AJTMH HINARI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med., s1-14(2), 1934, pp. 163-179
Copyright © 1934 by American Journal of Tropical Medicine

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kemp, H. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wright, H. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kemp, H. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wright, H. E.

Relapsing Fever in Texas

III. Some Notes on the Biological Characteristics of the Causative Organism

Hardy A. Kemp, W. H. Moursund AND Harry E. Wright
From the Department of Bacteriology, Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, Baylor University College of Medicine, Dallas, Texas

The observed similarities and minor differences between the relapsing fever spirochete found in Texas and the strains observed elsewhere may be summarized as follows:

1. The Texas spirochete presents no essential differences in morphology from the known varieties.
2. Viability in vitro depends to a great extent upon time in the disease when blood is taken.
3. Freezing temperatures of 2 per cent sodium citrate—0.8 saline solutions kill the spirochete.
4. Fifty-two degrees Centigrade for twenty minutes is more than the actual thermal death point.
5. The Texas spirochete does not pass a Berkefeld N candle nor a Seitz filter at 40 mm. negative pressure.
6. In our hands, cultivation was unsuccessful in Noguchi's medium and in blood and serum mixtures both under aerobic and anaerobic conditions.
7. Virulence may be greatly increased by rapid transfer of onset blood.
8. White rats, white mice and rhesus monkeys are quite susceptible to the Texas spirochete. Their reactions present no essential differences from those observed in the same kind of animals infected with other strains.
9. Guinea pigs and rabbits vary in their susceptibility to the Texas spirochete.
10. Persistence of the virus in the brain of rats over long periods of time was not observed.
11. The Texas spirochete does not penetrate the unbroken skin of young white rats.
12. Young rats may become infected by eating material heavily contaminated with virulent spirochetes.
13. In three "strains" of spirochetes from different sources in Texas identical in cytolytic tests, one failed to cross immunize with the other two.
14. White rats are immune at least ten months after infection.
15. Active immunity in rats may be produced by intraperitoneal inoculations of heat killed spirochetes.
16. Hereditary immunity was not observed in a small number of rats.
17. Passive immunity may be conferred by inoculations of hyperimmune sera.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1934 by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.