HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (7) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by WILSON, L. S. Articles by BARRIO, K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by WILSON, L. S. Articles by BARRIO, K. Related Collections Chagas Disease Modeling

COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF CHAGAS DISEASE INTERVENTIONS IN LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN: MARKOV MODELS

Chagas disease is a parasitic disease in Latin America. Despite vector control programs that have reduced incidence by 70%, there are at least 12–14 million prevalent cases. We used a Markov model to examine strategies for control and treatment of Chagas disease that compared annual costs, life expectancies, and cost-effectiveness of three vector control and drug treatment strategies. Vector control programs alone and vector control plus drug treatment are dominant over no vector control (i.e., less costly and save more lives), and vector control plus drug is highly cost-effective compared with vector control alone. We demonstrated expected changes in deaths over time resulting from various prevention approaches. Vector control affects primarily incidence, not decreasing deaths and prevalence for 30 years, while drug treatment affects prevalence and deaths immediately. The best strategy to combat Chagas disease is combinations of vector control and a potential new drug.

Received March 28, 2005. Accepted for publication June 16, 2005.

Disclosure: Leslie S. Wilson received consulting fees from OneWorld Health, a non-profit pharmaceutical company that is in the early stages of development of a drug for treatment of Chagas disease. This statement is made in the interest of full disclosure and not because the author considers this to be a conflict of interest.

^* Address correspondence to Leslie S. Wilson, Departments of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, Box 0613, 3333 California Street, San Francisco, CA 94143. E-mail: lwilson{at}itsa.ucsf.edu

Authors’ addresses: Leslie S. Wilson, Departments of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, Box 0613, 3333 California Street, San Francisco, CA 94143, Telephone: 415-502-5092, Fax: 415-502-0792, E-mail: wilsonL{at}pharmacy.ucsf.edu. Arthur M. Strosberg, Institute for OneWorld Health, 580 California Street, Suite 900, San Francisco, CA 94104, Telephone: 415-421-4700, Fax: 415-421-4747, E-mail: astrosberg{at}oneworldhealth.org. Kimberly Barrio, Business Development Institute for OneWorld Health, 580 California Street, Suite 900, San Francisco, CA 94104, Telephone: 415-421-4700, Fax: 415-421-4747, E-mail: kbarrio{at}oneworldhealth.org.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. S. Wilson, J. M. Ramsey, Y. B. Koplowicz, L. Valiente-Banuet, C. Motter, S. M. Bertozzi, and L. H. Tobler Cost-effectiveness of Implementation Methods for ELISA Serology Testing of Trypanosoma cruzi in California Blood Banks Am J Trop Med Hyg, July 1, 2008; 79(1): 53 - 68. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Gourbiere, E. Dumonteil, J. E. Rabinovich, R. Minkoue, and F. Menu Demographic and Dispersal Constraints for Domestic Infestation by Non-Domicilated Chagas Disease Vectors in the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico Am J Trop Med Hyg, January 1, 2008; 78(1): 133 - 139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]