|
|
||||||||
| ABSTRACT |
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|
|
|---|
Most detailed studies of the duration of P. falciparum parasitemia refer to malaria infections deliberately used for treatment of syphilis (therapeutic malaria) and report average infection durations of 200300 days.49 Data such as these convinced most malariologists that untreated infections would generally persist for periods of this order, although occasionally P. falciparum infections are reported in returned tourists and immigrants from endemic areas whose last exposure was much further in the past.
Most of these data deal with induced malaria in non-immune subjects, and while these may be applicable in areas of low endemicity subject to epidemics, this does not necessarily reflect the duration in endemic areas where people are repeatedly reinfected. The most widely quoted figure of 200 days for the total duration of infection is that derived by Macdonald,10 who analyzed weekly parasitemia data recorded for a small group of individuals in Puerto Rico.11 However reassessment of the original dataset 25 years later led to the conclusion that infections with P. falciparum might still be patent some 30 months after the original infection and possibly longer.12
It is difficult to see how, in the absence of parasite typing data, duration of infection could be reliably estimated from field studies in areas with ongoing reinfection. However, the decay in the parasite rate when transmission is interrupted can be used to estimate the average duration of infection. A seminal paper in this field was that of Macdonald and Göckel.13 Using cross-sectional data from a number of attempts at eradication, they fitted a simple model of constant clearance rate to the parasite prevalence P
![]() |
with solution:
![]() |
where P0 is the prevalence at time t = 0, immediately prior to the interruption of transmission, and claimed that the results were broadly consistent with a duration of 200 days. Here log refers to the natural logarithm and P to the prevalence at time t.
In this report, we make use of this model to estimate the total duration of P. falciparum infection after transmission has been interrupted, but improve on the basic model by allowing for recruitment of new individuals and for changes in age. Modeling the natural duration of infection is considerably complicated when anti-malarial treatment is available. We therefore fitted the models to P. falciparum prevalence data from three historical datasets from malaria research projects that preceded the introduction of primary health care providing anti-malarial treatments: the Pare-Taveta scheme,14 a pilot project in West Papua (Metselaar D, 1957. A Pilot Project of Residual Insecticide Spraying in Netherlands New Guinea: Contribution to the Knowledge of Holo-Endemic Malaria. Ph.D Dissertation. Leiden, The Netherlands: Leiden University), and the Garki project.15 We also test whether the duration of infection depends on the age of the host in these studies.
| METHODS |
|
|
|---|
|
The Garki Project.
The data used here were collected from the Garki project, an intensively monitored trial of malaria control in northern Nigeria carried out in 19691976. In contrast to the Pare-Taveta and West Papua datasets, in Garki the individuals were identified and parasitologic status could therefore be analyzed in the same individuals longitudinally. From April 1972 to October 1973, villages in three concentric areas were treated with one of three control strategies (A1, A2, and B), which are described in detail by Molineaux and Gramiccia.15 Since the objective of this paper is to estimate the duration of P. falciparum infections in untreated individuals, we analyze only data collected from the six sentinel villages in the intervention area where there was no mass drug administration (area B). Residual indoor spraying with insecticide propuxur for three or four rounds, at intervals of approximately two months, was applied to this area both before and during each of two main transmission seasons (1972 and 1973). Eight surveys of the entire population of these villages were carried out prior to the intervention, and an additional eight surveys were carried out during the intervention. We consider the data from survey 8 as comprising a baseline for our analysis, and analyze changes in parasitologic status during surveys 916. Table 1
shows the number of people in each age group that were examined at baseline. There were very little changes in these numbers in the subsequent surveys.
| MODELS |
|
|
|---|
|
i
k. Let Pi,t denote the proportion positive at time t among those in age group i at time t0 (i.e., at baseline). We assume that this proportion is adequately described by the equation
![]() |
where ri is the clearance rate at time t for individuals in age group i at baseline. If Pi,t0 is the proportion positive at base-line then it follows that
![]() |
The total duration of infection was estimated using two different methods of analysis, namely, repeated cross-sectional and longitudinal survival analysis. Both methods were used to analyze the data from the Garki (area B) study, while only the repeated cross-sectional analysis method was applied to the other two datasets.
Analysis of infection duration from repeated cross-sectional data. Garki data. In the Garki data, the exact age of each individual was known and the individuals were identified and followed-up longitudinally. However, for the purpose of comparison with the other two datasets, we start by analyzing this dataset as if they were collected from unlinked cross-sectional surveys, and assign individuals to different age groups using the age groupings in the Pare-Taveta study. We fitted equation 4 with separate estimates for Pi,t0 and a common estimate for ri (i.e., ri = r for all the age groups). To allow for effects of age on infection duration, we also fitted equation 4 with separate estimates of Pi,t0 and of ri for each age group and to test for a linear trend in the effect of age on r we fitted the model with ri in (4) substituted with the following age dependent term
![]() |
where ai,0 is the mid-age of age group i at baseline.
To allow for random variation, we assume a binomial error function for the parasite prevalence, i.e.,
![]() |
whereXi,t is number of positive samples in age group i at time t and ni(t) is the total number of samples examined in age group i at time t.
Pare-Taveta and West Papua data. We take into consideration the fact that the population sampled in each age group varies for each survey by attempting to capture in our model the proportions of the population within each age group at a later time that were in the different age groups at baseline. For this we make the additional assumption that the age distributions are approximately uniform. That is, the number of individuals within each age group is proportional to the width of the age group. We make use of this assumption in deriving equation 7.
First, we give a brief explanation, in non-mathematical terms, of the scenario that the equations developed below attempt to capture. Consider, for example, three distinct cohorts (or age groups) at baseline, i.e., at time t0 (Figure 2
). We assume that the prevalence in each age group decreases in an exponential manner with time (given by equation 4), with the possibility of a different rate of decrease for the different age groups. Since different cohorts were studied at different surveys, we wish to estimate for example at a later time (e.g., t1 in Figure 2
) the proportion of a newly recruited cohort 2 who were in cohort 1 at baseline (t0) (given by equation 7). Looking at Figure 2
again, this proportion is given by the segment AB. We estimate this proportion and take it back to its original age group at baseline. It is clear that when the time interval between the baseline and any subsequent survey is long enough, some individuals within a specific cohort at baseline will move to two or more subsequent cohorts. From the example given by in Figure 2
, we find that at time-point t2, a certain proportion (AC) of cohort 1 has moved to cohort 2 while another proportion (CD) has moved to cohort 3. We sum up these proportions, take them back to their original age groups (i.e., the age group they belonged to at baseline), and apply the corresponding exponential decrease that was assumed for this group to start with. This is summarized by equation 8.
|
![]() |
and it follows from this and equation 4 that the expected value of the prevalence in age group j at time t, E(Pj,t) is
![]() |
which is a function of the unknown parameters ri, Pi,t0 We report results obtained by assuming a binomial error function for the parasite prevalence in both areas, i.e.,
![]() |
The estimates for the r values were obtained in a similar manner as described in this section. In addition, analyses were carried out separately for different sites within the study areas to test for effects of malaria endemicity on infection duration.
Longitudinal survival analysis of infection duration. Second, we fitted an exponential model to the survival times of the infections in the Garki dataset. We studied only changes in the parasitologic status of individuals who were present and positive at baseline (eighth survey) until the survey when they were either negative or absent. We assumed that the observations for each individual were independent of each other (i.e., an individual positive at two consecutive surveys was treated as two separate counts and so on) and we estimated the proportion (P) infected at time t + 1, (It+l), conditional on being infected at time t, (It), as follows
![]() |
We also took into account random variation by assuming a binomial error function as follows
![]() |
where X+,i equals the total number positive at all surveys j (8
j < i ) and positive at survey i, while n+,i equals the total number positive at all surveys j (8
j < i ) and present at survey i, (9
i
16).
The model parameters were estimated using WinBUGS version 1.3,16 and assuming gamma priors for the r values. The quoted results are based on samples of 29,500 values from the posterior densities, following a burn-in of 30,000 iterations.
| RESULTS |
|
|
|---|
|
Figure 4
shows the fit of the model to the data and also the predicted prevalence at each time point in the cohort initially present at baseline. This is shown (Figure 4
) explicitly for the eight different age groups in one of the sites (Pare swamp) in the Pare-Taveta study. There is a clear difference in the rate of decrease in prevalence in the younger age groups (especially in the first age group of 011 months) because newborns were directly recruited into these age groups. The difference between these two curves become less visible as the age groups become older because at subsequent surveys the newborns were not old enough to attain these age groups and thus affect the observed prevalence within them. The model fit to the Garki data was also good (Figure 5
).
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|
|
|---|
The overall estimates for the duration of infection from the analysis of the repeated cross-sectional data are similar in the three areas, but are much higher than the most widely quoted values derived from analyses by Macdonald and Göckel two generations ago.10,13 There was no obvious relationship between infection duration and the endemicity of malaria (Figures 6
and 7
). Our results suggest a waiting time of at least 23 years is needed before evaluating the effect of interventions that suppress transmission without actively clearing parasites such as insecticide treated nets, indoor residual spraying, and mosquito source reduction.
Among the sites for which Macdonald and Göckel13 presented curves for the decrease in parasite rates when transmission was interrupted, the Pare Taveta and West Papua sites showed the lowest rates of decrease. According to Macdonald and Göckel,13 this was because transmission was not completely interrupted in these sites. However, although there were some infections in children born after the start of spraying, the comprehensive application of insecticide ensured that these were very few in number (Figures 1
and 4
). This indicates that post-intervention new infections were rare and cannot account for the persistently high prevalence (Figure 1
).
A number of studies in endemic areas have reported that infections are of relatively short duration in very young children. For example, Walton17 found that the average duration of infection in infants in Freetown, Sierra Leone was slightly more than three months at a time when there was relatively little transmission there. More recently, it was estimated that the duration of infections with parasites belonging to the merozoite surface protein 2 FC27 allelic family increased with age using data collected from Tanzanian children 6-30 months old.18,19 An increase in duration with age during the first two years of life has also been reported in a study with Ghanaian children.20
We chose the Pare Taveta, West Papua, and Garki data for re-analysis because all three allowed us to analyze the duration of infection by age. The Pare-Taveta and West Papua data showed a faster initial decrease in prevalence in the youngest age group than in the older ones. However, Macdonald and Göckel13 suggested that infection duration appeared shorter in young children only because the data had been analyzed inappropriately, and that a cohort analysis should have been carried out. This is because straightforward analysis of the decrease in parasite prevalence with time after transmission is interrupted fails to allow for the recruitment of new uninfected individuals (newborns). Our new analysis allows for this effect, and indeed we find that after this adjustment there is no indication in these datasets that parasites are cleared faster in the youngest children. Indeed, there seems to be a slow decrease in duration with age.
While we agree with Macdonald and Göckel13 about the biases due to recruitment of unexposed newborns, all our estimates of clearance rates, except those from the cohort analysis of the Garki data, remain much lower than those reported based on other datasets quoted by Macdonald and Göckel.13 Part of the reason for this may be that few of the datasets they used are from surveys in endemic communities in the absence of mass treatment. For instance, the data they refer to for the eradication of Anopheles gambiae from Brazil21 appear to be incidence figures for clinical cases.
The explanation of why the estimates of duration from unlinked data are lower than those from the cohort analysis is that the latter systematically underestimates duration by treating temporarily subpatent infections as though they had been cleared.22 This can be illustrated by a typical profile of parasite density during follow-up of a malariatherapy patient (Figure 8
). The patient was inoculated at time A and parasites were cleared at some time H after the last day G on which parasites were detectable. The true duration of infection is thus H-A. However, longitudinal studies that do not allow for imperfect detectability, such as that of Macdonald10 and our own longitudinal Garki analysis, give estimates of the duration of parasitemic episodes (either D-C or F-E). Estimates of durations from longitudinal data can be even shorter if sampling is frequent because of sequestration during the 48-hour cycle of the parasite. Using longitudinal microscopy data from blood smears collected at very frequent intervals among inhabitants of a single village in Papua New Guinea, Bruce and others obtained an estimate of 327 days for the duration of parasitemic episodes of asymptomatic P. falciparum infections.23
|
Our study thus provides convincing evidence that malaria infections in endemic areas actually persist on average for much longer than Macdonald10 claimed and that it is the cohort analysis that can be biased. It also suggests that duration is not very dependent on exposure in highly endemic communities. However, studies where transmission is interrupted cannot tell us what is the infection duration when superinfection is occurring. Moreover, very few of the individuals were in the youngest age categories, so we cannot be confident that very young children and malaria-naive individuals have similar duration to people with more exposure. A critical assumption of this paper was that residual transmission was negligible. A key question that could not be adequately addressed using these datasets is that by how much is the duration of infection overestimated due to the fact that reinfection is not accounted for. However, a graphic display of the raw data provides convincing evidence of a general exponential decay pattern, therefore indicating that the results are not greatly altered, although it is possible that a better fit could be obtained with more complex decay models. For example, in the Garki project, it was shown that after the spraying program, reinfection did continue at a level approximately one-sixth its original value.15 Using the cross-sectional analysis for the Garki data, we obtained an estimated infection duration of 1,329 days, suggesting that even if this low level of reinfection was accounted for, the estimated duration of infection will still be much longer than those that have been thought of in the past. The average durations that we estimated are also much longer than those seen in malariatherapy patients in whom the whole course of infection was observed.9
Field-based parasite typing studies now make it possible to study duration of infection in the presence of superinfections. Thus, it was found24 that the mean duration of episodes of positivity (i.e., D-C or F-E in Figure 8
) for the same23 P. falciparum genotype to be approximately 60 days in Papua New Guinean children. Typing studies have found asymptomatic infections persisting for more than 12 months in eastern Sudan.25 It was also found that a single parasite genotype of P. falciparum asymptomatic infections could persist for as long as 40 weeks.20 However, few typing studies have attempted to calculate population averages of overall duration.
Recently, a model that allows for imperfect detectability has been proposed19 that analyzes infection dynamics in longitudinal data where parasites have been typed by a polymerase chain reaction and in the presence of new inoculations. These analyses covered only a narrow age range of hosts. Further analyses of longitudinal parasite typing data are needed that cover the whole age distribution and from areas of different endemicity.
Received May 27, 2003. Accepted for publication October 22, 2003.
Acknowledgments: Wilson Sama is the recipient of a stipend from the Stipendiumkommission of the Amt für Ausbildungsbeiträge of the Canton of Basel. We thank Klaus Dietz and Louis Molineaux for their helpful comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript, and Penelope Vounatsou for assistance with the statistical software. David Bradley, Louis Molineaux, and Paulette Rozé helped in the recovery of data from old records.
Authors address: Wilson Sama, Gerry Killeen, and Tom Smith, Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, Swiss Tropical Institute, Socinstrasse 57, Postfach, CH-4002 Basel Switzerland, Telephone: 41-61-284-8282 or 41-79-233-6748, Fax: 41-61-271-7951, E-mail: wilson.sama{at}unibas.ch.
| REFERENCES |
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. MAIRE, T. SMITH, A. ROSS, S. OWUSU-AGYEI, K. DIETZ, and L. MOLINEAUX A MODEL FOR NATURAL IMMUNITY TO ASEXUAL BLOOD STAGES OF PLASMODIUM FALCIPARUM MALARIA IN ENDEMIC AREAS. Am J Trop Med Hyg, August 1, 2006; 75(2_suppl): 19 - 31. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. F. KILLEEN, A. ROSS, and T. SMITH INFECTIOUSNESS OF MALARIA-ENDEMIC HUMAN POPULATIONS TO VECTORS. Am J Trop Med Hyg, August 1, 2006; 75(2_suppl): 38 - 45. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. GU and R. J. NOVAK HABITAT-BASED MODELING OF IMPACTS OF MOSQUITO LARVAL INTERVENTIONS ON ENTOMOLOGICAL INOCULATION RATES, INCIDENCE, AND PREVALENCE OF MALARIA Am J Trop Med Hyg, September 1, 2005; 73(3): 546 - 552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |