AJTMH ASTMH Job Mart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 66(5), 2002, pp. 503-508
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morassin, B
Right arrow Articles by Magnaval, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morassin, B
Right arrow Articles by Magnaval, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Malaria
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Vol 66, Issue 5, 503-508
Copyright © 2002 by American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

Research Articles


One year's experience with the polymerase chain reaction as a routine method for the diagnosis of imported malaria

B Morassin, R Fabre, A Berry, and JF Magnaval

Given the problems encountered in westernized countries with the laboratory diagnosis of malaria, namely sensitivity of the conventional methods and detection of mixed infections, a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based diagnosis has been developed and routinely used. The PCR used two sets of primers to simultaneously detect any infection due to the genus Plasmodium, or to the species P. falciparum. The PCR results were available within six hours. Five hundred twenty-nine patients were tested, of whom 136 were found positive by the PCR, and only 104 by the quantitative buffy coat (QBC) method. The 32 discrepancies were analyzed on the basis of the clinical data, and technical, molecular, and sequencing findings to ascertain the presence of Plasmodium DNA. The PCR-based diagnosis of malaria appeared to be a useful tool that was suitable as a second-line method when the results of conventional techniques were negative in patients presenting a syndromeconsistent with malaria, as well as yielding an accurate species identification.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
S. E. Shokoples, M. Ndao, K. Kowalewska-Grochowska, and S. K. Yanow
Multiplexed Real-Time PCR Assay for Discrimination of Plasmodium Species with Improved Sensitivity for Mixed Infections
J. Clin. Microbiol., April 1, 2009; 47(4): 975 - 980.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
A. U. Orjih
Requirements for Maximal Enrichment of Viable Intraerythrocytic Plasmodium falciparum Rings by Saponin Hemolysis
Experimental Biology and Medicine, November 1, 2008; 233(11): 1359 - 1367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
K. A. Mangold, R. U. Manson, E. S. C. Koay, L. Stephens, M. Regner, R. B. Thomson Jr., L. R. Peterson, and K. L. Kaul
Real-Time PCR for Detection and Identification of Plasmodium spp.
J. Clin. Microbiol., May 1, 2005; 43(5): 2435 - 2440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
M. Rougemont, M. Van Saanen, R. Sahli, H. P. Hinrikson, J. Bille, and K. Jaton
Detection of Four Plasmodium Species in Blood from Humans by 18S rRNA Gene Subunit-Based and Species-Specific Real-Time PCR Assays
J. Clin. Microbiol., December 1, 2004; 42(12): 5636 - 5643.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.