AJTMH HINARI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 70(6), 2004, pp. 607-612
Copyright © 2004 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CACERES, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by AREVALO, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by CACERES, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by AREVALO, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Vector Biology
Right arrow Epidemiology
Right arrow Leishmaniasis
Right arrow Sand Flies

EPIDEMIOLOGY OF ANDEAN CUTANEOUS LEISHMANIASIS: INCRIMINATION OF LUTZOMYIA AYACUCHENSIS (DIPTERA: PSYCHODIDAE) AS A VECTOR OF LEISHMANIA IN GEOGRAPHICALLY ISOLATED, UPLAND VALLEYS OF PERU

ABRAHAM G. CACERES, PABLO VILLASECA, JEAN CLAUDE DUJARDIN, ANNE LAURE BAÑULS, ROCIO INGA, MARTIN LOPEZ, MARGARITA ARANA, DOMINIQUE LE RAY, AND JORGE AREVALO
Instituto Nacional de Salud, Lima, Peru; Departmento de Fisiologia e Instituto de Medicina Tropical Alexander von Humboldt, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru; Laboratoire de Parasitologie Moleculaire, Instituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde, Antwerp, Belgium; Génétique des Maladies Infectieuses, Unité Mixte de Recherche, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Montpellier, France


ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The southernmost limit of the distribution of endemic Andean cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL), commonly known as Uta, is localized in the western Andean valleys of Ayacucho, Peru. This area is completely isolated from other regions endemic for this disease. Identification of the insect vector for Andean CL was carried out by combining entomologic and parasitologic approaches. Two Lutzomyia species were captured: Lutzomyia ayacuchensis and Lu. noguchii. The former species was considered responsible for transmission of Leishmania because 1) there was a coincidence in space and time between the presence of this insect and the distribution of Andean CL, 2) it was shown to be highly anthropophilic, 3) Leishmania parasites of the subgenus Viannia were detected by a specific polymerase chain reaction assay, 4) promastigotes isolated from this insect were shown by multilocus enzyme electrophoresis and molecular karyotyping to belong to the same deme of Leishmania (Viannia) peruviana as the one circulating in humans living in the study area, and 5) the complete cycle of L. (V.) peruviana was observed in experimental infections of Lu. ayacuchensis. Parasite and vector homogeneity found in Ayacucho contrasted with the heterogeneity reported for other areas endemic for Andean CL. The potential influence of ecologic determinants on this geographically isolated area is discussed.


INTRODUCTION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Andean cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL), commonly known as Uta, is a particular mild clinical form of tegumentary leishmaniasis. It is endemic in Peru and constitutes an important primary health problem in people living in the highlands of this country.1,2 This disease, which affects mainly children, has been reported between latitudes 5°S and 13°S.3–5 These coordinates include 1) western Andean valleys (from 800 to 3,000 meters above sea level, 2) inter-Andean valleys (from 1,900 to 3,200 meters above seal level), and 3) some eastern Andean valleys (between 300 and 1,900 meters above sea level) in Peru.

Peru is an very heterogeneous country in terms of ecology, and on the basis of the endemicity of several animal species (including butterflies), 48 different geographic and ecologic scenarios known as biogeographic units (BGUs), have been described.6 Andean CL is encountered in several of these BGUs; accordingly, one might expect an important heterogeneity of both parasites and vectors involved in the transmission of this disease.

Preliminary entomologic surveys in different Andean valleys of Peru have demonstrated extensive sand fly diversity. The following sand flies have been described in areas endemic for Andean CL: Lutzomyia noguchii, Warileya phlebotomanica, Lu. verrucarum, Lu. peruensis,3,7–10 Lu. tejadai,11 Lu. ayacuchensis,9,12 and Lu. pescei.7,13 Of them, the first two species are not anthropophilic.

Lutzomyia peruensis, Lu. verrucarum, and Lu. tejadai have been incriminated as vectors of Andean CL because 1) Lu. peruensis and Lu. verrucarum show the same spatial and temporal distribution as this disease,8,9 2) sentinel hamsters had amastigotes in skin biopsy specimens when used as baits in areas with high densities of Lu. peruensis,14 3) Leishmania sp. were obtained in culture from captured Lu. peruensis15 or from hamsters inoculated with their extracts,16 and 4) Leishmania of the subgenus Viannia was detected by a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in captured Lu. peruensis, Lu. tejadai, and Lu. verrucarum.11,17

Lutzomyia ayacuchensis has been suspected to be an vector of Andean CL since its first description.9,12,18 This species was originally described in the geographically isolated valleys in Ayacucho, the southernmost limit of areas endemic for Andean CL in Peru.5,12 However, Lu. ayacuchensis was subsequently found in northern areas: 1) the North of Peruvian Andes (Piura in Huancabamba Province),9 2) the neotropical rainforest (Cajamarca in San Ignacio Province), a Peruvian region located near the boarder with Ecuador,19 3) areas endemic for Andean CL in the Llaucano Valley (Cajamarca in Chota Province),20 and 4) the Andean valleys of Azuay and Chimborazo (Ecuador).21,22 Despite extensive entomologic surveys, no specimens of Lu. ayacuchensis have been captured in areas endemic for Andean CL between Ayacucho (in southern Peru) and Chimborazo or Cajamarca (in northern Peru).

In this report, which combines classic entomologic studies with modern Leishmania characterization procedures, we present strong evidence that Lu. ayacuchensis is the single vector of Andean CL in the geographic isolated highlands of Ayacucho. Interestingly, in this endemic area, there is also only one reported genetic variant of Leishmania peruviana, in contrast with other endemic areas.18


MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Study area. The study was performed in Saquihuacca (2,250 meters above sea level, 15°13'S, 73°59'W) in the district of Pullo, province of Parinacochas, department of Ayacucho (Figure 1Go). This locality is situated on the western side of the Andes, in the secondary valley of the Lampalla River, 15 km from the village of Miraflores (2,000 meters above sea level). This is a xerophytic area that is part of the Surco-South BGU and ecologically isolated and different from the occidental Andean valleys of the northern and central Peru.6 The predominant shrubs are Caesalpinea tara (tara), Acacia sp. (huarango), Schinus sp. (molle), Carica candicans (jerco), and Cactaceae.



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 1. Map of Peru showing the distribution of areas endemic for Andean cutaneous leishmaniasis (dotted areas) and sand fly vectors: Lutzomyia ayacuchensis (•), Lu. peruensis (////////), Lu. verrucarum(\\\\\\\\\), and Lu. tejadai ({blacktriangleup}). The arrow shows the study area, Parinacochas Province, Department of Ayacucho.

 
From April to October, grassy areas (family Gramineae) and wild pasturage predominate after the rainy season. Cattle and herd of goats are put out to pasture in that area during different periods of the year. Peasant families accompany their flocks for 2–3 months at that time, and live in pircas (temporary built stone dwellings). Leishmaniasis transmission occurs during this period of time in these locations.

Capture of sand flies. Lutzomyia sand flies were captured in February, April, July, September, and November for five consecutive days each month by 1) Shannon trap from 5:00 PM to 7:00 AM of the next day, 2) human bait from 5:00 PM to 8:00 PM, and 3) Centers for Disease Control (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], Atlanta, GA) light traps from 5:00 PM to 6:00 AM of the next day. All traps were located in open fields, far from towns, where abandoned "pircas" still remained.

Lutzomyia were pooled in different batches according to the month and cite of capture. Pooled sand flies were stored under liquid nitrogen in 1.5-mL plastic centrifuge tubes containing 5% dimethylsulfoxide in phosphate-buffered saline. All material were suitable for use in analysis by a PCR. Equipment for manipulating insect material was free of DNA, either because it was disposable and new or because it was washed in a 1.5% bleach solution.23,24

Dissection of sand flies and isolation of parasites. Sand flies kept under liquid nitrogen were thawed and processed separately. Each Lutzomyia female was placed on a microscope slide containing 0.5 mL of sterile saline solution. The wings and legs were then removed and further dissection was done on another microscope slide containing 0.3 mL of saline solution. The gut was extracted with fine sterile needles and microscopically observed to determine in which part of the gut trypanosomatids were present. Lutzomyia were identified according to the morphology of their spermathecae.12,25

Guts that contained trypanosomatid-like forms were cut transversally to free them. The suspension was aspirated with a 1.0-mL disposable syringe containing 0.4 mL of saline solution with antibiotics (200 units/ml of penicillin and 200 mg/ml of streptomycin); 0.2 mL was inoculated into two tubes containing blood agar biphasic medium (USMARU),26,27 0.1 mL was inoculated into the left hind paw of a golden hamster, and the remaining 0.1 mL was placed in a 1.5-mL plastic centrifuge tubes for subsequent PCR analysis. Culture media were maintained at room temperature for 30 days and observed weekly under an inverted microscope. Hamsters were observed during for months. Aspirates were performed twice during that period of time.

Experimental infection of sand flies. Twenty-five Lu. ayacuchensis female sand flies were captured in Saquihuacca. Eggs obtained from them were transported to our laboratory in Lima and added to our sand fly colony. Seventy-nine fourth generation females were fed on the swollen footpads of hamsters experimentally infected with L. peruviana LCA04 (MHOM/PE/90/LCA04) or LCA06 (MHOM/PE/90/LCA06). These Leishmania isolates were obtained from skin lesions of patients infected in the study area.18 To check for Leishmania infection, a variable number of sand flies were dissected every day within a 10-day post-feeding period. The location of promastigotes in infected individuals were classified according to the criteria of Lainson and Shaw.28 The maintenance and care of experimental animals complied with our University guidelines for the humane use of laboratory animals.

Molecular characterization of parasites. Leishmania parasites were characterized by three techniques: PCR, multilocus enzyme electrophoresis (MLEE), and molecular karyotyping.

The PCR for Leishmania detection, which is specific for the subgenus Viannia, was carried out using the MP1L and MP3H primers, as described elsewhere.24 A 70-basepair amplification product indicated an infected sand fly.

For MLEE, 15 enzyme systems (revealing 17 loci) were analyzed by cellulose acetate electrophoresis: aconitase (ACON: EC 4.2.1.3), glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD: EC 1.1.1.49), glucose-6-phosphate isomerase (GPI: EC 5.3.1.9), aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT: EC 2.6.1.1), alanine aminotransferase (ALAT: EC 2.6.1.2), isocitrate dehydrogenase (NADP+) (IDH: EC 1.1.1.42), malate dehydrogenase (NAD+) (MDH: EC 1.1.1.37), malate dehydrogenase (NADP+) or malic enzyme (ME: EC 1.1.1.40), mannose-6-phosphate isomerase (MPI: EC 5.3.1.8), nucleoside phosphorylase (NP1, substrate inosine and NP2, substrate deoxyinosine: EC 2.4.2.1), peptidases S or leucyl aminopeptidases (PEP1, substrate L-leucyl-leucine-leucine and PEP2, L-leucyl-L-alanine: EC 3.4.11.1), 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (6PGD: EC 1.1.1.44), and phosphoglucomutase (PGM: EC 5.4.2.2.). Electrophoresis and staining procedures were carried out according to the methods of Ben Abderrazak and others.29

Molecular karyotyping was performed as described elsewhere.18 Analysis was made on the whole karyotype after staining with ethidium bromide or on three size-variable chromosomes recognized by specific DNA probes: pLb-134Sp (recognizing a portion of gp63 encoding genes)30 and pLb-168 and pLb-22 (two random probes derived from a genomic library of L. braziliensis M2904.18 Random primer labeling with 32P-dCTP and hybridization were performed according to the manufacturer’s (Amersham, Rainham, United Kingdom) instructions.


RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Insect captures. A total of 4,886 sand flies were captured in the study area. Only two species were detected: Lu. ayacuchensis and Lu. noguchii. Among flies captured in CDC light traps, the former species was only slightly more abundant than the latter (400 versus 323 of 723 trapped individuals) (Table 1Go). Nevertheless, when anthropophilic traps were used (Shannon or human bait traps), there was a strong bias toward Lu. ayacuchensis. More than 90% of the females captured with Shannon traps were Lu. ayacuchensis, while only 6.2% were Lu. noguchii. A similar difference was obtained when human bait traps were used (Table 1Go). When anthropophily was evaluated, the proportion of male and female Lu. noguchii attracted by Shannon traps was quite similar (271 males and 227 females) (Table 1Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1
Anthropophilic behavior of Lutzomyia sand flies from Ayacucho, Peru captured with anthropophilic (Shannon and HB) and non-anthropophilic (CDC) traps*
 
Sand fly dissection. Of the 3,856 Lu. ayacuchensis females captured, 1,849 were dissected. Nine (0.49%) were found to be infected with trypanosomatids. Of the 461 Lu. noguchii females captured, 352 were dissected. Five (1.42%) were found to be infected with trypanosomatids (Table 2Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2
Characterization of trypanosomatids found in female Lutzomyia sand flies in Ayacucho, Peru*
 
Molecular characterization of parasites. The 70-basepair PCR amplification product specific for the Leishmania subgenus Viannia was observed in five of the nine Lu. ayacuchensis that contained flagellate forms in their guts. In contrast, all five Lu. noguchii that contained trypanosomatids were PCR negative.

Of the five samples that were PCR positive, four led to successful parasite isolation by culture. These isolates were further characterized by more discriminative methods. Analysis by MLEE with the enzyme MPI identified all Ayacucho isolates as L. peruviana (Figure 2AGo). Moreover, exhaustive characterization of three of them (La36, La78, and La98) by MLEE for 17 loci showed that they all belonged to zymodeme 4, the same zymodeme circulating in human isolates in that region (Figure 2BGo).31 These three stocks were further characterized by molecular karyotyping, which showed a very similar chromosomal banding pattern (Figure 3AGo). Hybridization with the chromosome-specific probes pLb-134Sp, pLb-168, and pLb149 (Figure 3B–DGo) demonstrated that they belonged to the L.(V.) peruviana karyodeme PA2, the same karyodeme circulating in human isolates in that region.18



View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 2. Multilocus enzyme electrophoresis profiles of parasites with A, mannose-6-phosphate isomerase and B, nucleoside hydrolase (substrate deoxyinosine) enzyme systems. All isolates were obtained from humans, except for La36 and La98, which were obtained from Lutzomyia ayacuchensis. A, Lanes 1 and 2, two Leishmania braziliensis reference stocks; lanes 3 and 4, La36 and La98; lanes 5 and 6, L. peruviana originating from Huancabamba biogeographic units and Surco biogeographic units, respectively. B, Lanes 1 and 2, two L. peruviana originating from Huancabamba biogeographic units; lanes 3 and 4, La36 and La98; lanes 5-7, three L. peruviana originating from Surco biogeographic units.

 


View larger version (125K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 3. Molecular karyotyping of parasites after staining with ethidium bromide (A) and hybridization with chromosome-specific probes pLb-134Sp (B), pLb-168 (C), and pLb-22 (D). Lane 1, Leishmania peruviana LCA08 isolated from a human; lane 2, La36 isolated from Lutzomyia ayacuchensis.

 
Experimental infection of sand flies. Twenty-six of forty-seven and twenty-seven of thirty-two Lu. ayacuchensis fed on footpad lesions in hamsters inoculated with the LCA04 and LCA06 isolates, respectively, were infected. Motile Leishmania were observed in the hindgut of infected sand flies after the third day post-feeding. This location (perypilaria) is a typical feature of the subgenus Viannia.


DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Leishmania peruviana, the causative agent of Andean CL, has been reported between latitudes 5°S and 13°S in the Peruvian Andes.2,3 The transmission cycle of L. peruviana has been reported in a variety of geographic and ecologic scenarios (BGUs).6 From Piura in northern Peru to Ayacucho in the southern part of this country, different isolates obtained from both patients and insect vectors have been extensively studied by molecular techniques. The genetic patterns have been shown to be polymorphic and have established a strong ecogeographic pattern of parasite genotypes along a north-south cline.22,30,31

The Ayacucho region is particularly interesting because it constitutes the southernmost limit of the distribution of this disease (Figure 1Go). Furthermore, it is isolated from the neighbor endemic area by desert and seasonal small rivers (quebradas). This region has been reported as an area endemic For Andean CL since the end of 19th century.5

In Ayacucho, only two species of Lutzomyia belonging to subgenus Helcocyrtomyia have been reported: Lu. ayacuchensis and Lu. noguchii. Our results support the hypothesis that Lu. ayacuchensis is the primary, if not the only, vector of Andean CL in the region of Parinacochas (Ayacucho). First, this study showed that Lu. ayacuchensis females were very anthropophilic. More than 90% of the females captured in Shannon traps and by human baits were Lu. ayacuchensis, whereas Lu. noguchii was poorly represented in captured sand flies. This difference cannot be explained because of a lower abundance of Lu. noguchii because flies captured in CDC light traps showed a similar proportion of females of both species (56% and 44% for Lu. ayacuchensis and Lu. noguchii, respectively). Second, Leishmania belonging to the subgenus Viannia were detected in five specimens of Lu. ayacuchensis by a specific PCR assay. Four of them grew in culture and were subsequently characterized by MLEE and molecular karyotyping as L. (V.) peruviana. These characterization methods clearly demonstrated that sand fly isolates belong to the same genetic cluster group as those isolated and characterized from human patients with Andean CL who lived in this endemic area.18

Lutzomyia ayacuchensis kept in a colony become infected with L. (V.) peruviana when fed on animals experimentally infected with this parasite. This finding shows that these parasites can be successfully transmitted from a vertebrate host to a sand fly. Even when these results do not fully demonstrate vector competence, taken together with all our data, they strongly support the role of Lu. ayacuchensis as a vector of L. peruviana.

Our results also indicate that the transmission of leishmaniasis in Ayacucho involves only a single anthropophilic species of Lutzomyia. In contrast, other endemic areas show more than one insect vector. For example, Lu. peruensis and Lu. verrucarum have been found in the western Andean valleys in central Peru (Surco-North and Surco-Center BGUs),9,15–17,20 and Lu. tejadai has been found in the inter-Andean valleys of central Peru (Huanuco BGU).11,20 In contrast, Lu. ayacuchensis has never been observed in these other BGUs, and Lu. peruensis, Lu. verrucarum, and Lu. tejadai have never been found in Ayacucho (Surco-South BGU) (Figure 1Go).

A remarkable finding in this study was that L. peruviana isolated from naturally infected insect vectors in Ayacucho corresponded to a genetic homogeneous population based on their molecular karyotype and zymodeme. There was a single karyodeme of parasites (PA2) reported to circulate in Ayacucho among both human and invertebrate hosts.18 The homogeneity of both parasites and insect vectors could be explained by geographic isolation.

The Nasca Desert and the Andean highlands (more than 3,200 meters above sea level) constitute major natural barriers that keep both sand flies and rodents (the latter animal a suspected wild reservoir of leishmaniasis) isolated from other endemic areas. This isolation is reinforced by the restricted ecologic diversity of the Ayacucho region, a primary xerophytic environment that contrasts with other regions endemic for Andean CL that show secondary and more complex environments.

We do not exclude the possibility that other karyodemes or zymodemes do exist, either native or imported, but their prevalence would suggest a very low contribution to the genetic pool of Leishmania circulating in Ayacucho. Moreover, this particular area shows very low human immigration rates because of its very depressed economy.

Parasites homogeneity could also be explained by a strict parasite/vector association in natural conditions. Nevertheless, such an association is not exclusive because the PA2 karyodeme has been previously reported in the Surco-Center BGU (8 of 14 isolates studied) where Lu. ayacuchensis was never reported.18 In contrast, Lu. ayacuchensis captured in the southern Ecuador (Azuay and Chimborazo)21,22 have been found to be infected with L. mexicana.32–34

Finally, another interesting aspect of Lu. ayacuchensis is that this species was found in two different areas of Peru separated by a considerable distance. One area was in the extreme northern part of Peru (inter-Andean valleys of Huancabamba, Huancabamba BGU,9,20 inter-Andean valleys of Chinchipe19 and Llaucano20) and the other was in Ayacucho. These two areas are 1,200 km apart, without any reported Lu. ayacuchensis despite intensive surveys. Further studies (morphologic, hybrid fertility, genotypic) of the insect are necessary to better characterize these allopatric populations and evaluate the need for reclassifying them as subspecies.

Received January 10, 2003. Accepted for publication May 3, 2003.

Acknowledgments: We thank Luz Mendizabal (Instituto de Medicina Tropical Alexander von Humboldt) for feeding and maintaining the sand fly colony, and to the people of Sancos for their kind support.

Financial support: This investigation was funded by the UNDP/World Bank/World Health Organization Special Program for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (L30/18/59, ID:890424), the European Community (contracts TS2-CT90-0315 and TS2-CT92-0129) and the Belgian Agency for Co-operation to Development.

Authors’ addresses: Abraham G. Caceres and Pablo Villaseca, Instituto Nacional de Salud, PO Box 451, Lima 100, Peru. Jean Claude Dujardin and Dominique Le Ray, Laboratoire de Parasitologie Moleculaire, Instituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde, 155 Nation-alestraat, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium. Anne Laure Bañuls, Institut Re-cherche pour le Développement, BP 5045, Montpellier, France. Ro-cio Inga, Martin Lopez, Margarita Arana, and Jorge Arevalo, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, PO Box 4314, Lima 100, Peru.

Reprint requests: Abraham G. Caceres, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Calle Capac Yupanqui 1400, Jesús Maria, Lima, Peru, Telephone: 51-1-471-9920, Fax: 51-1-264-0535, E-mail: acaceres31{at}hotmail.com.


REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Davies CR, Llanos-Cuentas A, Pyke SDM, Dye C, 1995. Cutaneous leishmaniasis in the Peruvian Andes: an epidemiological study of infecction and immunity. Epidemiol Infect 114: 297–318.[Medline]
  2. Lumbreras H, Guerra H, 1985. Leishmaniasis in Peru. Chang KP, Bray R, eds. Leishmaniasis. Volume 1. New York: Elsevier, 297–311.
  3. Herrer A, 1962. The incedence of uta (cutaneous leishmaniasis) among the child population of Peru. Sci Rep First Super Sanita 2: 131–137.
  4. Herrer A, 1951. Estudios sobre leishmaniasis tegumentaria en el Perú. VI. Relación entre leishmaniasis tegumentaria y Phlebotomus. Rev Med Exp 8: 119–137.
  5. Barros TDP, 1895. La uta del Perú o lupus. Cron Med 12: 154–159, 172–175, 234–239, 250–260.
  6. Lamas G, 1982. A preliminary zoogeographical division of Peru, based on butterfly distributions (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea). Prance TP, ed. Biological Diversification in the Tropics. New York: Columbia University Press, 336–357.
  7. Herrer A, 1951. Estudio sobre leishmaniasis tegumentaria en el Perú. IV Observaciones epidemiológicas sobre la uta. Rev Med Exp 8: 45–86.
  8. Villaseca P, Llanos-Cuentas A, Perez E, Davies CR, 1993. A comparative field study of the relative importance of Lutzomyia peruensis and Lu. verrucarum as vectors of cutaneous leishmaniasis in the Peruvian Andes. Am J Trop Med Hyg 49: 260–269.
  9. Davies CR, Llanos-Cuentas A, Campos P, Monge J, Villaseca P, Dye C, 1997. Cutaneous leishmaniasis in the Peruvian Andes: risk factors identified from a village cohort study. Am J Trop Med Hyg 56: 85–95.
  10. Cáceres A, 1990. Fauna flebotómica (Diptera: Psychodidae) del Valle de Marca-Recuay (Ancash, Perú). Rev Peru Entomol 32: 29–32.
  11. Cáceres A, 1993. Fauna flebotómica (Diptera: Psychodidae) del Valle Interandino Higueras, Huánuco-Perú. Rev Peru Entomol 34: 53–54.
  12. Cáceres A, Galati BAE, 1988. Descriçao de Lutzomyia ayacuchensis sp. n. (Diptera, Psychodidae) dos Andes peruanos. Rev Bras Entomol 32: 55–61.
  13. Pesce H, Pardo GL, 1943. Notes on cutaneous leishmaniasis and Phlebotomus in the province of Andahuaylas. Peru Am J Hyg 37: 255–258.
  14. Herrer A, 1982. Empleo de hamster dorado como animal centinela en las localidades donde es endémica la uta (leishmaniasis tegumentaria). Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 24: 162–167.[Medline]
  15. Herrer A, 1982. Lutzomyia peruensis, Shannon 1929, posible vector natural de la uta (leishmaniasis tegumentaria). Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 24: 168–172.[Medline]
  16. Perez E, Villaseca P, Cáceres A, Lopez M, Zolessi A, Campos M, Guerra H, Llanos-Cuentas A, 1991. Leishmania (Viannia) peruviana isolated from the sand fly Lutzomyia peruensis (Diptera: Psychodidae) and a sentinel hamster in the Huayllacayan Valley, Ancash, Peru. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 85: 60.[Medline]
  17. Perez E, Ogusuku E, Inga R, Lopez M, Monje J, Paz L, Nieto E, Arevalo J, Guerra H, 1994. Natural Leishmania infection of Lutzomyia spp. in Peru. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 88: 161–164.[Medline]
  18. Dujardin JC, Llanos-Cuentas A, Caceres A, Arana M, Dujardin JP, Gomez J, Arroyo J, de Doncker S, Jacquet D, Hamers R, Guerra H, Le Ray D, Arevalo J, 1993. Molecular karyotype variation in Leishmania (Viannia) peruviana: indication of geographical populations in Peru distributed along a north-south cline. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 87: 335–347.[Medline]
  19. Cáceres A, Galati BAE, Le Pont F, 1995. Fauna flebotómica (Diptera: Psychodidae) de tres provincias de la Región Nor Oriental del Marañon, Perú. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 28: 215–221.[Medline]
  20. Cáceres GA, 1996. Especies de Lutzomyia (Diptera: Psychodidae), Phlebotominae) vectores de la uta en el Perú. Rev Peru Entomol 38: 23–26.
  21. Alexander JA, Takaoka H, Eshita Y, Gomez E, Hashiguchi Y, 1992. New records of phlebotminae sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) from Ecuador. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 87: 123–130.
  22. Gomez EAL, Sud RA, Jurado HMS, Rumbea JG, Mimori T, Nonaka S, Matsumoto Y, Hashiguchi Y, 1992. A preliminary study of Andean leishmaniasis in Alausi and Huigra, Department of Chimborazo, Ecuador. Hashiguchi Y, ed. Studies on New Leishmaniasis and Its Transmission, with Particular Reference to Ecuador. Kochi, Japan: Kyowa Report Series 3: 49–58.
  23. Young DG, Morales A, Kreutzer RD, Alexander JB, Corrredor A, Tesh RB, 1987. Isolations of Leishmania braziliensis (Kinetoplastida: Trypanosomatidae) from cryopreserved Colombia sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae). J Med Entomol 24: 587–589.[Medline]
  24. Arévalo J, Inga R, Lopez M, 1993. Polymerase chain reaction detection of Leishmania braziliensis. Persing DH, Smith RF, Tenover FC, White TJ, eds. Diagnostic Molecular Microbiology: Principals and Application. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology, 456–461.
  25. Galati EAB, Caceres A, 1992. Descriçao de Lutzomyia kirigetiensis sp. n. (Diptera: Psychodidae, Phlebotominae) do Peru e consideraçoes sobre a composiçao do subgenero Helcocyrtomyia. Rev Bras Entomol 36: 446–456.
  26. Walton B, Shaw JJ, Lainson R, 1977. Observations of culture in vitro of Leishmania braziliensis. J Parasitol 63: 1118–1119.[Medline]
  27. Word Health Organization Expert Committee, 1990. Control of the Leishmaniases. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 793.
  28. Lainson R, Shaw JJ, 1979. The role of animals in the epidemiology of South American leishmaniasis. Lumsden WHR, Evans DA, eds. Biology of the Kinetoplastida. Volume 2. London: Academic Press, 2–116.
  29. Ben Abderrazak S, Guerrini F, Mathieu-Daude F, Truc P, Neubauer K, Lewicka K, Barnabe C, Tibayrenc M, 1993. Isozyme electrophoresis for parasite characterization. Walker JM, ed. Protocols in Molecular Parasitology. Volume 21. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 361–382.
  30. Dujardin JC, Dujardin JP, Tibayrenc M, Timperman C, De Doncker S, Jacket D, Arevalo J, Llanos-Cuentas A, Guerra H, Bermudez H, Hamers R, Le Ray D, 1995. Karyotype plasticity in neotropical Leishmania: and index for measuring genomic distance among Le.(V.) peruviana and Le. (V.) braziliensis populations. Parasitology 110: 21–30.
  31. Bañuls AL, Dujardin JC, Guerrini F, De Doncker S, Jacquet D, Arevalo J, Noël S, Le Ray D, Tibayrenc M, 2000. Is Leishmania (Viannia) peruviana a distinct species? A MLEE/RAPD evolutionary genetics answer. J Eukaryot Microbiol 47: 197–207.[Medline]
  32. Takaoka H, Gomez EA, Alexander BJ, Hashiguchi Y, 1990. Natural infections with Leishmania promastigotes in Lutzomyia ayacuchensis (Diptera: Psychodidae) in an Andean focus of Ecuador. J Med Entomol 27: 701–702.[Medline]
  33. Gomez EA, Hashiguchi Y, 1991. Monthly variation in natural infection of the sand fly Lutzomyia ayacuchensis with Leishmania mexicana in an endemic focus in the Ecuadorian Andes. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 85: 407–411.[Medline]
  34. Hashiguchi Y, Gomez EA, de Coronel VV, Mimori T, Kawabata M, Furuya M, Nanaka S, Takaoka M, Alexander BJ, Quizpe AM, Grimaldi G, Kreutzer RD, Tesh RB, 1991. Andean leishmaniasis in Ecuador caused by infection with Leishmania mexicana and L. major-like parasites. Am J Trop Med Hyg 44: 205–217.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am J Trop Med HygHome page
H. Kato, A. G. Caceres, E. A. Gomez, T. Mimori, H. Uezato, J. D. Marco, P. A. Barroso, H. Iwata, and Y. Hashiguchi
Molecular Mass Screening to Incriminate Sand Fly Vectors of Andean-type Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Ecuador and Peru
Am J Trop Med Hyg, November 1, 2008; 79(5): 719 - 721.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CACERES, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by AREVALO, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by CACERES, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by AREVALO, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Vector Biology
Right arrow Epidemiology
Right arrow Leishmaniasis
Right arrow Sand Flies

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS