRL) as previously described.16 Babesia divergens Purnell was cultured as previously described in bovine erythrocytes but in complete culture medium consisting of HL-1 medium supplemented with 20% normal adult bovine serum. The cultures were incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 2% oxygen, 5% carbon dioxide, and 93% nitrogen and maintained following previously described protocols.14,16

Cultures of NR831 and B. divergens in the sixth and eighth passages, respectively, were quantitated to produce 1 x 105 infected erythrocytes per dose. The doses were prepared in a final concentration of 10% polyvinylpyrrolidone 40 in Puck’s saline glucose with 10 g/L extra glucose and stored in liquid nitrogen. An aliquot of each isolate was successfully recovered in culture to confirm viability of the inoculum prior to use for experimental infections of calves described below. The frozen inocula were shipped on dry ice by overnight courier to the Animal Disease Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Pullman, WA, and immediately stored in liquid nitrogen until used.

Babesia divergens Purnell and NR831 cultures were prepared as antigens for indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) tests as previously described.18

Experimental inoculations. Seven 6- to 9-month-old Holstein-Friesian steers were obtained from a feedlot in Washington State. Each animal was confirmed Babesia-free after serologic screening using B. divergens–, B. bovis–, and B. bigemina–specific IIF. The steers were housed in a BL-2 facility and maintained as prescribed by the institutional biosafety and animal care committees (Washington State University, Pullman, WA) in keeping with National Institutes of Health guidelines.

Three of the steers were surgically splenectomized prior to the onset of the study. Principal animals, which each received an intravenous dose of 1 x 105 erythrocytes infected with NR831, included two splenectomized and three spleen-intact animals. One splenectomized and one spleen-intact animal served as controls, and each similarly received an intravenous dose of 1 x 105 erythrocytes infected with B. divergens Purnell. On Day 59 postinoculation (PI), each surviving principal and the spleen-intact control animal were challenged with an intravenous dose of 1 x 105 erythrocytes infected with B. divergens Purnell.

Evaluation of infection. Blood samples and rectal body temperature were obtained from each animal 17 days prior to inoculation and on Days 4–7, 9–14, 17, 19, 21, 26, and 33 PI. Blood samples collected into Alsever’s solution were kept refrigerated until weekly collections were complete and then shipped to Texas A&M University (College Station, TX) for testing by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and in vitro culture as described below. Blood collected into Vacutainer tubes (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) containing EDTA was used to determine hematocrit and to prepare Giemsa-stained blood films. The blood films were examined microscopically at 1,000x under oil immersion for the presence of Babesia sp. parasites. Serum samples were evaluated for antibody activity specific for B. divergens or the Nantucket Babesia isolate by IIF. Clinical signs, such as inappetance, lethargy, and hemoglobinuria, were also noted daily. After challenge, the animals were similarly monitored until infection was confirmed in all animals by visualization of the parasite in Giemsa-stained blood films.

Cultures. Blood samples were prepared for culture using previously described protocols with modification.15 Blood collected into Alsever’s solution was centrifuged to pellet the cells, and the resulting cell pellet was washed by centrifugation as previously described.15 For each animal, packed washed erythrocytes (0.2 mL) were dispensed into 0.8 mL complete culture medium (HL-1 with 20% bovine serum as described above) in a well of a 24-well culture plate. In addition, cultures containing 0.1 mL packed erythrocytes from the principals and 0.1 mL washed packed human erythrocytes (Rockland Immunochemicals,Gilbertsville, PA) in 0.8 mL HL-1 medium with 20% human serum (Rockland Immunochemicals) were prepared. The cultures were incubated as above. Each day, 0.8 mL supernatant medium was removed from the cultures and replaced with fresh appropriate medium. Giemsa-stained erythrocyte smears were made daily from the cultures and examined microscopically at 1,000x under oil immersion to screen for the appearance of Babesia organisms. The cultures were maintained until parasites were detected or until 2 weeks after initiation. Cultures were not initiated from control animal blood samples after Day 11 PI.

PCR. A nested PCR protocol was used to amplify a small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) gene fragment common to both B. divergens and the Nantucket Babesia isolate. Genomic DNA was purified from 200 µL packed washed erythrocytes by a standard phenol/chloroform extraction protocol19 facilitated by use of Phase-lock gel tubes (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and ethanol precipitated. The dried DNA pellets were resuspended in 20 µL TE (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA), and 1 µL of the suspension was used in a primary PCR with 1 pmol each forward primer A (5'-AACCTGGTGATCCTGCCAGT-3') and reverse primer B (5'-GATCCTTCTGCAGGTTCACCTAC-3')20 in a 25 µL reaction volume (Advantage 2 PCR Kit, BD Biosciences, Palo Alto, CA) to amplify the SSU rRNA gene. The cycling protocol included an initial denaturation step at 96°C for 3 minutes followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 10 seconds, annealing at 60°C for 10 seconds, and extension at 72°C for 2 minutes, with a final extension at 72°C for 10 minutes and hold at 4°C in a PCR Express or Sprint thermocycler (Hybaid, Waltham, MA).

Primers designed to specifically amplify a 1,026-bp fragment of the SSU rRNA gene common to both B. divergens and NR831were used for nested PCR. The primary PCR products were diluted 1:20 in PCR grade water and 1 µL used as template in each reaction mixture as above, but with 1 pmol each primer srBdvF (3'-GGTGTTAATATTGACTAATGTCGAGA TTGC-5') and srBdvR (3'-CCAAGCCGACGAATC GGAAAGGCC-5') and the initial denaturation reduced to 1 minute. The products were separated by electrophoresis through a 1% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide, and viewed by ultraviolet transillumination.


RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
No evidence of infection was found in any of the principal animals inoculated with the Nantucket Babesia isolate (Figure 1Go). No clinical signs were noted, no detectable parasitemias were detected from stained blood films, all PCR assays were negative, and no parasites were detected in any of the cultures.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
    FIGURE 1. Hematocrit (A) and rectal temperature (B) postinoculation. Individual values for the splenectomized (x) and spleen-intact ({square}) control calves inoculated with Babesia divergens and means for two splenectomized ({Delta}) and three spleen-intact ({diamond}) principal calves inoculated with the Nantucket Babesia isolate are shown.

 
The splenectomized and spleen-intact control calves inoculated with B. divergens subsequently developed clinical infections. Blood samples from the spleen-intact control animal were PCR positive from Day 4 through Day 18 PI, and B. divergens was detected in cultured blood samples collected on Day 5 onwards (Table 1Go). Parasites were first detected in blood films on Day 10 PI. A mild response to infection resulted with no evident hemoglobinuria or hemoglobinemia. The lowest hematocrit (25) was observed on Day 9 PI (Figure 1Go). Blood samples from the splenectomized control calf were PCR positive on Day 4 PI, negative on Day 5, and then positive for all subsequent samples (Table 1Go). Cultured blood samples confirmed infection from Day 4 onwards and parasitized erythrocytes were detected on Giemsa-stained blood films at Day 7 PI. Severe clinical signs of infection developed, which included lethargy and hemolytic anemia resulting in hemoglobinuria and hemoglobinemia. On Day 11 PI, in parallel with an elevated temperature, the hematocrit decreased to 17 and the parasitemia increased to 9%. The animal was humanely euthanized shortly thereafter.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1
PCR and culture results for the splenectomized (asplenic) and spleen-intact (spleen) calves that received either Babesia divergens Purnell inoculum (controls) or the Nantucket Babesia isolate inoculum (principals)
 
After challenge inoculation with B. divergens Purnell, all five principal animals developed infections that were similar to the primary responses observed in the controls. The splenectomized and the spleen-intact principal calves were positive by PCR on Day 4 and Day 7 (not tested Days 5 or 6) postchallenge (PC), respectively (Table 2Go). Parasites were detected in blood smears from the two splenectomized principal animals on Day 8 and Day 9 and from each of the spleen-intact principal animals on Day 10 PC. Clinical disease resulting from challenge inoculation was severe in the two splenectomized principals, both presenting with hemoglobinuria and hemoglobinemia. Hematocrits decreased to 13 on Day 9 PC in one and 15 on Day 10 PC in the other (Figure 2Go). After detection of parasites from stained blood films, each animal was humanely euthanized. The control spleen-intact animal was completely protected from clinical manifestations upon challenge with B. divergens Purnell but remained positive by PCR (Tables 1Go and 2Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2
PCR results post Babesia divergens Purnell challenge for the spleen-intact (spleen) control calf and the splenectomized (asplenic) and three spleen-intact (spleen) principal calves
 


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
    FIGURE 2. Individual hematocrit values for splenectomized (x, *) and spleen-intact ({Delta}, {square}, {diamond}) principal calves post challenge inoculation with Babesia divergens Purnell.

 
Seroconversion was not detected by IIF in the principals after inoculation with the Nantucket Babesia isolate. Cross-reactivity to B. divergens Purnell and the Nantucket Babesia antigen was noted in the two control calves inoculated with B. divergens by Day 11 PI. The spleen-intact control animal maintained a titer that increased after the challenge inoculation with B. divergens Purnell. Each of the principal animals seroconverted after B. divergens Purnell challenge inoculation, with serologic cross-reactions between the B. divergens Purnell and Nantucket Babesia isolate antigens observed in the IIF test.


DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Since the first case of human babesiosis was diagnosed in the United States in 1966, hundreds of B. microti infections have been reported primarily in the northeastern and upper midwestern United States.21,22 Over the past decade, emergence of human babesiosis, caused by agents other than B. microti in geographic areas of the United States where the disease has not previously been known to occur, has raised awareness of this underreported, potentially fatal disease.23,24 The recognition of new agents in the United States capable of causing babesiosis in humans raises questions about their reservoir hosts and tick vectors. To date, these questions remain largely unanswered.

Reports of human babesiosis by parasites resembling B. divergens in Missouri, Kentucky, and Washington states are particularly perplexing.68 Babesia divergens, a parasite of cattle that causes serious production losses, is also the primary cause of human babesiosis in Europe.2 Considered an exotic parasite, not only the human population but also resident cattle populations would be at risk if this parasite were established in the United States.

Babesia species traditionally are defined based on parasite morphology, mammalian host, tick vector, and serologic characterization. More recently, molecular markers have added another dimension to identification of these organisms, and the use of DNA sequence data to differentiate Babesia species is now widely accepted. Although a number of genes have been investigated for their utility in parasite identification, to date the genetic databases hold more Babesia spp. sequence data for the small subunit ribosomal RNA gene than any other single gene. SSU rRNA sequence comparisons have identified known Babesia spp. in new mammalian hosts as well as parasites possessing previously unreported sequences that may represent newly discovered species.8,2527 A drawback to this methodology is that there is no baseline sequence variation defined for any genetic marker for allo-patric hemoprotozoan populations.

In the current case, a concern regarding whether a zoonotic B. divergens–like parasite in the United States is, in fact, B. divergens centers on the potential economic impact to the cattle industry in this country, in addition to the human health risk.24,28 Host specificity is a defining trait of Babesia spp., thus, inoculation of cattle was undertaken to determine the infectivity of the U.S. parasite for this well-documented host of B. divergens. We elected to test both spleen-intact and splenectomized calves to provide optimum conditions for parasite infectivity. Even Babesia strains of low pathogenicity may be tested for host specificity using splenectomized calves because they are less efficient in clearing the parasites and thus more susceptible to infection.

Parallel inocula of B. divergens and the Nantucket Babesia isolate (conspecific with the U.S. human agent) were prepared from parasite cultures at similar passage levels (passages 8 and 6, respectively). Early passages were used because culture attenuation has been reported for some Babesia spp.,29 and B. divergens has been reported variously as attenuated over time in culture or as unaffected by long-term passage in vitro.30,31 To preclude the possibility of such effects, parasites from very early passages were used for both the primary inoculation and challenge doses. No clinical disease ensued after inoculation of either principal spleen-intact or splenectomized calves with the Nantucket Babesia isolate. Furthermore, parasites were not detected by either PCR or culture in any of the principals at any time. Finally, primary inoculation with the Nantucket Babesia isolate provided no protection upon subsequent challenge inoculation with B. divergens. Both the three spleen-intact and two splenectomized principal animals became infected with B. divergens, and severe clinical disease occurred in the two splenectomized animals. Both culture and PCR confirmed infection and identified the infections 3 to 5 days sooner than stained blood films. In contrast, the spleen-intact B. divergens Purnell control calf was completely protected from clinical disease upon homologous challenge.

Molecular characterization based on the SSU rRNA gene indicates that the Nantucket Island parasite and that found in man in Kentucky are likely the same organism.13 Furthermore, it is now known that the Nantucket Island, Kentucky, and Missouri parasites share identical SSU rRNA gene sequences (GenBank accession nos. AY144688, AY887132, and AY904043; AY887131; and AY048113, respectively). MO-1 also failed to infect calves,6 which contributed to the conclusion that MO-1 was not B. divergens. Thus, it is also likely that MO-1 is conspecific with the Nantucket Island Babesia. It appears that the eastern cottontail rabbit, which is found throughout the United States, may be a natural reservoir host for this parasite. Molecular evidence shows that Ixodes dentatus, which feeds primarily on rabbits, may serve as the tick vector for this Babesia sp.13

On the other hand, the B. divergens SSU rRNA gene sequence differs slightly from that of the Nantucket, Kentucky, and MO-1 isolates, suggesting that these North American isolates may not be conspecific with the European agent of bovine and human babesiosis, nor is this parasite the same as the B. divergens–like parasite isolations from wild ungulates in North America.15,3235 Those characterized by SSU rRNA gene sequence analysis were identified as B. odocoilei14,15 or as divergent from, but closely related to, B. divergens.36 Phylogenetic studies based on the SSU rRNA gene show that B. odocoilei is closely related to B. divergens (Purnell strain = type species) (20–30 base pair difference), and these two species branch together in the true Babesia clade.14,36,37

Multiple rRNA transcriptional units with variable SSU rRNA gene sequences are reported for the bovine parasites B. bovis and B. bigemina, demonstrating that SSU rRNA gene variability does exist within some Babesia species.38,39 On the other hand, identical SSU rRNA gene sequences have been found in the aforementioned isolates of B. odocoilei, whether isolated from white-tailed deer,14 caribou,32 elk,15,33 musk oxen, or bighorn sheep.27 The biology of B. bovis, which is a bovine-specific parasite, differs from that of B. divergens or B. odocoilei, which infect diverse host species. However, all three may be vectored by Ixodes spp. ticks.40 Thus, perhaps various Babesia spp. may be similar or dissimilar from each other in rRNA transcriptional unit make-up as well. Moreover, the degree of intraspecies SSU rRNA sequence variation may differ as well, depending on the Babesia species. If so, then absolute boundaries cannot be drawn across this genus for species delineation based on the SSU rRNA gene.

This study clearly shows that despite morphologic, serological, clinical course of human disease, at-risk human factors (i.e., splenectomy), tick vector (Ixodes spp.), and genetic similarities, B. divergens and the U.S. Babesia sp. are not conspecific as they do not share the bovine host. In the case of these two parasites, a three-base difference in the SSU rRNA gene sequence is sufficient to molecularly distinguish the two species.


Received June 17, 2005. Accepted for publication August 8, 2005.

Acknowledgments: The authors extend their thanks to Kathy Feldner and others at WSU Animal Resource Unit for animal care, Emma Karel, Lori Fuller, and Duane Chandler at ADRU for sample collections, and Shirley Sandoval and others in the WSU Large Animal Hospital for surgical assistance.

Financial support: This study was supported in part by USDA-ARS-ADRU-CRIS no. 5348-32000-020-00D, NIAID NIH RO3 AI054799-01, and Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Project 8973.

* Address correspondence to Will L. Goff, Animal Disease Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, 3003 ADBF, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-6630. E-mail: wgoff{at}vetmed.wsu.edu Back

Authors’ addresses: Patricia J. Holman and Angela M. Spencer, Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, TAMU 4467, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-4467, Telephone: 979-845-4202, Fax: 979-862-2344, E-mail: pholman{at}cvm.tamu.edu and aspencer{at}cvm.tamu.edu. Sam R. Telford, III and Heidi K. Goethert, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine, 200 Westboro Road, Tufts University, North Grafton, MA 01536, Telephone: 508-887-4236 and 508-839-7929, Fax: 508-839-7911, E-mail: Sam.Telford{at}tufts.edu and Heidi.Goethert{at}tufts.edu. Andrew J. Allen, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-7040, Telephone: 509-335-0784, Fax: 509-335-6094, E-mail: aja{at}vetmed.wsu.edu. Donald P. Knowles and Will L. Goff, Animal Disease Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Pullman, WA 99164-6630, Telephone: 509-335-6029, Fax: 509-335-8328, E-mail: dknowles{at}vetmed.wsu.edu and wgoff{at}vetmed.wsu.edu.

Reprint requests: Will L. Goff, Animal Disease Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, 3003 ADBF, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-6630, Telephone: 509-335-6003, E-mail: wgoff{at}vetmed.wsu.edu.


REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Krause PJ, 2003. Babesiosis diagnosis and treatment. Vector Borne & Zoonotic Diseases 3: 45–51.
  2. Kjemtrup AM, Conrad PA, 2000. Human babesiosis: an emerging tick-borne disease. Int J Parasitol 30: 1323–1337.[Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Franca C, 1908. Sur une piroplasme nouvelle chez une mangouste. Bull Soc Pathol Exot 1: 410–412.
  4. M’Fadyean J, Stockman S, 1911. A new species of piroplasm found in the blood of British cattle. J Comp Pathol 24: 340–354.
  5. Lewis D, Williams H, 1979. Infection of the Mongolian gerbil with the cattle piroplasm Babesia divergens. Nature 278: 170–171.[Medline]
  6. Herwaldt BL, Persing DH, Precigout EA, Goff WL, Mathiesen DA, Taylor PW, Eberhard ML, Gorenflot AF, 1996. A fatal case of babesiosis in Missouri: identification of another piroplasm that infects humans. Ann Intern Med 124: 643–650.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Beattie JF, Michelson ML, Holman PJ, 2002. Acute babesiosis caused by Babesia divergens in a resident in Kentucky. New Eng J Med 347: 697–698.[Free Full Text]
  8. Herwaldt BL, de Bruyn G, Pieniazek NJ, Homer M, Lofy KH, Slemenda SB, Fritsche TR, Persing DH, Limaye AP, 2004. Babesia divergens-like infection in Washington State. Emerg Infect Dis 10: 622–629.[Web of Science][Medline]
  9. Quick RE, Herwaldt BL, Thomford JW, Garrett ME, Eberhard ML, Wilson M, Spach DH, Dickerson JW, Telford III Sr, Steingart KR, Pollock R, Persing DH, Kobayashi JM, Juranek DD, Conrad PA, 1993. Babesiosis in Washington State: a new species of Babesia? Ann Inter Med 119: 284–290.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Persing DH, Herwaldt BL, Glaser C, Lane RS, Thomford JW, Mathiesen D, Krause PJ, Phillip DF, Conrad PA, 1995. Infection with a Babesia-like organism in northern California. N Engl J Med 332: 298–303.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Kjemtrup AM, Lee B, Fritz CL, Evans C, Chervenak M, Conrad PA, 2002. Investigation of transfusion transmission of a WA-1-type babesial parasite to a premature infant in California. Transfusion 42: 1482–1487.[Web of Science][Medline]
  12. Zintl A, Mulcahy G, Skerrett HE, Taylor SM, Gray JS, 2003. Babesia divergens, a bovine blood parasite of veterinary and zoonotic importance. Clin Microbiol Rev 16: 622–636.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Goethert HK, Telford SR III, 2003. Enzootic transmission of Babesia divergens among cottontail rabbits on Nantucket Island, Massachusetts. Am J Trop Med Hyg 69: 455–460.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Holman PJ, Madeley J, Craig TM, Allsopp BA, Allsopp MTEP, Petrini KR, Waghela SD, Wagner GG, 2000. Antigenic, phenotypic and molecular characterization confirms Babesia odocoilei isolated from three cervids. J Wildlife Dis 36: 518–530.[Abstract]
  15. Holman PJ, Bendele KG, Schoelkopf L, Jones-Witthuhn RL, Jones SO, 2003. Ribosomal RNA analysis of Babesia odocoilei isolates from farmed reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus) and elk (Cervus elaphus canadensis) in Wisconsin. Parasitol Res 91: 378–383.[Web of Science][Medline]
  16. Holman PJ, Spencer AM, Droleskey RE, Goethert HK, Telford, SR III. In vitro cultivation of a zoonotic Babesia sp. isolated from eastern cottontail rabbits (Sylvilagus floridanus) on Nantucket Island, Massachusetts. J Clin Microbiol 43: 3995–4001.
  17. Purnell RE, Brocklesby DW, Hendry DJ, Young ER, 1976. Separation and recombination of Babesia divergens and Ehrlichia phagocytophila from a field case of redwater from Erie. Vet Rec 99: 415–417.[Abstract]
  18. Goff WL, Wagner GG, Craig TM, Long RF, 1982. The bovine immune response to tick-derived Babesia bovis infection: serological studies of isolated immunoglobulins. Vet Parasitol 11: 109–120.[Web of Science][Medline]
  19. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T, 1989. Molecular Cloning, a Laboratory Manual, Volume 3. Second edition. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, E.3-E.4.
  20. Sogin ML, 1990. Amplification of ribosomal RNA genes for molecular evolution studies. Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White JJ, eds. PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications. New York: Academic Press, 307–314.
  21. Scholtens RG, Braff EK, Healy GR, Gleason N, 1968. A case of babesiosis in man in the United States. Am J Trop Med Hyg 17: 810–813.
  22. Spach DH, Liles WC, Campbell GL, Quick RE, Anderson DE Jr, Fritsche TR, 1993. Medical progress: tickborne diseases in the United States. N Engl J Med 329: 936–947.[Free Full Text]
  23. Sherr VT, 2004. Human babesiosis – an unrecorded reality. Absence of formal registry undermines its detection, diagnosis and treatment, suggesting the need for immediate mandatory reporting. Med Hypoth 63: 609–615.[Web of Science][Medline]
  24. Filbin MR, Mylonakis EE, Callegari L, Legome E, 2003. Babesiosis. J Emerg Med 20: 21–24.
  25. Herwaldt BL, Caccio S, Gherlinzoni F, Aspock H, Slemenda SB, Piccaluga PP, Martinelli G, Edelhofer R, Hollenstein U, Poletti G, Pampiglione S, Loschenberger K, Tura S, Pieniazek NJ, 2003. Molecular characterization of a non-Babesia divergens organism causing zoonotic babesiosis in Europe. Emerg Infect Dis 9: 942–948.[Web of Science][Medline]
  26. Birkenheuer AJ, Neel J, Ruslander D, Levy MG, Breitschwerdt EB, 2004. Detection and molecular characterization of a novel large Babesia species in a dog. Vet Parasitol 124: 151–160.[Web of Science][Medline]
  27. Schoelkopf L, Hutchinson CE, Bendele KG, Goff WL, Willett M, Rasmussen JM, Holman PJ, New ruminant hosts and wider geographic range identified for Babesia odocoilei (Emerson and Wright, 1970). J Wildlife Dis (in press).
  28. Cable RG, Leiby DA, 2003. Risk and prevention of transfusion-transmitted babesiosis and other tick-borne diseases. Curr Opin Hematol 10: 405–411.[Web of Science][Medline]
  29. Schuster FL, 2002. Cultivation of Babesia and Babesia-like blood parasites: agents of an emerging zoonotic disease. Clin Microbiol Rev 15: 365–373.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Winger CM, Canning EU, Culverhouse JD, 1989. A strain of Babesia divergens, attenuated after long-term culture. Res Vet Sci 46: 110–113.[Web of Science][Medline]
  31. Gorenflot AF, Brasseur P, Precigout EA, L’Hostis M, Marchand A, Schrevel J, 1991. Cytological and immunological responses to Babesia divergens in different hosts: ox, gerbil, man. Parasitol Res 77: 3–12.[Web of Science][Medline]
  32. Holman PJ, Petrini KR, Rhyan JC, Wagner GG, 1994. Culture isolation and partial characterization of a Babesia from a North American woodland caribou (Tarandus rangifer caribou). J Wildlife Dis 30: 195–200.[Abstract]
  33. Holman PJ, Craig TM, Doan Crider DL, Petrini KR, Rhyan J, Wagner GG, 1994. Culture isolation and partial characterization of a Babesia sp. from a North American elk (Cervus elaphus). J Wildlife Dis 30: 460–465.[Abstract]
  34. Goff WL, Jessup DA, Waldrup KA, Thomford JW, Conrad PA, Boyce WM, Gorham JR, Wagner GG, 1993. The isolation and partial characterization of a Babesia sp. from desert bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis nelsoni). J Euk Microbiol 40: 237–243.[Web of Science][Medline]
  35. Thomford JW, Conrad PA, Boyce WM, Holman PJ, Jessup DA, 1993. Isolation and in vitro cultivation of Babesia parasites from free-ranging desert bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis nelsoni) and mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) in California. J Parasitol 79: 77–84.[Medline]
  36. Kjemptrup AM, Thomford J, Robinson T, Conrad PA, 2000. Phylogenetic relationships of human and wildlife piroplasm isolates in the western United States inferred from the 18S nuclear small subunit RNA gene. Parasitol 120: 487–493.
  37. Reddy GR, Chakrabarti D, Yowell CA, Dame JB, 1991. Sequence microheterogeneity of the three small subunit ribosomal RNA genes of Babesia bigemina: expression in erythrocyte culture. Nucleic Acids Res 19: 3641–3645.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Dalrymple BP, Dimmock CM, Parrodi F, Wright IG, 1992. Babesia bovis, Babesia bigemina, Babesia canis, Babesia microti and Babesia rodhaini: comparison of ribosomal RNA gene organization. Int J Parasitol 22: 851–855.[Web of Science][Medline]
  39. Mackenstedt U, Luton K, Baverstock PR, Johnson AM, 1994. Phylogenetic relationships of Babesia divergens as determined from comparison of small subunit ribosomal RNA gene sequences. Mol Biochem Parasitol 68: 161–165.[Web of Science][Medline]
  40. Purnell RE, 1981. Babesiosis in various hosts. Ristic M, Kreier JP, eds. Babesiosis. New York: Academic Press, 25–63.




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HOLMAN, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by GOFF, W. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HOLMAN, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by GOFF, W. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Babesiosis
Right arrow Zoonotic Diseases


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS