AJTMH ASTMH Job Mart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 9(2), 1960, pp. 175-179
Copyright © 1960 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shaffer, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Key, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shaffer, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Key, I.

The Ingestion of Bacteria and of Altered Bacterial Structures by Entamoeba Histolytica in Shaffer-Frye and in Modified Shaffer-Frye Media*

James G. Shaffer AND Iris Key
The Department of Microbiology and Public Health, The Chicago Medical School, Chicago 12, Illinois

Three cultural variants of the Gram-negative anaerobic bacillus used in the Shaffer-Frye (S-F) medium for propagation of Entamoeba histolytica were studied in the S-F medium and in the modified S-F medium of Reeves, et al. Culture S1, which is now used routinely in the S-F medium was found to produce round bodies, probably protoplasts, under the influence of the penicillin G in both media. These bodies were ingested by the amebae during their propagation. At no time were ingested bacterial cells seen with culture S1. Culture LSU, which is used routinely in the modified S-F medium, developed considerable cellular granulation under the influence of the penicillin G, but did not form round bodies in either medium. With this culture, bacterial cells were ingested by the amebae during their propagation. Culture S6, which does not support propagation of E. histolytica in either medium, also did not form round bodies in either medium. Nevertheless, the amebae ingested the bacterial cells of this culture. Darkfield microscopy was used for all direct observations in these studies. Permanent preparations were made by fixation of the cultures with 10% formalin followed by staining with the May-Grünwald stain.

Within the limits of these experiments, it appears that the observed changes induced by penicillin G were inherent characteristics of the bacterial cultures and not the result of variation between the S-F and the modified S-F media. The fact that the ameba ingested bacterial cells (LSU and S6) or round bodies (S1) regardless of whether propagation was supported or not, was interpreted as an indication that ingestion of a particle does not necessarily imply that the particle is useful to the ameba.


* This investigation was supported by a grant (E-499C6) from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Public Health Service.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1960 by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.