|
|
||||||||
| ABSTRACT |
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|
|
|---|
We therefore have extended these studies to include the years 19911999 and report on the demographic and epidemiologic features of patients with imported malaria at our hospital. We explore trends in these features over the quarter century that these reviews span and we briefly review the clinical characteristics of the disease in our cohort of patients.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|
|
|---|
There were 82 positive smears for Plasmodium species during the study period. Nineteen of these patients were referrals from outside practitioners or other hospitals for review and confirmation, and did not have corresponding patient charts at our hospital. Therefore, 63 smears from 61 patients had corresponding charts in our hospital. (Two patients had two smears each so only their first presentation has been included for analysis, since any subsequent presentation may represent a recrudescence or recurrence of the first presentation.) Charts belonging to two patients could not be located despite an extensive search. Fifty-nine patient charts were therefore available for review. Information on demographics, area(s) of travel, species of Plasmodium, use of chemoprophylactic agents, and clinical course were extracted from the charts and analyzed.
| RESULTS |
|
|
|---|
|
Table 2
shows the regions where the patients had last traveled before malaria was diagnosed, comparing the three periods. These areas were presumed to be the areas where malaria was acquired. The majority (73%) of the cases were acquired in Africa during 19911999. There were 38 patients (64%) with P. falciparum, making it the most dominant species, and 89% of these were acquired in Africa. Plasmodium vivax was the second most common species with 14 cases. Two smears had mixed P. falciparum and P. vivax infections, and one smear had mixed P. falciparum and P. ovale infection. The species of Plasmodium could not be determined on nine smears because the parasitemia was too low. There were no cases of P. malariae. Table 2
shows comparisons with the previous two study periods.
|
Disease among children of immigrants. Seventeen (29%) of the patients were children less than 15 years of age. All were children of immigrants who had traveled with their families to Africa, including three pairs of siblings with malaria. In one family, the father and two young children had symptomatic malaria. In another family, one child was diagnosed with malaria when he presented with a febrile illness, at which point the parents requested that their other child be screened for malaria, and indeed, the child had P. falciparum parasitemia although he was completely asymptomatic. In the third pair of siblings, the children presented with fever two weeks apart; one child had P. falciparum and the other had an indeterminate species.
Clinical features and accuracy of clinical diagnosis. The time interval from arrival in the United States to presentation at the hospital varied from as little as 24 hours to as long as 15 days for all patients, except for one patient who became ill with fevers four months after his arrival in the United States. He was diagnosed as being infected with P. vivax, which he had acquired in India.
Diagnosis was prompt for most of the patients; 97% of the patients were diagnosed with malaria within 24 hours of being evaluated by a physician at our hospital. The two patients whose diagnosis was delayed were in the hospital for five and seven days, respectively, with fever before a diagnosis was made. Both were United States-born men in their thirties who had traveled to South America; travel history was not elicited in either case until after the diagnosis was established. They both were infected with P. vivax. Two other patients (children four and six years old) had been seen by their local physicians, and had been diagnosed as having viral gastroenteritis and bacterial otitis media respectively prior to presenting at our hospital, where malaria was promptly diagnosed.
Clinical manifestations were protean and nonspecific but fever was present in 58 of 59 patients (98%). There were two cases of severe P. falciparum malaria as defined by the World Health Organization.9 The first was a 40-year-old businessman from Africa who was visiting New York when he presented with fever and confusion. He had a parasitemia of 8%. This patient required a short stay in the intensive care unit because of pulmonary edema that was noted on his chest radiograph on his second day of admission. The second case of severe disease was a six-year-old United States-born daughter of African immigrants who presented with fever and acute renal failure requiring dialysis, and had a parasitemia of 18%.
Treatment and clinical response. All patients responded well to treatment, including the ones with severe malaria. Treatment consisted of quinine with or without doxycycline in adults or sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine in children for P. falciparum malaria. Chloroquine plus primaquine was given in cases of P. vivax malaria. There were no deaths in our series.
| DISCUSSION |
|
|
|---|
One notable finding in our series was the occurrence of malaria among young siblings. Given the devastating nature of this disease in young children, it might be prudent to screen young siblings for malaria if one child is diagnosed with the disease after traveling to malaria-endemic areas. Others have advocated screening immigrants, particularly refugees, from malaria-endemic areas for asymptomatic parasitemia.4,13 The effectiveness of this practice has yet to be established. Practitioners giving pre-travel counseling should inquire if the travelers are bringing children or others with them on their journeys and appropriate measures should be taken to protect the children from malaria and other health problems.
In this series, the use of chemoprophylaxis was only 8%. This is much lower than the percentage reported by our predecessors. In the reviews by Kean and Reilly6 and Winters and Murray,7 the overall percentages of people using chemoprophylaxis were 45% and 36%, respectively. This suggests that there may be lower rates of chemoprophylaxis use; however, since this is a case series this conclusion cannot be made. A cohort study is needed to quantify the extent of the problem and if there are truly lower rates of chemoprophylaxis use.
However, some European studies have shown lower rates of chemoprophylaxis use among immigrant groups compared with non-immigrants.10 There are several potential reasons for this. For example, there is a misconception among immigrants that they are immune to the disease when they return to their native countries. The exact duration of such acquired immunity is not known. In addition, some immigrants may not seek pre-travel advice due to a lack of resources or they may be misinformed about preventive measures against malaria. Similarly, individuals from malaria-free countries might discontinue their chemoprophylaxis after an extended stay in endemic areas believing that their residence in a malaria-endemic area has afforded them adequate immunity to the disease. According to the CDC, malaria-related deaths among United States citizens are attributable mainly to non-use or inappropriate use of chemoprophylaxis.12 Patient education is therefore vital. Clinicians should impress upon travelers the need for preventive regimens against malaria. The CDC considers immigrants visiting their homelands at high risk for infection, and advises that this be recognized when providing them with pre-travel counseling.14 If necessary, travelers should be referred to specialized travel clinics to get the most up-to-date recommendations.
The need for prompt diagnosis, especially with P. falciparum malaria, cannot be overemphasized. In our group of patients, diagnosis was rendered swiftly in most cases, owing largely to an accurate travel history. This was also the case in the previously published series.6,7 Fewer patients were seen by outside practitioners before coming to the hospital in this series than in the study by Murray and Winters.7 In that study, many patients had been seen by community physicians, and malaria was not initially considered by the community physicians.7 Only two patients, both of them children, had been seen by their private physicians prior to presenting to our hospital. It is not entirely clear why most of our patients had not consulted community physicians prior to presenting to our hospital. Delay in the diagnosis of imported malaria is due either to lack of familiarity with the symptoms of malaria by the treating practitioner or failure to elicit a pertinent travel history. Several studies have confirmed that a more timely diagnosis of malaria in non-endemic areas occurs in centers that specialize in travel medicine and/or tropical diseases.3,6,7
As travel and migration between malaria-endemic areas and temperate countries increase, imported malaria will remain a public health priority. Although we have highlighted malaria among immigrants living in the United States who have visited their countries of origin, a high proportion of our cases occurred in United States-born travelers (46%). A concerted effort is needed to disseminate knowledge about the dangers of malaria and the need for pre-travel counseling to all visitors to malaria endemic areas. However, immigrants living in the United States may be at a particularly high risk of acquiring malaria when they visit their countries of origin. Several factors including lack of resources, cultural beliefs and lack of knowledge, may contribute to their increased risk.
Received August 20, 2003. Accepted for publication November 7, 2003.
Acknowledgments: We thank Barry Hartman and Warren Johnson, Jr. for critically reviewing the manuscript.
Financial support: The work was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (grants T32 AI-7613-1 to Chrispin Kambili and AI46494 to Linnie M. Golightly).
Authors addresses: Chrispin Kambili, International AIDS Vaccine Initiative, 110 William Street, Floor 27, New York, NY, Telephone: (212) 763-5460, Fax: 212-847-1113, E-mail: ckambili{at}iavi.org. Henry W. Murray and Linnie M. Golightly, Division of International Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Weill Medical College of Cornell University and the New York-Presbyterian Hospital, 1300 York Avenue, Room A-421, New York, NY 10021, Telephone (Henry W. Murray): 212-746-6320.
Reprint requests: Linnie M. Golightly, Division of International Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Weill Medical College of Cornell University and the New York-Presbyterian Hospital, 1300 York Avenue, Room A-421, New York, NY 10021, Telephone: 212-746-6303, Fax: 212-746-8675, E-mail: lgolight{at}med.cornell.edu.
| REFERENCES |
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. M. Stauffer, M. Weinberg, R. D. Newman, L. M. Causer, M. J. Hamel, L. Slutsker, and M. S. Cetron Pre-departure and Post-arrival Management of P. falciparum Malaria in Refugees Relocating from Sub-Saharan Africa to the United States Am J Trop Med Hyg, August 1, 2008; 79(2): 141 - 146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Y. Angell and M. S. Cetron Health Disparities among Travelers Visiting Friends and Relatives Abroad Ann Intern Med, January 4, 2005; 142(1): 67 - 72. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |