|
|
||||||||
Before 1995, only one outbreak of cyclosporiasis had been reported in the United States. To identify risk factors for Cyclospora infection acquired in Florida in 1995, we conducted a matched case-control study (24 sporadic cases and 69 controls) and retrospective cohort studies of clusters of cases associated with two May social events (attack rates = 15.4% [8 of 52] and 54.5% [6 of 11]). In univariate analysis of data from the case-control study, consumption of fresh raspberries (odds ratio [OR] = 6.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1-31.7) and bare-handed contact with soil (OR = 5.4, 95% CI = 1.4-20.7) were associated with infection; soil contact was also implicated in multivariate analysis. For the events, mixed-fruit items that had only fresh raspberries and strawberries in common had elevated relative risks (3.7 and 4.2), but the confidence intervals overlapped 1.0. The raspberries eaten at the events and by sporadic case-patients were imported. Given the cumulative evidence of the three studies and the occurrence in 1996 and 1997 of outbreaks in North America associated with consumption of Guatemalan raspberries, food-borne transmission of Cyclospora was likely in 1995 in Florida as well.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Sancak, Y. Akyon, and S. Erguven Cyclospora infection in five immunocompetent patients in a Turkish university hospital. J. Med. Microbiol., April 1, 2006; 55(Pt 4): 459 - 462. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Orlandi, L. Carter, A. M. Brinker, A. J. da Silva, D.-M. Chu, K. A. Lampel, and S. R. Monday Targeting Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms in the 18S rRNA Gene To Differentiate Cyclospora Species from Eimeria Species by Multiplex PCR Appl. Envir. Microbiol., August 1, 2003; 69(8): 4806 - 4813. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. L. Herwaldt, M. J. Beach, and the Cyclospora Working Group* The Return of Cyclospora in 1997: Another Outbreak of Cyclosporiasis in North America Associated with Imported Raspberries Ann Intern Med, February 2, 1999; 130(3): 210 - 220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |