AJTMH ASTMH MEMBERSHIP INFORMATION: astmh@astmh.org
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 60(1), 1999, pp. 66-69
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moorhead, A
Right arrow Articles by Schantz, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moorhead, A
Right arrow Articles by Schantz, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Trichinellosis
Right arrow Epidemiology
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Vol 60, Issue 1, 66-69
Copyright © 1999 by American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

Research Articles


Trichinellosis in the United States, 1991-1996: declining but not gone

A Moorhead, PE Grunenwald, VJ Dietz, and PM Schantz

Since the U.S. Public Health Service began recording statistics on trichinellosis in 1947, the number of cases reported by state health departments has decreased steadily. In the late 1940s, health departments reported an average of 400 cases and 10-15 deaths each year. From 1991 to 1996, the period covered in this report, three deaths in 230 cases were reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (an average of 38 cases per year), including 14 multiple case outbreaks from 31 states and Washington, DC. Information on the suspected food item was available for 134 (58%) of the 230 reported cases. Pork was implicated in 80 (60%) cases, bear meat in 31 (23%), walrus meat in 13 (10%), and cougar meat in 10 (7%). Sausage was the most frequently implicated pork product (i.e., 57 of the 64 cases for which the form of the pork product was identified). The proportion of trichinellosis cases attributable to consumption of commercial pork continued to decrease; this decrease was probably due to a combination of factors, including the continued reduction in the prevalence of Trichinella spiralis in domestic swine, the increased use of home freezers, and the practice of thoroughly cooking pork. As a proportion of all cases reported, those associated with wild game meat products has increased; however, the absolute numbers of such cases have remained similar at approximately 9-12 per year. The continued multiple case outbreaks and the identification of nonpork sources of infection indicate the need for further education and control measures.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
F Bruschi and K D Murrell
New aspects of human trichinellosis: the impact of new Trichinella species
Postgrad. Med. J., January 1, 2002; 78(915): 15 - 22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
Safer and Healthier Foods--1900-1999
JAMA, November 24, 1999; 282(20): 1909 - 1912.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.