AJTMH HINARI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 77(1), 2007, pp. 176-187
Copyright © 2007 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Weaver, S. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Weaver, S. C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Viral Hemorrhagic Fevers
Right arrow Alphaviruses

Infection and Dissemination of Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis Virus in the Epidemic Mosquito Vector, Aedes taeniorhynchus

Darci R. Smith*, Nicole C. Arrigo, Grace Leal, Linda E. Muehlberger, AND Scott C. Weaver
Department of Pathology, Center for Biodefense and Emerging Infectious Diseases, Histopathology Service Core, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas

The mosquito Aedes taeniorhynchus is an important epidemic vector of Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus (VEEV), but detailed studies of its infection are lacking. We compared infection by an epidemic VEEV strain to that by an enzootic strain using virus titrations, immunohistochemistry, and a virus expressing the green fluorescent protein. Ae. taeniorhynchus was more susceptible to the epidemic strain, which initially infected the posterior midgut and occasionally the anterior midgut and cardia. Once dissemination beyond the midgut occurred, virus was present in nearly all tissues. Transmission of the epidemic strain to mice was first detected 4 days after infection. In contrast, the enzootic strain did not efficiently infect midgut cells but replicated in muscles and nervous tissue on dissemination. Because VEEV emergence can depend on adaptation to epidemic vectors, these results show that epidemic/enzootic strain comparisons not only comprise a useful model system to study alphavirus transmission by mosquitoes, but also have important public health implications.


Received December 27, 2006. Accepted for publication April 10, 2007.

Acknowledgments: The authors thank Jing Huang for rearing mosquitoes and Nikolaos Vasilakis and Slobodan Paessler for technical advice. We also thank Charles Fulhorst, Lifang Zhang, and James Grady for statistical advice and William Romoser for kindly reviewing this manuscript. DRS was supported by a fellowship from the Keck Virus Imaging Program and by CDC Training Grant T01/CCT622892, and this research was supported by NIH Grants AI418807 and AI57156.

* Address correspondence to Darci R. Smith, Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Boulevard, Galveston, TX 77555-0609. E-mail: darci.smith{at}amedd.army.mil

Authors’ addresses: Darci R. Smith, Nicole C. Arrigo, Grace Leal, and Scott C. Weaver, Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Boulevard, Galveston, TX 77555-0609, Telephone: 409-747-2440, Fax: 409-747-2415. Linda E. Muehlberger, Histopathology Service Core, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Boulevard, Galveston, TX 77555-1019, Telephone: 409-747-0735, Fax: 409-747-0725.

Reprint requests: Scott C. Weaver, Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Boulevard, Galveston, TX 77555-0609.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.