|
|
||||||||
In Vietnam, Plasmodium falciparum is resistant to commonly used antimamalarial drugs.1 In 1995, we investigated the sensitivity of halofantrine by conducting a 28-day in vivo test in two villages in Khanh Hoa province, 40 miles west of the coastal town of Nha Trang in southern central Vietnam. Malaria incidence rates in this area are 1.9 per person-year for P. falciparum, 1.1/person-year for P. vivax, and 0.03/person-year for P. malariae (Nhan DH, unpublished data). Written, informed consent was obtained from all participating patients or their parents/guardians. The study was conducted according to the Vietnamese Ministry of Health and the United States Navy regulations governing the protection of human subjects in medical research. Entry criteria and study conduct have been reported in detail elsewhere.2 Three doses of halofantrine (Glaxo SmithKline, London, United Kingdom), 8 mg/kg every six hours, was administered in the hospital on an empty stomach (at least one hour before or two hours after a meal) to patients with no clinical signs of cardiac disease and a normal QTc interval. Thick and thin film blood smears (days 1, 2, 4, 7, 11, 14, 18, 21, and 28) were stained with Giemsa, read, and the results were reported as parasites/microliter. Data were analyzed using Epi-Info version 6.04 (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA).
There were 37 treated patients in the study: 32 with P. falciparum monoinfection and 5 with mixed P. falciparum/P. vivax malaria. Enrollment characteristics are shown in Table 1
. On day 0, all patients were either symptomatic or febrile (oral temperature > 37°C). By day 28, four patients were lost to follow-up, and two patients with P. falciparum malaria developed recurrent P. falciparum parasitemia: a 17-year-old man on day 14 (day 0 parasitemia = 2,120/µL, recurrent parasitemia = 240/µL) and an eight-year-old girl on day 21 (day 0 parasitemia = 18,040/µL, recurrent parasitemia = 280/µL). Using a previously published method,3 we amplified the small subunit ribosomal RNA of P. falciparum by a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to confirm the microscopic diagnosis of P. falciparum of the day 0/day recurrent (dayrec) slides. However, technical difficulties unfortunately precluded the genotyping the dayrec slides with merozoite surface protein-2 primers.3 When the four patients lost to follow-up were excluded, the 28-day cure rate was 31 (93.9%) of 33 (95% confidence interval = 79.899.2%). The P. falciparum parasite clearance rates were 16.2% by day 1, 73.0% by day 2, 91.4% by day 4, and 100% by day 7.
|
5 (1.9 infections/person-year x 33 persons x 4 weeks x 1/52 years). These epidemiologic data favor new infections as the cause of our two cases of recurrent parasitemia. However, we cannot exclude drug resistance because of the failure of our PCR genotyping.
Mefloquine, but not halofantrine, was available in local shops when the study was conducted. Mefloquine is cross-resistant to halofantrine; thus, its use would be a factor in the generation of halofantrine resistance.5,6 Our study used the original World Health Organization (WHO) parasitologic in vivo test to assess halofantrine sensitivity. There is now a new WHO in vivo test for areas of intense and low/moderate malaria transmission that should be adopted as the standard test for defining drug resistance. Accordingly, our two cases of recurrent parasitemia would have been classified as either late parasitologic or clinical treatment failures, depending on whether they were febrile (axillary temperature
37.5°C.) at the time of their recurrent parasitemia.7
Halofantrine has potentially serious cardiotoxicity that restricts its use to specific clinical indications, e.g., drug-resistant P. falciparum malaria in patients with normal electrocardiographic findings who have not recently consumed drugs that prolong the QTc interval.810 These prerequisites make halofantrine unsuitable for widespread use in primary health settings of malaria-endemic countries.
Received September 17, 2002. Accepted for publication April 26, 2003.
Acknowledgments: We are grateful to Drs. Luc Nguyen Tuyen (Khanh Hoa Provincial Antimalaria Office, Nha Trang, Vietnam), Le Minh Dao and Ta Thi Tinh (Institute of Malariology, Parasitology, and Entomology, Hanoi, Vietnam) for assistance with field execution; Pak Suradi (U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit No. 2) for assistance with data management; and Pak Purnomo and Pak Masbar for slide quality control.
Financial support: This study was supported by the U.S. Naval Medical Research and Development Command (Work Unit Number 63002A810.00101.HFX.1433).
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not in any way represent those of the U.S. Navy or the Vietnamese Ministry of Health.
Authors addresses: Doan Hanh Nhan, Nguyen Dieu Thuong, Tran Thi Uyen, and Le Dinh Cong, Institute of Malariology, Parasitology, and Entomology, Hanoi, Vietnam. Walter R. J. Taylor, World Health Organization/TDR/PRD, Centre Casai, 51-53 Avenue Louis, Casai 1216, Cointrin, Geneva, Switzerland, Telephone: 41-22-791-3853, Fax: 44-22-791-4774, E-mail: taylorw{at}who.ch. David J. Fryauff, Ika Susanti, Eduardo Gómez-Saladín, and J. Kevin Baird, U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit No. 2, Box 3, Unit 8132, APO, AP 96520-8132, Jakarta. Indonesia.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |