AJTMH ASTMH Job Mart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 80(1), 2009, pp. 20-23
Copyright © 2009 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Galbadage, T.
Right arrow Articles by DuPont, H. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Galbadage, T.
Right arrow Articles by DuPont, H. L.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Diarrhea
*Traveler's Health
Related Collections
Right arrow Bacterial Infection
Right arrow Diarrheal diseases

Improvement in Detection of Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in Patients with Travelers’ Diarrhea by Increasing the Number of E. coli Colonies Tested

Thushara Galbadage, Zhi-Dong Jiang*, AND Herbert L. DuPont
The University of Texas School of Public Health at Houston, Houston, Texas; The University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas; St. Luke’s Episcopal Hospital, Houston, Houston, Texas; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas

No cause of one-third of travelers’ diarrhea (TD) cases can be detected despite microbiologic assessment. We propose that these pathogen-negative TD cases include undetected enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC). As a standard in diagnostic microbiology, samples of five E. coli colonies were tested to detect ETEC from stool cultures. We compared the sensitivities and the number of ETEC detected by 20 colonies with those of 5, 10, and 15 colonies. The percent detection of ETEC with five E. coli colonies was significantly different from that using 20 E. coli colonies. Of the 116 subjects studied, the number positive for ETEC for 5, 10, 15 and 20 colonies tested were 22 (19.0%), 37 (31.9%), 45 (38.8%) and 46 (39.7%), respectively. Based on our results, we recommend the testing of at least 10 E. coli colonies for optimum detection of ETEC in patients with TD.


Received July 23, 2008. Accepted for publication September 28, 2008.

Acknowledgments: We thank Dr. Asha S. Kapadia (The University of Texas School of Public Health [UTSPH]) for assisting with the statistical analyses, Dr. Ismail M. Meraz (UTSPH) for his contributions to the initial laboratory procedures, and the students of The University of Texas Medical School for collecting stool specimens used in this study. This project fulfilled the requirement for MPH for Thushara Galbadage at the University of Texas School of Public Health.

* Address correspondence to Zhi-Dong Jiang, 1200 Herman Pressler, RAS E-739, Houston, TX 77030. E-mail: Zhi-Dong.Jiang{at}uth.tmc.edu

Authors’ addresses: Thushara Galbadage sand Zhi-Dong Jiang, The University of Texas School of Public Health at Houston, Houston, TX 77225. Herbert L. DuPont, The University of Texas School of Public Health at Houston, Houston, TX 77225; The University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, TX 77030; St. Luke’s Episcopal Hospital, Houston, TX 77030; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
G. M. Glenn, D. H. Francis, and E. M. Danielsen
Toxin-Mediated Effects on the Innate Mucosal Defenses: Implications for Enteric Vaccines
Infect. Immun., December 1, 2009; 77(12): 5206 - 5215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.