AJTMH HINARI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 73(3), 2005, pp. 553-559
Copyright © 2005 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GRAY, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by BRADLEY, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by GRAY, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by BRADLEY, T. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Mosquitoes

PHYSIOLOGY OF DESICCATION RESISTANCE IN ANOPHELES GAMBIAE AND ANOPHELES ARABIENSIS

EMILIE M. GRAY* AND TIMOTHY J. BRADLEY
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, California


ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Desiccation resistance and water balance were studied in the adult female mosquitoes Anopheles arabiensis and Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto. When the two species were reared from egg to adult under identical conditions, An. arabiensis had significantly higher desiccation resistance than did An. gambiae. Data are presented that indicate that this difference in desiccation resistance is associated with a higher body water content prior to desiccation in An. arabiensis. No differences in rate of water loss during desiccation or water content at death were observed. Measurements of metabolic rate and respiratory pattern also showed no statistically significant differences between the species. This study provides the first physiologic measurements of desiccation resistance in adults of these species and offers insights into the physiologic differences associated with differential resistance to desiccation stress.


INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The Anopheles gambiae species complex includes the main vectors of malignant malaria in sub-Saharan Africa, a disease that causes more than a million deaths per year. Although most malaria transmission occurs during the rainy season and in humid habitats, some mosquitoes are capable of surviving during the dry season and in dry savannah areas of Africa.13 Furthermore, evidence in recent years suggests range expansion of vector mosquitoes both geographically and seasonally towards more arid climates.4,5

Anopheles gambiae and its sister species Anopheles arabiensis, the two principal vectors of malaria throughout much of Africa, display distribution patterns characterized by different levels of aridity.6,7 Anopheles arabiensis generally occurs in more arid habitats than An. gambiae. The latter species is comprised of several chromosomal forms that carry different strain-specific combinations of inversions. Various field-based studies have demonstrated that the forms also show distinct patterns of seasonal and geographic distributions.1,4,810 These studies provide evidence that supports the role of some chromosomal inversions (or the genetic characters statistically associated with them) in conferring tolerance to arid conditions.11 Ecologic, biogeographic, and molecular phylogenetic evidence suggests that these inversions have been transferred to An. gambiae from An. arabiensis.12

No physiologic measurements have been made to date quantifying desiccation resistance or relevant parameters related to water balance in adult anopheline mosquitoes. Investigators have suggested that the seasonal distribution of the various mosquito populations might be related to larval habitat availability, larval habitat type, and migrations between suitable habitats.3,13,14 Anopheline eggs have been shown to survive on moist soil for up to two weeks.15 No evidence of estivation has been found in these populations. However, the most frequently proposed hypothesis for the differential distribution of An. gambiae and An. arabiensis, both geographically and seasonally, is that of differential desiccation tolerance in the adults.9,11,12

In this study, we compared the desiccation resistance of female mosquitoes from two stable laboratory colonies, one of An. arabiensis and one of An. gambiae S molecular form. Males were not included in the present study. The contribution of males to the persistence of the population occurs early in their adult life.16 Conversely, females with enhanced resistance to aridity would have an increased ability to host seek, blood feed, and lay eggs during the dry season. Therefore, their potential as a vector and their reproductive success are linked to surviving longer in this stressful environment.

We predicted that a species from a stress-prone environment is more resistant to that stress. In this scenario, An. arabiensis should be more desiccation resistant than An. gambiae. From a physiologic viewpoint, desiccation resistance in insects is determined by initial water content, rate of water loss, and water content at death.17,18 We examined each of these parameters with regard to their role in differential desiccation resistance. Also, reduced resting metabolic rate has been proposed as an evolved mechanism of desiccation resistance in insects and other animals.19 We measured the resting metabolic rate of both species to determine whether this trait might be involved in adaptation to aridity of An. gambiae and An. arabiensis.


MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Mosquito rearing. The An. arabiensis KGB strain was obtained from Mark Benedict (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA via the Malaria Research and Reference Reagent Resource Center at www.malaria.mr4.org). The stock had been maintained by this center for 37 generations at a relative humidity of 80% and a temperature of 27°C. The original stock was established in 1975 from a Zimbabwe population. The An. gambiae pink-eye strain was obtained from the laboratory of A. A. James (University of California, Irvine, CA). This strain was produced in 1992 by a cross between a wild population from western Kenya and a strain carrier of the pink eye gene and has since been maintained at a relative humidity of 80% and a temperature of 28°C.20 It was estimated that 75% of the genome of the pink-eye strain had been derived from western Kenya An. gambiae. We identified the An. gambiae population as being the S molecular form.21

Both populations were reared in the same conditions at 28°C, a relative humidity of 70–80%, and a 12:12 light-dark cycle. Mosquito colonies were maintained by blood feeding on non-anesthetized mice, as authorized by an animal use protocol approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of California, Irvine. Larvae were reared in shallow plastic trays at a density of 150 per liter of tap water and fed a mixture of Tetramin® (Tetra Werke, Melle, Germany) fish food and yeast. Pupae were placed in pint-sized paper cups with a mesh cover and left to emerge. Adults had access to a cotton ball saturated with a 10% sucrose solution. Mosquitoes tested on the day of emergence were not provided sucrose.

Desiccation resistance and water content at death. The desiccation resistance and water content at death of female mosquitoes were tested at emergence (n = 20), four days (n = 40), and eight days (n = 20) post-emergence. For this experiment, each mosquito was placed in an individual 8-dram glass vial. A foam stopper was inserted one-third down the length of the vial. Drierite (W.A. Hammond Drierite Co., Ltd., Xenia, OH) was poured on the stopper and Parafilm® (American Can Company, Greenwich, CT) wrapped around the vial to seal it. The drierite served to absorb the water from the air inside the vial, creating an environment where the relative humidity was less than 10%. Viability was assessed visually at hourly intervals. We considered an individual dead when it could not fly or right itself. Death in this case refers to a state in which normal locomotory and righting functions are disrupted, although some capacity for response might remain. Upon determination of death, each mosquito was immediately weighed, placed in a 70°C oven overnight, and reweighed. The difference between wet body mass at death and dry mass represents water content at death. The time to death represents the desiccation resistance of the individual.

Change in body composition, resting CO2 release rate, and respiratory pattern characteristics with age. We measured water content, dry mass, lipid content, rate of CO2 release (VCO2) at rest and respiratory pattern of individual female mosquitoes at emergence and 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 days post-emergence. Fourteen females of each species were used per age group. First, resting VCO2 was determined via flow-through respirometry. Mosquitoes were placed in small 3-mL chambers and subjected to a constant flow of dry air at a rate of 100 mL/minute. Following an acclimation period of 90 minutes, measurements of CO2 release were made at one-second intervals for five minutes per chamber, using a CO2-H2O gas analyzer (Li-Cor model 6262, Li-Cor Biosciences, Lincoln, NE). Release of CO2 in mosquitoes at rest occurs cyclically. Variability in the release of CO2 for each female was measured by determining the standard error of the mean over a five-minute time period. Following the respiratory measurements, each mosquito was weighed, dried in a 70°C oven overnight, and weighed again to obtain dry mass and water content (also referred to as initial water content, without prior desiccation). Lipid content was determined by measuring dry weight, extracting each carcass overnight in petroleum ether, and reweighing the dry mass following extraction. The difference in weight was attributed to lipid.

VCO2 and water loss rate during desiccation. We followed the VCO2 and water loss rate of individual females until death by desiccation, using flow-through respirometry and a CO2-H2O gas analyzer (Li-Cor 6262, Lincoln, NV). Death in this circumstance refers to a VCO2 of zero. Twelve individuals of each species were measured at emergence and four days post-emergence. Mosquitoes were placed in small 3-mL chambers and subjected to a constant flow of dry air at a rate of 50 mL/minute. For each chamber, values were recorded at one-second intervals for 15 minutes every 2 hours.

Statistical analyses. We compared desiccation resistance and water content at death of both species at each age group by a t-test and between age groups by analysis of variance. For body composition and resting VCO2 we performed one-way analysis of variance. We compared both species on each day and pooled all days together to compare both species overall. For VCO2 and water loss rate during desiccation, we performed analysis of covariance for each variable and each age group using time as a covariate.


RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Desiccation resistance and water content at death. When the two species were reared from egg to adult under identical conditions, female An. arabiensis had a significantly higher desiccation resistance than female An. gambiae (P < 0.001 at emergence, P < 0.0001 at 4 and 8 days post-emergence; Table 1Go and Figure 1Go). The desiccation resistance of both species was higher just after emergence than it was later in adult life (P < 0.001).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1
Desiccation resistance and water content at death of adult female Anopheles mosquitoes (mean ± SE)
 


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
    FIGURE 1. Survival plots of Anopheles arabiensis (solid line) and An. gambiae (broken line) in still dry air.

 
At any given age, the water content at death of females did not differ between species (Table 1Go). In both species, relative water content at death significantly decreased with age (P < 0.0001). Females of both species died when their relative water content reached approximately 2 mg/mg of dry mass at emergence, 1.7 mg/mg of dry mass at 4 days post-emergence, and 1.4 mg/mg of dry mass at 8 days post-emergence.

Changes in body composition and resting VCO2 with age. We measured VCO2 at rest, variability of the resting CO2 release pattern (represented by the SE of the mean VCO2), dry mass, water content, and lipid content of female mosquitoes at several ages between emergence and 10 days post-emergence (Figure 2Go). When all days were pooled, we found no difference in resting VCO2 between the two species (P = 0.070), even when the values were corrected for differences in dry mass (P = 0.738). The difference in resting VCO2 seen on day 6 is marginally significant (P = 0.046). Overall, An. arabiensis had a higher dry mass and water content (P = 0.044 and P < 0.0001, respectively) than An. gambiae. The difference in dry mass was visible at most ages, although not large enough to be significant in any one age group. Water content was significantly higher in An. arabiensis than in An. gambiae (P < 0.010) at emergence, 6 days post-emergence, and 10 days post-emergence. The difference in dry mass could be a confounding factor responsible in part for the difference in water content. To determine whether An. arabiensis contain more body water relative to their dry mass, we calculated dry mass-specific water content. We found that An. arabiensis still have more water per unit dry mass than An. gambiae (P = 0.003). Lipid contents were similar between the species (P = 0.440).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
    FIGURE 2. Change in resting VCO2, amplitude of the pattern of CO2 release (represented by S.E. of the mean resting VCO2), dry mass, water and lipid mass with age for female Anopheles gambiae (open circles) and An. arabiensis (closed circles). N = 14. Bars represent the SE.

 
We compared the amplitude of the respiratory patterns of both groups at different ages by determining the SE of the mean VCO2 for each individual (Figure 2bGo). Sample respiratory patterns of females at emergence and four days post-emergence are shown in Figure 3Go. We found no significant difference in the SE of the mean between both groups (P = 0.962). For both species, values were lower at emergence than later in adult life (P < 0.001).



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
    FIGURE 3. Sample respiratory patterns at rest of individual Anopheles arabiensis and An. gambiae females at emergence and four days post-emergence. ppm = parts per million.

 
Rates of CO2 release and water loss during desiccation. We measured the VCO2 and water loss rate during desiccation of individual females at emergence and four days post-emergence using flow-through respirometry (Figure 4Go). The water loss rates measured do not distinguish between cuticular and respiratory water loss. We found that mosquitoes at emergence had similar water loss rates during desiccation (P = 0.052). Furthermore, the water loss rates of both species seemed constant and equal throughout most of the stress and increased, to a different extent in each species, shortly before death. Mosquitoes at emergence also had similar VCO2 during desiccation (P = 0.139). Four-day-old mosquitoes had a more variable water loss rate during desiccation, but overall there was no significant difference between species (P = 0.839). At four days post-emergence, An. gambiae had a significantly lower VCO2 during desiccation than did An. arabiensis (P = 0.008). Excretory events were observed during these experiments but did not appear to differ in frequency or amplitude between the experimental groups.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
    FIGURE 4. Average VH2O and VCO2 of female measure individually (Anopheles gambiae in open circles and broken line and An. arabiensis in closed circles and solid line) during desiccation in a 50-mL/minute dry airstream (N = 12 at the beginning of the experiment, bars represent the SE). Data are shown for the time periods where at least one-third of the mosquitoes were still alive.

 

DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
This is the first study to directly measure desiccation resistance in adults of An. gambiae and An. arabiensis and to explore the physiologic bases of this trait. We found that female An. arabiensis live longer in dry air than do female An. gambiae. The difference in desiccation resistance between species is found upon emergence and persists even after several days and access to sugar water. This result is compatible with the hypothesis that differences in desiccation resistance in adult An. arabiensis and An. gambiae are responsible for their distinct geographic distributions.

Desiccation resistance in small insects can be quantitatively partitioned into three important parameters: initial body water content, rate of water loss, and water content at death. Initial body water represents water stores in the hemolymph and in the tissues. Water loss occurs mainly through excretion, respiration, and diffusion across the cuticle. Water content at death indicates the critical body water content below which survival is no longer possible. We measured all three parameters in An. gambiae and An. arabiensis and found that these species differ only in initial body water content.

The source of the observed difference in water content can involve several mechanisms that are not mutually exclusive. First, An. arabiensis might have a higher hemolymph volume than An. gambiae. This has been found in Drosophila selected for enhanced desiccation resistance.22 Such a physiologic adaptation requires an increase in the amount of hemolymph solutes to maintain homeostasis. Female mosquitoes are faced with a large flux of fluid through the hemolymph at each blood meal. Anopheles ingest more than their weight in blood and although part of the blood meal is excreted via the anus during feeding, the larger portion of the fluid ingested is transferred to the Malpighian tubules via the hemocoel.23 Since female mosquitoes are accustomed to managing large fluid volumes, adaptation to desiccating conditions by increasing hemolymph volume is not improbable. Hemolymph volume is technically difficult to measure in such small insects, but has been done in Drosophila gravimetrically and by several other methods, such as injection of radioactive markers.17,22

Another possible avenue of enhanced water storage is water bound to glycogen and stored intracellularly. This energy storage compound can bind up to five times its weight in water, and it has been suggested that insects can store more water by favoring energy storage in the form of glycogen rather than lipid.24,25 Anopheles arabiensis contain an average 0.18 mg more water than An. gambiae. Theoretically, the amount of glycogen necessary to store this additional water is 0.036 mg.24 This would require practically all the dry mass difference observed between species to be due to glycogen alone (An. arabiensis have on average 0.042 mg more dry mass than An. gambiae). If the difference in dry mass between both species is due to glycogen, then that amount of glycogen is sufficient to explain the difference in water content. Therefore, glycogen cannot be ruled out as a reasonable candidate for permitting the storage of intracellular water.

Finally, An. arabiensis could simply replenish their crop content more often than An. gambiae. When mosquitoes feed on a source of sugar, the contents of this meal enters the crop and is slowly passed to the midgut to be absorbed little by little. Replenishing this fluid more often might enhance chances of survival in a dry environment. Khan and Maibach found that thirsty mosquitoes feed more often, suggesting that the crop provides a reservoir for water as well as sugar.26 It would be interesting to compare the feeding frequency of both species to determine whether An. arabiensis have evolved a modified feeding behavior in response to a more desiccating environment.

We found no difference in water content at death between An. arabiensis and An. gambiae. Various studies of Drosophila have demonstrated identical water contents at death in 20 separate populations of Drosophila that had undergone different selection regimens, including strong selection for enhanced desiccation resistance for more than 150 generations.18,22,25 Those results clearly indicate that Drosophila can show evolved changes in multiple parameters strongly affecting desiccation resistance, but water content at death is not one of them. It is possible that the terrestrial environment has pushed tolerance of low water content to its limit early on in the evolution of these small dipterans, resulting in no genetic variability in this trait.

We followed the water loss rate and VCO2 of individual females during desiccation. The VCO2 is a measure of the metabolic expenditure of an animal and a value higher than resting VCO2 may reflect an increase in activity, or alternatively, an increase in non-locomotory energy expenditure during the desiccation stress. Increases in respiratory water loss rate parallel the rate of gas exchange associated with activity. Thus, activity levels during a desiccation stress might significantly influence desiccation resistance.27,28 However, interspecific comparisons have shown that respiratory water loss contributes more to total water loss in xeric species than in mesic species. The reason for this is that xeric species have a less permeable cuticle, with the consequence that water loss is proportional to metabolic rate in xeric but not in mesic species.29 Cross-species comparisons in Drosophila have shown water loss rate to be negatively correlated with desiccation resistance.25,30,31 Gibbs and others showed that Drosophila from mesic and xeric habitats differed in water loss rate, but not in metabolic rate, body water content, or water content at death.30 Although they could not demonstrate differences in the characteristics of cuticular lipids in the species studied, it is nevertheless possible that more xeric species had a less permeable cuticle than mesic ones. We found in this study no difference in water loss rate or VCO2 between species during desiccation at emergence. At four days, An. gambiae had a lower VCO2 than An. arabiensis but the same water loss rate. Within each species, we found no correlation between VCO2 and water loss rate. Our results suggest no difference in respiratory or cuticular water loss between these two closely related mosquito species.

Using our data for desiccation resistance as well as mass of body water prior to and following desiccation, we estimated the average water loss rate of these mosquitoes in still dry air. Figure 5Go shows a plot created using dry mass-specific initial water content, dry mass-specific water content at death, and desiccation resistance values for each group. The slopes obtained represent the mean rate of water loss during desiccation in still dry air. The values were nearly identical for both species at emergence (slope = –0.057 corresponding to 57 µg of water/hour) as well as at four days post-emergence (slope = –0.020). This reinforces the conclusion from the flow-through desiccation experiment that water loss rates are not different between the populations studied.



View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
    FIGURE 5. Estimated average water loss rate based on experimental results of desiccation resistance and mass of body water prior to following desiccation. Lines represent Anopheles gambiae (broken lines) and An. arabiensis (solid lines) at emergence (black lines) and four days post-emergence (gray lines).

 
All insects studied to date using flow-through respirometry show cyclical, or in some cases discontinuous, ventilatory patterns at rest.32 Mosquitoes, among the smallest insects studied to date, are no exception.33 Various possible reasons have been proposed for this behavior, the most traditional but currently disputed one states that breathing discontinuously can reduce the rate of respiratory water loss.29,34,35 We compared the amplitude of the cycles for both species to determine whether they might show different respiratory control strategies. Because An. arabiensis are found in more arid environments than An. gambiae s.s., we wished to test the hypothesis that the respiratory pattern of the former was modified for better water conservation, i.e., that they respired more discontinuously than the latter. We found no difference in the respiratory patterns between An. gambiae and An. arabiensis. Also, both species had the same VCO2 at rest, indicating that these mosquitoes have not modified their resting metabolic rate to reduce gas exchange. Drosophila that had been selected for enhanced desiccation resistance showed an increase in amplitude of the respiratory pattern, as well as reduction in water loss rates.31,36 Respiratory pattern and rate of water loss can evolve in small dipterans under selection for desiccation resistance, but apparently have not done so in An. gambiae and An. arabiensis.

Our results highlight some notable differences in respiration and water balance between newly emerged and older adult mosquitoes. We found that both species have a higher desiccation resistance, lower amplitude of respiratory pattern, and lower water loss rates at emergence compared with later ages. Mosquitoes are very vulnerable in the hours following emergence. After exiting their pupal case, they must expand their appendages, diurese, and perhaps make a short flight to a resting place. In the next few hours, their cuticle hardens. In two days, maturation of several organs such as salivary glands, midgut epithelium, and flight organs occurs.37 Our emergence experiments were performed on females that were at most a few hours old. These mosquitoes are not yet ready to mate or seek hosts. They have a relatively low resting VCO2 at this time. The low amplitude of their respiratory pattern suggests that they are not controlling gas exchange as efficiently as they do at later ages, perhaps because the cuticle is not yet fully hardened. However, in response to a desiccation stress, emergence mosquitoes survive longer. As shown in Figure 5Go, they have more body water relative to their dry mass than do four-day-old mosquitoes. Figure 4Go shows that their water loss rates are lower and more constant than those of older mosquitoes. Their quiescent behavior brought about by the maturation period and the extra water they contain relative to their mass both contribute to their enhanced survival.

In conclusion, our study indicates that the variation in desiccation resistance among these anopheline species is due to body water content. Anopheles arabiensis carry more water than An. gambiae. Our populations are laboratory colonies that were created from field populations belonging to two sister species recently diverged.12 Differential desiccation resistance has persisted in these populations despite hundreds of generations of laboratory rearing at high relative humidity. These results were obtained in mosquitoes reared under identical conditions, indicating that the physiologic differences are genetically based. Evidence accumulated over the past 20 years suggests that some chromosomal inversions, fixed in An. arabiensis but polymorphic in An. gambiae, are somehow linked to aridity tolerance. This study provides the first physiologic evidence of differential resistance to aridity in the adults of these species and an indication of the mechanisms involved. We now need to extend these physiologic studies to the different chromosomal forms of An. gambiae s.s. By doing so, we hope to characterize and quantify the physiologic specializations of these disease vectors. This work is also a necessary step towards the understanding of the genetic basis of physiologic traits that confer tolerance to aridity in An. gambiae and of the possible involvement of gene suites carried within chromosomal inversions.


Received March 8, 2005. Accepted for publication April 13, 2005.

Acknowledgments: We thank Marc Benedict (Entomology Branch, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA) and Anthony James (Departments of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics and Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, University of California, Irvine, CA) for providing mosquito eggs for the establishment of colonies. We also thank the anonymous reviewers for their comments.

Financial support: This work was supported by a Graduate Assistance in Areas of National Need fellowship to Emilie M. Gray.

* Address correspondence to Emilie M. Gray, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-2525. E-mail: djemilie{at}gmail.com Back

Authors’ address: Emilie M. Gray and Timothy J. Bradley, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-2525, Telephone: 949-824-7038, Fax: 949-824-2181, E-mails: djemilie{at}gmail.com and tbradley{at}uci.edu.


REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Toure YT, Traore SF, Sankare O, Sow MY, Coulibaly A, Esposito F, Petrarca V, 1996. Perennial transmission of malaria by the Anopheles gambiae complex in a North Sudan Savanna area of Mali. Med Vet Entomol 10: 197–199.[ISI][Medline]
  2. Simard F, Lehmann T, Lemasson JJ, Fontenille D, 2000. Persistence of Anopheles arabiensis during the severe dry season conditions in Senegal: an indirect approach using microsatellite loci. Insect Molec Biol 9: 467–479.
  3. Charlwood JD, Vij R, Billingsley PF, 2000. Dry season refugia of malaria-transmitting mosquitoes in a dry savannah zone of East Africa. Am J Trop Med Hyg 62: 725–732.
  4. Toure YT, Petrarca V, Traore SF, Coulibaly A, Maiga HM, Sankare O, Sow M, Di Deco MA, Coluzzi M, 1994. Ecological genetic studies in the chromosomal form Mopti of Anopheles s. str. in Mali, West Africa. Genetica 94: 213–223.[ISI][Medline]
  5. Onyabe DY, Conn JE, 2001. Population genetic structure of the malaria mosquito Anopheles arabiensis across Nigeria suggests range expansion. Mol Ecol 10: 2577–2591.[Medline]
  6. Lindsay SW, Parson L, Thomas CJ, 1998. Mapping the ranges and relative abundance of the two principal African malaria vectors, Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto and An. arabiensis, using climate data. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 265: 847–854.[Medline]
  7. Coetzee M, Craig M, Le Sueur D, 2000. Distribution of African malaria mosquitoes belonging to the Anopheles gambiae complex. Parasitol Today 16: 74–77.[ISI][Medline]
  8. Coluzzi M, Sabatini A, Petrarca V, Di Deco MA, 1979. Chromosomal differentiation and adaptation to human environment in the Anopheles gambiae complex. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 73: 483–497.[ISI][Medline]
  9. Coluzzi M, Petrarca V, Di Deco MA, 1985. Chromosomal inversion intergradation and incipient speciation in Anopheles gambiae. Boll Zool 52: 45–63.
  10. Bayoh MN, Thomas CJ, Lindsay SW, 2001. Mapping distributions of chromosomal forms of Anopheles gambiae in West Africa using climate data. Med Vet Entomol 15: 267–274.[Medline]
  11. Powell JR, Petrarca V, Della Torre A, Caccone A, Coluzzi M, 1999. Population structure, speciation, and introgression in the Anopheles gambiae complex. Parassitologia 41: 101–113.[Medline]
  12. Besansky NJ, Krzywinski J, Lehmann T, Simard F, Kern M, Mukabayire O, Fontenille D, Toure YT, Sagnon N, 2003. Semipermeable species boundaries between Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles arabiensis: evidence from multilocus DNA sequence variation. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 100: 10818–10823.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Minakawa N, Githure JL, Beier JC, Yan G, 2001. Anopheline mosquito survival strategies during the dry period in western Kenya. J Med Entomol 38: 388–392.[ISI][Medline]
  14. Edillo FE, Toure YT, Lanzaro GC, Dolo G, Taylor CE, 2002. Spatial and habitat distribution of Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles arabiensis (Diptera: Culicidae) in Banambani Village, Mali. J Med Entomol 39: 70–77.[ISI][Medline]
  15. Shililu JI, Grueber WB, Mbogo CM, Githure JI, Riddiford LM, Beier JC, 2004. Development and survival of Anopheles gambiae eggs in drying soil: influence of the rate of drying, egg age, and soil type. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 20: 243–247.[Medline]
  16. Chambers GM, Klowden MJ, 2001. Age of Anopheles gambiae Giles male mosquitoes at time of mating influences female oviposition. J Vector Ecol 26: 196–201.[Medline]
  17. Hadley NF, 1994. Water Relations of Terrestrial Arthropods. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  18. Bradley TJ, Williams AE, Rose MR, 1999. Physiological responses to selection for desiccation resistance in Drosophila melanogaster. Am Zool 39: 337–345.
  19. Hoffmann AA, Parsons PA, 1991. Evolutionary Genetics and Environmental Stress. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
  20. Githeko AK, Brandling Bennett AD, Beier M, Atieli F, Owaga M, Collins FH, 1992. The reservoir of Plasmodium falciparum malaria in a holoendemic area of western Kenya. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 86: 355–358.[ISI][Medline]
  21. Santolamazza F, Della Torre A, Caccone A, 2004. Short report: A new polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism method to identify Anopheles arabiensis from An. gambiae and its two molecular forms from degraded DNA templates or museum samples. Am J Trop Med Hyg 70: 604–606.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Folk DG, Han C, Bradley TJ, 2001. Water acquisition and partitioning of Drosophila melanogaster: Effects of selection for desiccation resistance. J Exp Biol 204: 3323–3331.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Nijhout HF, Carrow GM, 1978. Diuresis after a bloodmeal in female Anopheles freeborni. J Insect Physiol 24: 293–298.
  24. Schmidt-Nielsen K, 1997. Animal Physiology. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
  25. Gibbs AG, Chippindale AK, Rose MR, 1997. Physiological mechanisms of evolved desiccation resistance in Drosophila melanogaster. J Exp Biol 200: 1821–1832.[Abstract]
  26. Khan AA, Maibach HI, 1971. A study of the probing response of Aedes aegypti. 2. Effect of desiccation and blood feeding on probing to skin and artificial target. J Econ Entomol 64: 439–442.[Medline]
  27. Lehmann F-O, Dickinson MH, Staunton J, 2000. The scaling of carbon dioxide release and respiratory water loss in flying fruit flies (Drosophila spp.). J Exp Biol 203: 1613–1624.[Abstract]
  28. Williams AE, Rose MR, Bradley TJ, 2003. The respiratory pattern in Drosophila melanogaster selected for enhanced desiccation resistance is not associated with the observed evolution of decreased locomotory activity. Physiol Biochem Zool 77: 10–17.
  29. Chown SL, 2002. Respiratory water loss in insects. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 133: 791–804.[Medline]
  30. Gibbs AG, Fukuzato F, Matzkin LM, 2003. Evolution of water conservation mechanisms in Drosophila. J Exp Biol 206: 1183–1192.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Williams AE, Rose MR, Bradley TJ, 1998. Using laboratory selection for desiccation resistance to examine the relationship between respiratory pattern and water loss in insects. J Exp Biol 201: 2945–2952.[Abstract]
  32. Lighton JRB, 1996. Discontinuous gas exchange in insects. Annu Rev Entomol 41: 309–324.[ISI][Medline]
  33. Gray EM, Bradley TJ, 2003. Metabolic rate in female Culex tarsalis (Diptera: Culicidae): age, size, activity and feeding effects. J Med Entomol 40: 903–911.[Medline]
  34. Gibbs AG, Johnson RA, 2004. The role of discontinuous gas exchange in insects: the chthonic hypothesis does not hold water. J Exp Biol 207: 3477–3482.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Hetz SK, Bradley TJ, 2005. Insects breathe discontinuously to avoid oxygen toxicity. Nature 433: 516–519.[Medline]
  36. Williams AE, Rose MR, Bradley TJ, 1997. CO2 release patterns in Drosophila melanogaster: the effect of selection for enhanced desiccation resistance. J Exp Biol 200: 615–624.[Abstract]
  37. Clements AN, 1992. The Biology of Mosquitoes. Volume 1. Development, Nutrition and Reproduction. Oxon: United Kingdom: CABI Publishing.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. B. Benoit and D. L. Denlinger
Suppression of water loss during adult diapause in the northern house mosquito, Culex pipiens
J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2007; 210(2): 217 - 226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
E. M. Gray and T. J. Bradley
Evidence from mosquitoes suggests that cyclic gas exchange and discontinuous gas exchange are two manifestations of a single respiratory pattern
J. Exp. Biol., May 1, 2006; 209(9): 1603 - 1611.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GRAY, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by BRADLEY, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by GRAY, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by BRADLEY, T. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Mosquitoes


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS