HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (21) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by ALIFRANGIS, M. Articles by RØNN, A. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by ALIFRANGIS, M. Articles by RØNN, A. M. Related Collections Malaria

PREDICTION OF PLASMODIUM FALCIPARUM RESISTANCE TO SULFADOXINE/ PYRIMETHAMINE IN VIVO BY MUTATIONS IN THE DIHYDROFOLATE REDUCTASE AND DIHYDROPTEROATE SYNTHETASE GENES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN SITES OF DIFFERING ENDEMICITY

ABSTRACT

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Plasmodium falciparum resistance to sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine (S/P) is due to mutations in the dihydrofolate reductase (dhfr) and dihydropteroate synthetase (dhfr) genes. Large-scale screening of the prevalence of these mutations could facilitate the surveillance of the level of S/P resistance in vivo. The prevalence of mutations in dhfr and dhps in relation to S/P efficacy was studied in four sites of differing endemicity in Sudan, Mozambique, and Tanzania. The sites were organized in order of increasing resistance and a significant increase in the prevalence of triple mutations in codons c51, c59, and c108 of dhfr was observed. A similar trend was observed when dhfr genotypes were combined with c437 of dhps. Since the differences in S/P resistance between the sites were minor, but nevertheless revealed major differences in dhfr genotype prevalence, the role of dhfr as a general molecular marker seems debatable. The differences may reflect variation in the duration and magnitude of S/P usage (or other antifolate drugs) between the sites. Thus, triple dhfr mutations may prove suitable only as a general guideline for detecting emerging S/P resistance in areas where S/P has been introduced recently. However, changes in susceptibility within the same area with moderate levels of resistance may be possible by longitudinal surveillance of a subset of dhfr/dhps mutations that has been associated with S/P resistance in vivo in a defined location.

INTRODUCTION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine (S/P) is the first-line drug in treatment of uncomplicated malaria in countries such as Kenya and Tanzania. However, Plasmodium falciparum resistance to S/P is emerging in these countries and poses a serious threat to control of malaria, since few cheap alternative drugs are available. Monitoring resistance longitudinally and on various locations is therefore of major importance.

In vitro studies have shown a good correlation between mutations in the dihydrofolate reductase (dhfr) and dihydropteroate synthetase (dhps) genes of P. falciparum and resistance to pyrimethamine^1–4 and sulfadoxine,^5–7 respectively. Detecting the prevalence of mutations in dhfr and dhps, or a selection of these have been suggested as a surveillance tool to monitor the extent of S/P resistance on a large scale.⁸

Several studies have searched for a common genotypic marker of S/P resistance that enables the prediction of the clinical and/or parasitologic outcome before treatment.^9–13 The mutation in codon c108 in dhfr is the initial and most important change developing in response to S/P drug pressure.⁴ However, the c108 mutation in itself is not a predictive marker of in vivo resistance.^14–16 With continuous S/P drug pressure the c51 and c59 mutations of dhfr will eventually follow,⁴ and infections with triple mutations in dhfr are believed to be a good indicator of clinical and/or parasitologic resistance by some investigators.¹⁷ Others believe that a combination of triple mutations in dhfr and mutation(s) in dhps, mainly in c437, are necessary to ensure resistance in vivo.^11,18 The question remains whether one unifying marker exists at all since local conditions like malaria intensity as well as host immunity may interfere.

The purpose of the present study was to assess if dhfr/dhps genotypes generally reflect the level of S/P resistance at four sites in three east African countries with varying endemicity and degrees and prevalences of clinical and parasitologic resistance. The four sites were a mesoendemic site in Hag Yousif, Sudan and one holoendemic site in Kibaha, Tanzania, both with low levels of resistance, a hyperendemic site in Matola, Mozambique with a low-to-medium level of resistance, and one holoendemic site in Magoda, Tanzania with a high level of resistance. We have included dhfr/dhps prevalence data from the Magoda site from three consecutive years, but with marked decreasing in vivo resistance over the three-year period. An identical dhfr/dhps genotyping protocol has been performed on all samples in the same laboratory.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Study sites. Hag Yousif, Sudan. The in vivo trial is described in detail by Khalil and others.¹⁶ Hag Yousif is located 11 km east of Khartoum, Sudan. The use and availability of S/P is limited in the area.¹⁶ The in vivo sensitivity test was conducted according to guidelines of the World Health Organization (WHO).^19,20 Inclusion criteria were P. falciparum monoinfections and asexual parasite densities between 1,000 and 80,000/µL of blood. Patients 10–65 years old (mean ± SD age = 27.7 ± 12.05 years) were included and treated orally under medical supervision with a single dose of S/P (25 mg/kg of sulfadoxine and 1.25 mg/kg of pyrimethamine). Venous blood was obtained pretreatment into heparinized vacu-containers. Samples were centrifuged for 10 minutes at 2,000 x g and the plasma was removed. The samples were transported on dry ice to the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Immunology in Copenhagen, Denmark and stored at -80°C for further analysis.

Kibaha, Tanzania. Kibaha is situated in the coastal region 30 km of Dar es Salaam. The use of S/P in the area is restricted (Tarimo D, unpublished data). The in vivo trial was conducted according to WHO guidelines²⁰ and is published elsewhere.²¹ Children between 12 and 59 months of age with P. falciparum monoinfections and parasitemias between 2,000 and 250,000 asexual parasites/µL of blood were included and treated orally with a single dose of S/P (25 mg/kg of sulfadoxine and 1.25 mg/kg of pyrimethamine). Venous blood was obtained pretreatment into EDTA-containing vacu-containers. Samples were centrifuged for 10 minutes at 2,000 x g and the plasma was removed. Samples were transported on dry ice to the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Immunology in Copenhagen, Denmark and stored at -80°C for further analysis.

Matola, Mozambique. Details of the study area in Matola district are described elsewhere.²² Briefly, Matola is a peri-urban area located about 15 km north of Maputo, Mozambique. Malaria transmission in this area is seasonal, with the majority of cases occurring during the rain season from November to April. Sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine has been available for some years in the area and was also used as a first-line drug during the floods in early 2000 as a temporary measure due to the threat of epidemics (Enosse S and Magnussen P, unpublished data). The in vivo sensitivity test was conducted from April to June 2000 according to WHO guidelines.²⁰ Inclusion criteria were children between 6 and 59 months of age with P. falciparum monoinfections and parasitemias between 2,000 and 80,000 asexual parasites/µL of blood. Children were treated orally under medical supervision with a single dose of S/P (25 mg/kg of sulfadoxine and 1.25 mg/kg of pyrimethamine). Finger prick blood was taken for blood microscopy and an additional 50 µL of blood were collected onto filter paper for genotyping.

Magoda, Tanzania. The study population was children between 6 and 59 months of age with uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria living in Magoda and Mpapayu villages in Muheza in the northeastern part of Tanzania in July 1997, 1998, and 1999. Sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine was introduced in the villages in 1993 during a study investigating the prophylactic effect of weekly pyrimethamine/dapsone (Maloprim^®, batch 490B; Wellcome Foundation, Limited, London, United Kingdom) on malaria morbidity.²³ Sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine has been available ever since in the villages (Lemnge M, unpublished data). The in vivo sensitivity test was conducted according to WHO guidelines.²⁰ Children with P. falciparum monionfections and parasitemias between 2,000 and 200,000 asexual parasites/µL of blood were included in the study; 84, 70, and 51 children completed the in vivo trial in 1997, 1998, and 1999, respectively. All children were treated orally under medical supervision with a single dose of S/P (25 mg/kg of sulfadoxine and 1.25 mg/kg of pyrimethamine). Before treatment, 50 µL of blood was collected onto filter paper for genotyping.

Ethical review. The study in Sudan was reviewed and approved by the Institute of National Health and the Research Board of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Sudan (Khartoum, Sudan). The studies in Tanzania were reviewed and approved by the Commission for Science and Technology and the Tanzanian Ministry of Health. The study in Mozambique was reviewed and approved by the Ethical Review Board of the National Institute of Health-Ministry of Health.

Extraction of DNA and restriction fragment length polymorphism-polymerase chain reaction (RFLP-PCR). DNA from blood samples collected in EDTA- or heparin-containing tubes was extracted by treatment with phenol-chloroform. Briefly, 50 µL of blood was incubated overnight with 250 µL of a proteinase K solution at 37°C (1 mM EDTA, 15 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 100 µg/mL of proteinase K). The samples were then extracted with phenol-chloroform and precipitated with ethanol as described by Sambrook and others.²⁴ The samples from Sudan were collected in heparin and were additionally treated with heparinase I as described by Khalil and others.¹⁶ DNA from filter paper was extracted by the Chelex-100 method as described by Wooden and others.²⁵ One microliter of the extracted DNA suspension was added to the PCR mixture. For the outer and nested PCRs and RFLPs, the method of Duraisingh and others²⁶ was used, except that the two outer dhfr and dhps PCRs were multiplexed into a single reaction. Additionally, a nested dhps PCR targeting c540 specifically was designed (c540-K/, PCR product of 126 basepairs, same reaction conditions as the other nested dhfr and dhps PCRs).²⁶ The c540 primer sequence was 5'-GCATAAAAGAGGAAATCCACATACAATGGtT-3'; the lower case base is one mismatch engineered into the primer to provide a cleavage site for the restriction enzyme Mse I to detect the c540 wild type (Lys). The P. falciparum laboratory strain 3d7 was used as a control for the PCR.

Statistical analysis. The chi-square test with Yates’ correction or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the genotypic prevalence. P values less than 0.05 were considered significant. All calculations were performed using Sigmastat version 2.03 software (Jandel Scientific, San Rafael, CA).

RESULTS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Clinical and parasitologic resistance to S/P in Hag Yousif (Sudan), Kibaha (Tanzania), Matola (Mozambique) and Magoda (Tanzania). The outcome after S/P treatment from the four sites, including data from three consecutive years of S/P trials in Magoda, is shown in Table 1. The age of the patients in the study in Hag Yousif in Sudan ranged between 10 and 65 years; otherwise, children less than five years old were enrolled. The trials in Hag Yousif, Kibaha, and Matola were carried out as 28-days tests. The trials in Magoda were performed as 14-days tests.

View larger version (20K): [in this window] [in a new window]       FIGURE 1. Prevalence and 95% confidence intervals of dihydrofolate reductase (dhfr) genotypes in Hag Yousif (Sudan), Kibaha (Tanzania), Matola (Mozambique), and Magoda (Tanzania). Wildtypes in dhfr = infections with at least one wild type in any of the codons c51, c59, and c108. tDHFR = true triple dhfr mutants; mutant genotype in both c51, c59, and c108. Mixed genotypes in dhfr = infections with a mutant genotype in c51, c59, and c108 and wild type in at least one of the codons (mixed genotype infections). Magoda97-99 = Magoda sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine trials in 1997, 1998, and 1999.

Prevalence of combinations of mutations in dhfr and c437 of dhps. The prevalence of combinations of dhfr genotypes and c437 of dhps from the four sites is shown in Figure 2. The prevalence of combinations of dhfr genotypes including c437 of dhps in Magoda in 1997, 1998, and 1999 showed no significant differences and the data from the three years were pooled.

View larger version (21K): [in this window] [in a new window]       FIGURE 2. Prevalence and 95% confidence intervals of dihydrofolate reductase (dhfr) and dihydropteroate synthetase (dhps) genotypes in Hag Yousif (Sudan), Kibaha (Tanzania), Matola (Mozambique), and Magoda (Tanzania). Wildtypes in dhfr+c437 = at least one wild type in any of the dhfr codons (c51, c59, and c108) or dhps (c437). tDHFR+c437 = true triple dhfr mutants and dhps c437 mutant; mutant genotype in all three codons of dhfr coupled with the mutation in c437 of dhps. Mixed genotypes in dhfr+c437 = infections with a mutant genotype in c51, c59, and c108 of dhfr and c437 of dhps and wild type in at least one of the codons (mixed genotype infections). Magoda97-99 = Magoda sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine trials in 1997, 1998, and 1999.

DISCUSSION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
A number of studies have investigated the association between mutations in dhfr and dhps genes and the parasitologic and/or clinical response to S/P treatment at an individual level.^{9–11,17,18,27} In general, the associations were poor or none existed.^9,10,27 The present study investigated the frequency of mutations in the two genes at four distinct sites in east Africa and compared the frequency of mutations between in vivo sensitive and resistant outcomes that were parasitologically or clinically defined. There was a general tendency at all four sites for a higher frequency of mutations in the groups of resistant outcomes. However, it is possible that due to few patients in some of the groups, only mutations at c436 in dhps in Hag Yousif, Sudan and c59 in dhfr and c437 of dhps in Matola, Mozambique was significantly predictive of parasitologic failure. In Magoda, Tanzania, c437 in dhps was predictive of both parasitologic and clinical failure in 1997, but not in 1998 and 1999. These results indicate that PCR analysis of mutations in dhfr and dhps cannot be used to predict infection outcome at an individual level. However, the high frequency of mixed genotype infections found in Kibaha, Matola, and Magoda may be an important factor that affects the predictive usefulness of the mutations. The study also examined the relationship between dhfr genotypes either alone or in combination with dhps genotypes and the prevalence of S/P resistance by comparing the four distinct sites with variable endemicity, transmission intensity, and probably S/P usage.

The four sites were organized in order of increasing parasitologic and clinical resistance, although the differences between Hag Yousif, Kibaha, and Matola were marginal. As a function of increasing resistance in vivo, the prevalence of true triple mutations in dhfr increased significantly. Furthermore, the prevalence of infections with one or more wild types in c51, c59, and/or c108 decreased significantly. When dhfr genotypes in c51, c59, and c108 were combined with c437 in dhps, similar differences between the sites were found, although not as marked as when examining dhfr genotypes alone. In other words, inclusion of c437 in dhps does not contribute significantly to the relationship and, consequently, this suggests that dhfr genotypes alone may be a suitable marker of the overall resistance level. However, combinations of dhfr and dhps mutations may still prove to be important mainly in areas of low endemicity, as has been observed by others.^9,12,16

Despite our results, it should be emphasized that the usefulness of dhfr/dhps genotypes as a marker of S/P resistance is still highly debatable. In Magoda, the in vivo resistance decreased between 1997 and 1999 (Lemnge M, unpublished data), while the dhfr/dhps genotypes changed only marginally. Thus, the applicability of dhfr/dhps mutations in this area remains limited. Moreover, the evident differences in dhfr/ dhps prevalence between the three areas with relatively low levels of resistance (Hag Yousif, Kibaha, and Matola) reflected only minor differences in resistance in vivo. Perhaps the differences in dhfr/dhps prevalence reflect the duration and magnitude of S/P usage (or antifolate drugs in general), rather than the differences in resistance in vivo between these three areas. Conversely, the in vivo test defined by WHO²⁰ may not be equally suitable in all endemic areas, especially if it is conducted with the 14-day version.²⁸

Immunity and transmission intensity may be important confounders that reduce the predictive usefulness of dhfr/ dhps genotypes. In hyperendemic or holoendemic areas, partially resistant parasites may be cleared by immunity rather than by treatment, even in children, resulting in discrepancies between dhfr/dhps genotypes and in vivo outcome.^9,10 The rate of immunity acquisition depends on transmission intensity and may therefore play a varying role in treatment outcome between different sites. For instance, in mesoendemic Sudan, the role of immunity may be insignificant and the treatment outcome may be more dependent on the genotypic profile of the parasitic infection. High transmission intensity may result in multiclonal infections.²⁹ As expected, Magoda showed a significantly higher prevalence of mixed genotype infections compared with the other sites. Treatment outcome is probably dependent on the initial density of wild type versus the mutant type population. Therefore, the impact of multiclonal infections may likewise play a varying role in treatment outcome between different localities. Based on our data, triple dhfr mutations may only prove to be suitable as a general guideline for detecting emerging S/P resistance in areas where S/P recently has been introduced. However, changes in susceptibility within the same area with moderate levels of resistance may be detectable by longitudinal surveillance of a subset of dhfr/dhps mutations that has been associated with S/P resistance in vivo in a defined location.

Received March 17, 2003. Accepted for publication August 20, 2003.

Acknowledgments: We thank laboratory technicians Jimmy Weng and Gitte Hoff Jensen for excellent technical assistance in performing the RFLP-PCR. We also thank Anna Färnert for critical comments on this manuscript.

Financial support: This study was supported by the Danish International Development Agency (DANIDA) Research Council (RUF, grant no. 90892). The study in Tanzania was supported by DANIDA grant no. 104.Dan.8L as part of a Tanzanian-Danish collaboration under the Enhancement of Research Capacity (ENRECA) program. The study in Sudan was supported by DANIDA. The study in Mozambique was supported by the ENRECA program and the Danish Bilharziasis Laboratory.

Authors’ addresses: Michael Alifrangis and Insaf F. Khalil, Panum Institute, Institute of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Building 24.2, Blegdamsvej 3, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark. Sonja Enosse, National Institute of Health, Ministry of Health, Maputo, Mozambique. Donath S. Tarimo, PO Box 65011, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Martha M. Lemnge, National Institute for Medical Research, Amani Research Centre, PO Box 4, Amani, Tanga, Tanzania. Richardo Thompson, National Institute of Health, Ministry of Health, Maputo, Mozambique. Ib C. Bygbjerg and Anita M. Rønn, Institute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Nørre Alle 4-6, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.

Reprint requests: Michael Alifrangis, Panum Institute, Institute of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Building 24.2, Blegdamsvej 3, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark, Telephone: 45-3-532-7676, Fax: 45-3-532-7851, E-mail: malif{at}biobase.dk.

REFERENCES

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 

1. Cowman A, Morry MJ, Biggs BA, Cross GAM, Foote SJ, 1988. Amino acid changes linked to pyrimethamine resistance in the dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase gene of Plasmodium falciparum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85: 9109–9113.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Snewin VA, England SM, Sims PF, Hyde JE, 1989. Characterisation of the dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthetase gene from human malaria parasites highly resistant to pyrimethamine. Gene 76: 41–52.[ISI][Medline]
3. Hyde JE, 1990. The dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthetase gene in the drug resistance of malaria parasites. Pharmacol Ther 48: 45–59.[ISI][Medline]
4. Sirawaraporn W, Sathitkul T, Sirawaraporn R, Yuthavong Y, Santi DV, 1997. Antifolate-resistant mutants of Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 1124–1129.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Brooks R, Wang P, Read M, Watkins MW, Sims PFG, Hyde JE, 1994. Sequence variation of the hydroxymethyldihydropterin pyrophosphokinase: dihydropteroate synthase gene lines of the human malaria parasite, Plasmodium falciparum, with differing resistance to sulfadoxine. J Biochem 224: 397–405.
6. Triglia T, Cowman A, 1994. Primary structure and expression of the dihydropteroate synthetase gene of Plasmodium falciparum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 7149–7153.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Wang P, Read M, Sims PFG, Hyde JE, 1997. Sulfadoxine resistance in the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum is determined by mutations in dihydropteroate synthetase and an additional factor associated with folate utilization. Mol Microbiol 23: 979–986.[ISI][Medline]
8. Plowe CV, Djimde A, Bouare M, Doumbo O, Wellems TE, 1995. Pyrimethamine and proguanil resistance-conferring mutations in Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase: polymerase chain reaction methods for surveillance in Africa. Am J Trop Med Hyg 52: 565–568.
9. Omar SA, Adagu IS, Warhurst DC, 2001. Can pretreatment screening for dhps and dhfr point mutations in Plasmodium falciparum infections be used to predict sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine treatment failure? Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 95: 315–319.[ISI][Medline]
10. Basco LK, Tahar R, Keundjian A, Ringwald P, 2000. Sequence variations in the genes encoding dihydropteroate synthase and dihydrofolate reductase and clinical response to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine in patients with acute uncomplicated falciparum malaria. J Infect Dis 182: 624–628.[ISI][Medline]
11. Wang P, Lee C-S, Bayoumi R, Djimde A, Doumbo O, Swedberg G, Dao LD, Mshinda H, Tanner M, Watkins MW, Sims PFG, Hyde JE, 1997. Resistance to antifolates in Plasmodium falciparum monitored by sequence analysis of dihydropteroate synthetase and dihydrofolate reductase alleles in a large number of field samples of diverse origins. Mol Biochem Parasitol 89: 161–177.[ISI][Medline]
12. Plowe CV, Cortese JF, Djimde A, Nwanyanwu OC, Watkins WM, Winstanley PA, Estrada-Franco JG, Mollinedo RE, Avila JC, Cespedes JL, Carter D, Doumbo OK, 1997. Mutations in Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase and dihydropteroate synthase and epidemiologic patterns of pyrimethamine-sulfadoxine use and resistance. J Infect Dis 176: 1590–1596.[ISI][Medline]
13. Kublin JG, Dzinjalamala FK, Kamwendo DD, Malkin EM, Cortese JF, Martino LM, Mukadam RA, Rogerson SJ, Lescano AG, Molyneux ME, Winstanley PA, Chimpeni P, Taylor TE, Plowe CV, 2002. Molecular markers for failure of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and chlorproguanil-dapsone treatment of Plasmodium falciparum malaria. J Infect Dis 185: 380–388.[ISI][Medline]
14. Rallon NI, Osorio LE, Giraldo LE, 1999. Lack of an association between the ASN-108 mutation in the dihydrofolate reductase gene and in vivo resistance to sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine in Plasmodium falciparum. Am J Trop Med Hyg 61: 245–248.[Abstract]
15. Kublin JG, Witzig RS, Shankar AH, Zurita JQ, Gilman RH, Guarda JA, Cortese JF, Plowe CV, 1998. Molecular assays for surveillance of antifolate-resistant malaria. Lancet 351: 1629–1630.[ISI][Medline]
16. Khalil I, Alifrangis M, Ronn AM, Gabar HA, Jelinek T, Satti GM, Bygbjerg IC, 2002. Pyrimethamine/sulfadoxine combination in the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria: relation between dihydropteroate synthase/dihydrofolate reductase genotypes, sulfadoxine plasma levels, and treatment outcome. Am J Trop Med Hyg 67: 225–229.[Abstract]
17. Nzila AM, Nduati E, Mberu EK, Hopkins SC, Monks SA, Winstanley PA, Watkins WM, 2000. Molecular evidence of greater selective pressure for drug resistance exerted by the long-acting antifolate pyrimethamine/sulfadoxine compared with the shorter-acting chlorproguanil/dapsone on Kenyan Plasmodium falciparum. J Infect Dis 181: 2023–2028.[ISI][Medline]
18. Nagesha HS, Din S, Casey GJ, Susanti AI, Fryauff DJ, Reeder JC, Cowman AF, 2001. Mutations in the pfmdr1, dhfr and dhps genes of Plasmodium falciparum are associated with in-vivo drug resistance in West Papua, Indonesia. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 95: 43–49.[ISI][Medline]
19. WHO, 1973. Chemotherapy of malaria and resistance to antimalarial drugs. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 529.
20. WHO, 1996. Assessment of Therapeutic Efficacy of Antimalarial Drugs - For Uncomplicated Falciparum Malaria in Areas with Intense Transmission. Geneva: World Health Organization, WHO/MAL/96.1077.
21. Tarimo DS, Minjas JN, Bygbjerg IC, 2002. Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine monotherapy in Tanzanian children gives rapid parasite clearance but slow fever clearance that is improved by chloroquine in combination therapy. Trop Med Int Health 7: 592–598.[ISI][Medline]
22. Thompson R, Begtrup K, Cuamba N, Dgedge M, Mendis C, Gamage-Mendis A, Enosse SM, Barreto J, Sinden RE, Hogh B, 1997. The Matola malaria project: a temporal and spatial study of malaria transmission and disease in a suburban area of Maputo, Mozambique. Am J Trop Med Hyg 57: 550–559.
23. Lemnge MM, Msangeni HA, Rønn AM, Salum FM, Jakobsen PH, Mhina J, Akida JA, Bygbjerg IC, 1997. Maloprim malaria prophylaxis in children living in a holoendemic village in north-eastern Tanzania. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 91: 68–73.[ISI][Medline]
24. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T, 1989. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Second edition. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
25. Wooden J, Kyes S, Sibley CH, 1993. PCR and strain identification in Plasmodium falciparum. Parasitol Today 9: 303–305.[ISI][Medline]
26. Duraisingh MT, Curtis J, Warhurst DC, 1998. Plasmodium falciparum: detection of polymorphisms in the dihydrofolate reductase and dihydropteroate synthetase genes by PCR and restriction digestion. Exp Parasitol 89: 1–8.[ISI][Medline]
27. Jelinek T, Rønn AM, Lemnge MM, Curtis J, Mhina J, Duraisingh MT, Bygbjerg IC, Warhurst DC, 1998. Polymorphisms in dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) and dihydropteroate synthetase (DHPS) genes of Plasmodium falciparum and in vivo resistance to sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine in isolates from Tanzania. Trop Med Int Health 3: 605–609.[ISI][Medline]
28. Mutabingwa T, Nzila A, Mberu E, Nduati E, Winstanley P, Hills E, Watkins W, 2001. Chlorproguanil-dapsone for treatment of drug-resistant falciparum malaria in Tanzania. Lancet 358: 1218–1223.[ISI][Medline]
29. Magesa SM, Mdira KY, Farnert A, Simonsen PE, Bygbjerg IC, Jakobsen PH, 2001. Distinguishing Plasmodium falciparum treatment failures from re-infections by using polymerase chain reaction genotyping in a holoendemic area in northeastern Tanzania. Am J Trop Med Hyg 65: 477–483.[Abstract]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. LEMNGE, M. ALIFRANGIS, M. Y. KAFUYE, M. D. SEGEJA, S. GESASE, D. MINJA, J. J. MASSAGA, A. M. RONN, and I. C. BYGBJERG High reinfection rate and treatment failures in children treated with amodiaquine for falciparum malaria in muheza villages, northeastern Tanzania. Am J Trop Med Hyg, August 1, 2006; 75(2): 188 - 193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. COHUET, M. BONNET, M. VAN HERP, C. VAN OVERMEIR, U. D'ALESSANDRO, and J.-P. GUTHMANN Molecular markers associated with Plasmodium falciparum resistance to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine in the democratic republic of congo. Am J Trop Med Hyg, July 1, 2006; 75(1): 152 - 154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. MENARD, D. DJALLE, F. YAPOU, A. MANIRAKIZA, and A. TALARMIN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF ANTIMALARIAL DRUG-RESISTANT ALLELES AMONG ISOLATES OF PLASMODIUM FALCIPARUM IN BANGUI, CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC Am J Trop Med Hyg, February 1, 2006; 74(2): 205 - 210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. ALIFRANGIS, S. ENOSSE, R. PEARCE, C. DRAKELEY, C. ROPER, I. F. KHALIL, W. M. NKYA, A. M. RONN, T. G. THEANDER, and I. C. BYGBJERG A SIMPLE, HIGH-THROUGHPUT METHOD TO DETECT PLASMODIUM FALCIPARUM SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISMS IN THE DIHYDROFOLATE REDUCTASE, DIHYDROPTEROATE SYNTHASE, AND P. FALCIPARUM CHLOROQUINE RESISTANCE TRANSPORTER GENES USING POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION- AND ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY-BASED TECHNOLOGY Am J Trop Med Hyg, February 1, 2005; 72(2): 155 - 162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. MUGITTU, M. NDEJEMBI, A. MALISA, M. LEMNGE, Z. PREMJI, A. MWITA, W. NKYA, J. KATARAIHYA, S. ABDULLA, H.-P. BECK, et al. THERAPEUTIC EFFICACY OF SULFADOXINE-PYRIMETHAMINE AND PREVALENCE OF RESISTANCE MARKERS IN TANZANIA PRIOR TO REVISION OF MALARIA TREATMENT POLICY: PLASMODIUM FALCIPARUM DIHYDROFOLATE REDUCTASE AND DIHYDROPTEROATE SYNTHASE MUTATIONS IN MONITORING IN VIVO RESISTANCE Am J Trop Med Hyg, December 1, 2004; 71(6): 696 - 702. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. DORSEY, C. DOKOMAJILAR, M. KIGGUNDU, S. G. STAEDKE, M. R. KAMYA, and P. J. ROSENTHAL PRINCIPAL ROLE OF DIHYDROPTEROATE SYNTHASE MUTATIONS IN MEDIATING RESISTANCE TO SULFADOXINE-PYRIMETHAMINE IN SINGLE-DRUG AND COMBINATION THERAPY OF UNCOMPLICATED MALARIA IN UGANDA Am J Trop Med Hyg, December 1, 2004; 71(6): 758 - 763. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (21) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by ALIFRANGIS, M. Articles by RØNN, A. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by ALIFRANGIS, M. Articles by RØNN, A. M. Related Collections Malaria