AJTMH Tropical Medicine and Hygiene News
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 6(3), 1957, pp. 430-432
Copyright © 1957 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, B.

Discussion of Dr. John B. Poole's Paper

Benjamin Schwartz
United States Department of Agriculture

The medical importance of hydatidosis may be gaged by the fact that a number of international meetings have been held on this parasitic disease—the latest in 1956—and others undoubtedly will be held in the future. Moreover, there is an international journal published in Montevideo, Uruguay—Archivos Internacionales de la Hidatidosis—devoted exclusively to hydatidosis. Finally, the vast literature that has accumulated practically the world over on Echinococcus, together with the confusion that still prevails regarding the speciation of the genus, attests to the wide interest that parasitologists and medical workers everywhere have shown in this parasite of man and animals.

North America, with the exception of Mexico, has until recently been considered almost free of this parasitic infection. In South America, on the other hand, hydatidosis is known to be of great importance in several countries, especially Argentina, Paraguay, and Uruguay.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1957 by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.