HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) An erratum has been published Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (24) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by MURRAY, H. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by MURRAY, H. W. Related Collections Drug-Resistance Leishmaniasis

TREATMENT OF VISCERAL LEISHMANIASIS IN 2004

In 2004, visceral leishmaniasis (kala-azar) maintains its status as a neglected, if not "most neglected" disease. Lack of affordable new drugs, still a basic unsolved problem, has also been joined by additional therapeutic obstacles including large-scale resistance to pentavalent antimony (Sb) in India and coinfection with human immuno-deficiency virus in all endemic regions. Nevertheless, available treatment options have actually expanded because the energetic clinical trials effort of the past decade has yielded tangible advances. This progress includes successful application of less expensive generic Sb; rediscovery of the high-level efficacy of amphotericin B; implementation of short-course parenteral regimens (lipid formulations of amphotericin B); potential to replace Sb and amphotericin B with price-capped paromyomycin; and identification of the first effective oral agent (miltefosine). How to sustain and move this progress ahead, make new advances practical (e.g., affordable, and therefore, deployable), and how to translate promising experimental approaches into actual therapy remain difficult next steps in the treatment of kala-azar.

Received May 20, 2004. Accepted for publication May 26, 2004.

Acknowledgment: Space constraints did not permit many relevant references to be included; however, these references can be found in recent reviews.^2,4,5,26 I am particularly grateful to colleagues who generously shared their slides and photographs.

Financial support: This study was supported by National Institutes of Health research grant AI-16963. The American Committee on Clinical Tropical Medicine and Travelers’ Health (ACCTMTH) assisted with publication expenses.

Author’s address: Henry W. Murray, Department of Medicine, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, Box 136, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021, Telephone: 212-746-6330, Fax: 212-746-6332, E-mail: hwmurray{at}med.cornell.edu.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				U. K. Singh, R. Prasad, B. P. Jaiswal, P. K. Singh, and C. P Thakur Amphotericin B Therapy in Children with Visceral Leishmaniasis: Daily vs. Alternate Day, a Randomized Trial J Trop Pediatr, January 11, 2010; (2010) fmp132v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. Myles, G. W. Wortmann, J. F. Cummings, R. V. Barthel, S. Patel, N. F. Crum-Cianflone, N. S. Negin, P. J. Weina, C. F. Ockenhouse, D. J. Joyce, et al. Visceral Leishmaniasis: Clinical Observations in 4 US Army Soldiers Deployed to Afghanistan or Iraq, 2002-2004 Arch Intern Med, September 24, 2007; 167(17): 1899 - 1901. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Seifert and S. L. Croft In Vitro and In Vivo Interactions between Miltefosine and Other Antileishmanial Drugs Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., January 1, 2006; 50(1): 73 - 79. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]