AJTMH HINARI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 65(4), 2001, pp. 355-361
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schindler, H.
Right arrow Articles by Jaureguiberry, G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schindler, H.
Right arrow Articles by Jaureguiberry, G
Related Collections
Right arrow Travel Medicine
Right arrow Malaria
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Vol 65, Issue 4, 355-361
Copyright © 2001 by American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

Research Articles


Development and optimization of polymerase chain reaction-based malaria diagnostic methods and their comparison with quantitative buffy coat assay

HC Schindler, L Montenegro, R Montenegro, AB Carvalho, FG Abath, and G Jaureguiberry

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assays targeting the small-subunit rRNA were developed and evaluated, allowing for the simultaneous diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax DNA in human blood samples. The PCR methods and quantitative buffy coat (QBC) were compared in 402 patients. The heminested PCR method showed a sensitivity of 97.4%, which was superior to the sensitivity of the QBC method (91.7%, P < 0.05), to simple PCR (84.6%, P < 0.001), and to PCR with digoxigenin labeling (PCR-DIG) (88.5%, P < 0.001). The PCR-DIG and QBC analyses were more sensitive than simple PCR (P < 0.003 and P < 0.05, respectively). There was no significant difference between the sensitivities of the QBC assay and the PCR-DIG assay. The specificity for the 3 PCR-based methods was 100%, superior to the specificity calculated for the QBC assay (88.95%, P < 0.009). The frequency of a positive result in groups from endemic areas but without detectable parasitemia increased, in order, from simple PCR, QBC test, PCR-DIG, to heminested PCR. An association between a positive PCR result and a history of malaria was also found. Taken together, these data suggest that this technology could be further developed to screen people with oligoparasitemia and to monitor malaria treatment.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Trop Med HygHome page
H. SWAN, L. SLOAN, A. MUYOMBWE, P. CHAVALITSHEWINKOON-PETMITR, S. KRUDSOOD, W. LEOWATTANA, P. WILAIRATANA, S. LOOAREESUWAN, and J. ROSENBLATT
EVALUATION OF A REAL-TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION ASSAY FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF MALARIA IN PATIENTS FROM THAILAND
Am J Trop Med Hyg, November 1, 2005; 73(5): 850 - 854.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.