|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
500 meters from a stream versus 1.76 episodes per person year for residence <500 meters from a stream). Multivariate analysis showed that distances of residence from a swamp or from a stream were independent predictors of malaria incidence, controlling for age, use of preventative measures, and primary source of water. Distance from a swamp was the strongest predictor, with an incidence rate ratio of 4.3 (95% confidence interval = 2.66.9, P < 0.001) between residence within a swamp and >100 meters from a swamp. In this urban setting, incidence of clinical episodes of malaria was strongly associated with proximity of residence to potential mosquito breeding sites.
Control of malaria in Africa presents a significant challenge.1 Targeting existing methods for malaria control to populations at greatest risk could increase the effectiveness of interventions.2 Urbanization is occurring rapidly in sub-Saharan Africa and may have a significant impact on the epidemiology of malaria.3 Although malaria transmission is lower in urban than in rural areas of Africa, transmission and parasite prevalence may be heterogenous within densely populated areas, clustering near mosquito breeding sites.35 Risk of malaria, as measured by parasite prevalence, estimated annual malaria incidence, and risk of clinical illness, has been shown to increase with mosquito exposure;46 however, some data suggest that parasite prevalence7 and clinical illness8 are less common in more exposed children, possibly due to increased acquired immunity. Global positioning system (GPS) and geographic information system (GIS) technology coupled with clinical data can be used to identify geographic areas at greatest malaria risk.2 In this study, GPS and GIS were used to map the location of households in a cohort of Ugandan children followed prospectively for one year, allowing us to examine the relationship between location of residence and incidence of clinical episodes of malaria in an urban area.
This study was part of a longitudinal randomized trial that has been described elsewhere.9 Briefly, community-based, convenience sampling was used to identify interested parents or guardians of healthy children between the ages of 6 and 59 months residing in the Kawempe division of Kampala, Uganda. Kawempe has an estimated population of 153,900 and covers an area of approximately 3,245 hectares (Kampala City Council, 1998, unpublished data). Although recent entomologic data are lacking, malaria is considered meso-endemic in Kampala (parasite rate = 25%, spleen rate = 25% in children 29 years of age) with peaks associated with the two rainy seasons (Ugandan Ministry of Health, unpublished data). Primary caregivers of participants were interviewed after enrollment and information was collected on malaria-related knowledge, attitudes, and practices, household demographics, measures of socioeconomic status, and household and environmental characteristics.10 The study was reviewed and approved by the Uganda National Council of Science and Technology, and the Institutional Review Boards of the University of California, San Francisco and Makerere University, Kampala.
At the time of enrollment, participants were randomized to receive one of three treatments (sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine [SP], SP plus amodiaquine, or SP plus artesunate) for each episode of uncomplicated malaria diagnosed during the one-year follow-up period.9 Participants were instructed to seek all medical care at the clinic, and each time they presented with a temperature
38.0°C tympanic or history of fever during the previous 48 hours a thick blood smear was prepared and evaluated for malaria parasites. Criteria used to diagnose malaria are described elsewhere.9 For all recurrent episodes of malaria, genotyping was done to distinguish recrudescence (treatment failure) from new infections as previously described.9 In this study, a new episode was defined as a first episode of malaria or a subsequent episode fulfilling our criteria for new infections based on genotyping results. Time at risk was defined as the longest duration lived at any one household within Kawempe. A participants time at risk was corrected if they moved residence within or out of Kawempe, and for first- and second-line antimalarial treatments received. The 14 days following each treatment of malaria were not considered time at risk because new infections were unlikely during this period.
Participant household locations were mapped using a hand-held GPS receiver (eTrex Legend; Garmin, Olathe, KS), with an accuracy goal of <15 m (Figure 1
). If participants lived in the same house, or in immediately adjacent houses, one reading was taken. Similar readings were taken for the boundaries of the division and local swamps and streams. A swamp was defined as a low-lying area with frequent standing water, particularly in times of steady rainfall. Distances of households to swamps and streams within Kawempe were calculated using ARC/INFO GIS software (Version 7; Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA).
|
Of the 316 subjects enrolled in the primary study, 305 from 219 households completed at least six weeks of follow-up, and were included in the analysis. The follow-up period covered approximately the same calendar year for all subjects. The cumulative period of observation in the primary cohort covered 93% of potential follow-up time, and 282 subjects (89%) completed the full one-year of follow-up. Parasite prevalence at the time of enrollment was 17%, supporting the classification of Kampala as a mesoendemic area.11 Incidence of clinical episodes of malaria varied greatly, with 367 new malaria episodes diagnosed in 174 (57%) children (incidence range = 114 episodes per person year). Malaria was not diagnosed in the remaining 131 (43%) children. Univariate analyses showed that distance of residence from a swamp was associated with a gradient in incidence of clinical episodes of malaria, increasing from 0.41 (residence >100 meters from a swamp) to 2.22 (residence within a swamp) (Table 1
). Residence near a stream also impacted on incidence of clinical malaria episodes, with a decrease in incidence density observed with residence
500 meters compared with residence <500 meters from a stream (Table 1
). Multivariate analysis, controlling for other previously identified risk factors, showed that distance of residence from a swamp and from a stream were independent predictors of incidence of clinical episodes of malaria; distance from a swamp was the stronger predictor (Table 2
).
|
|
With the spread of antimalarial drug resistance, control of malaria in Africa can no longer rely solely on chemotherapy and effective case management. An integrated approach, including vector control strategies, will be necessary to reduce malaria-associated morbidity and mortality.12 Urban areas, with dense population and easily located mosquito breeding sites, may be prime targets for antimalarial control activities.3 Identifying areas at highest malaria risk may allow for more efficient targeting of vector control methods, including use of insecticide treated nets, house spraying, larvicide application, and elimination of breeding sites.
Received February 15, 2003. Accepted for publication May 27, 2003.
Acknowledgments: We thank the clinical study team of Marx Dongo, B. M. Karakire, Sam Nsobya, Moses Kiggundu, Christopher Bongole, Regina Nakafero, Denise Njama, Bridget K. Nzarubara, Pauline Byakika, and Sarah Kibirango; the community leaders from the Kawempe Division of Kampala; and the study participants and their parents/guardians.
Financial support: This study was supported by the Fogarty International Center/National Institutes of Health (grants TW00007, TW01506, and AI-43301), the UNDP/World Bank/World Health Organization Special Program for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR), the David E. Rogers Fellowship (New York Academy of Medicine), and the University of California, San Francisco, Rainer Fund.
Authors addresses: Sarah G. Staedke, E. Willis Nottingham, Philip J. Rosenthal, Grant Dorsey, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143. Jonathan Cox, Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom. Moses R. Kamya, Makerere University Medical School, Kampala, Uganda.
Reprint requests: Philip J. Rosenthal, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, Box 0811, San Francisco, CA 94143, Telephone: 415-206-8845, Fax: 415-648-8425, E-mail: rosnthl{at}itsa.ucsf.edu.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Protopopoff, W. Van Bortel, T. Marcotty, M. Van Herp, P. Maes, D. Baza, U. D'Alessandro, and M. Coosemans Spatial Targeted Vector Control Is Able to Reduce Malaria Prevalence in the Highlands of Burundi Am J Trop Med Hyg, July 1, 2008; 79(1): 12 - 18. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. HUSTACHE, M. NACHER, F. DJOSSOU, and B. CARME MALARIA RISK FACTORS IN AMERINDIAN CHILDREN IN FRENCH GUIANA Am J Trop Med Hyg, April 1, 2007; 76(4): 619 - 625. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. MATTHYS, P. VOUNATSOU, G. RASO, A. B. TSCHANNEN, E. G. BECKET, L. GOSONIU, G. CISSE, M. TANNER, E. K. N'GORAN, and J. UTZINGER URBAN FARMING AND MALARIA RISK FACTORS IN A MEDIUM-SIZED TOWN IN COTE D'IVOIRE Am J Trop Med Hyg, December 1, 2006; 75(6): 1223 - 1231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. M. MUTUKU, M. N. BAYOH, J. E. GIMNIG, J. M. VULULE, L. KAMAU, E. D. WALKER, E. KABIRU, and W. A. HAWLEY PUPAL HABITAT PRODUCTIVITY OF ANOPHELES GAMBIAE COMPLEX MOSQUITOES IN A RURAL VILLAGE IN WESTERN KENYA Am J Trop Med Hyg, January 1, 2006; 74(1): 54 - 61. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. PARIKH, G. DORSEY, and P. J. ROSENTHAL HOST POLYMORPHISMS AND THE INCIDENCE OF MALARIA IN UGANDAN CHILDREN Am J Trop Med Hyg, December 1, 2004; 71(6): 750 - 753. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. KEISER, J. UTZINGER, M. C. DE CASTRO, T. A. SMITH, M. TANNER, and B. H. SINGER URBANIZATION IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA AND IMPLICATION FOR MALARIA CONTROL Am J Trop Med Hyg, August 1, 2004; 71(2_suppl): 118 - 127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |