|
|
||||||||
In 2004, the Institute of Medicine concluded that a global high-level subsidy was the best way to make effective antimalarial drugs—currently, artemisinin-combination therapies (ACTs)—widely available at affordable prices and at the same time substantially delay the emergence and spread of artemisinin-resistant strains of falciparum malaria. The subsidy would be available to manufacturers of all ACTs meeting pre-specified efficacy, safety, and quality criteria. Buyers would pay very low prices, allowing drugs to flow through existing channels, with the aim of reaching consumers at a similar price to chloroquine, the most frequently used (although no longer effective) malaria drug. Unsubsidized artemisinin monotherapies would be more expensive than subsidized ACTs (co-formulations), thereby largely eliminating their use through market forces. Conditions favoring the emergence of artemisinin-resistant malaria would be greatly reduced. The global high-level subsidy is a powerful idea that is moving from economic concept to pragmatic reality.
Received December 29, 2006. Accepted for publication March 5, 2007.
* Address correspondence to Hellen Gelband, Institute of Medicine, 500 5th Street NW, Room 853, Washington, DC, 20001. E-mail: HGelband{at}nas.edu
Authors addresses: H. Gelband, Institute of Medicine, 500 5th Street NW, Room 853, Washington, DC, 20001. A. Seiter, 1818 H St. NW, Washington DC 20433.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. G. Breman, M. S. Alilio, and N. J. White Defining and Defeating the Intolerable Burden of Malaria III. Progress and Perspectives Am J Trop Med Hyg, December 1, 2007; 77(6_Suppl): vi - xi. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |