AJTMH HINARI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med., s1-10(6), 1930, pp. 435-439
Copyright © 1930 by American Journal of Tropical Medicine

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tyner, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tyner, J. D.

Tropical Sprue: Its Differentiation from Pernicious Anemia by the Arneth Count

James D. Tyner
From the Clifton Springs Sanitarium and Clinic

The difficulties attendant upon the differential diagnosis of sprue and pernicious anemia are well known to those called upon to treat the two conditions. In some cases it is impossible to distinguish between them and this has led some clinicians to regard them as the same disease. Christian (1) has suggested that they are one and the same disease and that sprue may develop into pernicious anemia. Wood (2) has added support to this idea by finding Monilia psilosis in cases of pernicious anemia, which yeasts are regarded by Ashford as the causative organism of sprue. Baumgartner (3) disagrees and thinks that they are two distinct diseases but states that some cases "probably cannot be correctly diagnosed, at least by methods now available." This disagreement has been under discussion in the literature for years; the diagnosis of the two conditions meanwhile becomes constantly more complex.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1930 by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.