AJTMH ASTMH MEMBERSHIP INFORMATION: astmh@astmh.org
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 59(4), 1998, pp. 600-605
Copyright © 1998 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Masinde, G.
Right arrow Articles by Duffy, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Masinde, G.
Right arrow Articles by Duffy, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Malaria
Right arrow Plasmodium
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Vol 59, Issue 4, 600-605
Copyright © 1998 by American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

Research Articles


Immunization with SPf66 and subsequent infection with homologous and heterologous Plasmodium falciparum parasites

GL Masinde, DJ Krogstad, DM Gordon, and PE Duffy

In an area of intense transmission, a malaria vaccine could reduce infection due to the parasite types represented in the vaccine, but have no detectable effect on the overall frequency of infection if it did not protect against infection with heterologous parasites. These studies were performed to determine whether immunization with SPf66 decreased infection with homologous parasites containing the 11 amino acid peptide from merozoite surface protein-1 (MSP-1) in SPf66, or increased infection due to heterologous parasites containing heterologous (alternative) MSP-1 sequences. Based on this 11 amino acid peptide (YSLFQKEKMVL), three forward primers (S,Q,V) were designed to amplify the MSP-1 sequence present in SPf66, and 3 additional forward primers (G,H,I) to amplify the alternative MSP-1 sequence (YGLFHKEKMIL). This strategy was validated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and dideoxy sequencing with 14 cloned laboratory isolates, which demonstrated that each primer amplified one MSP-1 sequence or the other, but not both. The technique was then used to examine filter paper blots from an SPf66 vaccine study of 69 subjects in Saradidi, Kenya. In that study, the prevalence of infection with YSLFQKEKMVL or YGLFHKEKMIL type parasites was unaffected by immunization with SPf66 (based on PCR amplification with the S, Q, V, G, H and I primers, respectively). These results suggest that immunization with SPf66 does not produce a selective effect in vivo. They demonstrate a molecular method to test for selection in vivo as an indirect measure of vaccine efficacy.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
D. T. McNamara, J. M. Thomson, L. J. Kasehagen, and P. A. Zimmerman
Development of a Multiplex PCR-Ligase Detection Reaction Assay for Diagnosis of Infection by the Four Parasite Species Causing Malaria in Humans
J. Clin. Microbiol., June 1, 2004; 42(6): 2403 - 2410.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
L. Kedzierski, C. G. Black, M. W. Goschnick, A. W. Stowers, and R. L. Coppel
Immunization with a Combination of Merozoite Surface Proteins 4/5 and 1 Enhances Protection against Lethal Challenge with Plasmodium yoelii
Infect. Immun., December 1, 2002; 70(12): 6606 - 6613.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.