AJTMH HINARI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 73(2), 2005, pp. 386-391
Copyright © 2005 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GARG, P. K.
Right arrow Articles by PARSONNET, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by GARG, P. K.
Right arrow Articles by PARSONNET, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Geohelminths
Right arrow Epidemiology

RISK OF INTESTINAL HELMINTH AND PROTOZOAN INFECTION IN A REFUGEE POPULATION

PARVEEN K. GARG*, SHARON PERRY, MARTHA DORN, LAURA HARDCASTLE, AND JULIE PARSONNET
Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California; Santa Clara Valley Health and Hospital System, San Jose, California; Refugee Health Section, California Department of Health Services, Sacramento, California


ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
With continuing emigration from endemic countries, screening for parasitic infections remains a priority in U.S. communities serving refugee and immigrant populations. We report the prevalence of helminths and protozoa as well as demographic risk factors associated with these infections among 533 refugees seen at the Santa Clara County, California, Refugee Clinic between October 2001 and January 2004. Stool parasites were identified from 14% of refugees, including 9% found to have one or more protozoa and 6% found to have at least one helminth. Most common protozoan infections were Giardia lamblia (6%) and Dientamoeba fragilis (3%), and for helminths, hookworm (2%). Protozoa were more frequent in refugees < 18 years of age (OR: 2.2 [1.2–4.2]), whereas helminths were more common in refugees from South Central Asia (OR: 8.0 [2.3–27.7]) and Africa (OR: 5.9 [1.6–21.6]) when compared with refugees from Eastern Europe and the Middle East. Among helminths, Ascaris lumbricoides and hookworm were concentrated among South Central Asians (6 of 7 and 10 of 11 cases, respectively), whereas Strongyloides stercoralis was predominantly found in Africans (5 of 7 cases). Although predeparture empirical treatment programs in Saharan Africa may have helped to reduce prevalence among arriving refugees from this region, parasitic infection is still common among refugees to the United States with helminth infections found in more specific populations. As refugees represent only a fraction of recent immigrants from endemic countries, current studies in nonrefugee groups are also needed.


INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
A third of the world’s population, most of them children, may be infected with intestinal worms, principal among them Ascaris lumbricoides, hookworm, and Trichura trichiura, which cause a variety of conditions including malnutrition, iron-deficiency anemia, malabsorption syndrome, intestinal obstruction, and mental and physical growth retardation.1 The protozoan Entamoeba histolytica, cause of amoebiasis and life-threatening liver abscess, is a leading cause of death due to parasites, second only to malaria.2 Although many intestinal parasites, particularly the geohelminths, have virtually disappeared from industrialized countries, screening for parasitic infection remains a public health priority in U.S. health care settings serving refugees and immigrants,3 most of whom may have emigrated from countries where intestinal parasitic diseases are endemic.4 In selected groups of refugees,59 immigrants,1012 and migrant laborers,11,13,14 prevalence of intestinal parasites has ranged from 20% to 80%, depending on age, class of parasite (helminth or protozoa), and region of emigration. The implementation in 1999 of pre-departure albendazole treatment programs throughout Saharan Africa has helped to reduce prevalence of many parasitic infections among new arrivals from these countries; however, such programs are less uniformly established in other endemic countries.6,15 Knowledge of parasitic infections among refugees is important not only to guide outreach programs but also in understanding immune response to other conditions as well.

Helminth and protozoan infections differ importantly both in host immune response and in epidemiology. Helminths are macroparasites that reproduce sexually within the definitive host, where they can persist for many years, whereas protozoa are microparasites that are capable of direct reproduction within the host, often at high rates, and cause relatively short-lived infection.16 Helminth infections are well-known to elicit a Type 2 (Th2) noninflammatory T-cell response,17 a hallmark of which is IgE elevation with eosinophilia, and which may be strong enough to exert biasing effects on concomitant infections18,19 as well as host response to Th1-mediated chronic infections,2022 including intracellular parasites.23 By contrast, many protozoa, like bacteria, act through manipulation of Th-1 pathways.24

These differences in host immune response have important implications in medical management of populations from different parts of the developing world. Concomitant infections are not uncommon,25 and even populations from the same regions can have different epidemiologic profiles.26 In addition, different parasitic infections may have broader implications for explaining global variations in autoimmune and atopic diseases.27 Some common protozoa, such as Giardia lamblia, Dientamoeba fragilis, and E. histolytica, may be associated with sporadic outbreaks in industrialized countries, whereas helminths have specific geographic distributions and may be rapidly extinguished with improvements in community sanitary conditions. For this reason, helminth infections are likely to be found in more recent arrivals than in long-term immigrants.12

Since the 1990s, under the auspices of the federal Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended by the Refugee Act of 1980, the United States, through the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Refugee Resettlement, in cooperation with state public health authorities, provides transitional medical care, including preventive health screening, to the approximately 70,000 refugees and asylees admitted to the United States each year (classes of immigrants who may be admitted on the basis of political persecution).28 As part of this program, the California Department of Health Services (CDHS), through its Office of County Health Services (OCHS), Refugee Health Section (RHS), administers the California Refugee Health Assessment Program (RHAP), to include health screening assessments. We here report results of parasite testing performed through the California RHAP between October 2001 and January 2004 in Santa Clara County, home to one of the largest immigrant communities in the United States. Objectives of the study were to characterize overall prevalence of helminths and protozoa in local refugees and to describe variations in prevalence in association with demographic characteristics.


MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Study subjects. Santa Clara County participates in RHAP through its Valley Health Center Refugee Clinic at Lenzen Street in San Jose, California. Under this program, all newly arriving refugees are offered comprehensive health examinations through the County Refugee clinic. These examinations, which are recommended within 90 days of arrival for all refugees, may also be arranged through private health care providers. Subjects of this report are refugees who elected to have examinations through the Refugee Clinic, including parasite testing, between October 2001 and January 2004. Refugees were asked to provide three stool specimens over several days deposited in two 15-mL vials: one containing zinc sulfate and polyvinyl alcohol (Zn-PVA) for fixation of trophozoites, and one containing 10% formalin for concentration and microscopic examination (PARA-PAK, Meridian Bioscience, Cincinnati, OH). The Santa Clara County Microbiology Laboratory, Parasite Division, carried out specimen preparation, including permanent (Trichrome) staining and sedimentation (ethyl acetate) techniques and microscopic evaluations. The estimated sensitivity of these techniques is greater than 90% for at least two specimens.29

Data collection. Beginning federal fiscal year (October) 2001, results of all parasite examinations conducted under the state RHAP have been entered into the state’s Refugee Health Electronic Information System (RHEIS), a standardized online database that tracks referrals as well as clinical and laboratory results. Parasite records consist of dates of stool collection, specimen number, and species identification. Only results considered pathogenic (of treatment implication) were entered. With the assistance of the state office of Refugee Health, records were extracted for all ova and parasite examinations completed between October 2001 and January 2004. In addition to results of O&P examinations, data included demographic characteristics, country of emigration, and dates of emigration and arrival in the United States. The institutional review boards of Stanford University and Santa Clara Valley Medical Center approved methods and fields targeted for extraction.

Analytic methods. We compared demographic characteristics of refugees completing O&P examinations through the Refugee Clinic with those who declined health assessments or who failed to complete an examination. For analysis of O&P results, only RHAP records with results for at least two of three possible stool specimens were considered eligible for our analysis. An examination was considered positive if intestinal parasites were identified in at least one of two (or three) stool specimens and negative if all specimens were negative. Individual test results are described by species, number of different species, and class of intestinal parasite (helminth and protozoa).

We assessed geographic and demographic (age, gender, educational attainment of adults, year of arrival) characteristics associated with helminth and protozoan infections using the {chi}2 test or test of medians, as appropriate. For analysis of geographic distributions, only regions with parasite results in at least five individuals were used. These regions were Africa, South Central Asia (Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka), Middle East, and Eastern Europe. Because of a low representative sample, regions excluded from this analysis were Southeast Asia (N = 4), Western Europe (N = 4), and the Caribbean (N = 1). Logistic regression was used to estimate odds and 95% confidence intervals for helminth and protozoan infections univariately as well as to adjust geographic distribution for age and gender. For these analyses, Middle East and Eastern European groups were combined as the referent group due to low frequency of helminths in these regions relative to Africa and South Central Asia. Year of arrival (2001/2002 versus 2003/2004) was also assessed to look for significant variations in infection prevalence. The collapsing of years reflects the fact that relatively few records were entered in 2001, the database being initiated near the end of the year, or in 2004, which includes only one month of intakes.


RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Between October 2001 and January, 2004, a total of 1,174 refugees and asylees were referred to the Valley Refugee Clinic, of whom 772 (66%) elected to receive health assessments through the county RHAP. Of those electing RHAP, 534 (69%) completed stool analysis for parasites, and 238 (31%) did not return specimens (Table 1Go). Compared with those completing health assessments through RHAP, those refusing health assessments as well as those consenting to but not completing one were both younger (median ages of 24 versus 30 years, P = 0.01). Those declining health assessments, were more likely to have emigrated from East Asia (P < 0.01) or Southeast Asia (P = 0.01). Of the 534 completing health assessments, 80% were ≥ 18 years of age (range 1 year to 80 years). Among adults completing RHAP, median years of formal education was 11, with more than 20% having no formal education. However, education was significantly lower, median level of 8 years (P < 0.01), in those refugees consenting to but not completing a health assessment. Education level was not available for those refugees refusing to initiate a health assessment. Among those completing health assessments, the largest proportion emigrated from South Central Asia (31%), followed by Africa (27%), the Middle East (25%), and Eastern Europe (16%) (Table 1Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1
Demographic characteristics of 1,174 refugees offered health assessments through Santa Clara Valley California Refugee Health Clinic, October 2001 to January 2004
 
All 534 who returned specimens had at least two stool specimens available for O&P examination (including 532 individuals with three and two individuals with two stool specimens). One result for Oncocercha volvulus, a parasite not found in stool, was excluded as data entry error, yielding a total 533 records for analysis. Among these 533 individuals, 77 (14%) had at least one positive stool specimen for a protozoan or helminth. The 77 positive refugees had 11 different pathogenic species, including four different protozoa and seven different species of helminths. Multiple species were seen in nine (12%) of these 77 refugees, including three positive for protozoa and helminths, one for two species of helminth, and five for multiple protozoa. Thus, a total of 49 subjects (9%) had protozoan and 31 (6%) had helminthic identifications (Table 2Go). Of 66 subjects with single infections, 41 (62%) were positive for the parasite on all three specimens and 52 (79%) on at least two specimens. These yields were not significantly different when comparing helminths versus protozoa.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2
Prevalence of intestinal parasites found in 533 refugees completing health assessments at Santa Clara Valley Refugee Clinic, October 2001 to January 2004
 
The most common protozoan was Giardia lamblia (63% of individuals with protozoa and 6% of all refugees tested), and G. lamblia was present in 6 of 7 multiple infections. Entamoeba histolytica was reported in 14% of individuals with protozoan isolates (1% of refugees), although antigen testing was not performed, and we cannot differentiate the organism from Entamoeba dispar. Among the 31 subjects with helminth infections, the most common isolate was hookworm (35% of individuals with helminthic infections and 2% of all refugees). A. lumbricoides and Strongyloides sterocoralis were each found in 22% of those with helminth infections (1% of all refugees).

Different species of helminths and protozoa were found in refugees from different regions (Table 3Go). Hookworm and A. lumbricoides were concentrated among South Central Asian refugees (16 of 18 identifications) whereas S. stercoralis was predominantly found among African refugees (5 of 7 identifications). In addition to S. stercoralis, Africans had the greatest variety of helminth infections, including two cases of Schistosomiasis mansoni, three of Hymenolepsis nana, and one each of Taenia saginata and Trichuris trichiura. That hookworm was found exclusively in South Central Asian and Middle Eastern groups suggests Ancylostoma duodenale. By contrast, the more common pathogenic protozoa were distributed more uniformly geographically.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3
Frequency of specific helminths and protozoa based on region of origin
 
Compared with refugees from Eastern Europe and the Middle East, South Central Asians were eight times more likely to have intestinal helminths (OR: 8.0 [2.3–27.7]) and Africans nearly six times more likely (OR: 5.9 [1.6–21.6]) (Table 4Go). Neither age nor gender was associated with helminth infection; however, adults without a high school education were somewhat more likely to be infected (OR: 2.2 [0.93–5.1], P = 0.07). Adjusting for age and gender (Table 5Go) did not alter the magnitudes of association with region of emigration appreciably. In addition, Africans were not significantly different from South Central Asians in adjusted risk.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4
Factors associated with positive helminth and protozoa examinations in 523 refugees (odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals, univariate analysis)
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 5
Factors associated with positive helminth and protozoa examinations in 523 refugees (odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals, multivariate analysis)
 
Prevalence of protozoan infection did not differ significantly between African and Middle East/Eastern Europeans (P = 0.96), although South Central Asians were somewhat less likely to have protozoan infections than refugees from the Middle East or Central Europe (OR: 0.53 [0.24–1.14], P = 0.11). Children were more than twice as likely as adults to have protozoa (OR: 2.2 [1.2–4.2], P = 0.01), and males somewhat more likely (OR: 1.6 [0.9–2.9], P = 0.14). Adjusting for age and gender did not alter risk associated with region of emigration appreciably. Year of arrival (2001/2002 versus 2003/2004) was not significantly associated with either protozoan or helminth infection.


DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
With continuing immigration from endemic countries, screening for intestinal parasite infections remains an important priority in U.S. communities serving refugees and other recent immigrants. Historically, California has received about 12% of the estimated two million refugees who have entered the United States since 1975. In this study of refugees resettling in the Santa Clara County region of northern California, we found that 14% of those undergoing parasite examinations had intestinal parasites, including rates of 9% and 6% for protozoa and helminths respectively. As expected, there were significant variations in prevalence of these classes of parasites by region of emigration as well as age. Protozoan infections were found across all regions and were more likely among children, while helminth infections were concentrated in refugees from South Central Asia and Africa, with S. stercoralis concentrated disproportionately among African refugees and A. lumbricoides and hookworm found nearly exclusively in South Central Asian refugees.

Our population of refugees had somewhat lower rates of parasitic infection than has been reported in other state RHAP studies. In Minnesota,5 the overall rate of infection for eight specific pathogenic parasites was 22% among 2,129 refugees screened in 1999, with trichuriasis in 7% and giardiasis in 3%. Nearly three-quarters of this population was from sub-Saharan Africa (compared with 26% in our study population). Similarly, for a 6-year period, Massachusetts6 reported that 56% of African refugees harbored parasitic infections, including 14% with helminth infections. In a different, 3-year survey from the same jurisdiction, 21% of refugee children, 2 of 3 of whom were from Eastern Europe, were found to harbor parasitic infections, the most common species in children from this region being G. lamblia and B. hominis.30

In addition to differences in emigration mix, one explanation for the lower prevalence observed here might be the impact of predeparture albendazole programs, primarily in Saharan Africa. Detection of parasites decreased from 24% to 4% for helminths and 57% to 47% for protozoa after establishment of this program in African refugees arriving in Massachusetts.6 By comparison, 9% of Africans in this study had helminth infections. It should also be noted that albendazole does not provide complete coverage for the spectrum of parasitic infections, including schistosomiasis and protozoa. In addition, for target pathogens, efficacy can vary widely depending on species as well as course (single or three days). Notably, schistosomiasis and Strongyloides were found uniquely or primarily among Africans, and helminth prevalence was not significantly different from that observed among South Central Asians, a region where predeparture treatment is less uniformly enforced. This underscores the fact that predeparture treatment programs can vary significantly in their coverage and effectiveness.

Parasitic infections were nevertheless common in our population, and species-related geographic variations observed in this study are consistent with variations reported elsewhere. The majority of refugees are without access to empirical treatment before departure, and there remains a need for parasite screening in all incoming refugee populations. Perhaps as important as the initial screening of immigrant populations is the need for continuing surveillance in active resettlement communities. In one Canadian study of Kampuchean refugees (64% of whom had parasite infections at arrival), prevalence was still 22% six years after initial screening.31 Interestingly, while some parasites were almost completely eradicated, A. lumbricoides, G. lamblia, and hookworm, others were present at levels comparable to the initial screening (S. stercoralis decreased only slightly from 15% to 11%).31 Longitudinal studies are needed to characterize the protracted risk for overall infection as well as infection by specific parasites in communities where refugee resettlement is ongoing and to develop screening strategies beyond the initial testing.

Refugee participation in RHAP programs is often culturally driven. In this study, only 2 of 3 of refugees contacted elected to participate, and of these, about 31% did not complete their assessments. Some of those declining participation may have used other providers; however, certain geographic regions—in particular, East Asia and Southeast Asia that represented a sizeable amount of incoming refugees—were almost completely absent from the group completing health assessments through the state RHAP clinic. In addition, although protozoa were more likely to be found in children, children were underrepresented in groups completing health assessments. We also found that lower levels of educational attainment among adults were associated with lower rates of completion. Educational awareness programs targeted both to newly arriving refugees and to resettlement communities serving particular cultural groups are needed to improve participation rates.

Although refugees represent an important target screening group for parasitic infections, it is well to note that refugees represent only a fraction of the estimated 5 million persons who may have immigrated to the United States in the previous 5 years,4 a number that does not include undocumented aliens common in border states like California, or migrant laborers.32 During the 1970s and 1980s, a number of studies reported high rates of parasitic infection in nonrefugee immigrant as well as refugee groups, but current screening studies are lacking, and many of these groups do not have access to preventive health services like RHAP. With the exception of giardiasis, mandated federal reporting of intestinal parasitic infections ceased in 1994, although high-risk communities like Santa Clara County maintained reporting on seven different helminths and three different parasites until the late 1990s. It is by virtue of state RHAP programs that the epidemiology of parasitic infections in the United States is being revisited; however, the recognition of new surveillance and health care needs should not necessarily be limited to refugee groups.

The importance of recognizing parasitic infection in immigrants extends beyond the clinical diseases they specifically elicit. Although most infections are asymptomatic, increasing amounts of data indicate that harboring helminths may alter the course of other, more life-threatening and communicable infectious diseases, such as tuberculosis and HIV.33 Besides upregulating Th2 responses, many helminths also downregulate Th1 responses, affecting the ability of the host’s immune system to respond to other pathogens or vaccines.34,35 A. lumbricoides and Onchocerca volvulus, parasites commonly found in immigrant populations, have been found to impair immune response to both acute (Vibrio) and chronic (Mycobacteria) infection.36,37 High rates of latent TB infection have been noted in a number of refugee screening studies.5,8,26,30,38,39 With reactivation of latent TB often occurring within the first few years of immigration, it is conceivable that untreated helminth infections contribute to this important public health problem.

Our study has several important weaknesses. First, the low frequency of parasitic infections necessarily limited the statistical analysis. Some nonsignificant trends observed may be due to sampling error. Second, the sensitivity of microscopic stool ova and parasite testing is known to be imperfect. All subjects in this study provided at least two specimens, but other reasons for reduced sensitivity may include variations in stool sampling in concert with parasite behavior. In practice, O&P examinations are likely to be supplemented with symptom and systems reviews, as well as other laboratory tests, such as for eosinophil counts. Prevalence, therefore, may be underestimated with reliance on O&P results alone. Finally, due to limited participation rates among South and East Asians, we were unable to adequately assess patterns of infection in these two groups of refugees. We cannot be sure that these refugees did not influence the observed prevalence of infection.

Parasites comprise a very diverse group of species that have different manifestations of varying disease severity and that require different, often highly individualized, clinical approaches. In a low-incidence country, timely, cost-effective diagnosis is aided immensely by a priori clinical suspicion.3,40 Beginning to understand what classes and species of parasites are associated with recent immigrant populations can serve to better direct clinical suspicion. Under current recommendations, treatment of asymptomatic carriers in low-risk settings is optional.41 However, refugees and other immigrant populations tend to congregate, thus placing one another at increased risk of infection and facilitating the likelihood that these parasites persist within these communities. It is this public health imperative that justifies the continued screening of these populations through heightened clinical suspicion.


Received September 28, 2004. Accepted for publication March 20, 2005.

Acknowledgment: The authors would like to thank Sakchai Himathongkhan for his help in data preparation and manuscript review.

* Address correspondence to Parveen K. Garg, 8 & 281 Dunham Dr, Naperville, IL 60540. E-mail: parveen{at}md.northwestern.edu Back

Authors’ addresses: Parveen K. Garg, 8 & 281 Dunham Dr., Naperville, IL 60540. Sharon Perry and Julie Parsonnet, Stanford University, Grant Building, Room S156, 5107, Stanford, CA 94305-5107. Martha Dorn, Valley Center at Lenzen, 976 Lenzen Ave., San Jose, CA 95126. Laura Hardcastle, California Department of Health Services, Office of County Health Services, Refugee Health Section, Sacramento, CA 94234-7320.

Reprint requests: Parveen K. Garg, 8 & 281 Dunham Dr., Naperville, IL 60540.


REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Allen JE, Maizels RM, 1996. Immunology of human helminth infection. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 109: 3–10.[ISI][Medline]
  2. Stanley SL Jr, 2003. Amoebiasis. Lancet 361: 1025–1034.[ISI][Medline]
  3. Walker PF, Jaranson J, 1999. Refugee and immigrant health care. Med Clin North Am 83: 1103–1120.[ISI][Medline]
  4. Larson L, 2003. The foreign-born population in the United States: 2003. Bureau USC, ed. Current Population Reports. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, 1–12.
  5. Lifson AR, Thai D, O’Fallon A, Mills WA, Hang K, 2002. Prevalence of tuberculosis, hepatitis B virus, and intestinal parasitic infections among refugees to Minnesota. Public Health Rep 117: 69–77.[ISI][Medline]
  6. Geltman PL, Cochran J, Hedgecock C, 2003. Intestinal parasites among African refugees resettled in Massachusetts and the impact of an overseas pre-departure treatment program. Am J Trop Med Hyg 69: 657–662.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Sutherland JE, Avant RF, Franz WB 3rd, Monzon CM, Stark NM, 1983. Indochinese refugee health assessment and treatment. J Fam Pract 16: 61–67.[ISI][Medline]
  8. Parenti DM, Lucas D, Lee A, Hollenkamp RH, 1987. Health status of Ethiopian refugees in the United States. Am J Public Health 77: 1542–1543.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Parish RA, 1985. Intestinal parasites in Southeast Asian refugee children. West J Med 143: 47–49.[ISI][Medline]
  10. Winsberg GR, Sonnenschein E, Dyer AR, Schnadig V, Bonilla E, 1975. Prevalence of intestinal parasites in Latino residents of Chicago. Am J Epidemiol 102: 526–532.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Arfaa F, 1981. Intestinal parasites among Indochinese refugees and Mexican immigrants resettled in Contra Costa County, California. J Fam Pract 12: 223–226.[ISI][Medline]
  12. Salas SD, Heifetz R, Barrett-Connor E, 1990. Intestinal parasites in Central American immigrants in the United States. Arch Intern Med 150: 1514–1516.[Abstract]
  13. Ortiz JS, 1980. The prevalence of intestinal parasites in Puerto Rican farm workers in western Massachusetts. Am J Public Health 70: 1103–1105.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Ungar BL, Iscoe E, Cutler J, Bartlett JG, 1986. Intestinal parasites in a migrant farmworker population. Arch Intern Med 146: 513–515.[Abstract]
  15. Barnett ED, 2004. Infectious disease screening for refugees resettled in the United States. Clin Infect Dis 39: 833–841.[ISI][Medline]
  16. Maizels RM, Bundy DA, Selkirk ME, Smith DF, Anderson RM, 1993. Immunological modulation and evasion by helminth parasites in human populations. Nature 365: 797–805.[Medline]
  17. Sher A, Coffman RL, 1992. Regulation of immunity to parasites by T cells and T cell-derived cytokines. Annu Rev Immunol 10: 385–409.[ISI][Medline]
  18. Pit DS, Polderman AM, Baeta S, Schulz-Key H, Soboslay PT, 2001. Parasite-specific antibody and cellular immune responses in human infected with Necator americanus and Oesophagostomum bifurcum. Parasitol Res 87: 722–729.[ISI][Medline]
  19. Cunin P, Tchuem Tchuente LA, Poste B, Djibrilla K, Martin PM, 2003. Interactions between Schistosoma haematobium and Schistosoma mansoni in humans in north Cameroon. Trop Med Int Health 8: 1110–1117.[ISI][Medline]
  20. Cox FE, 2001. Concomitant infections, parasites and immune responses. Parasitology 122 (Suppl): S23–S38.
  21. Cooper PJ, Chico ME, Sandoval C, Espinel I, Guevara A, Kennedy MW, Urban JF Jr, Griffin GE, Nutman TB, 2000. Human infection with Ascaris lumbricoides is associated with a polarized cytokine response. J Infect Dis 182: 1207–1213.[ISI][Medline]
  22. Fox JG, Beck P, Dangler CA, Whary MT, Wang TC, Shi HN, Nagler-Anderson C, 2000. Concurrent enteric helminth infection modulates inflammation and gastric immune responses and reduces helicobacter-induced gastric atrophy. Nat Med 6: 536–542.[ISI][Medline]
  23. Le Hesran JY, Akiana J, Ndiaye el HM, Dia M, Senghor P, Konate L, 2004. Severe malaria attack is associated with high prevalence of Ascaris lumbricoides infection among children in rural Senegal. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 98: 397–399.[ISI][Medline]
  24. Sacks D, Sher A, 2002. Evasion of innate immunity by parasitic protozoa. Nat Immunol 3: 1041–1047.[ISI][Medline]
  25. Hotez PJ, Brooker S, Bethony JM, Bottazzi ME, Loukas A, Xiao S, 2004. Hookworm infection. N Engl J Med 351: 799–807.[Free Full Text]
  26. Catanzaro A, Moser RJ, 1982. Health status of refugees from Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia. JAMA 247: 1303–1308.[Abstract]
  27. Yazdanbakhsh M, Kremsner PG, van Ree R, 2002. Allergy, parasites, and the hygiene hypothesis. Science 296: 490–494.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. 2002. Refugee Admissions and Resettlement Policy. CRS Report for Congress. Washington, DC: Department USS, ed.
  29. Cartwright CP, 1999. Utility of multiple-stool-specimen ova and parasite examinations in a high-prevalence setting. J Clin Microbiol 37: 2408–2411.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Geltman PL, Radin M, Zhang Z, Cochran J, Meyers AF, 2001. Growth status and related medical conditions among refugee children in Massachusetts, 1995–1998. Am J Public Health 91: 1800–1805.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Gyorkos TW, MacLean JD, Viens P, Chheang C, Kokoskin-Nelson E, 1992. Intestinal parasite infection in the Kampuchean refugee population 6 years after resettlement in Canada. J Infect Dis 166: 413–417.[ISI][Medline]
  32. Devidoff K BL, 2004. Evaluating components of international migration: estimates of the foreign-born population by migration status in 2000. Bureau USC, ed. Working Paper #58. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
  33. Bentwich Z, Kalinkovich A, Weisman Z, Borkow G, Beyers N, Beyers AD, 1999. Can eradication of helminthic infections change the face of AIDS and tuberculosis? Immunol Today 20: 485–487.[ISI][Medline]
  34. Elias D, Wolday D, Akuffo H, Petros B, Bronner U, Britton S, 2001. Effect of deworming on human T cell responses to mycobacterial antigens in helminth-exposed individuals before and after bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccination. Clin Exp Immunol 123: 219–225.[ISI][Medline]
  35. Kullberg MC, Pearce EJ, Hieny SE, Sher A, Berzofsky JA, 1992. Infection with Schistosoma mansoni alters Th1/Th2 cytokine responses to a non-parasite antigen. J Immunol 148: 3264–3270.[Abstract]
  36. Cooper PJ, Chico M, Sandoval C, Espinel I, Guevara A, Levine MM, Griffin GE, Nutman TB, 2001. Human infection with Ascaris lumbricoides is associated with suppression of the interleukin-2 response to recombinant cholera toxin B subunit following vaccination with the live oral cholera vaccine CVD 103-HgR. Infect Immun 69: 1574–1580.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Stewart GR, Boussinesq M, Coulson T, Elson L, Nutman T, Bradley JE, 1999. Onchocerciasis modulates the immune response to mycobacterial antigens. Clin Exp Immunol 117: 517–523.[ISI][Medline]
  38. DeRiemer K, Chin DP, Schecter GF, Reingold AL, 1998. Tuberculosis among immigrants and refugees. Arch Intern Med 158: 753–760.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Perez-Stable EJ, Slutkin G, Paz EA, Hopewell PC, 1986. Tuberculin reactivity in United States and foreign-born Latinos: results of a community-based screening program. Am J Public Health 76: 643–646.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Muennig P, Pallin D, Sell RL, Chan MS, 1999. The cost effectiveness of strategies for the treatment of intestinal parasites in immigrants. N Engl J Med 340: 773–779.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Pickering L, Baker CJ, Overturf GD, Prober CG, 2003. RedBook Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases. Elk Grove, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Trop Med HygHome page
C. Franco-Paredes, R. Dismukes, D. Nicolls, A. Hidron, K. Workowski, A. Rodriguez-Morales, M. Wilson, D. Jones, P. Manyang, and P. Kozarsky
Persistent and Untreated Tropical Infectious Diseases Among Sudanese Refugees in the United States
Am J Trop Med Hyg, October 1, 2007; 77(4): 633 - 635.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GARG, P. K.
Right arrow Articles by PARSONNET, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by GARG, P. K.
Right arrow Articles by PARSONNET, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Geohelminths
Right arrow Epidemiology


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS