|
|
||||||||
| ABSTRACT |
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|
|
|---|
To evaluate whether RTS,S/AS02 has a protective effect only against parasites with a csp sequence similar to that of NF54, parasites from breakthrough infections in control and vaccine groups have been characterized at two highly polymorphic epitope sequences encoded within the csp gene, csp-th2r and csp-th3r. In addition, we investigated whether vaccination with RTS,S/AS02 led to a reduction in the mean number of P. falciparum genotypes per infection, as has been described previously in trials with the SPf66 malaria vaccine conducted in Tanzania and in The Gambia.10,11
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|
|
|---|
Written informed consent was obtained from adult males participating in the trial. The study was approved by the Joint Gambia Government/Medical Research Council Ethics Committee, an Independent Data Safety Monitoring Committee, and collaborating partners Institutional Review Boards. The trial, which was conducted according to International Conference of Harmonisation (ICH) Good Clinical Practice guidelines, was monitored by the World Health Organization and GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals.
Genotyping of csp polymorphic epitope sequences. Extraction of DNA and amplification by a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of a 319-base pair fragment of the csp gene were performed as described previously.12 Samples of DNA were amplified routinely in a single round PCR. However, samples with low parasitemia were amplified in a second round PCR using fresh primers, Taq DNA polymerase (BIOTAQ;TM Bioline, London, United Kingdom), and 1 µl of PCR csp gene product from the first PCR. PCR products were subsequently tested by sequence-specific oligonucleotide probing, a technique that was designed specifically for these investigations. The overall allele frequencies at both regions of the csp sequence (th2r and th3r) were determined by counting each allelic type detected in an isolate and dividing it by the total number of alleles detected in the samples analyzed. When more than one allele was present in an isolate, it was necessary to score the results based on the relative intensity of hybridization of the probes to each allele. In this way, it was possible to determine the major allele, i.e., the allele that gave the strongest hybridization signal (minor alleles hybridized weakly but specifically to their respective probe). Allele frequencies at csp-th2r and csp-th3r loci at the trial site had been characterized in 1997 before the start of the study.12
Genotyping of other markers to assess multiplicity of infection. The same set of DNA samples was analyzed for diversity at other genetic markers that contain polymorphic repeat sequences. The markers tested were within the merozoite surface protein 1 (msp1), msp2, and glutamate-rich protein (glurp) genes. An allele-specific, nested PCR was used for the discrimination of msp1 block 2 and msp2 allelic families, and the allelic variants present within the RII repeat region of glurp were detected by semi-nested PCR.13 PCR products were resolved by electrophoresis through MetaphoreTM (FMC BioProducts, Rockland, ME) agarose gels in 0.5x TBE buffer, stained with ethidium bromide, and visualized by ultraviolet transillumination. Bands corresponding to parasite allelic forms were distinguished by their size and counted and the number of genotypes for msp1, msp2, and glurp loci determined for each isolate. In addition, the overall MOI for each isolate was then determined as the highest number of alleles observed at any of the loci.
Statistical analyses.
To test if RTS,S/AS02 vaccine efficacy was allele-specific, we compared the frequency of the csp-th2r*03 and csp-th3r*03 alleles (vaccine type) in breakthrough infections in the vaccine and control groups using the chi-square test. The Wilcoxon test14 was used for two-group comparisons and the Cuzick15 non-parametric linear trend test was used when the groups were ordered (parasite density and time). Poisson regression was used to produce estimates of the vaccine effect on MOI adjusted for the effect of time, village, and parasite density. The MOI values are presented as means with SD values in Table 1
.
|
| RESULTS |
|
|
|---|
Genotyping at the csp-th2r and csp-th3r loci.
The overall allele frequencies were similar to those described previously for a population sample in the trial site before vaccination.12 The primary analysis concentrated on the effects of vaccination with RTS,S/AS02 on the frequency of the NF54-like allele in breakthrough infections when present either alone or with other alleles. Fifteen alleles were detected at csp-th2r locus (Figure 1a
). No new types were detected. At the csp-th3r locus, 10 alleles were detected (Figure 1b
), and a small number of new alleles were detected with low frequencies in both groups (< 5%), but these were not characterized further. The csp-th2r*03 allele (vaccine type for th2r sequence) was present in nine of 77 infections in subjects in the RTS,S/AS02 group (12%) and in 13 of 80 infections in subjects in the control group (16%) (P = 0.5), whereas csp-th3r*03 (vaccine type for th3r sequence) was present in 27 of 77 infections in subjects in the RTS,S/AS02 group (35%) and in 28 of 80 infections in the control group (35%) (P = 0.9) (Figure 1
). These proportions are higher than the allele frequencies because some infections contained more than one parasite genotype.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|
|
|---|
If RTS,S/AS02 had an allele-specific effect, a reduction in the prevalence of the csp-th2r*03 and csp-th3r-03 alleles should have been observed. Given the prevalence of the csp-th3*03 allele (35%) and the sample size in each group, the study had 99% power to detect a two-fold allele-specific effect of RTS,S/AS02. Since the prevalence of the vaccine type at th2r (csp-thr2*03) was 16%, the study had 60% power to detect a two-fold effect at that locus. Thus, the statistical power was very high for th3r and reasonably high for th2r, so the lack of an allele-specific effect is well supported.
Studies of immune responses elicited by vaccination with RTS,S/AS02 suggest that protection may be mediated, at least in part, by antibodies against the NANP(n) repeat region of CSP, a conserved region among all P. falciparum parasite strains.16 In the RTS,S/AS02 group, anti-CSP antibody levels to the NANP(n) repeat region were 20 times higher after the third dose than those in the control group and these levels correlated with efficacy among the vaccinees.9
The vaccine also induced strong T cell responses as determined by proliferation and cultured ELISPOT (Millipore, Watford, England) to many peptides in the th2r and th3r epitopes of csp, although, given the small numbers studied for these responses it has yet to be examined whether these responses were associated with protection.9 Our decision to analyze csp-th2r and csp-th3r epitopes for correlation with protection was based partly on the absence of real T-cell protective epitopes, and partly on existing suggestive data8,17,18 that these two epitopes might be protective.
The T cell responses to peptides within the conserved CST3 region apparently correlated with protection.9 This and the conserved NANP(n) antibody epitope might explain why there was no specific effect on the frequency of any allelic type of csp in vaccinees compared with controls.
Having established that RTS,S/AS02 vaccine did not have any effect on the distribution of alleles at the csp-th2r and csp-th3r loci, the possibility that it reduced the genetic complexity of infection (MOI) as assessed by typing of unrelated polymorphic loci was investigated. This approach was prompted by reports that children vaccinated with another malaria vaccine (SPf66) in Tanzania and The Gambia had a slightly lower number of genotypes compared with the controls.10,11
Differences in multiplicity were found between villages, suggesting local variations in the level of transmission, and these correlated with parasite density. Although the vaccine reduced the incidence of infection, it did not reduce the multiplicity per infection compared with the controls. A liver-stage vaccine would be expected to induce a reduction or no change in the number of genotypes depending on whether it was strain-specific, but this was not observed in this study. However, overall vaccine efficacy was still maintained at 34% at the end of the follow up-period.9
The molecular characterization of parasites in breakthrough cases following vaccination with RTS,S/AS02 has added another dimension to the understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in conferring protection against a specific parasite strain. This study has clearly demonstrated that the effect of RTS,S/AS02 vaccine is not allele-specific. The non-allelic protective efficacy of RTS,S/AS02 vaccine should encourage the testing of this vaccine in transmission settings where the NF54 strain is not the predominant type. Molecular typing should become an integral part of the evaluation of future malaria vaccine trials in which vaccines that might be anticipated to have a strain specific effect is used.
Received January 28, 2002. Accepted for publication April 29, 2002.
Acknowledgments: We thank the volunteers who participated in this study and the field staff of the Medical Research Council laboratories for their assistance with blood collection and slide reading. We are also grateful to Professors Adrian Hill and Geoffrey Targett for useful discussions.
Financial support: This study was funded by a European Economic Community (EEC) grant (PL 962164).
This research was funded by an EEC grant (PI 962164) for which GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals was the coordinator. Drs. Nadia Tornieporth and Joe Cohen are employees of GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals.
Reprint requests: Ali Alloueche, Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, Telephone: 44-20-7927-2338, Fax: 44-20-7636-8739, Email: ali.alloueche{at}lshtm.ac.uk
Authors addresses: Ali Alloueche, David J. Conway, and Brian M. Greenwood, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT. United Kingdom, Telephone: 44-20-7927-2338/2326, Fax: 44-20-7636-8739, E-mail: Ali.Alloueche{at}lshtm.ac.uk. Paul Milligan, Margaret Pinder, Kalifa Bojang, and Tom Doherty, Medical Research Council Laboratories, P.O. Box 273, Fajara, The Gambia. Nadia Tornieporth and Joe Cohen, GlaxoSmith-Kline Biologicals, Rue de lInstitut, B-1330, Rixensart, Belgium.
| REFERENCES: |
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. R. Ballou and C. P. Cahill Two Decades of Commitment to Malaria Vaccine Development: GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals Am J Trop Med Hyg, December 1, 2007; 77(6_Suppl): 289 - 295. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Chinchilla, M. F. Pasetti, S. Medina-Moreno, J. Y. Wang, O. G. Gomez-Duarte, R. Stout, M. M. Levine, and J. E. Galen Enhanced Immunity to Plasmodium falciparum Circumsporozoite Protein (PfCSP) by Using Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhi Expressing PfCSP and a PfCSP-Encoding DNA Vaccine in a Heterologous Prime-Boost Strategy Infect. Immun., August 1, 2007; 75(8): 3769 - 3779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. ZAKERI, M. AVAZALIPOOR, A. A. MEHRIZI, N. D. DJADID, and G. SNOUNOU RESTRICTED T-CELL EPITOPE DIVERSITY IN THE CIRCUMSPOROZOITE PROTEIN FROM PLASMODIUM FALCIPARUM POPULATIONS PREVALENT IN IRAN Am J Trop Med Hyg, June 1, 2007; 76(6): 1046 - 1051. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Conway Molecular Epidemiology of Malaria Clin. Microbiol. Rev., January 1, 2007; 20(1): 188 - 204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Jalloh, H. van Thien, M. U. Ferreira, J. Ohashi, H. Matsuoka, T. Kanbe, A. Kikuchi, and F. Kawamoto Sequence Variation in the T-Cell Epitopes of the Plasmodium falciparum Circumsporozoite Protein among Field Isolates Is Temporally Stable: a 5-Year Longitudinal Study in Southern Vietnam J. Clin. Microbiol., April 1, 2006; 44(4): 1229 - 1235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Calvo-Calle, G. A. Oliveira, and E. H. Nardin Human CD4+ T Cells Induced by Synthetic Peptide Malaria Vaccine Are Comparable to Cells Elicited by Attenuated Plasmodium falciparum Sporozoites J. Immunol., December 1, 2005; 175(11): 7575 - 7585. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Kumkhaek, K. Phra-ek, L. Renia, P. Singhasivanon, S. Looareesuwan, C. Hirunpetcharat, N. J. White, A. Brockman, A. C. Gruner, N. Lebrun, et al. Are Extensive T Cell Epitope Polymorphisms in the Plasmodium falciparum Circumsporozoite Antigen, a Leading Sporozoite Vaccine Candidate, Selected by Immune Pressure? J. Immunol., September 15, 2005; 175(6): 3935 - 3939. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |