|
|
||||||||
| ABSTRACT |
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|
|
|---|
We have conducted assessments of chloroquine for treatment of uncomplicated P. falciparum and P. vivax in northeastern Papua (formerly known as Irian Jaya), Indonesia.58 Three of these reports described resistance to chloroquine in P. vivax. Another study9 found relatively low risk of therapeutic failure with chloroquine therapy of P. vivax (22% at day 14). Subsequent studies of P. vivax in the same region found higher risk of therapeutic failure (3153% at day 14).7,8 Similar studies in the region evaluated chloroquine combined with primaquine7 or doxycycline10 against P. vivax. Risk of therapeutic failure with chloroquine for P. falciparum at day 14 post-therapy ranged from 57% to 84% in this region.6,8,10
The continued use of chloroquine for uncomplicated P. falciparum and P. vivax malaria in Indonesian Papua points to the lack of practical therapeutic options in the setting of a frontier area of a developing nation. Indonesian authorities have not adopted policies that would permit distribution of drugs such as mefloquine, either alone or as combined therapy, largely as a consequence of prohibitive cost. Effective therapies may be purchased in bulk for as little as US $1 per adult treatment (e.g., mefloquine plus artesunate as marketed in Cambodia), but chloroquine or pyrimethamine/sulfadoxine treatments cost approximately US $0.20 (as marketed in Indonesia). Moreover, the longer and more complex dosing regimens of the new therapeutic agents carry the hidden and substantial cost of adapting the acquisition and distribution mechanism, along with educating healthcare providers and patients. In the case of Indonesia, the fourth most populous nation in the world, such commitments engage many thousands of government officers and many millions of citizens. In addition to compelling evidence of the inadequacy of current antimalarials, changes to policy and practice will require fiscal resources not currently available to the health infrastructure.
This report contributes to the case for adopting alternative therapies for uncomplicated P. falciparum and P. vivax malaria in Indonesian Papua by describing the highest risk of therapeutic failure yet documented in the region. We know of no other region in Indonesia with risk of therapeutic failure even approaching that reported here from northeastern Papua. Substantiation of this may allow singling out the region for the distribution and use of relatively expensive and effective combined therapies. Thus limiting the scale of application would substantially diminish the hidden costs of adopting new therapeutic strategies.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|
|
|---|
|
Therapy and follow-up. Subjects received directly observed therapy with chloroquine phosphate (uncoated scored tablets containing 150 mg base, ResochinTM; P.T. Bayer Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia) in daily doses of 10 mg/kg on day 0 and day 1, and a 5 mg/kg dose on day 2. Subjects were observed for 30 minutes and repeated doses vomited in that time. Primaquine therapy for subjects infected by P. vivax was withheld until day 28 or at time of rescue therapy (oral quinine sulfate tablets; 10 mg/kg three times a day for seven days) with recurrent parasitemia. Thick and thin blood films were collected on days 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 11, 14, 18, 21, and 28, or at any time a subject complained of illness. Blood films were collected at the home or place of work/school. Subjects were queried about their recovery and well being during home visits.
Microscopy. Thick and thin blood films were stained with standard Giemsa reagents and examined under 1,000x, oil immersion light microscopy by experienced and certified research technicians. At least 200 fields were examined before a slide was considered negative. Positive blood films were recorded by the count of asexual parasites per 200 white blood cells. This value was converted to parasites per microliter of blood by assuming a white blood cell count of 8,000/µL.
Whole blood chloroquine levels. Peripheral blood collected into 100-µl heparinized capillary tubes was expelled onto filter paper (No. 1; Whatman, Maidstone, United Kingdom) discs on days 0 (before therapy), 3, and 28, or the day of rescue therapy of recurrent parasitemia. These blots were air-dried for several hours and placed into individual sealable plastic envelopes. These were stored at ambient temperature and protected from exposure to light or moisture for several months prior to analysis. We extracted and measured by high-performance liquid chromatography levels of chloroquine and its primary metabolite, desethylchloroquine (DCQ), using methods detailed elsewhere.8,13
Classification of the therapeutic response.
We considered recurrent parasitemia with P. falciparum during the 28-day evaluation consistent with a resistant classification, provided there was evidence of good absorption of therapy (day 3 level of chloroquine plus DCQ > 500 ng/ml). For P. vivax, we considered recurrent parasitemia during the 28-day evaluation resistant to chloroquine if it occurred with
100 ng/ml of chloroquine plus DCQ (the minimal effective concentration), along with evidence of good absorption of therapy (> 500 ng/ml of chloroquine plus DCQ on day 3). The rationale for P. vivax classification has been explained elsewhere.14 In this non-immune population, we considered parasitemia objective evidence of risk of clinical disease, whether disease was present or not at the point of observation.
Risk of therapeutic failure. We used life tables to estimate interval-specific and cumulative incidence (risk) of therapeutic failure. Cumulative incidence (CI) was calculated as follows: CIx = 1 - [(1 - CIx-1)(1 - IRx)], where IR is the interval risk, X is the interval, and X - 1 is the prior interval. Recurrences consistent with a resistance classification were considered incident cases in the life table calculation.
Interpretation of the life table estimates of risk was according to species and interval of risk. For both P. falciparum and P. vivax, the 14-day cumulative risk of therapeutic failure was viewed as a conservative estimate of the prevalence of resistance to chloroquine in the community. These relatively early recurrences were considered more likely to be recrudescence than those appearing relatively late (days 1528) when reinfection or relapse was more likely to confound the estimate of risk. The 28-day cumulative risk of recurrence was viewed as an estimate of therapeutic failure due to resistance, reinfection, or relapse.
| RESULTS |
|
|
|---|
|
|
Table 3
lists the proportion of infections in this study population having parasitologic evidence and chloroquine plus DCQ levels supporting the diagnosis of resistance to chloroquine. The total number of infections by P. falciparum or P. vivax (placing the mixed infections in both columns) was 75 and 49. All withdrawals except one were due to the administration of alternative therapy for parasitemia by the other species: 7 for P. falciparum and 25 for P. vivax. Plasmodium falciparum interfered with the P. vivax evaluation in approximately half of the infections. Among the 67 P. falciparum infections (all had adequate absorption), all but one required alternative therapy, and all but another one occurred with chloroquine plus DCQ levels above the minimal effective concentration. Therefore, 99% of the P. falciparum infections successfully evaluated ended with therapeutic failure. Among the 24 infections by P. vivax that were evaluated (all had adequate absorption), 23 ended with a requirement for alternative therapy. Therefore, 96% of infections by P. vivax fully evaluated ended with a requirement for alternative therapy.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|
|
|---|
An attractive option for bringing combined therapies to bear on the problem of drug-resistant malaria is chloroquine plus pyrimethamine/sulfadoxine. The interest in this regimen, with good efficacy demonstrated in a few studies and interventions,15,16 stems largely from the relative ease with which it could be adopted. Both drugs are already stocked by government-operated clinics across Indonesia. Health care providers need only change how they administer the drugs, thereby substantially saving on administrative/education costs compared with introducing new therapies. A critical question for this strategy is efficacy against a backdrop of resistance to chloroquine and pyrimethamine/sulfadoxine as monotherapies. When is it too late to apply the combined therapy with a reasonable expectation of good efficacy? Finding that threshold becomes a vital public health issue where deployment of combined chloroquine and sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine may be considered. Areas having risk of therapeutic failure exceeding that threshold may be targeted for more effective (and expensive) therapies. Reliable estimates of resistance to chloroquine and sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine should guide information-based decisions on adopting either a new first line combined therapy, or deploying relatively expensive alternatives. In the specific case of northeastern Papua, the available data6,8,10 support abandoning chloroquine therapy either as monotherapy or combined with another agent. This heavily malarious region seems a good candidate for targeted distribution of artemisinin derivatives combined with mefloquine or another agent that has not yet lost clinical efficacy.
Standard protocols for therapeutic assessments of drugs for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria strive to accomplish uniformity across laboratories and investigators representing a wide range of capabilities. The tests present realistic goals with respect to obtaining useful information in the setting of a rural health clinic in the tropics. A national program successfully developing such a surveillance network will possess a powerful tool for information-based decisions on malaria therapy policies and practice. Indonesia has not yet developed such a network. The relatively few studies of the therapeutic response to standard antimalarials come from research laboratories. Research laboratories may have compelling reasons to not follow standardized protocols for surveillance of resistance. These facilities typically send a team of specialists to a remote area with the intent of obtaining as much useful information as possible within a practical time. For example, teams of specialists living in Jakarta cannot remain indefinitely at a remote health clinic in far off Papua. Personal and economic priorities necessarily minimize time spent in the field. Therefore, it is not often possible to follow standardized protocols designed and intended for rural health clinic staff resident at the site. The passive collection of study subjects is not practical for the visiting research team. Instead, research teams actively seek out study subjects by mass slide screening, essentially as described in this study. Also, we have found it impractical to exclude patients with parasitemias less than 1,000/µL for P. falciparum or less than 300/µL for P. vivax. In the areas we work, 85% of otherwise eligible subjects fall below these levels. Strict adherence to this criterion would result in a diminishingly small sample size within the time constraints imposed by a visiting research team. Moreover, systematic exclusion of relatively low-grade parasitemia, often representing the majority of patients presenting for treatment, could create a deeply biased sample with respect to estimating risk of therapeutic failure in a community. We also include patients with mixed infections of P. falciparum and P. vivax. Our microscopists consistently and reliably detect mixed infections and are not confused by the species identity of the recurrence. The intent of broader inclusion criteria is maximizing the collection of useful information obtained from the remote post with a fixed and relatively brief period, while also minimizing risk of sample bias in the estimate of risk.
In summary, we documented nearly complete resistance to chloroquine by P. falciparum and P. vivax in non-immune Javanese migrants taking residence in hyperendemic to holoendemic northeastern Papua, Indonesia. We know of no other area of Indonesia with such high risk of therapeutic failure with chloroquine. These findings support adopting a therapeutic strategy tailored to this region, and provide a backdrop of risk of therapeutic failure for evaluations of combined therapies that include chloroquine as treatment options.
Received August 14, 2002. Accepted for publication December 23, 2002.
Acknowledgments: We thank the officials of the Ministry of Health, Government of Indonesia, especially Dr. Sumaryati Aryoso in Jakarta; Dr. Slamet Harjosuwarno and Dr. Lana of the Provincial Health Service in Jayapura, Papua; Patriot, Mantri Hendrik, and Sukimin; Sofyan Sauri (the Department of Transmigration officer in charge of Arso Pir V) and his assistant, Supriyanto, for their advice and assistance.
Financial support: This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Defense Global Emerging Infections Surveillance Program.
Disclaimer: The views of the authors expressed herein are their own and do not purport to reflect those of the U.S. Navy or the Department of Defense.
Authors addresses: Iwa W. Sumawinata, Budhi Leksana, Awalludin Sutamihardja, Purnomo, and J. Kevin Baird, U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit No. 2, American Embassy, Jakarta, Indonesia, FPO AP 96520-8132, Fax: 62-21-424-4507, E-mail: bairdjk{at}namru2.med.navy.mil. Bernadeta and Budi Subianto, Provincial Health Service, Abepura, Papua, Indonesia. Sekartuti, Infectious Disease Research Center, Ministry of Health, Jakarta, Indonesia. David J. Fryauff, Malaria Program, Naval Medical Research Center, 503 Robert Grant Avenue, Silver Spring, MD 20910-7500.
| REFERENCES |
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Russell, F. Chalfein, B. Prasetyorini, E. Kenangalem, K. Piera, R. Suwanarusk, A. Brockman, P. Prayoga, P. Sugiarto, Q. Cheng, et al. Determinants of In Vitro Drug Susceptibility Testing of Plasmodium vivax Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., March 1, 2008; 52(3): 1040 - 1045. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. N. Price, E. Tjitra, C. A. Guerra, S. Yeung, N. J. White, and N. M. Anstey Vivax Malaria: Neglected and Not Benign Am J Trop Med Hyg, December 1, 2007; 77(6_Suppl): 79 - 87. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. S. Griffith, L. S. Lewis, S. Mali, and M. E. Parise Treatment of Malaria in the United States: A Systematic Review JAMA, May 23, 2007; 297(20): 2264 - 2277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. K. Baird Effectiveness of Antimalarial Drugs N. Engl. J. Med., April 14, 2005; 352(15): 1565 - 1577. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Hastings, J. D. Maguire, M. J. Bangs, P. A. Zimmerman, J. C. Reeder, J. K. Baird, and C. H. Sibley Novel Plasmodium vivax dhfr Alleles from the Indonesian Archipelago and Papua New Guinea: Association with Pyrimethamine Resistance Determined by a Saccharomyces cerevisiae Expression System Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., February 1, 2005; 49(2): 733 - 740. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. SYAFRUDDIN, P. B. S. ASIH, G. J. CASEY, J. MAGUIRE, J. K. BAIRD, H. S. NAGESHA, A. F. COWMAN, and J. C. REEDER MOLECULAR EPIDEMIOLOGY OF PLASMODIUM FALCIPARUM RESISTANCE TO ANTIMALARIAL DRUGS IN INDONESIA Am J Trop Med Hyg, February 1, 2005; 72(2): 174 - 181. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. HUAMAN, K. YOSHINAGA, A. SURYANATHA, N. SUARSANA, and H. KANBARA SHORT REPORT: POLYMORPHISMS IN THE CHLOROQUINE RESISTANCE TRANSPORTER GENE IN PLASMODIUM FALCIPARUM ISOLATES FROM LOMBOK, INDONESIA Am J Trop Med Hyg, July 1, 2004; 71(1): 40 - 42. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |