|
|
||||||||
| ABSTRACT |
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|
|
|---|
Ingestion of infected pork is not required to acquire cysticercosis, which is transmitted fecal-orally by the ingestion of infective eggs excreted by a tapeworm carrier. However, a common mistake is to look for a history of contact with pigs or infected pork and neglects the search for the tapeworm carrier, which in fact is the key for transmission. This was clearly exemplified in an "outbreak" of neurocysticercosis in unrelated families from an Orthodox Jewish community in New York in 1991, where the diagnosis of NCC was initially not considered by the attending neurologists.4 The overall seroprevalence in this nonendemic community (1.3%) was unexpectedly high,5 most likely originated from tapeworm-carrier housemaids who immigrated from cysticercosis-endemic areas.
In endemic countries, housemaids also usually migrate from cysticercosis-endemic areas to work in nonendemic areas for people with higher socioeconomic standards. We performed a serological and parasitological survey to determine whether taeniasis/cysticercosis was prevalent in housemaids working in five of the wealthier districts of urban Lima, a nonendemic metropolis with 8 million inhabitants.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|
|
|---|
Targeting this housemaid population, we recruited volunteers from eight adult schools and one free medical clinic for housemaids. Previous to recruitment, a house-by-house information campaign was launched including a flyer about cysticercosis and the study itself. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Peruvian National Institutes of Health.
Before entry into the study, all subjects received detailed information about the procedures and the purpose of the investigation and were asked to read and sign a written informed consent form. A standard socioeconomic questionnaire was administered to all housemaids including questions on place of origin, history of pig husbandry, household characteristics (water supply, sewage), history of taeniasis, and neurologic symptoms including headache, seizures or fainting, and family history of seizures. Four blood drops were obtained by finger-stick from each subject and spotted on a filter paper, which was then left to dry and stored at room temperature until use. This method of blood sample collection has been used before in epidemiologic studies.7 To confirm seropositive cases, a second blood sample of 5 mL was taken by venipuncture on all subjects who tested positive on the filter paper sample. Both filter paper blood samples and serum samples were tested in the Cysticercosis Unit of the Instituto de Ciencias Neurologicas (ICN, the national referral center for neurology in Peru) by enzyme-linked inmunoelectrotransfer blot (EITB) assay using purified T. solium glycoprotein antigens as developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and originally described by Tsang and others.8
Participating individuals were also given disposable plastic cups and asked to collect three stool samples. We provided information to participants on personal hygiene, care during sample collection, sample management, and potential biohazards. Stools were microscopically examined after concentration by both the formolether method9 and by sedimentation in water.10 Individuals found to have Taenia spp. eggs in stools were treated with niclosamide and a purgative.11 All samples from volunteers from the recruitment sites were accepted and processed, but the surveys were only administered to housemaids.
All tapeworm carriers and a nonrandom sample composed of the 30 first volunteer housemaids with positive serology were invited to have a noncontrasted brain CT scan performed at the ICN in a Siemens Somatom IV machine using 10-mm slices. A neuroradiologist who did not know the results of the EITB assay read the scans.
Contacts at households of employers. Housemaids diagnosed as carrying a tapeworm were interviewed in private to give them their results and asked for their permission to communicate the findings to their employers. All of them consented, and the study team visited each of these households, explained the disease and the purpose of the study, and invited all household members to participate in blood testing by EITB and noncontrasted brain CT scans.
Statistical analysis.
Data entry and analysis was performed using SPSS 12.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Associations between categorical variables were assessed using the
2 test or Fishers exact test as appropriate, and associations between continuous variables were tested by Students t test or Mann-Whitney test.
| RESULTS |
|
|
|---|
|
Seroprevalence. All positive results on filter paper were also positive when testing the serum sample obtained by venipuncture. Seroprevalence of specific antibodies to T. solium was 14.6% (172 of 1,178, 95% confidence interval 12.616.6%). The higher seroprevalence was found in housemaids from coastal departments excluding Lima (30 of 116, 25.9%), followed by those from the highlands (132 of 904, 14.6%). Lower seroprevalence ratios were found in housemaids born in Lima (8 of 107, 7.5%) or in the jungle where there was only one seropositive individual (1 of 50, 2.0%). Seropositive individuals reported having raised pigs in a higher proportion of cases (135 of 171, 78.9% versus 710 of 999, 71.1%, OR 1.53, P = 0.034). There were no statistically significant differences between seropositive and seronegative persons in regard to age, length of residence in Lima, seizures, headaches, or seizures in relatives.
Stool examination results. Overall coverage for stool sample collection was 86.2% (1,016 of 1,178). More than half of patients brought at least 2 stool samples (559, 55.0%). A total of 12 Taenia carriers were detected, for an overall prevalence of taeniasis as detected by stool microscopy of 12 of 1,016, 1.2% (95% CI 0.61.8%). There were some differences in stool sample collection: coverage was higher in the target group of housemaids from wealthy districts (86.2%, 860 of 961) than in maids from other districts (71.9%, 156 of 217), as was the proportion of individuals who brought more than one stool sample (503 of 860, 58.5%, versus 56 of 156, 38.5%). However, the prevalence of taeniasis was similar (10 of 860, 1.16%, versus 2 of 156, 1.28%).
The 12 carriers were younger (mean age 17 years, median 16.5, IQR 1518.8 versus mean 22.8, median 20, IQR 1824, P = 0.001, Mann-Whitney test) and had lived in Lima for a shorter time (mean 3.1 years, median 3, IQR 1.34.0 versus mean 7.3, median 5, IQR 3.09.0; analysis considering only 8 tapeworm carriers not born in Lima) (P = 0.036, Mann-Whitney test). There were no statistically significant differences between tapeworm carriers and controls in regard to a history of raising pigs, sanitation, seizures, headaches, and seizures in relatives (albeit this analysis was limited by the small number of tapeworm carriers).
All tapeworm carriers were treated with niclosamide,11 and the species diagnosis was confirmed to be Taenia solium infection after the recovery of proglottids, which were examined by histology and PCR.12
Prevalence of other parasites. Other intestinal parasites found were Giardia lamblia (N = 58, 5.7%), Trichuris trichura (N = 31, 3.1%), Hymenolepis nana (N = 29, 2.9%), Ancylostoma duodenale/Necator americanus (N = 27, 2.7%), Ascaris lumbricoides (N = 19, 1.9%), Strongyloides stercoralis (N = 15, 1.5%), Enterobius vermicularis (N = 4, 0.4%), and Fasciola hepatica (N = 3, 0.3%).
Computed tomography.
Overall, 38 brain CT scans were performed to 26 seropositive subjects and 12 tapeworm carriers (also seropositive). Half of the seropositive had brain lesions compatible with NCC, mostly calcifications. Two had viable cysts. Brain lesions were less frequent in the tapeworm carriers (Table 2
).
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|
|
|---|
The housemaid population represents a migrant group generally typified by young women from rural areas who recently arrived in a big city, and domestic work is usually their first job. The age-specific prevalence distribution for taeniasis shows a sharp decrease and completely disappears after age 22 (Figure 1
). This is compatible with a short life span of the tapeworm (current assumptions calculate the life span of T. solium between 3 to 5 years). However, there was one tapeworm carrier who had lived in Lima for 7 years. She could have been infected during return visits to her hometown or by eating pork products sent by relatives from endemic areas. Albeit unlikely, we cannot exclude the possibility that some of them became infected in Lima. Three of the tapeworm carriers lived in the same neighborhood and shopped for meat in the same market.
|
An important characteristic of this study was the access to housemaids outside their work environment, which facilitated their cooperation. Many of them could have refused to participate if the study was conducted at their work places because of the lack of control on access to their test results by their employers. Many housemaids are insecure about their work positions. Our approach to recruitment permitted us to explain the disease and its mode of transmission to the housemaids and assure them that they will be treated and cured so that their employers would not have any excuse for terminating them from their jobs.
CT scan showed that 50% of a selected sample of seropositive subjects had brain lesions compatible with NCC, but there was no correlation between lesions and symptoms. This has also been shown by some epidemiologic studies in endemic areas.17,18 We cannot conclude that NCC is asymptomatic in this group of patients because some of them could have hidden their symptoms to avoid being stigmatized by their classmates. It is also unknown whether asymptomatic patients with cerebral lesions could turn symptomatic later.
We found 6 seropositive cases of infection (23%) in the employers upper socioeconomic class families. Given that employers family members were in general reluctant to participate, control families (employers from housemaids who did not carry a tapeworm) were not recruited because their cooperation for blood sampling and time-consuming CT tests was even less likely. However, the seroprevalence found in this subgroup differs strikingly from other surveys performed in Lima19 (where seroprevalence levels around 1% were found in two different groups), suggesting a strong association between living with a tapeworm-carrier housemaid and being seropositive for cysticercosis.
Both the prevalence of taeniasis in housemaids and the proportion of seropositive family members in the employer families are similar to prevalence values in endemic villages, pointing toward active transmission of infection in this setting. There could be more employer families that are exposed to tapeworm carriers because of the frequent turnover of housemaids in households and the fact that some housemaids who tested negative for tapeworms may have been infected and lost the worm before the survey. This situation parallels that of industrialized countries where immigrants from endemic countries are hired, often without work permit, to do domestic work. We recommend that all housemaids from endemic areas be screened for intestinal parasites including specific search for tapeworm infections, under appropriate confidentiality safeguards.
Received November 5, 2004. Accepted for publication February 25, 2005.
Acknowledgments: We are grateful to Carmen Taquiri for her hard work on sample processing.
Financial support: This work was mainly funded by grant number 892 from the VIGIA project (USAID/Instituto Nacional de Salud - Peruvian Ministry of Health). Research grants from the National Institutes of Health (R.G., H.G.), The Wellcome Trust (R.G., A.G., H.G.), the Food and Drug Administration (H.G.), and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (R.G., V.T., A.G., H.G.) fund ongoing cysticercosis research from the authors. The sponsors had no role in the design or writing of this work.
* Address correspondence to Hector H. García, Cysticercosis Unit, Instituto de Ciencias Neurológicas, Jr. Ancash 1271, Barrios Altos, Lima 1, Perú. E-mail: hgarcia{at}jhsph.edu ![]()
Authors addresses: Branko N. Huisa, Luis A. Menacho, and Hector H. García, Department of Microbiology, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Avenida Honorio Delgado 430, San Martin de Porras, Lima 31, Peru, E-mail: hgarcia{at}jhsph.edu. Silvia Rodriquez and Javier A. Bustos, Cysticercosis Unit, Instituto de Ciencias Neurológicas, Jr., Ancash 1271, Barrios Altos, Lima 1, Peru. Robert H. Gilman, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health, 615 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205. Victor C. W. Tsang, Immunology Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, Mailstop F-13, Atlanta, GA 30341-3724. Armando E. Gonzalez, School of Veterinary Medicine, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Cuadra 29 Avenida Circunvalacion s/n, San Borja, Lima, Peru.
Reprint requests: Hector H. García, Cysticercosis Unit, Instituto de Ciencias Neurológicas, Jr. Ancash 1271, Barrios Altos, Lima 1, Perú, Telephone: (51-1) 328-7360, Fax: (51-1) 328-7382, E-mail: hgarcia{at}jhsph.edu.
| REFERENCES |
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |