AJTMH HINARI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 59(6), 1998, pp. 916-921
Copyright © 1998 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rivera, W.
Right arrow Articles by Kanbara, H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rivera, W.
Right arrow Articles by Kanbara, H
Related Collections
Right arrow Diarrheal diseases
Right arrow Amebiasis
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Vol 59, Issue 6, 916-921
Copyright © 1998 by American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

Research Articles


Field study on the distribution of Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar in the northern Philippines as detected by the polymerase chain reaction

WL Rivera, H Tachibana, and H Kanbara

We used the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to study the distribution of Entamoeba histolytica and E. dispar in 1,872 individuals in 14 communities in the northern Philippines. Here we report a field study using a DNA extraction protocol from formalin-fixed stool specimens as previously reported. This assay detected 137 stools (7.318%) containing E. dispar and 18 stools (0.961%) containing E. histolytica. The most affected age group for E. histolytica/E. dispar infections were those 5-14 years of age. There was no significant difference in the sex distribution of E. histolytica, while in the case of E. dispar, a higher prevalence was observed in females (9.186%) than in males (5.731%) (P < 0.01). An apparent clustering of stool-positive cases of E. histolytica and E. dispar was also observed in the northern part of the study area. The results of this survey demonstrate that E. dispar is highly prevalent in the communities studied. Moreover, it offers promise for the PCR using DNA extracted from formalin-fixed stools as a sensitive epidemiologic tool for detecting E. histolytica and E. dispar infections.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
R. Fotedar, D. Stark, N. Beebe, D. Marriott, J. Ellis, and J. Harkness
Laboratory Diagnostic Techniques for Entamoeba Species
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., July 1, 2007; 20(3): 511 - 532.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
C. Ordaz-Pichardo, M. Shibayama, S. Villa-Trevino, M. Arriaga-Alba, E. Angeles, and M. de la Garza
Antiamoebic and Toxicity Studies of a Carbamic Acid Derivative and Its Therapeutic Effect in a Hamster Model of Hepatic Amoebiasis
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., March 1, 2005; 49(3): 1160 - 1168.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
M. Espinosa-Cantellano and A. Martinez-Palomo
Pathogenesis of Intestinal Amebiasis: From Molecules to Disease
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., April 1, 2000; 13(2): 318 - 331.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.