AJTMH Tropical Medicine and Hygiene News
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 65(3), 2001, pp. 184-188
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shu, E.
Right arrow Articles by Okonkwo, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shu, E.
Right arrow Articles by Okonkwo, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Onchocerciasis
Right arrow Health Outcomes
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Vol 65, Issue 3, 184-188
Copyright © 2001 by American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

Research Articles


Community-based ivermectin therapy for onchocerciasis: comparison of three methods of dose assessment

EN Shu and PO Okonkwo

A new method of assessment based on mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) is described for dosage adjustment for community-based ivermectin distribution. We studied 878 subjects eligible for ivermectin dosing in Awhum, Nigeria. In a previous preliminary study of 40 persons, MUAC (in cm) correlated with weight (kg) in the first 20 male (r = 0.97, r2 = 0.95, P < 0.0001) and the first 20 female subjects (r = 0.94, r2 = 0.88, P < 0.0001). We therefore studied the use of height, physical appearance, and MUAC for calculating the dose of ivermectin. The MUAC-based schedule underdosed only 4.1% of the population. The methods based on height underdosed 3.3% and 21.1%, and assignment based on physical appearance underdosed 10.2% of the population studied. This MUAC-based method (13-15 cm, 0.5 tablet; 16-20 cm, 1.0 tablet; 21-27 cm, 1.5 tablets; > or = 28 cm, 2.0 tablets) is more convenient and corresponds closely to dosing by weight. An adaptation of this method with reference to other prevalent tropical diseases and their respective drugs is therefore advocated.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
B. Munoz, A. W. Solomon, J. Zingeser, R. Barwick, M. Burton, R. Bailey, D. Mabey, A. Foster, and S. K. West
Antibiotic Dosage in Trachoma Control Programs: Height as a Surrogate for Weight in Children
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2003; 44(4): 1464 - 1469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.